网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
In Bargh’s experiment, the students were asked to （ ）
A． evaluate someone’s personality
B． write down their hypotheses
C． fill out a personal information form
D． hold coffee and cold drink alternatively
参考答案
更多 “ In Bargh’s experiment, the students were asked to （ ）A． evaluate someone’s personalityB． write down their hypothesesC． fill out a personal information formD． hold coffee and cold drink alternatively ” 相关考题
考题
The experiment shows all the following EXCEPT that ．A．the cell phone drivers get less than half of the visual informationB．the cell phone drivers are, twice as likely to hit the front carsC the cell phone driver’S response to sudden dangers is slowerD．the 110 drivers were reluctant to take part in the experiment
考题
根据下列材料请回答 46～50 题：CNext time a customer comes to your office，offer him a cup of coffee．And when you’re doing your holiday shopping online，make sure you’re holding a large glass of iced tea．The physical sensa’tion(感觉)of warmth encourages emotional warmth，while a cold drink in hand prevents you frommaking unwise decision--those are the practical lesson being drawn from recent research by psychologist Johna．Bargh．Psychologists have known that one person’s perception(感知)of another's“warmth”is a powerful determiner in social relationships．Judging someone to be either“WflfflTl”or“cold”is a primaryconsideration。even trumping evidence that a“cold”person may be more capable．Much of this isrooted in very early childhood experiences，Bargh argues，when babies’conceptual sense of theworld around them is shaped by physical sensation，particularly warmth and coldness．Classic stud—ies by Harry Harlow，published in 1958，showed monkeys preferred to stay close to a cloth“moth—er”rather than one made of wire．even when the wire‘‘mother”carried a food bottle．Harlow’S workand later studies have led psychologists to stress the need for warm physical contact from caregiversto help young children grow into healthy adults with normal social skills．Feelings of“warmth”and“coldness”in social judgments appear to be universal．Although noworldwide study has been done Sargh says that describing people as“warm”or“cold”is common tomany cultures，and studies have found those perception influence judgment in dozens of countries．To test the relationship between physical and psychological warmth，Bargh conducted an experi-ment which involved 41 college students．A research assistant who was unaware of the study’Shypotheses(假设)，handed the students either a hot cup of coffee，or a cold drink，to hold whiletlle researeher filled out a short information form：The drink was then handed back．After that，the students were asked to rate the personality of“Person A”based on a particular description．Those who had briefly held the warm drink regarded Person A as warmer than those who had held the iced drink．“We ale grounded in our physical experiences even when we think abstractly，”says Bargh．第 46 题 According to Paragraph 1,a person’s emotion may be affected by____________．A．the visitors to his officeB．the psychology lesson he hasC．his physical feeling of coldnessD．the things he has bought online
考题
In Bargh’s experiment，the students were asked to____________．A．rate someone’s personalityB．write down their hypothesesC．fill out a personal information formD．hold coffee and cold drink alternatively
考题
The ____________ shoes were covered with mud, so I asked them to take them off before they got into __________ car.A. girl’s; Tom’sB. girls’; Toms’C. girls’; Tom’sD. girl’s; Toms’
考题
Three students were chosen to ()the experiment.
