网友您好, 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:

题目内容 (请给出正确答案)

Structural unemployment 结构性失业


参考答案

更多 “Structural unemployment 结构性失业” 相关考题
考题 Frictional unemployment 磨擦性失业

考题 Structural unemployment 结构性失业

考题 Voluntary unemployment 自愿失业

考题 充分就业是指经济中只存在()A、摩擦性失业和季节性失业B、摩擦性失业和结构性失业C、结构性失业和季节性失业D、需求不足行失业

考题 由于经济中结构性因素例如产业结构变化,产业开放造成的失业称为( )。A.季节性失业B。摩擦性失业C.结构性失业D,周期性失业

考题 自愿失业的形式包括( )。A.周期性失业B.摩擦性失业C.结构性失业D.需求不足型失业E.非结构性失业

考题 What can be done about mass unemployment All the wise heads agree:there’re no quick or any answers.There’s work to be done,but workers aren’t ready to do it.They’re in the wrong places,or they have the wrong skills.Our problem are “structural,”and will take many years to solve. But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.There isn’t any.On the contrary,all the facts suggest that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand.Saying that there’re no easy answers sounds wise, but it’s actually foolish:our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will to act.In other words,structural unemployment is a fake problem,which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions.The fact is job openings have plunged in every major sector,while the number of workers forced into part-time employment in almost all industries has soared.Unemployment has surged in every major occupational category.Only three states,with a combined population not much larger than that of Brooklyn,have unemployment rates below 5%.So the evidence contradicts the claim that we’re mainly suffering from structural unemployment.Why,then,has this claim become so popular Part of the answer is that this is what always happens during periods of high unemployment-in part because experts and analysts believe that declaring the problem the problem deeply rooted,with no easy answers,makes them sound serious.I’ve been looking at what self-proclaimed experts were saying about unemployment during the Great Depression;it was almost identical to what Very Serious People are saying now.Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly,declared one 1935 analysis,because the workforce is“unadaptable and untrained”.I cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may offer.A few years later,a large defense buildup finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy’s needs anD.suddenly industry was eager to employ those“unadaptable and untrained”workers.But now,as then,powerful forces are ideologically opposed to the whole idea of government action on a sufficient scale to jump-start the economy.And that, fundamentally,is why claims that we face huge structural problems have been multiplying:they offer a reason to do nothing about the mass unemployment that is crippling our economy and our society. So what you need to know is that there's no evidence whatsoever to back these claims.We aren't suffering from a shortage of needed skills;we’re suffering from a lack of policy resolve.As I said,structural unemployment isn’t real problem, it's an excuse-a reason not to act on America’s problems at a time when action is desperately needed. What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage 《》()A.To testify to the experts’analysis of America’s problems. B.To offer a feasible solution to the structural unemployment. C.To show the urgent need for the government to take action. D.To alert American workers to the urgency for adaptation.

考题 What can be done about mass unemployment All the wise heads agree:there’re no quick or any answers.There’s work to be done,but workers aren’t ready to do it.They’re in the wrong places,or they have the wrong skills.Our problem are “structural,”and will take many years to solve. But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.There isn’t any.On the contrary,all the facts suggest that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand.Saying that there’re no easy answers sounds wise, but it’s actually foolish:our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will to act.In other words,structural unemployment is a fake problem,which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions.The fact is job openings have plunged in every major sector,while the number of workers forced into part-time employment in almost all industries has soared.Unemployment has surged in every major occupational category.Only three states,with a combined population not much larger than that of Brooklyn,have unemployment rates below 5%.So the evidence contradicts the claim that we’re mainly suffering from structural unemployment.Why,then,has this claim become so popular Part of the answer is that this is what always happens during periods of high unemployment-in part because experts and analysts believe that declaring the problem the problem deeply rooted,with no easy answers,makes them sound serious.I’ve been looking at what self-proclaimed experts were saying about unemployment during the Great Depression;it was almost identical to what Very Serious People are saying now.Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly,declared one 1935 analysis,because the workforce is“unadaptable and untrained”.I cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may offer.A few years later,a large defense buildup finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy’s needs anD.suddenly industry was eager to employ those“unadaptable and untrained”workers.But now,as then,powerful forces are ideologically opposed to the whole idea of government action on a sufficient scale to jump-start the economy.And that, fundamentally,is why claims that we face huge structural problems have been multiplying:they offer a reason to do nothing about the mass unemployment that is crippling our economy and our society. So what you need to know is that there's no evidence whatsoever to back these claims.We aren't suffering from a shortage of needed skills;we’re suffering from a lack of policy resolve.As I said,structural unemployment isn’t real problem, it's an excuse-a reason not to act on America’s problems at a time when action is desperately needed. What does the author think of the expert’s claim concerning unemployment 《》()A.Self-evident. B.Thought-provoking. C.Irrational D.Groundless.

