澳门非会计专业考生能报名参加ACCA国际会计师考试吗?

发布时间:2020-01-10


众所周知,ACCA证书的含金量是十分高的,不仅仅国内认可,国际上也认可。据调查显示,目前持有ACCA证书的人尚且不多,而社会对这一部分人才的需求也是十分巨大的,因此使得越来越多的人来报考ACCA考试。目前,很多非会计专业的同学,比如金融专业和管理专业的同学这些专业可以报考吗?51题库考试学习网为大家一一解答这些问题:

ACCA考试是一个系统性的学习体系,在报名条件上奉行宽进严出的准则,对于中国考生来说,有机会从零基础开始阶梯性学习,最终成为一个具备高端财务技能和职业操守的综合性人才,并胜任跨国集团的各类高级财务岗位。那么大家先看看报考条件是什么呢?

报考国际注册会计师的条件有哪些?

报名国际注册会计师ACCA考试,具备以下条件之一即可:

1)凡具有教育部承认的大专以上学历,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

2)教育部认可的高等院校在校生,顺利完成大一的课程考试,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

3)未符合1、2项报名资格的16周岁以上的申请者,也可以先申请参加FIA(Foundations in Accountancy)基础财务资格考试。在完成基础商业会计(FAB)、基础管理会计(FMA)、基础财务会计(FFA)3门课程,并完成ACCA基础职业模块,可获得ACCA商业会计师资格证书(Diploma in Accounting and Business),资格证书后可豁免ACCAF1-F3三门课程的考试,直接进入技能课程的考试。

一直以来,ACCA都以培养国际性的高级会计、财务管理专家著称,其高质量的课程设计,高标准的考试要求,不仅赢得了联合国和各大国际性组织的高度评价,更为众多跨国公司和专业机构所推崇。

可以说参加ACCA课程学习,不但可以让学员充分地掌握专业的会计技能,更能学到更多的高级财务管理知识,帮助他们更好地胜任高级财务管理者岗位。

综上所述,报考ACCA考试是没有专业限制的,只需要学历达到专科及以上就可以了(自考本科的也算哦,但是需要有一定的工作年限才可以)

看完这些,各位萌新们是不是更加了解ACCA考试了呢?51题库考试学习网在这里提醒一下大家:2020年3月份即将迎来ACCA新的一季考试,有参加的ACCAer们就建议大家可以开始着手准备复习了哦;俗话说,机会是留给有准备的人的,早点备考多学一些知识才能去攻克更多的困难。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝大家考试通过,成功上岸,ACCAer们,加油~


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Distinguish between strategic and operational risks, and explain why the secrecy option would be a source

of strategic risk. (10 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Strategic and operational risks
Strategic risks
These arise from the overall strategic positioning of the company in its environment. Some strategic positions give rise to
greater risk exposures than others. Because strategic issues typically affect the whole of an organisation and not just one or
more of its parts, strategic risks can potentially concern very high stakes – they can have very high hazards and high returns.
Because of this, they are managed at board level in an organisation and form. a key part of strategic management.
Operational risks
Operational risks refer to potential losses arising from the normal business operations. Accordingly, they affect the day-to-day
running of operations and business systems in contrast to strategic risks that arise from the organisation’s strategic positioning.
Operational risks are managed at risk management level (not necessarily board level) and can be managed and mitigated by
internal control systems.
The secrecy option would be a strategic risk for the following reasons.
It would radically change the environment that SHC is in by reducing competition. This would radically change SHC’s strategic
fit with its competitive environment. In particular, it would change its ‘five forces’ positioning which would change its risk
profile.
It would involve the largest investment programme in the company’s history with new debt substantially changing the
company’s financial structure and making it more vulnerable to short term liquidity problems and monetary pressure (interest
rates).
It would change the way that stakeholders view SHC, for better or worse. It is a ‘crisis issue’, certain to polarise opinion either
way.
It will change the economics of the industry thereby radically affecting future cost, revenue and profit forecasts.
There may be retaliatory behaviour by SHC’s close competitor on 25% of the market.
[Tutorial note: similar reasons if relevant and well argued will attract marks]

5 You are the audit manager for three clients of Bertie & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. The financial

year end for each client is 30 September 2007.

