你知道USCPA与ACCA有什么不同吗?了解一下吧!

发布时间:2020-01-31


USCPA为美国注册会计师,而ACCA则为英国特许公认会计师,但ACCA又被我国称之为国际注册会计师。两者同为国际财经领域数一数二的证书,其有哪些区别呢? 51题库考试学习网带领大家一起来了解一下。

1.职业发展方向的比较

首先,ACCA作为当今的国际性会计师组织之一,ACCA会员资格得到欧盟立法以及许多国家公司法的承认。ACCA在国际上的认可度也很高,截至目前,ACCA在中国的认可雇主企业超过800家,ACCA认可雇主会给予公司职员报考ACCA考试费用,带薪休假参加考试等支持,还会对ACCA会员优先录用。IBMGE、摩托罗拉、强生、卡特彼勒、“四大”、中国银行等国内外数百家企业均认可ACCA证书,并定期组织员工参加ACCA学习与认证。

ACCA在全球范围内得到众多大学的认可,在英国,如邓迪大学、埃克赛特大学、赫尔大学、布拉德福德大学等众多财经名校均认可ACCA,其专业教学课程与ACCA展开了紧密结合,ACCA学员将便捷向包括这些院校在内的诸多名校的递交深造申请。学生可赴英国1-2年完成本科、硕士阶段ACCA-金融专业ACCA-国际管理、ACCA-国际商务、ACCA-工商管理、ACCA-国际会计专业学习,并获得学士学位、硕士学位。

美国是世界经济体,相应的财务要求高,USCPA是美国的注册会计师,GAAP准则一直引领国际会计的发展趋势,且具备签字权。在美国有很好的发展前景,也是一个非常不错的选择。

2.考试政策的差别

ACCA和USCPA都是全英文考试,对学员英语水平有一定要求,通常具有英语四六级水平即可。但是在考试内容上面各有不同:

考试科目不同:ACCA考试科目为13门,分为两个部分,第一部分为基础阶段,共9门,主要涉及财务会计和管理会计方面的核心知识;第二部分为专业阶段,共5门,引入了作为未来的高级会计师所必须的更高级的职业技能和知识技能,相当于硕士阶段的课程难度。 USCPA的考试科目相对简单,只考4门:Auditing & Attestation审计、Financial Accounting & Reporting财务会计与报告、REG Regulation法规和Business Environment & Concepts商业环境,考试形式为机考,都是单项选择题组和模拟案例题组。只要有相关会计及审计经验的,考起来都不算太难。

会计准则不同: ACCA适用于英国会计准则和国际会计准则;USCPA适用的是GAAP准则,由于美资公司在世界分布广泛,GAAP准则一直引领着国际会计的发展趋势。

好了,看了上面的内容,相信大家对ACCAUSCPA有哪些不同有了更多的了解。如果还想了解其他信息,欢迎来51题库考试学习网留言。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) Explanatory notes, together with relevant supporting calculations, in connection with the loan. (8 marks)

Additional marks will be awarded for the appropriateness of the format and presentation of the schedules, the

effectiveness with which the information is communicated and the extent to which the schedules are structured in

a logical manner. (3 marks)

Notes: – you should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 and for the financial year

to 31 March 2007 apply throughout the question.

– you should ignore value added tax (VAT).

