请问在职人士报考ACCA需要准备什么材料?

发布时间:2020-02-28


随着企业需求的日益增多,现在只拥有一个初级证书是不够的,所以就有很多人会选择报考更高级别的资格考试,来提升自己在应聘和求职过程中的优势。很多在职人士也想要报名,那在职人士报名需要准备哪些材料呢?一起来看看吧!

对于已经完成学业的在职人士来讲,他们在报考的时候需要准备哪些报名材料具体来说应分为两种情况:非在校学生所需准备的注册资料:中英文个人身份证件或护照中英文学历证明,2寸彩色护照用,证件照一张用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票; 非在校学生所需准备的注册资料: 中英文个人身份证件或护照,2寸彩色护照用证件照一张用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票。

看了在职人士报考ACCA的材料,接下来看看报考的其他内容吧!

报考ACCA优势:

1.理论与实践能力的提升

ACCA是一个比较完善的系统知识体系,学到的东西也绝不仅是会计层面,学习后对公司制度的本质有了蛮大的了解。课程是根据现时商务社会对财会人员的实际要求进行开发、设计的,特别注意培养学员的分析能力和在复杂条件下的决策、判断能力。系统的、高质量的培训给予学员真才实学,学员学成后能适应各种环境,并逐步成为具有全面管理素质的高级财务管理专家。

2.较高的薪资和认可

根据官方统计,ACCA会员收入在50万至100万之间的比例高达21%。受访会员最高年薪超过200万。ACCA未来的就业方向和行业大部分都集中在大公司。

3.学历+证书双向提升学员

通过ACCA前两个阶段的考试后,在国内即可申请牛津布鲁克斯大学的应用会计理学士学位,申请英国和英联邦成员国很多著名大学MBA或金融和会计学硕士学位有诸多免考科目,因此ACCA学员在备考的过程中,可以同时获得海外学位。

4.出国和移民优势ACCA留学签证率高,移民更可获得技术加分。ACCA会员可在工商企业财务部门、审计/会计师事务所、外资银行等金融机构、财政税务部门、跨国公司、国内境外上市公司等从事财务和金融分析咨询工作。中国遵照WTO约定全面开放银行、保险、投资等金融业务,国内涉外的专业金融人才缺口三百多万。

以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家带来的相关内容了,如果还想了解更多信息,请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(ii) job enlargement; (5 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Job enlargement is often referred to as ‘horizontal job enlargement’ and is aimed at widening the content of jobs by increasing the number of operations in which the job holder is involved and is another method by which employees at Bailey’s might become more involved. It reduces the level of repetition and dullness by providing a horizontal extension to activity, reducing monotony and boredom inherent in the operations at Bailey’s.

(b) A sale of industrial equipment to Deakin Co in May 2005 resulted in a loss on disposal of $0·3 million that has

been separately disclosed on the face of the income statement. The equipment cost $1·2 million when it was

purchased in April 1996 and was being depreciated on a straight-line basis over 20 years. (6 marks)

Required:

For each of the above issues:

(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and

(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,

in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Keffler Co for the year ended

31 March 2006.

NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.

