四川省考生:ACCA准考证打印流程是怎么样的呢?
发布时间:2020-01-10
2020已经快要过去两个周啦,报名了2020年3月份ACCA考试的同学们快看过来,51题库考试学习网提醒各位同学:考前两周即可登录ACCA官网打印准考证了,那究竟操作流程是怎么样的呢? 且随51题库考试学习网继续往下看吧~
温馨提示一下初次备考ACCA考试的萌新,因为最新的ACCA考试相关政策暂未发布,所以本文的打印流程是借鉴往年的打印流程介绍,今年具体的情况还是要以官网为准哟
教程如下:
一.登录 MYACCA, 点击 Docket ,进入下一步
二.之后进入到第二个界面,点击 Access your docket
三. 进入第三个界面,财华学员选择第三个选项 Distance/Online learning,之后的 Learning Provider 下 拉 选 择 Beijing Caihuahongyuan
International Education Co.LId(Distance Learning)
其他学员根据自己的情况选填:
Full time
-face to face(classroom):全职-面对面(课堂)
Full time
-face to face(classroom):兼职-面对面(课堂)
Distance/online
learning blended learning:远程/在线学习混合学习
revision
course self-study:自学
四.之后点击 SAVE&CONFIRM 进行下载即可。
注意,面授和网课学习的同学按各自不同情况进行选择哦
以面授学员为例:
1.在‘Method of Study"选项选择"Part time -face to
face(classroom):兼职-面对面(课堂)
2.在‘’Country‘’选项选择默认项“China”,
3.在‘’Learning provider‘’选择“Shanghai Golden Finance”,别忘了在最后的小方框上点一个“√”
点击SAVE & CONFIRM,系统就就会自动跳转下载准考证啦!(远程网课学员或其他分校学员请按自身情况自行选择learning provider~)
注:
*Full
time -face to face(classroom):全职-面对面(课堂)
*Part
time -face to face(classroom):兼职-面对面(课堂)
*Distance/online
learning blended learning:远程/在线学习混合学习
*revision
course self-study:自学
ACCA考生参加考试时请务必携带好身份证(或护照)和准考证!!
准考证打印的注意事项:
1.ACCA准考证无需彩印,黑白打印即可;当然如果你希望准考证更美观,可以彩打。
2.按照规定ACCA准考证需双面打印,在一张A4纸上面。
3.准考证可以多打几张,以免丢失。
4.不要等到临考前才打印准考证,官网有时候会拥挤或犯病,所以提前打印为好。
以上信息就是关于ACCA国际注册会计师考试的准考证的打印相关流程,51题库考试学习网最后提醒一下大家,准考证必须有照片,准考证上面没有照片的学员请尽快与ACCA 英国方联系。
俗话说,有志者事竟成,备考ACCA考试的各位同学们,加油~
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
3 The directors of The Healthy Eating Group (HEG), a successful restaurant chain, which commenced trading in 1998,
have decided to enter the sandwich market in Homeland, its country of operation. It has set up a separate operation
under the name of Healthy Sandwiches Co (HSC). A management team for HSC has been recruited via a recruitment
consultancy which specialises in food sector appointments. Homeland has very high unemployment and the vast
majority of its workforce has no experience in a food manufacturing environment. HSC will commence trading on
1 January 2008.
The following information is available:
(1) HSC has agreed to make and supply sandwiches to agreed recipes for the Superior Food Group (SFG) which
owns a chain of supermarkets in all towns and cities within Homeland. SFG insists that it selects the suppliers
of the ingredients that are used in making the sandwiches it sells and therefore HSC would be unable to reduce
the costs of the ingredients used in the sandwiches. HSC will be the sole supplier for SFG.
(2) The number of sandwiches sold per year in Homeland is 625 million. SFG has a market share of 4%.