You are reviewing the audit senior’s proposed audit reports for two clients, Alpha Co and Deema Co.

Alpha Co, a listed company, permanently closed several factories in May 2007, with all costs of closure finalised and

paid in August 2007. The factories all produced the same item, which contributed 10% of Alpha Co’s total revenue

for the year ended 30 September 2007 (2006 – 23%). The closure has been discussed accurately and fully in the

chairman’s statement and Directors’ Report. However, the closure is not mentioned in the notes to the financial

statements, nor separately disclosed on the financial statements.

The audit senior has proposed an unmodified audit opinion for Alpha Co as the matter has been fully addressed in

the chairman’s statement and Directors’ Report.

In October 2007 a legal claim was filed against Deema Co, a retailer of toys. The claim is from a customer who slipped

on a greasy step outside one of the retail outlets. The matter has been fully disclosed as a material contingent liability

in the notes to the financial statements, and audit working papers provide sufficient evidence that no provision is

necessary as Deema Co’s lawyers have stated in writing that the likelihood of the claim succeeding is only possible.

The amount of the claim is fixed and is adequately covered by cash resources.

The audit senior proposes that the audit opinion for Deema Co should not be qualified, but that an emphasis of matter

paragraph should be included after the audit opinion to highlight the situation.

Hugh Co was incorporated in October 2006, using a bank loan for finance. Revenue for the first year of trading is

$750,000, and there are hopes of rapid growth in the next few years. The business retails luxury hand made wooden

toys, currently in a single retail outlet. The two directors (who also own all of the shares in Hugh Co) are aware that

due to the small size of the company, the financial statements do not have to be subject to annual external audit, but

they are unsure whether there would be any benefit in a voluntary audit of the first year financial statements. The

directors are also aware that a review of the financial statements could be performed as an alternative to a full audit.

Hugh Co currently employs a part-time, part-qualified accountant, Monty Parkes, who has prepared a year end

balance sheet and income statement, and who produces summary management accounts every three months.

Required:

(a) Evaluate whether the audit senior’s proposed audit report is appropriate, and where you disagree with the

proposed report, recommend the amendment necessary to the audit report of:

(i) Alpha Co; (6 marks)

正确答案:
5 BERTIE & CO
(a) (i) Alpha Co
The factory closures constitute a discontinued operation per IFRS 5 Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations, due to the discontinuance of a separate major component of the business. It is a major component due to
the 10% contribution to revenue in the year to 30 September 2007 and 23% contribution in 2006. It is a separate
business component of the company due to the factories having made only one item, indicating a separate income
generating unit.
Under IFRS 5 there must be separate disclosure on the face of the income statement of the post tax results of the
discontinued operation, and of any profit or loss resulting from the closures. The revenue and costs of the discontinued
operation should be separately disclosed either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial
statements. Cash flows relating to the discontinued operation should also be separately disclosed per IAS 7 Cash Flow
Statements.
In addition, as Alpha Co is a listed company, IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires separate segmental disclosure of
discontinued operations.
Failure to disclose the above information in the financial statements is a material breach of International Accounting
Standards. The audit opinion should therefore be qualified on the grounds of disagreement on disclosure (IFRS 5,
IAS 7 and IFRS 8). The matter is material, but not pervasive, and therefore an ‘except for’ opinion should be issued.
The opinion paragraph should clearly state the reason for the disagreement, and an indication of the financial
significance of the matter.
The audit opinion relates only to the financial statements which have been audited, and the contents of the other
information (chairman’s statement and Directors’ Report) are irrelevant when deciding if the financial statements show
a true and fair view, or are fairly presented.
Tutorial note: there is no indication in the question scenario that Alpha Co is in financial or operational difficulty
therefore no marks are awarded for irrelevant discussion of going concern issues and the resultant impact on the audit
opinion.