正确答案:
(b) Sale of industrial equipment
(i) Matters
■ The industrial equipment was in use for nine years (from April 1996) and would have had a carrying value of
$660,000 at 31 March 2005 (11/20 × $1·2m – assuming nil residual value and a full year’s depreciation charge
in the year of acquisition and none in the year of disposal). Disposal proceeds were therefore only $360,000.
■ The $0·3m loss represents 15% of PBT (for the year to 31 March 2006) and is therefore material. The equipment
was material to the balance sheet at 31 March 2005 representing 2·6% of total assets ($0·66/$25·7 × 100).
■ Separate disclosure, of a material loss on disposal, on the face of the income statement is in accordance with
IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’. However, in accordance with IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’,
it should not be captioned in any way that might suggest that it is not part of normal operating activities (i.e. not
‘extraordinary’, ‘exceptional’, etc).
Tutorial note: However, note that if there is a prior period error to be accounted for (see later), there would be
no impact on the current period income statement requiring consideration of any disclosure.
■ The reason for the sale. For example, whether the equipment was:
– surplus to operating requirements (i.e. not being replaced); or
– being replaced with newer equipment (thereby contributing to the $8·1m increase (33·8 – 25·7) in total
assets).
■ The reason for the loss on sale. For example, whether:
– the sale was at an under-value (e.g. to a related party);
– the equipment had a bad maintenance history (or was otherwise impaired);
– the useful life of the equipment is less than 20 years;
– there is any deferred consideration not yet recorded;
– any non-cash disposal proceeds have been overlooked (e.g. if another asset was acquired in a part-exchange).
■ If the useful life was less than 20 years, tangible non-current assets may be materially overstated in respect of other
items of equipment that are still in use and being depreciated on the same basis.
■ If the sale was to a related party then additional disclosure should be required in a note to the financial statements
for the year to 31 March 2006 (IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’).
Tutorial note: Since there are no specific pointers to a related party transaction (RPT), this point is not expanded
on.
■ Whether the sale was identified in the prior year audit’s post balance sheet event review. If so:
– the disclosure made in the prior year’s financial statements (IAS 10 ‘Events After the Balance Sheet Date’);
– whether an impairment loss was recognised at 31 March 2005.
■ If not, and the equipment was impaired at 31 March 2005, a prior period error should be accounted for (IAS 8
‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’). An impairment loss of $0·3m would have
been material to prior year profit (12·5%).
Tutorial note: Unless this was a RPT or the impairment arose after 31 March 2005 a prior period adjustment
should be made.
■ Failure to account for a prior period error (if any) would result in modification of the audit opinion ‘except for’ noncompliance
with IAS 8 (in the current year) and IAS 36 (in the prior period).
(ii) Audit evidence
■ Carrying amount ($0·66m as above) agreed to the non-current asset register balances at 31 March 2005 and
recalculation of the loss on disposal.
■ Cost and accumulated depreciation removed from the asset register in the year to 31 March 2006.
■ Receipt of proceeds per cash book agreed to bank statement.
■ Sales invoice transferring title to Deakin.
■ A review of maintenance expenses and records (e.g. to confirm reason for loss on sale).
■ Post balance sheet event review on prior year audit working papers file.
■ Management representation confirming that Deakin is not a related party (provided that there is no evidence to
suggest otherwise).

2 Clifford and Amanda, currently aged 54 and 45 respectively, were married on 1 February 1998. Clifford is a higher

rate taxpayer who has realised taxable capital gains in 2007/08 in excess of his capital gains tax annual exemption.

Clifford moved into Amanda’s house in London on the day they were married. Clifford’s own house in Oxford, where

he had lived since acquiring it for £129,400 on 1 August 1996, has been empty since that date although he and

Amanda have used it when visiting friends. Clifford has been offered £284,950 for the Oxford house and has decided

that it is time to sell it. The house has a large garden such that Clifford is also considering an offer for the house and

a part only of the garden. He would then sell the remainder of the garden at a later date as a building plot. His total

sales proceeds will be higher if he sells the property in this way.

Amanda received the following income from quoted investments in 2006/07:

Dividends in respect of quoted trading company shares 1,395

Dividends paid by a Real Estate Investment Trust out of tax exempt property income 485

On 1 May 2006, Amanda was granted a 22 year lease of a commercial investment property. She paid the landlord

a premium of £6,900 and also pays rent of £2,100 per month. On 1 June 2006 Amanda granted a nine year

sub-lease of the property. She received a premium of £14,700 and receives rent of £2,100 per month.

On 1 September 2006 Amanda gave quoted shares with a value of £2,200 to a registered charity. She paid broker’s

fees of £115 in respect of the gift.

Amanda began working for Shearer plc, a quoted company, on 1 June 2006 having had a two year break from her

career. She earns an annual salary of £38,600 and was paid a bonus of £5,750 in August 2006 for agreeing to

come and work for the company. On 1 August 2006 Amanda was provided with a fully expensed company car,

including the provision of private petrol, which had a list price when new of £23,400 and a CO2 emissions rate of

187 grams per kilometre. Amanda is required to pay Shearer plc £22 per month in respect of the private use of the

car. In June and July 2006 Amanda used her own car whilst on company business. She drove 720 business miles

during this two month period and was paid 34 pence per mile. Amanda had PAYE of £6,785 deducted from her gross

salary in the tax year 2006/07.

After working for Shearer plc for a full year, Amanda becomes entitled to the following additional benefits:

– The opportunity to purchase a large number of shares in Shearer plc on 1 July 2007 for £3·30 per share. It is

anticipated that the share price on that day will be at least £7·50 per share. The company will make an interestfree

loan to Amanda equal to the cost of the shares to be repaid in two years.

– Exclusive free use of the company sailing boat for one week in August 2007. The sailing boat was purchased by

Shearer plc in January 2005 for use by its senior employees and costs the company £1,400 a week in respect

of its crew and other running expenses.

Required:

(a) (i) Calculate Clifford’s capital gains tax liability for the tax year 2007/08 on the assumption that the Oxford

house together with its entire garden is sold on 31 July 2007 for £284,950. Comment on the relevance

to your calculations of the size of the garden; (5 marks)

正确答案:

 


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。