(3) The average selling price of all sandwiches sold by SFG is $2·40. SFG wishes to make a mark-up of 331/3% on
all sandwiches sold. 90% of all sandwiches sold by SFG are sold before 2 pm each day. The majority of the
remaining 10% are sold after 8 pm. It is the intention that all sandwiches are sold on the day that they are
delivered into SFG’s supermarkets.
(4) The finance director of HSC has estimated that the average cost of ingredients per sandwich is $0·70. All
sandwiches are made by hand.
(5) Packaging and labelling costs amount to $0·15 per sandwich.
(6) Fixed overheads have been estimated to amount to $5,401,000 per annum. Note that fixed overheads include
all wages and salaries costs as all employees are subject to fixed term employment contracts.
(7) Distribution costs are expected to amount to 8% of HSC’s revenue.
(8) The finance director of HSC has stated that he believes the target sales margin of 32% can be achieved, although
he is concerned about the effect that an increase in the cost of all ingredients would have on the forecast profits
(assuming that all other revenue/cost data remains unchanged).
(9) The existing management information system of HEG was purchased at the time that HEG commenced trading.
The directors are now considering investing in an enterprise resource planning system (ERPS).
Required:
(a) Using only the above information, show how the finance director of HSC reached his conclusion regarding
the expected sales margin and also state whether he was correct to be concerned about an increase in the
price of ingredients. (5 marks)
(c) In October 2004, Volcan commenced the development of a site in a valley of ‘outstanding natural beauty’ on
which to build a retail ‘megastore’ and warehouse in late 2005. Local government planning permission for the
development, which was received in April 2005, requires that three 100-year-old trees within the valley be
preserved and the surrounding valley be restored in 2006. Additions to property, plant and equipment during
the year include $4·4 million for the estimated cost of site restoration. This estimate includes a provision of
$0·4 million for the relocation of the 100-year-old trees.
In March 2005 the trees were chopped down to make way for a car park. A fine of $20,000 per tree was paid
to the local government in May 2005. (7 marks)
Required:
For each of the above issues:
(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and
(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,
in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Volcan for the year ended
31 March 2005.
NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
(c) Site restoration
(i) Matters
■ The provision for site restoration represents nearly 2·5% of total assets and is therefore material if it is not
warranted.
■ The estimated cost of restoring the site is a cost directly attributable to the initial measurement of the tangible fixed
asset to the extent that it is recognised as a provision under IAS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets’ (IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’).
■ A provision should not be recognised for site restoration unless it meets the definition of a liability, i.e:
– a present obligation;
– arising from past events;
– the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits.
■ The provision is overstated by nearly $0·34m since Volcan is not obliged to relocate the trees and de facto has
only an obligation of $60,000 as at 31 March 2005 (being the penalty for having felled them). When considered
in isolation, this overstatement is immaterial (representing only 0·2% of total assets and 3·6% of PBT).
■ It seems that even if there are local government regulations calling for site restoration there is no obligation unless
the penalties for non-compliance are prohibitive (unlike the fines for the trees).
■ It is unlikely that commencement of site development has given rise to a constructive obligation, since past actions
(disregarding the preservation of the trees) must dispel any expectation that Volcan will honour any pledge to
restore the valley.
■ Whether commencing development of the site, and destroying the trees, conflicts with any statement of socioenvironmental
responsibility in the annual report.
(ii) Audit evidence
■ A copy of the planning application and permission granted setting out the penalties for non-compliance.
■ Payment of $60,000 to local government in May 2005 agreed to the bank statement.
■ The present value calculation of the future cash expenditure making up the $4·0m provision.
Tutorial note: Evidence supporting the calculation of $0·4m is irrelevant as there is no liability to be provided for.
■ Agreement that the pre-tax discount rate used reflects current market assessments of the time value of money (as
for (a)).
■ Asset inspection at the site as at 31 March 2005.
■ Any contracts entered into which might confirm or dispute management’s intentions to restore the site. For
example, whether plant hire (bulldozers, etc) covers only the period over which the warehouse will be constructed
– or whether it extends to the period in which the valley would be ‘made good’.