A、be capable ofB、carry outC、be responsible forD、do one's best
考题
The family_____at the lunch table when someone came to tell them what had happened at_____.A．were sitting；Mr．BrownB．were sitting；Mr．Brown’SC．was sitting；Mr．BrownD．was sitting；Mr．Brown’s
考题
阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中，选出最佳选项，回答51－55题。 Next time a customer comes to your office, offer him a cup of coffee. And when you’re doing your holiday shopping online, make sure you’re holding a large glass of iced tea. The physical sensation(感觉) of warmth encourages emotional warmth, while a cold drink in hand prevents you from making unwise decisions—those are the practical lesson being drawn from recent research by psychologist John A． Bargh.Psychologists have known that one person’s perception(感知) of another’s “warmth” is a powerful determiner in social relationships. Judging someone to be either “warm” or “cold” is a primary consideration, even trumping evidence that a “cold” person may be more capable. Much of this is rooted in very early childhood experiences, Bargh argues, when babies’ conceptual sense of the world around them is shaped by physical sensations, particularly warmth and coldness. Classic studies by Harry Harlow, published in 1958, showed monkeys preferred to stay close to a cloth “mother” rather than one made of wire, even when the wire “mother” carried a food bottle. Harlow’s work and later studies have led psychologists to stress the need for warm physical contact from caregivers to help young children grow into healthy adults with normal social skills.Feelings of “warmth” and “coldness” in social judgments appear to be universal. Although no worldwide study has been done, Bargh says that describing people as “warm” or “cold” is common to many cultures, and studies have found those perceptions influence judgment in dozens of countries.To test the relationship between physical and psychological warmth, Bargh conducted an experiment which involved 41 college students. A research assistant who was unaware of the study’s hypotheses(假设), handed the students either a hot cup of coffee, or a cold drink, to hold while the researcher filled out a short information form. The drink was then handed back. After that, the students were asked to rate the personality of “Person A” based on a particular description. Those who had briefly held the warm drink regarded Person A as warmer than those who had held the iced drink.“We are grounded in our physical experiences even when we think abstractly,” says Bargh.第16题：According to Paragraph 1, a person’s emotion may be affected by（ ）A． the visitors to his officeB． the psychology lessons he hasC． his physical feeling of coldnessD． the things he has bought online
考题
The main idea of Paragraph Four shows us ______.A. some examples of shoot in US schoolsB. the American's feelingC. some famous schoolsD. that some teachers were killed by students
考题
A teacher showed students an example and explained the usage of past perfect tense, and asked students to list ten"past perfect tense" sentences by imitating that example． What's the teacher' s grammar teaching method?A.Consolidation．
B.Presentation．
C.Deduction．
D.Induction．
考题
A teacher handed out a list of twenty "Future tense"sentences and asked students to discuss and find out the grammatical structures. What is the teacher's grammar teaching method?
A．Induction.
B．Presentation.
C．Consolidation.
D．Deduction.
考题
A teacher handed out a list of twenty"Fature tense" sentences and asked students to discuss and find out the grammatical structures. What is the teacher's grammar teaching method?A. Induction.
B. Presentation.
C. Consolidation.
D. Deduction.
考题
共用题干
When Our Eyes Serve Our StomachOur senses aren't just delivering a strict view of what's going on in the world;they're af-fected by what's going on in our heads. A new study finds that hungry people see food-related words more clearly than people who'ye just eaten.Psychologists have known for decades that what's going on,inside our head affects our senses. For example,poorer children think coins are larger than they are,and hungry people think pictures of food are brighter. Remi Radel of University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted to investi-gate how this happens. Does it happen right away as the brain receives signals from the eyes or a lit-tle later as the brain's high-level thinking processes get involved.Radel recruited 42 students with a normal body mass index. On the day of his or her test,each student was told to arrive at the lab at noon after three or four hours of not eating. Then they were told there was a delay. Some were told to come back in 10 minutes;others were given an hour to get lunch first. So half the students were hungry when they did the ex-periment and the other half had just eaten.For the experiment,the participant looked at a computer screen. One by one,80 words flashed on the screen for about 1/300th of a second each. They flashed at so small a size thatthe students could only consciously perceive. A quarter of the words were food-related. After each word,each person was asked how bright the word was and asked to choose which of two words they'd seen一a food-related word like cake or a neutral word like boat. Each word ap-peared too briefly for the participant to really read it.Hungry people saw the food-related words as brighter and were better at identifying food-related words. Because the word appeared too quickly for them to be reliably seen,this means that the difference is in perception,not in thinking processes,Radel says.“This is something great to me. Humans can really perceive what they need or what they strive for. From the experiment,I know that our brain can really be at the disposal of our mo-tives and needs,”Radel says.There was a delay in Radel's experiment because_______.A: he needed more students to joinB: he didn't prepare enough food for the 42 studentsC: he wanted two groups of participants,hungry and non-hungryD: he didn't want to have the experiment at noon
考题
共用题干
