考研国家线已公布!2020年复试如何安排?复试会不会取消?

发布时间:2020-02-12


2020年4月14日对于考研的学生来说是特殊的一天,因为他们等了很久的国家线终于公布了,考研国家线是学生进入复试成绩的最低要求。所以要想进入复试或者调剂就必须得先达到考研国家线,其次看是否达到要考的学校划定的分数线。现在国家线公布了,意味着接下来就要进行复试了,那复试会不会取消?

显而易见答案是肯定的,复试不会取消,因为复试是研究生考试的重要组成部分。通过初试,我们只能了解一个学生的答题水平和对初试题目的掌握情况,却无法衡量一个学生的综合素质和面试临场表现。所以复试是考研过程中一个不可缺少的环节。今年的复试比较特殊,要考虑三个方面的因素。第一个方面:受疫情影响,必须要考虑考生以及老师还有其他在面试环节需要帮忙的工作人员的安全,要采取有效措施,提前做好准备,面对突发情况,也要做好应急预案,确保考生以及相关涉考人员的安全。第二个方面:要考虑公平性,不管是现场面试还是采取其他面试方式,要采取各种措施,一定要确保公平。第三个方面:要确保科学性,严格规定复试相关要求和考核标准,要保证招生质量。既然复试不会取消,而且要考虑诸多因素,那具体会怎么安排呢?

首先对于复试时间,教育部要求4月底前各个高校不得组织复试,具体的复试时间由各个学校根据当地的疫情防控情况决定。其次是复试方式的安排,今年的复试跟往年不一样,不是统一的现场面试,而是各个学校根据具体情况选择面试方式,可以选择的面试方式有现场面试、网络远程面试以及异地现场面试,或者可以委托其他高校帮忙面试。

根据疫情情况,各个学校需要选择最优的复试方式。如果选择网络远程面试,很多同学都会担心网络远程面试的公平性问题,所以对于网络远程面试有三个步骤安排,分别是考前、考中和考后,考前要运用一系列措施核对学生的身份问题,比如对比学籍学历库,人脸识别等,考试中大家用的平台都是统一的,考生的面试顺序随机抽取,面试的导师也是随机抽取,复试试题也不例外,也是随机抽取。不要以为面试完复试通过就万事大吉了,考后,也就是在开学后的三个月内,学校还会对所有通过的学生全面进行复查,一旦复查不合格,就要取消学籍,所以即使复试结束,也不能掉以轻心,要为复查做好准备。

2020年考研的战线拉得太长了,很多学生都被折磨得疲惫不堪。如今,国家线公布了,过没过国家线大家也都知道了。复试安排大家心里也大概有数了。接下来,大家要做的就是判定自己能不能进面试,如果可以进面试,现在要抓紧时间准备面试,不要因为复试方式不确定而整天担忧导致影响复习效果,不管采取何种面试方式,大家都一样要面对,不要想太多,安心复习才是重中之重。如果进不了面试,不管是要找工作还是参加其他考试或者二战,一定要调整好心态,好好做规划,不要因为一次的失败而气馁。如果不确定自己是不是可以进面试,则要做好两手准备。

最后预祝大家可以考入自己心中理想的大学或者找到自己心仪的工作。希望各位在以后遇事不要慌,做事不要慌,事事做成!!!



下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

唯物史观认为.人的本质是(  )
A.永恒不变的
B.可随主观意志而任意改变的
C.随着社会关系的变化而变化的
D.随着个性的改变而改变的

答案:C
解析:
本题考查的是对人的本质具体内容的理解和把握.唯物史观认为,人的本质在其现实性上是一切社关系的总和.但是人的本质不是“永恒不变的”,它“随着社会关系的变化而变化”,而不能“随主观意志而任意改变”,更不能“随着个性的改变而改变”.所以C项是正确答案.

