网友您好, 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:
题目内容
(请给出正确答案)
问答题
Don’t Blame DNA The really critical implication of the discovery still lies with the door that geneticists have opened on the environmental influences of our behaviour, our personalities and our health, 1 and with the critical blow it strikes on the idea of biological determinism. For the past decade, the public has witnessed a rising epidemic of tales of discoveries of genes that dispose humanity to homosexuality, to alcoholism, to political persuasion, to running ability, and to artistic taste. But even before yesterday’s revelations by Venter, scientists had stopped believing in the gay gene. Yet belief in its existence still persists among the public. The assault on biological determinism that geneticists have now triggered will be timely, and will prove that human nature is a lot more complex and intriguing than determinists have given it credit for. Even more importantly, the discovery has critical implications for our understanding of idea of free will. It has become increasingly fashionable for individuals particularly in the United States to blame actions and crimes on the influence of their genes. Consider the following story. A young American woman, Glenda Sue Caldwell, was convicted of killing her child and was jailed for life. Only later did she begin to display the symptoms of Huntington’s Disease, an inherited brain disorder that produces horrific delusions and uncontrolled movements. Claiming she was a victim of her genes, the woman was cleared on appeal. Since then, several other U.S. defendants accused of violent crimes have argued that they too were innocent victims of their genes. They were not responsible for their actions. Their genes were. None of these people have yet succeeded in persuading courts of their innocence and their genes’ guilt. Most lawyers felt such an outcome was nevertheless inevitable. In other words, genetic predestination could soon have been used to excuse murder or robbery—if it had not been for this discovery that we lack the genes to thus dispose us! Kevin Davies is the author of The Sequence, a story of the human genome race11. He said, “There has been a recent study on perfect pitch, the ability to know the absolute pitch of a musical note, that strongly suggests that is acquired through the inheritance of a single gene.” “That may sound like a clear-cut piece of biological determinism. However, there is a crucial corollary: you have to be exposed to early musical training for the ability to materialize. 13 In other words, even in seemingly simple inherited abilities, nurture has a role to play.” And then there is the case quoted by Venter. “Everyone talks about a gene for this and that. But it is not like that. Take the example of colon cancer. People say there is a gene that predisposes us to the disease. And certainly it runs in families. It is caused by an inherited weakness in one gene that controls DNA repair in other genes. 14 But that gene is found in cells in every part of the body. However, it is only the colon where we find all sorts of toxins and bacteria that provide the harsh circumstances that cause that gene to finally break down and for cancer to spread.” In short, it is not a colon cancer gene but a gene that affects our ability to respond to the environment. And that, is what human nature is all about.
参考答案
参考解析
解析:
暂无解析
更多 “问答题Don’t Blame DNA The really critical implication of the discovery still lies with the door that geneticists have opened on the environmental influences of our behaviour, our personalities and our health, 1 and with the critical blow it strikes on the idea of biological determinism. For the past decade, the public has witnessed a rising epidemic of tales of discoveries of genes that dispose humanity to homosexuality, to alcoholism, to political persuasion, to running ability, and to artistic taste. But even before yesterday’s revelations by Venter, scientists had stopped believing in the gay gene. Yet belief in its existence still persists among the public. The assault on biological determinism that geneticists have now triggered will be timely, and will prove that human nature is a lot more complex and intriguing than determinists have given it credit for. Even more importantly, the discovery has critical implications for our understanding of idea of free will. It has become increasingly fashionable for individuals particularly in the United States to blame actions and crimes on the influence of their genes. Consider the following story. A young American woman, Glenda Sue Caldwell, was convicted of killing her child and was jailed for life. Only later did she begin to display the symptoms of Huntington’s Disease, an inherited brain disorder that produces horrific delusions and uncontrolled movements. Claiming she was a victim of her genes, the woman was cleared on appeal. Since then, several other U.S. defendants accused of violent crimes have argued that they too were innocent victims of their genes. They were not responsible for their actions. Their genes were. None of these people have yet succeeded in persuading courts of their innocence and their genes’ guilt. Most lawyers felt such an outcome was nevertheless inevitable. In other words, genetic predestination could soon have been used to excuse murder or robbery—if it had not been for this discovery that we lack the genes to thus dispose us! Kevin Davies is the author of The Sequence, a story of the human genome race11. He said, “There has been a recent study on perfect pitch, the ability to know the absolute pitch of a musical note, that strongly suggests that is acquired through the inheritance of a single gene.” “That may sound like a clear-cut piece of biological determinism. However, there is a crucial corollary: you have to be exposed to early musical training for the ability to materialize. 13 In other words, even in seemingly simple inherited abilities, nurture has a role to play.” And then there is the case quoted by Venter. “Everyone talks about a gene for this and that. But it is not like that. Take the example of colon cancer. People say there is a gene that predisposes us to the disease. And certainly it runs in families. It is caused by an inherited weakness in one gene that controls DNA repair in other genes. 14 But that gene is found in cells in every part of the body. However, it is only the colon where we find all sorts of toxins and bacteria that provide the harsh circumstances that cause that gene to finally break down and for cancer to spread.” In short, it is not a colon cancer gene but a gene that affects our ability to respond to the environment. And that, is what human nature is all about.” 相关考题
考题
21. --- What do you think of their school?--- It’s really beautiful. But I don’t think their school is as big as ____.A. ours B. us C. we D. our
考题
–Can you come to our party this Friday?–()
A、Yes, that would be fun.B、No, I don't.C、Yes, but I'm busy this Friday.D、No, I don't like it.