(ii) Construct the argument against Professor West’s opinion, and in favour of Professor Leroi’s opinion that

a principles-based approach would be preferable in developing countries. Your answer should consider

the particular situations of developing countries. (10 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Principles-based approach
Advantages of a principles-based approach
The rigour with which governance systems are applied can be varied according to size, situation, stage of development
of business, etc. Organisations (in legal terms) have a choice to the extent to which they wish to comply, although they
will usually have to ‘comply or explain’. Explanations are more accepted by shareholders and stock markets for smaller
companies.
Obeying the spirit of the law is better than ‘box ticking’ (‘sort of business you are’ rather than ‘obeying rules’). Being
aware of overall responsibilities is more important than going through a compliance exercise merely to demonstrate
conformance.
Avoids the ‘regulation overload’ of rules based (and associated increased business costs). The costs of compliance have
been a cause of considerable concern in the United States.
Self-regulation (e.g. by Financial Services Authority in the UK) rather than legal control has proven itself to underpin
investor confidence in several jurisdictions and the mechanisms are self-tightening (quicker and cheaper than legislation)
if initial public offering (IPO) volumes fall or capital flows elsewhere.
Context of developing countries
Developing countries’ economies tend to be dominated by small and medium sized organisations (SMEs). It would be
very costly and probably futile, to attempt to burden small businesses with regulatory requirements comparable to larger
concerns.
Having the flexibility to ‘comply or explain’ allows for those seeking foreign equity to increase compliance whilst those
with different priorities can delay full compliance. In low-liquidity stock markets (such as those in some developing
countries) where share prices are not seen as strategically important for businesses, adopting a more flexible approach
might be a better use of management talent rather than ‘jumping through hoops’ to comply with legally-binding
constraints.
The state needs to have an enforcement mechanism in place to deal with non-compliance and this itself represents a
cost to taxpayers and the corporate sector. Developing countries may not have the full infrastructure in place to enable
compliance (auditors, pool of NEDs, professional accountants, internal auditors, etc) and a principles-based approach
goes some way to recognise this.

6 Andrew is aged 38 and is single. He is employed as a consultant by Bestadvice & Co and pays income tax at the

higher rate.

Andrew is considering investing in a new business, and to provide funds for this investment he has recently disposed

of the following assets:

(1) A short leasehold interest in a residential property. Andrew originally paid £50,000 for a 47 year lease of the

property in May 1995, and assigned the lease in May 2006 for £90,000.

(2) His holding of £10,000 7% Government Stock, on which interest is payable half-yearly on 20 April and

20 October. Andrew originally purchased this holding on 1 June 1999 for £9,980 and he sold it for £11,250

on 14 March 2005.

Andrew intends to subscribe for ordinary shares in a new company, Scalar Limited, which will be a UK based

manufacturing company. Three investors (including Andrew) have been identified, but a fourth investor may also be

invited to subscribe for shares. The investors are all unconnected, and would subscribe for shares in equal measure.

The intention is to raise £450,000 in this manner. The company will also raise a further £50,000 from the investors

in the form. of loans. Andrew has been told that he can take advantage of some tax reliefs on his investment in Scalar

Limited, but does not know anything about the details of these reliefs

Andrew’s employer, Bestadvice & Co, is proposing to change the staff pension scheme from a defined benefit scheme

to which the firm and the employees each contribute 6% of their annual salary, to a defined contribution scheme, to

which the employees will continue to contribute 6%, but the firm will contribute 8% of their annual salary. The

majority of Andrew’s colleagues are opposed to this move, but, given the increase in the firm’s contribution rate

Andrew himself is less sure that the proposal is without merit.

Required:

(a) (i) Calculate the chargeable gain arising on the assignment of the residential property lease in May 2006.

(2 marks)

正确答案:

 


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。