奥苏伯尔将先行组织者作为一种教学策略,它是指

A.一种学习材料
B.帮助学生学习的教师
C.组织的学生活动
D.帮助学生学习的学生
答案:A
解析:
先行组织者是先于学习任务本身呈现的一种引导性学习材料,当学生不具备同化新知识的原有认知结构时向学生呈现,帮助学生同化新的知识。它具有的特点是能清晰地与认知结构中原有的观念和新的学习任务关联。

The government is under renewed pressure to implement a"radical rethink"of apprenticeships after a near 27%fall in the number taking up trainee posts in the last quarter of 2017.The number starting apprenticeships dropped t0 114,000 between August and October,down from 155,700 in the same period in 2016.That followed a 59%drop in the prevrous three months after the introduction of the apprenticeship levy in April last year.Critics say employers are being deterred from creating apprenticeship posts because of the increased costs and complexity of the new scheme.Businesses with a payroll of more than£3m are charged 0.s%of their payroll towards the apprenticeship levy.A fifth of training must be carried out away from the workplace and employers with 50 0r more staff must contribute 10%of the cost.Seamus Nevin,head of policy research at the Institute of Directors(IoD),said the government risked failing to meet its target of 3 million people starting apprenticeships by 2020."Clearly the new system has failed to take off,"he said."The levy can be difficult to navigate and many employers still struggle to comprehend how the system is meant to work."Fhe IoD said more than one in 10 0f its mostly smaller company members paying the levy now viewed it as an extra tax and could no longer afford to offer any apprenticeships.The government is no longer fully funding apprenticeships,particularly for young people.The cuts have been heavily criticised.Mark Dawe of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers said:"For a government committed to improving social mobility,ministers have to be really concerned about the continued drop in starts for both young people and at lower levels."Verity Davidge,head of education and skills policy at EEF,the manufacturers'organisation,said:"Today's figures should act as a wake-up call to government which has failed to act on industry's growing concerns around the apprenticeship levy.This worrying trend is not just hampering employers'ability to get the skills their business needs,it is taking away invaluable opportunities for the next generation to undertake training and secure a future job.It is clear the apprenticeship levy and wider reforms aren't working and need a radical rethink."Neil Carberry,managing director of people policy at the CBI,said it wanted the levy to evolve into a"flexible skills levy"that would fund a broader array of training courses."Today's drop in apprenticeship starts remains alarming and proves again that the apprenticeship levy isn't yet working for businesses,apprentices and the economy.A fresh approach is needed to make skills reforms work,"he said.Anne Milton,the minister for apprenticeships and skills,said:"The last year has been a period of significant change.It will take time for employers to adjust.But we must not lose sight of why we introduced our reforms in the first place-to put quality at the heart of this programme,and put control in the hands of employers."Workers'rights groups have suggested that the number of apprenticeship starts is falling because the levy is weeding out the use of low-quality apprenticeships.They believe employers were offering minimal training as a way to source cheap labour,because the minimum wage for apprentices is below the national minimum wage.The Unite union has raised concerns about the lowesi grade of apprenticeships and whether they are beneficial.



Verity Davidge

A.worried that the fall in apprenticeships would be unfavourable to the next generation.
B.emphasized that the apprenticeship levy was designed to increase the quality of apprenticeships and place control in employers hands.
C.said that the apprenticeship levy was too high for most companles to pay.
D.pointed out that the apprenticeship levy did not work well and would deter the government from hitting its 2020 apprenticeship target
E.believed that apprentices were being treated as cheap labour and not getting quality training on the job.
F.indicated that increased levy flexibility was vital for businesses to fund a wider range of training.
G.held that apprenticeships for young people and at lower levels would be an engine of social mobility
答案:A
解析:
根据题干Verity Davidge定位至第七段。本段第二句他指出学徒人数下降的负面影响:不仅在当下阻碍雇主获得其经营所需的劳动技能.更将在未来剥夺下一代获得培训和工作的宝贵机会.A.概括指出学徒人数下降对下一代的负面影响.为正确项。

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。