When Our Eyes Serve Our StomachOur senses aren't just delivering a strict view of what's going on in the world;they're af-fected by what's going on in our heads. A new study finds that hungry people see food-related words more clearly than people who'ye just eaten.Psychologists have known for decades that what's going on,inside our head affects our senses. For example,poorer children think coins are larger than they are,and hungry people think pictures of food are brighter. Remi Radel of University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted to investi-gate how this happens. Does it happen right away as the brain receives signals from the eyes or a lit-tle later as the brain's high-level thinking processes get involved.Radel recruited 42 students with a normal body mass index. On the day of his or her test,each student was told to arrive at the lab at noon after three or four hours of not eating. Then they were told there was a delay. Some were told to come back in 10 minutes;others were given an hour to get lunch first. So half the students were hungry when they did the ex-periment and the other half had just eaten.For the experiment,the participant looked at a computer screen. One by one,80 words flashed on the screen for about 1/300th of a second each. They flashed at so small a size thatthe students could only consciously perceive. A quarter of the words were food-related. After each word,each person was asked how bright the word was and asked to choose which of two words they'd seen一a food-related word like cake or a neutral word like boat. Each word ap-peared too briefly for the participant to really read it.Hungry people saw the food-related words as brighter and were better at identifying food-related words. Because the word appeared too quickly for them to be reliably seen,this means that the difference is in perception,not in thinking processes,Radel says.“This is something great to me. Humans can really perceive what they need or what they strive for. From the experiment,I know that our brain can really be at the disposal of our mo-tives and needs,”Radel says.It can be learnt from what Radel says that______.A: humans'thinking processes are independent of their sensesB: an experiment with hungry and non-hungry participants is not reliableC: humans can perceive what they need without deep thinking processesD: 42 participants are too small a number for a serious investigation
考题
共用题干
When Our Eyes Serve Our StomachOur senses aren't just delivering a strict view of what's going on in the world;they're af-fected by what's going on in our heads. A new study finds that hungry people see food-related words more clearly than people who'ye just eaten.Psychologists have known for decades that what's going on,inside our head affects our senses. For example,poorer children think coins are larger than they are,and hungry people think pictures of food are brighter. Remi Radel of University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted to investi-gate how this happens. Does it happen right away as the brain receives signals from the eyes or a lit-tle later as the brain's high-level thinking processes get involved.Radel recruited 42 students with a normal body mass index. On the day of his or her test,each student was told to arrive at the lab at noon after three or four hours of not eating. Then they were told there was a delay. Some were told to come back in 10 minutes;others were given an hour to get lunch first. So half the students were hungry when they did the ex-periment and the other half had just eaten.For the experiment,the participant looked at a computer screen. One by one,80 words flashed on the screen for about 1/300th of a second each. They flashed at so small a size thatthe students could only consciously perceive. A quarter of the words were food-related. After each word,each person was asked how bright the word was and asked to choose which of two words they'd seen一a food-related word like cake or a neutral word like boat. Each word ap-peared too briefly for the participant to really read it.Hungry people saw the food-related words as brighter and were better at identifying food-related words. Because the word appeared too quickly for them to be reliably seen,this means that the difference is in perception,not in thinking processes,Radel says.“This is something great to me. Humans can really perceive what they need or what they strive for. From the experiment,I know that our brain can really be at the disposal of our mo-tives and needs,”Radel says.Radel's experiment discovered that hungry people______.A: were more sensitive to food-related words than stomach-full peopleB: were better at identifying neutral wordsC: were always thinking of food-related wordsD: saw every word more clearly than stomach-full people
考题
共用题干
第二篇Download Knowledge Directly to Your BrainFor the first time,researchers have been able to hack into the process of learning in the biain,using induced brain patterns to create a learned behavior. It's not quite as advanced as an instant Kung-fu down- load,and it's not as sleek as cognitive inception,but it's still an important finding that could lead to new teaching and rehabilitation techniques.Future therapies could decode the brain activity patterns of an athlete or a musician,and use them as a benchmark for teaching another person a new activity,according to the researchers.Scientists from Boston University and ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto used functional magnetic resonance imaging,or fMRI,to study the learning process.They were examining the adult brain's aptitude for visual perceptual learning,or VPL,in which repetitive training improves a per- son's performance on a particular task.Whether adults can do this as well as young people has been an on- going debate in neuroscience.Led by BU neuroscientist Takeo Watanabe,researchers used a method called decoded fMRI neurofeed- back to stimulate the visual cortex.First they showed participants circles at different orientations.Then they used fMRI to watch the participants'brain activity.The researchers were then able to train the participants to recreate this visual cortex activity.The volunteers were again placed in MRI machines and asked to visualize shapes of certain colors.The participants were asked to"somehow regulate activity in the posterior part of the brain"to make a solid green disc as large as they could.They were told they would get a paid bonus proportional to the size of this disc, but they weren't told anything about what the disc meant.The researchers watched the participants'brain activity and monitored the activation patterns in their visual cortices."Participants can be trained to control the overall mean activation of an entire brain region,"the study authors write,"or the adtivation in one region relative to that in another region."This worked even when test subjects were not aware of what they were learning,the researchers said."The most surprising thing in this study is that mere inductions of neural activation patterns corresponding to a specific visual feature led to visual performance improvement on the visual feature,without presenting the fea- ture or subjects' awareness of what was to be learned,"Watanabe said in a statement.Watanabe and colleagues said this method can be a powerful tool."It can'incept' a person to acquire new learning, skills,or memory,or possibly to restore skills or knowledge that has been damaged through accident,disease,or aging,without a person's awareness of what is learned or memorized,"they write.Which of the following statements is true of the experiment participants?A:They learned how to control MRL machines in the experiment.B:They were not told what to be learned in the experiment.C:They were paid to take part in the experiment.D:They were not cooperative in the experiment.
