ACCA考试成绩查询时间,你都了解了吗?

发布时间:2021-04-08


很多考生都想知道ACCA成绩查询在什么时候,51题库考试学习网为大家带来了相关信息,让我们一起来看看吧!

ACCA分季机考(PM-FM)及笔考考试科目(SBR/SBL及选修科目)的成绩将于考试结束后的40天内公布。

成绩查询方式:

1.进入ACCA官网点击右上角MyACCA进行登录:

2.输入账号、密码登录后进入主页面,点击Exam status&Results:

3.跳转页面后选择View your status report:

4.进入之后,就可以查询自己所报科目的成绩详情了。

假如担心官网崩溃无法登陆系统查询考试成绩,那么还可以通过电子邮件来接受考试成绩。具体方法为:登录myACCA,并选择通过email接收考试成绩。

51题库考试学习网为大家带来了一些备考技巧,一起先来看看吧!

备考技巧:

1.在阅读ACCA教材之前,请先阅读《ACCA Syllabus》,以了解每门课程的教学要求和教学目的,做到有的放矢。

2.看具体某一本教材,争取做到SQ3Rs,即Survey, Questions, Read, Recall, Review。

Survey:看某一章之前,浏览章节名称,阅读小结和教学目的,对整个章节的脉络有个大致了解。

Question:自己提出问题,即希望学完这一章,能够解决什么问题。教学目的中所提到的问题尤为重要。

Read:透彻阅读全章后,回答问题,并确认是否满足教学要求。做书中的案例和课本中的习题,分析答案。你也许会发现,把时间划分成20分钟或30分钟一段,可以保持精力集中。 Recall:每一部分/章节完成后,不参考课本,写下每一部分/章节的主题思想。

Review:审核所写是否正确。再阅读一遍章节,试着整体把握主题,将更有效果。最后能对照大纲想起每一部分的主要内容,主要计算方法和相关重要概念。但是没有必要过分精读,不要试图把每一部分背下来。

3.在看书的同时做笔记非常重要,但不能是简单地照抄书本,必须用自己的话来做笔记,要求做到简明扼要、重点突出、条理清晰。把自己所记的笔记作为教材和相关参考资料的补充,更有利于大家掌握知识点。

说明:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,51题库考试学习网提供的考试信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!

以上就是今天分享的全部内容了,各位小伙伴根据自己的情况进行查阅,希望本文对各位有所帮助,预祝各位取得满意的成绩,如需了解更多相关内容,请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(ii) Describe the claim of each of the four identified stakeholders. (4 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Stakeholder claims
Four external stakeholders in the case and their claims are as follows.
The client, i.e. the government of the East Asian country. This stakeholder wants the project completed to budget and
on time. It may also be concerned to minimise negative publicity in respect of the construction of the dam and the
possible negative environmental consequences.
Stop-the-dam, the vocal and well organised pressure group. This stakeholder wants the project stopped completely,
seemingly and slightly paradoxically, for environmental and social footprint reasons.
First Nation, the indigenous people group currently resident on the land behind the dam that would be flooded after its
construction. This stakeholder also wants the project stopped so they can continue to live on and farm the land.
The banks (identified as a single group). These seem happy to lend to the project and will want it to proceed so they
make a return on their loans commensurate with the risk of the loan. They do not want to be publicly identified as being
associated with the Giant Dam Project.
Shareholders. The shareholders have the right to have their investment in the company managed in such a way as to
maximise the value of their shareholding. The shareholders seek projects providing positive NPVs within the normal
constraints of sound risk management.
Tutorial note: only four stakeholders need to be identified. Marks will be given for up to four relevant stakeholders
only.