正确答案:
(c) Tax implications of there being a loan from Flores Ltd to Banda
Flores Ltd should have paid tax to HMRC equal to 25% of the loan, i.e. £5,250. The tax should have been paid on the
company’s normal due date for corporation tax in respect of the accounting period in which the loan was made, i.e. 1 April
following the end of the accounting period.
The tax is due because Flores Ltd is a close company that has made a loan to a participator and that loan is not in the ordinary
course of the company’s business.
HMRC will repay the tax when the loan is either repaid or written off.
Flores Ltd should have included the loan on Banda’s Form. P11D in order to report it to HMRC.
Banda should have paid income tax on an annual benefit equal to 5% of the amount of loan outstanding during each tax
year. Accordingly, for each full year for which the loan was outstanding, Banda should have paid income tax of £231
(£21,000 x 5% x 22%).
Interest and penalties may be charged in respect of the tax underpaid by both Flores Ltd and Banda and in respect of the
incorrect returns made to HMRC
Willingness to act for Banda
We would not wish to be associated with a client who has engaged in deliberate tax evasion as this poses a threat to the
fundamental principles of integrity and professional behaviour. Accordingly, we should refuse to act for Banda unless she is
willing to disclose the details regarding the loan to HMRC and pay the ensuing tax liabilities. Even if full disclosure is made,
we should consider whether the loan was deliberately hidden from HMRC or Banda’s previous tax adviser.
In addition, companies are prohibited from making loans to directors under the Companies Act. We should advise Banda to
seek legal advice on her own position and that of Flores Ltd.

(c) Assuming that she will survive until July 2009, advise on the lifetime inheritance tax (IHT) planning

measures that could be undertaken by Debbie, quantifying the savings that can be made. (7 marks)

For this question you should assume that the rates and allowances for 2004/05 apply throughout.

正确答案:
(c) Debbie survives until July 2009
Debbie should consider giving away some of her assets to her children, while ensuring that she still has enough to live on.
Such gifts would be categorised as PETs. Although Debbie will not survive seven years (at which point the gifts would fall out
of Debbie’s estate for IHT purposes), taper relief will reduce the amount chargeable to IHT. If gifts were made prior to July
2005, 40% taper relief would be available.
It is important to remember that Debbie’s annual exemptions will reduce the value of any PET when assets are gifted. Debbie
has not used her annual exemption for the last two years, and so she can gift £6,000 (2 x £3,000) in the current tax year
as well as £3,000 per year in future tax years. Debbie could therefore give away £18,000, saving tax of £7,200 (£18,000
x 40%). Debbie can also make small exempt gifts of up to £250 per donee per year.
Debbie should consider making gifts to Allison’s children instead of Allison (using, for example, an accumulation &
maintenance trust). This would ensure that the gifts were excluded from Allison’s estate.
It does not make sense for Debbie to gift shares in Dee Limited, as these qualify for full business property relief and therefore
are not subject to IHT.
As Andrew is shortly to be married, Debbie could give up to £5,000 in consideration of his marriage. This would save £2,000
in IHT.
Expenditure out of normal income is also exempt from IHT. This is where the transferor is left with sufficient income to
maintain his/her usual standard of living. Broadly, you need to demonstrate evidence of a prior commitment, or a settled
pattern of expenditure.
If substantial gifts are made, the donees would be advised to consider taking out insurance policies on Debbie’s life to cover
the potential tax liabilities that may arise on PETs in the event of her early death.

(c) The inheritance tax payable by Adam in respect of the gift from his aunt. (4 marks)

Additional marks will be awarded for the appropriateness of the format and presentation of the memorandum and

the effectiveness with which the information is communicated. (2 marks)

Note: you should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 will continue to apply for the

foreseeable future.

正确答案:
(c) Inheritance tax payable by Adam
The gift by AS’s aunt was a potentially exempt transfer. No tax will be due if she lives until 1 June 2014 (seven years after
the date of the gift).
The maximum possible liability, on the assumption that there are no annual exemptions or nil band available, is £35,216
(£88,040 x 40%). This will only arise if AS’s aunt dies before 1 June 2010.
The maximum liability will be reduced by taper relief of 20% for every full year after 31 May 2010 for which AS’s aunt lives.
The liability will also be reduced if the chargeable transfers made by the aunt in the seven years prior to 1 June 2007 are
less than £285,000 or if the annual exemption for 2006/07 and/or 2007/08 is/are available.

(ii) Calculate her income tax (IT) and national insurance (NIC) payable for the year of assessment 2006/07.

(4 marks)

正确答案:

 


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。