考题
资料：Faces, like fingerprints, are unique. Did you ever wonder how it possible for us to recognize people? Even a skilled writer probably could not describe all the features that make one face different from another. Yet a very young child or even an animal, such as a pingeon can learm to recognize faces. We all take this ability for granted.
We also tell people apart by how they behave. When we talk about someone’s personality, we mean the ways in which he or she acts, speaks, thinks and feels that make that individual different from others.
Like the human face human personality is very complex. But describing someone’s peronality in words is somewhat easier than describing his face. If you were asked to describe what a nice face looked like, you probably would have a difficult time doing so. But if you were asked to describe a nice person, you might begin to think about someone who was kind, considerate friendly, warm, and so forth.
There are many words to describe how a person thinks, feels and acts. Gordon Allports, an American psychologist, found nearly18,000 English words characterizing differences in people’s behavior. And many of us use this information as a basis for describing or typing, his personality. Bookworms, conservatives, military types——people are described with such terms.
People have always tried to type each other. Actors in early Greek drama wore masks to show the audience whether they played the villain’s or the hero’s role. In fact, the words person and persoality come from the Latin persona, meaning mask. Today, most television and movie actors do not wear masks. But we can easily tell the good guys from the bad guys because the two types differ in appearance as well as in actions.
What is the main idea of this passage?A.How to describe people’s personatities
B.How to distinguish people’s faces
C.How to distinguish people both inward and outward
D.How to differ good people from bad people
考题
资料：Faces, like fingerprints, are unique. Did you ever wonder how it possible for us to recognize people? Even a skilled writer probably could not describe all the features that make one face different from another. Yet a very young child or even an animal, such as a pingeon can learm to recognize faces. We all take this ability for granted.
We also tell people apart by how they behave. When we talk about someone’s personality, we mean the ways in which he or she acts, speaks, thinks and feels that make that individual different from others.
Like the human face human personality is very complex. But describing someone’s peronality in words is somewhat easier than describing his face. If you were asked to describe what a nice face looked like, you probably would have a difficult time doing so. But if you were asked to describe a nice person, you might begin to think about someone who was kind, considerate friendly, warm, and so forth.
There are many words to describe how a person thinks, feels and acts. Gordon Allports, an American psychologist, found nearly18,000 English words characterizing differences in people’s behavior. And many of us use this information as a basis for describing or typing, his personality. Bookworms, conservatives, military types——people are described with such terms.
People have always tried to type each other. Actors in early Greek drama wore masks to show the audience whether they played the villain’s or the hero’s role. In fact, the words person and persoality come from the Latin persona, meaning mask. Today, most television and movie actors do not wear masks. But we can easily tell the good guys from the bad guys because the two types differ in appearance as well as in actions.