(ii) Advise Clifford of the capital gains tax implications of the alternative of selling the Oxford house and

garden by means of two separate disposals as proposed. Calculations are not required for this part of

the question. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) The implications of selling the Oxford house and garden in two separate disposals
The additional sales proceeds would result in an increase in Clifford’s capital gains and consequently his tax liability.
When computing the gain on the sale of the house together with a small part of the garden, the allowable cost would
be a proportion of the original cost. That proportion would be A/A + B where A is the value of the house and garden
that has been sold and B is the value of the part of the garden that has been retained. Principal private residence relief
and taper relief would be available in the same way as that set out in (i) above.
When computing the gain on the sale of the remainder of the garden, the cost would be the original cost of the property
less the amount used in computing the gain on the earlier disposal. Principal private residence relief would not be
available as the land sold is not a dwelling house or part of one.

3 You are an audit manager in Webb & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. Your audit client, Mulligan Co,

designs and manufactures wooden tables and chairs. The business has expanded rapidly in the last two years, since

the arrival of Patrick Tiler, an experienced sales and marketing manager.

The directors want to secure a loan of $3 million in order to expand operations, following the design of a completely

new range of wooden garden furniture. The directors have approached LCT Bank for the loan. The bank’s lending

criteria stipulate the following:

‘Loan applications must be accompanied by a detailed business plan, including an analysis of how the finance will

be used. LCT Bank need to see that the finance requested is adequate for the proposed business purpose. The

business plan must be supported by an assurance opinion on the adequacy of the requested finance.’

The $3 million finance raised will be used as follows:

$000

Construction of new factory 1,250

Purchase of new machinery 1,000

Initial supply of timber raw material 250

Advertising and marketing of new product 500

Your firm has agreed to review the business plan and to provide an assurance opinion on the completeness of the

finance request. A meeting will be held tomorrow to discuss this assignment.

Required:

(a) Identify and explain the matters relating to the assurance assignment that should be discussed at the meeting

with Mulligan Co. (8 marks)

正确答案:
3 MULLIGAN CO
(a) Matters to be discussed would include the following:
The exact content of the business plan which could include:
– Description of past business performance and key products
– Discussion of the new product
– Evidence of the marketability of the new product
– Cash flow projections
– Capital expenditure forecasts
– Key business assumptions.
The form. of the assurance report that is required – in an assurance engagement the nature and wording of the expected
opinion should be discussed. Webb & Co should clarify that an opinion of ‘negative assurance’ will be required, and whether
this will meet the bank’s lending criteria.
The intended recipient of the report – Webb & Co need to clarify the name and address of the recipient at LCT Bank. For the
limitation of professional liability, it should be clarified that LCT Bank will be the only recipient, and that the assurance opinion
is being used only as part of the bank’s overall lending decision.
Limiting liability – Webb & Co may want to receive in writing a statement that the report is for information purposes only, and
does not give rise to any responsibility, liability, duty or obligation from the firm to the lender.
Deadlines – it should be discussed when the bank need the report. This in turn will be influenced by when Mulligan Co needs
the requested $3 million finance. The bank may need a considerable period of time to assess the request, review the report,
and ensure that their lending criteria have been fully met prior to advancing the finance.
Availability of evidence – Mulligan Co should be made aware that in order to express an opinion on the finance request, they
must be prepared to provide all the necessary paperwork to assist the assurance provider. Evidence is likely to include
discussions with key management, and written representations of discussions may be required.
Professional regulation – Webb & Co should discuss the kind of procedures that will be undertaken, and confirm that they
will be complying with relevant professional guidance, for example:
– ISAE 3000 Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information
– ISAE 3400 The Examination of Prospective Financial Information
Engagement administration – any points not yet discussed in detail when deciding to take the assurance engagement should
be finalised at the meeting. These points could include the following:
– Fees – the total fee and billing arrangements must be agreed before any work is carried out
– Personnel – Webb & Co should identify the key personnel who will be involved in the assignment
– Complaints procedures – should be briefly outlined (the complaints procedures in an assurance engagement may differ
from an audit assignment)
– Engagement letter – if not already signed by both Webb & Co and Mulligan Co, the engagement letter should be
discussed and signed at the meeting before any assignment work is conducted.
Tutorial note: the scenario states that Webb & Co have already decided to take the assurance assignment for their existing
client, therefore the answer to this requirement should not focus on client or engagement acceptance procedures.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。