考题
I think we are rich enough to ______ and protect our environment, but we have to improve environmental education too.
(A) care of(B) care for(C) care with(D) care to
考题
Bob is a most reliable person. He has our _______ trust.
A. similarB. simplyC. absoluteD. critical
考题
阅读下面两篇短文,掌握其大意,然后从41-65各题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中,选出一个最佳答案。AOur neighborhood used to be very quiet. However,these days,(41)things are happening in our neighborhood and everyone is unhappy. Zhao Jun,the local school teacher is extremely(42). When he was interviewed by the local newspaper,he said“, Every night we hear strange noises (43) our window. My wife thinks that is could be an (44),but my friends and I think it must be teenagers having (45).My parents called the police,but they can't (46) anything strange. They think it might be the (47). I don't think so! ”Zhao Jun's next door neighbor Xiang Dan is (48),too“. At first,I thought it might bea cat,but I can't see a cat,and I still hear the noises outside.”Everyone in our neighborhood is worried,and everyone has his or her own (49).There must be somthing (50) the homes in our neighborhood,but what is it?41.______________A.interesting B.exciting C.strange D.terrible
考题
We are not immune ____ the influences around us. What matters is that we have and use our own will.
A.forB.toC.towardD.with
考题
" ( )people have already joined our health club, and we haven’t started advertising yet."
A. lotB.FewC. Too fewD. A few
考题
I should have told you! You ______ the entire house. Our cleaning lady phoned she's coming tomorrow.A. didn't need to cleanB. needn't have cleanedC. don't need to cleanD. mustn't have cleaned
考题
What can we do for the case?_________
A.We would condult our lawyerB.The case is difficultC.I don't care about it
考题
“ ( )people have already joined our health club, and we haven’t started advertising yet.“
A. lotB. FewC. A fewD. Too few
考题
I think a bus stop advertisement is a very wise chance to promote our products. ().A、 Our products are popular.B、 You said it.C、 I don’t like advertisement.
考题
Our sleep influences our mood. Our mood ________, affects our performance.A: by turnB: turn overC: in turnD: after turn
考题
Hello, is that service center? The elevator of our apartment doesn't work.()A. Oh, I don't know what's wrong with it.B. Sorry,I'll have it checked out at once.C. OK, I see.
考题
I don’t think the rain will__________ our plans for a picnic.A.affectB.effectC.infectD.defect
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors Are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are very different from each other.The controversy is often conveniently referred to as "nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has littie,if anything ,to do with our abilities,characteristics and behaviors is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains that our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education,are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act.A behaviorist, B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines ,humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different expianations about one human chiaracteristic,intelligence ,offered by the tow theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say ,they don’t believe that factors in the enviroment have much inluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our inelligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an invironment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will experience greater intellectual development.Those who support the"nature"theory don’t believe environment_______.A:human is i)Orfl with a certain personalityB:how the personality and behavior are formedC:will experience intellectual developmentD:tWo differenlt schools on the matter have developedE:will influ ence on charactersF:human is horn with no personality
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors Are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are very different from each other.The controversy is often conveniently referred to as "nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has littie,if anything ,to do with our abilities,characteristics and behaviors is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains that our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education,are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act.A behaviorist, B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines ,humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different expianations about one human chiaracteristic,intelligence ,offered by the tow theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say ,they don’t believe that factors in the enviroment have much inluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our inelligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an invironment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will experience greater intellectual development.Social scientists want to clear out______.A:human is i)Orfl with a certain personalityB:how the personality and behavior are formedC:will experience intellectual developmentD:tWo differenlt schools on the matter have developedE:will influ ence on charactersF:human is horn with no personality
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors Are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are very different from each other.The controversy is often conveniently referred to as "nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has littie,if anything ,to do with our abilities,characteristics and behaviors is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains that our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education,are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act.A behaviorist, B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines ,humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different expianations about one human chiaracteristic,intelligence ,offered by the tow theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say ,they don’t believe that factors in the enviroment have much inluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our inelligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an invironment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will experience greater intellectual development.Paragraph 1______A:Environment is ImportantB:Two Approaches Different From Each Other Are FormedC:People Want to Know How Their Personalities and Behaviors Are FormedD:Our Personalities and Behavior Patterns Are Largely Determined by Biological FactorsE:We Want to Explain the Behaviors F:Tow Similar Approaches Are Forme
