研究生的考试流程是什么?限制年龄报考吗?四川省

某国大选在即,国际政治专家陈研究员预测:选举结果或者是甲党控制政府,或者是乙党控制政府。如果甲党赢得对政府的控制权,该国将出现经济问题;如果乙党赢得对政府的控制权,该国将陷入军事危机。根据陈研究员上述预测,可以得出以下哪项?

A.该国可能不会出现经济问题也不会陷入军事危机
B.如果该国出现经济问题,那么甲党赢得了对政府的控制权
C.该国将出现经济问题,或者将陷入军事危机
D.如果该国陷入了军事危机,那么乙党赢得了对政府的控制权
E.如果该国出现了经济问题并且险入了军事危机,那么甲党与乙党均赢得了对政府的控制权

Text 2 America rarely looks to Brussels for guidance.Commercial freedom appeals more than governmental control.But when it comes to data privacy,the case for copying the best bits of the European Union's approach is compelling.The General Data Protection Regulation（GDPR）is due to come into force next month.It is rules-heavy and has its flaws,but its premise that consumers should be in charge of their personal data is the right one.The law lets users gain access to,and to correct,information that firms hold on them.It gives consumers the right to transfer their data to another organisation.It requires companies to define how they keep data secure.And it lets regulators levy big fines if firms break the rules.America has enacted privacy rules in areas such as health care.But it has never passed an overarching data-protection law.The failings of America's self-regulatory approach are becoming clearer by the week.Large parts of the online economy are fuelled by data that consumers spray around without thought.Companies'mysterious privacy policies obscure what they do with their users'information,which often amounts to pretty much anything they please.Facebook is embroiled in crisis after news that data on 87m users had been passed to a political-campaign firm.These are changing the calculus about the benefits of self-regulation.Opponents of privacy legislation have long argued that the imposition of rules would keep technology companies from innovating.Yet as trust leaks out of the system,innovation is likely to suffer.If consumers worry about what smartphone apps may do with their data,fewer new offerings will take off.It is striking that many of the firms preparing for the GDPR's arrival in Europe are excited that the law has forced them to put their data house in order.The need to minimise legal fragmentation only adds to the case for America to adopt bits of the GDPR.One reason behind the new rules in the EU was to harmonise data-protection laws so that firms can do business across Europe more easily.America is moving in the opposite direction.States that have detected a need for greater privacy are drafting their own laws.California has pending legislation that would establish a data-protection authority to regulate how the state's big tech firms use Californians'personal data.The GDPR is far from perfect.At nearly 100 articles long,it is too complex and tries to achieve too many things.The compliance costs for smaller firms,in particular,look burdensome.But these are arguments for using it as a template,not for ignoring the issue of data protection.If America continues on today's path,it will fail to protect the privacy of its citizens and long-term health of its firms.America's data economy has thrived so far with hardly any rules.That era is over.
Which of the following is true,according to Paragraph 5?

A.The GDPR may result in fragmentation of international law.
B.America is restricting its firms from doing business in Europe.
C.American states have detected a need for greater data privacy.
D.California is considering legislation to protect personal data.

北洋政府时期，采用资产阶级三权分立宪法原则的宪法文件(草案)是（　　）。
A.“五五宪草”
B.《中华民国临时约法》
C.“天坛宪草”
D.“段记宪草”

一贯煎治疗肝郁胁痛，体现的治法是（　　）
A.培土抑水
B.培土生金
C.滋水涵木
D.补火生土
E.抑木扶土