考题 What can be done about mass unemployment All the wise heads agree:there’re no quick or any answers.There’s work to be done,but workers aren’t ready to do it.They’re in the wrong places,or they have the wrong skills.Our problem are “structural,”and will take many years to solve. But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.There isn’t any.On the contrary,all the facts suggest that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand.Saying that there’re no easy answers sounds wise, but it’s actually foolish:our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will to act.In other words,structural unemployment is a fake problem,which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions.The fact is job openings have plunged in every major sector,while the number of workers forced into part-time employment in almost all industries has soared.Unemployment has surged in every major occupational category.Only three states,with a combined population not much larger than that of Brooklyn,have unemployment rates below 5%.So the evidence contradicts the claim that we’re mainly suffering from structural unemployment.Why,then,has this claim become so popular Part of the answer is that this is what always happens during periods of high unemployment-in part because experts and analysts believe that declaring the problem the problem deeply rooted,with no easy answers,makes them sound serious.I’ve been looking at what self-proclaimed experts were saying about unemployment during the Great Depression;it was almost identical to what Very Serious People are saying now.Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly,declared one 1935 analysis,because the workforce is“unadaptable and untrained”.I cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may offer.A few years later,a large defense buildup finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy’s needs anD.suddenly industry was eager to employ those“unadaptable and untrained”workers.But now,as then,powerful forces are ideologically opposed to the whole idea of government action on a sufficient scale to jump-start the economy.And that, fundamentally,is why claims that we face huge structural problems have been multiplying:they offer a reason to do nothing about the mass unemployment that is crippling our economy and our society. So what you need to know is that there's no evidence whatsoever to back these claims.We aren't suffering from a shortage of needed skills;we’re suffering from a lack of policy resolve.As I said,structural unemployment isn’t real problem, it's an excuse-a reason not to act on America’s problems at a time when action is desperately needed. What does the author say helped bring unemployment during the Great Depression 《》()A.The booming defense industry. B.The wise heads’benefit package. C.Nationwide training of workers. D.Thorough restructuring of industries.

考题 What can be done about mass unemployment All the wise heads agree:there’re no quick or any answers.There’s work to be done,but workers aren’t ready to do it.They’re in the wrong places,or they have the wrong skills.Our problem are “structural,”and will take many years to solve. But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.There isn’t any.On the contrary,all the facts suggest that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand.Saying that there’re no easy answers sounds wise, but it’s actually foolish:our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will to act.In other words,structural unemployment is a fake problem,which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions.The fact is job openings have plunged in every major sector,while the number of workers forced into part-time employment in almost all industries has soared.Unemployment has surged in every major occupational category.Only three states,with a combined population not much larger than that of Brooklyn,have unemployment rates below 5%.So the evidence contradicts the claim that we’re mainly suffering from structural unemployment.Why,then,has this claim become so popular Part of the answer is that this is what always happens during periods of high unemployment-in part because experts and analysts believe that declaring the problem the problem deeply rooted,with no easy answers,makes them sound serious.I’ve been looking at what self-proclaimed experts were saying about unemployment during the Great Depression;it was almost identical to what Very Serious People are saying now.Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly,declared one 1935 analysis,because the workforce is“unadaptable and untrained”.I cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may offer.A few years later,a large defense buildup finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy’s needs anD.suddenly industry was eager to employ those“unadaptable and untrained”workers.But now,as then,powerful forces are ideologically opposed to the whole idea of government action on a sufficient scale to jump-start the economy.And that, fundamentally,is why claims that we face huge structural problems have been multiplying:they offer a reason to do nothing about the mass unemployment that is crippling our economy and our society. So what you need to know is that there's no evidence whatsoever to back these claims.We aren't suffering from a shortage of needed skills;we’re suffering from a lack of policy resolve.As I said,structural unemployment isn’t real problem, it's an excuse-a reason not to act on America’s problems at a time when action is desperately needed. What has caused claims of huge structural problems to multiply 《》()A.Powerful opposition to government’s stimulus efforts. B.Very Serious People’s attempt to cripple the economy. C.Evidence gathered from many sectors of the industries. D.Economists’failure to detect the problem in time.

考题 东北振兴政策出台前东北地区城市人口失业的主要原因是()A:摩擦性失业 B:贫困性失业 C:结构性失业 D:结构性失业和摩擦性失业

考题 举例说明什么是结构性失业?我们应该怎样治理结构性失业?

考题 工人不愿意结构现有的报酬或劳动条件,自愿放弃失业,是()。A、自愿性失业B、非自愿性失业C、结构性失业D、非结构性失业

考题 Unemployment 失业

考题 失业的类型一般分为()。A、摩擦性失业、结构性失业、周期性失业B、摩擦性失业、地区性失业,自然性失业C、技术性失业、地区性失业,周期性失业D、技术性失业,结构性失业、自然性失业

考题 自然失业率或者不可避免的总失业率,等于()。A、周期性失业B、摩擦性失业C、结构性失业D、摩擦性失业加上结构性失业

考题 摩擦性失业和结构性失业都属于自然失业。

考题 由于经济中结构性因素例如产业结构变化、产业开放造成的失业称为()。A、季节性失业B、摩擦性失业C、结构性失业D、周期性失业

考题 自愿失业包括摩擦性失业和结构性失业。

考题 单选题根据失业的原因,可以将失业分为(  )。A 摩擦性失业、结构性失业、非自愿失业B 摩擦性失业、自愿失业、周期性失业C 摩擦性失业、结构性失业、周期性失业D 摩擦性失业、非自愿失业、周期性失业

考题 名词解释题Voluntary unemployment 自愿失业

考题 单选题自然失业率是指()。A 周期性失业率;B 摩擦性失业率;C 结构性失业率;D 摩擦性失业和结构性失业造成的失业率

考题 单选题自然失业率或者不可避免的总失业率,等于()。A 周期性失业B 摩擦性失业C 结构性失业D 摩擦性失业加上结构性失业

考题 名词解释题Structural unemployment 结构性失业

考题 名词解释题Unemployment 失业

考题 单选题解雇的提前通知有助于降低()A 摩擦性失业B 结构性失业C 周期性失业和摩擦性失业D 摩擦性失业和结构性失业

考题 单选题小王辞职后到深圳1个月没找到工作,小张因在雪糕厂工作冬季在家玩2个月。小王和小张的失业分别属于()。A 结构性失业,季节性失业B 摩擦性失业,结构性失业C 摩擦性失业,季节性失业D 结构性失业,技术性失业

考题 单选题充分就业是指经济中只存在()。A 摩擦性失业和季节性失业B 摩擦性失业和结构性失业C 结构性失业和季节性失业D 需求不足行失业