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are verydifferent from each other. The controversy is often conveniently referred to as"nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior pat-terns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has little,if anything,to do with ourabilities,characteristics and behavior is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains tha our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education, are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining howwe will act.A behaviorist,B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines,humans respond to environmental stimulias the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different explanations about one human characteristic,intelligence,offered by the two theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say:They don't believe that factors in the environment have much in- fluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our in- telligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an environment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will ex- perience greater intellectual development.Paragraph 3_________A:Environment is ImportantB:Two Approaches Different From Each Other are FormedC:People Want to Know How Their Personalities and Behaviors are FormedD:Our Personalities and Behavior Patterns are Largely Determined by Biological FactorsE:We Want to Explain the BehaviorsF:Two Similar Approaches are Formed
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are verydifferent from each other. The controversy is often conveniently referred to as"nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior pat-terns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has little,if anything,to do with ourabilities,characteristics and behavior is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains tha our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education, are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining howwe will act.A behaviorist,B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines,humans respond to environmental stimulias the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different explanations about one human characteristic,intelligence,offered by the two theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say:They don't believe that factors in the environment have much in- fluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our in- telligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an environment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will ex- perience greater intellectual development.Paragraph 1_________A:Environment is ImportantB:Two Approaches Different From Each Other are FormedC:People Want to Know How Their Personalities and Behaviors are FormedD:Our Personalities and Behavior Patterns are Largely Determined by Biological FactorsE:We Want to Explain the BehaviorsF:Two Similar Approaches are Formed
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors Are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are very different from each other.The controversy is often conveniently referred to as "nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has littie,if anything ,to do with our abilities,characteristics and behaviors is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains that our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education,are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act.A behaviorist, B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines ,humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different expianations about one human chiaracteristic,intelligence ,offered by the tow theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say ,they don’t believe that factors in the enviroment have much inluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our inelligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an invironment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will experience greater intellectual development.Paragraph 2______A:Environment is ImportantB:Two Approaches Different From Each Other Are FormedC:People Want to Know How Their Personalities and Behaviors Are FormedD:Our Personalities and Behavior Patterns Are Largely Determined by Biological FactorsE:We Want to Explain the Behaviors F:Tow Similar Approaches Are Forme
考题
共用题干
How Human's Personalities and Behaviors are Formed1 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed.It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not,or why one is cooperative and another is competitive.2 Social scientists are,of course,extremely interested in these types of questions.They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors.There are no clear answers yet,but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed.As one might expect,the two approaches are verydifferent from each other. The controversy is often conveniently referred to as"nature vs.nurture".3 Those who support the"nature"side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior pat-terns are largely determined by biological factors.That our environment has little,if anything,to do with ourabilities,characteristics and behavior is central to this theory.Taken to an extreme,this theory maintains tha our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts.4 Those who support the"nurture"theory,that is,they advocate education, are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining howwe will act.A behaviorist,B.F.Skinner,sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings.The behaviorists maintain that,like machines,humans respond to environmental stimulias the basis of their behavior.5 Let us examine the different explanations about one human characteristic,intelligence,offered by the two theories.Supporters of the"nature"theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined.Needless to say:They don't believe that factors in the environment have much in- fluence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic.On the other hand,behaviorists argue that our in- telligence levels are the product of our experiences.Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an environment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will ex- perience greater intellectual development.Those who support the"nature"theory don't believe environment_________.A:human is born with a certain personalityB:how the personality and behavior are formedC:will experience intellectual developmentD:two different schools on the matter have developedE:will influence on charactersF:human is born with no personality
考题
翻译:I’d like to remind you that we have to withdraw our offer if we don ’ t hear from you by next Monday.
考题
单选题I don't think a warm winter always has a negative influence on our life, hasn't it?A
don't thinkB
hasC
onD
hasn't it
考题
单选题I don’t know().A
when will our ship sailB
will when our ship sailC
when our ship will sailD
will our ship when sail
考题
问答题翻译:I’d like to remind you that we have to withdraw our offer if we don ’ t hear from you by next Monday.
考题
单选题Wife: Our visit to London is really rewarding. What do you think,darling? Husband: ______ We’ve really got something from this visit. Wife: Don’t forget the shopping before we leave this lovely city. Husband: I’ve carved it in my mind. Don’t worry.A
I get it.B
Well,I don’t think the way you do.C
You bet.D
I’m glad to hear that.
考题
问答题Practice 8 I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you’ve bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition. Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents. That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet. These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land—a nagging fear that America’s decline is inevitable, and the next generation must lower its sights. Today I say to you that the challenges we face arc real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America—they will be met.
热门标签
最新试卷