The author is most probably a_______
A.psychologist
B.behaviorist
C.writer
D.sociologist
考题
共用题干
第二篇When Our Eyes Serve Our StomachOur senses aren't just delivering a strict view of what'5 going on in the world;they're affected by what's going on in our heads.A new study finds that hungry people see food-related words more clearly than people who'ye just eaten.Psychologists have known for decades that what’。going on inside our heads affects our senses.For example, poorer children think coins are larger than they are,and hungry people think pictures of food are brighter. Remi Radel of University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted to investigate how this happens.Does it happen right away as the brain receives signals from the eyes or a little later as the brain's high-level thinkingprocesses get involved?Radel recruited 42 students with a normal body mass（质量）index.On the day of his or her test,each student was told to arrive at the lab at noon after three or four hours of not eating.Then they were told there was a delay.Some were told to come back in 10 minutes;others were given an hour to get lunch first.So half the students were hungry when they did the experiment and the other half had just eaten.For the experiment, the participant looked at a computer screen.One by one,80 words flashed on the screen for about 1/300th of a second each.They flashed at so small a size that the studentsc o111d only con- sciously perceive - A quarter of the words were food-related.After each word,each person was asked how bright the word was and asked to choose which of two words they'd seen一a food-related word like cake or a neutral（中性的）word like boat. Each word appeared too briefly for the participant to really read it.Hungry people saw the food-related words as brighter and were better at identifying food-related words. Because the word appeared too quickly for them to be reliably seen,this means that the difference is in per-ception,not in thinking processes,Radel says."This is something great to me.Humans can really perceive what they need or what they strive（奋斗） for. From the experiment, I know that our brain can really be at the disposal（处理）of our motives（动机）and needs,"Radel says.Radel's experiment discovered that hungry people_______.A:were more sensitive to food-related words than stomach-full peopleB:were better at identifying neutral wordsC:were always thinking of food-related wordsD:saw every word more clearly than stomach-full people
考题
共用题干
第二篇When Our Eyes Serve Our StomachOur senses aren't just delivering a strict view of what'5 going on in the world;they're affected by what's going on in our heads.A new study finds that hungry people see food-related words more clearly than people who'ye just eaten.Psychologists have known for decades that what’。going on inside our heads affects our senses.For example, poorer children think coins are larger than they are,and hungry people think pictures of food are brighter. Remi Radel of University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis,France,wanted to investigate how this happens.Does it happen right away as the brain receives signals from the eyes or a little later as the brain's high-level thinkingprocesses get involved?Radel recruited 42 students with a normal body mass（质量）index.On the day of his or her test,each student was told to arrive at the lab at noon after three or four hours of not eating.Then they were told there was a delay.Some were told to come back in 10 minutes;others were given an hour to get lunch first.So half the students were hungry when they did the experiment and the other half had just eaten.For the experiment, the participant looked at a computer screen.One by one,80 words flashed on the screen for about 1/300th of a second each.They flashed at so small a size that the studentsc o111d only con- sciously perceive - A quarter of the words were food-related.After each word,each person was asked how bright the word was and asked to choose which of two words they'd seen一a food-related word like cake or a neutral（中性的）word like boat. Each word appeared too briefly for the participant to really read it.Hungry people saw the food-related words as brighter and were better at identifying food-related words. Because the word appeared too quickly for them to be reliably seen,this means that the difference is in per-ception,not in thinking processes,Radel says."This is something great to me.Humans can really perceive what they need or what they strive（奋斗） for. From the experiment, I know that our brain can really be at the disposal（处理）of our motives（动机）and needs,"Radel says.There was a delay in Radel's experiment because______.A:he needed more students to joinB:he didn't prepare enough food for the 42 studentsC:he wanted two groups of participants,hungry and non-hungryD:he didn't want to have the experiment at noon
考题
Which of the following is NOT said in the passage A.Wolfe‘s students praised Wolfe’s power of observation.
B.The author made an experiment on Wolfe‘s ability.
C.Wolfe‘s students asked the author to have a test of their ability.
D.Wolfe did not feel angry when he was tested.
考题
单选题We learn from the passage that _____.A
Chuck’s students are not clever enoughB
the students didn’t do Chuck’s homeworkC
Chuck Wall is an unusual teacherD
no students enjoyed Chuck’s homework
考题
单选题Wang’s zeal was contagious; soon all his fellow students were busily making posters, inspired by his ardent enthusiasm for the cause.A
eager B
enthusiasm C
zealot D
fanatic
考题
单选题The main idea of the second paragraph shows us ______.A
some examples of shooting in US schoolsB
the American’s feelingC
some famous schoolsD
that some teachers were killed by students
考题
单选题Which of the following is TRUE?A
In the 1920s, women were limited to being teachers, nurses or office workers.B
Women mainly paid their attention to how they were paid in the 1960s.C
Women asked to change “all men are created equal” into “all human beings are created equal”.D
No states have ever provided women with jobs in the government.
考题
单选题What’s happened in August?A
Four students were killed in the bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta.B
Four students were deported from Jakarta.C
The Marriott Hotel in Jakarta was bombed by terrorists.D
Four students participated in the Jakarta bombing.
考题
单选题What does “old traditions” in the last sentence of the passage refer to?A
Most of the north-eastern institutions were set up for both male and female students.B
Most of the north-eastern institutions enrolled only men students or women students before the 1960s.C
A lot of institutions in the north-east refused to enroll more students before the 1960s.D
Many institutions in the north-east have the same reputation as Harvard or Yale.
考题
单选题A
Write their lab reports.B
Find out Professor Smith’s schedule.C
Interview some high school students.D
Finish their chemistry experiment.
热门标签
最新试卷