(c) Outline the problems with references. (7 marks)
(15 marks)
Part (c)
There can be significant problems with references, these include the fact that most referees are well known to the applicant and
hesitate to say anything critical. However, the more skilful reference reader learns to look for what is conspicuous by omission
although there is always the risk that the writer merely forgot.
Often there are glowing tributes designed to aid the candidate on their way and some can be too ambiguous to be useful.
It is also important to note that references are poor predictors of future performance, are time consuming for the referee and the
subsequent reader. A particular problem is that employers who want to rid themselves of unsatisfactory employees could write an
enthusiastic reference, or at best one which leaves a lot unsaid.
However, care should be taken when providing references. Potentially, there can be legal consequences if a reference is misleading
or misrepresents the person for whom the reference is provided.
In addition, problems can arise when references are sought too early in the recruitment process and therefore breach confidentiality.
6 Charles and Jane Miro, aged 31 and 34 years respectively, have been married for ten years and have two children
aged six and eight years. Charles is a teacher but for the last five years he has stayed at home to look after their
children. Jane works as a translator for Speak Write Ltd.
Speak Write Ltd was formed and began trading on 6 April 2006. It provides translation services to universities. Jane,
who ceased employment with Barnham University to found the company, owns 100% of its ordinary share capital
and is its only employee.
Speak Write Ltd has translated documents for four different universities since it began trading. Its biggest client is
Barnham University which represents 70% of the company’s gross income. It is estimated that the company’s gross
fee income for its first 12 months of trading will be £110,000. Speak Write Ltd usually agrees fixed fees in advance
with its clients although it charges for some projects by reference to the number of days taken to do the work. None
of the universities makes any payment to Speak Write Ltd in respect of Jane being on holiday or sick.
All of the universities insist that Jane does the work herself. Jane carries out the work for three of the universities in
her office at home using a computer and specialised software owned by Speak Write Ltd. The work she does for
Barnham University is done in the university’s library on one of its computers as the documents concerned are too
delicate to move.
The first set of accounts for Speak Write Ltd will be drawn up for the year ending 5 April 2007. It is estimated that
the company’s tax adjusted trading profit for this period will be £52,500. This figure is after deducting Jane’s salary
of £4,000 per month and the related national insurance contributions but before any adjustments required by the
application of the personal service companies (IR 35) legislation. The company has no other sources of income or
capital gains.
Jane has not entered into any communication with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) with respect to the company
and wants to know:
– When the corporation tax computation should be submitted and when the tax is due.
– When the corporation tax computation can be regarded as having been agreed by HMRC.
Charles and Jane have requested a meeting to discuss the family’s finances. In particular, they wish to consider the
shortfall in the family’s annual income and any other related issues if Jane were to die. Their mortgage is covered
by a term assurance policy but neither of them have made any pension contributions or carried out any other long
term financial planning.
Jane has estimated that her annual after tax income from Speak Write Ltd, on the assumption that she extracts all of
the company’s profits, will be £58,000. Charles owns two investment properties that together generate after tax
income of £8,500. He estimates that he could earn £28,000 after tax if he were to return to work.
The couple’s annual surplus income, after payment of all household expenditure including mortgage payments of
£900 per month, is £21,000. Charles and Jane have no other sources of income.
Required:
(a) Write a letter to Jane setting out:
(i) the arguments that HMRC could put forward, based only on the facts set out above, in support of
applying the IR 35 legislation to Speak Write Ltd; and
(ii) the additional income tax and national insurance contributions that would be payable, together with
their due date of payment, if HMRC applied the IR 35 legislation to all of the company’s income in
2006/07. (11 marks)
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-08-14
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-09-04
- 2020-08-14
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-08-14
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-01
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-09-04
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-01
- 2020-09-04
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-08-15
- 2021-04-09
- 2020-01-10