网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
填空题
国家中医药管理局（State Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration，STCMA）是卫生部管理的主管（）的行政机构，于（）正式成立。
参考答案
参考解析
解析：
暂无解析
更多 “填空题国家中医药管理局（State Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration，STCMA）是卫生部管理的主管（）的行政机构，于（）正式成立。” 相关考题
考题
The Chinese government took ____ the administration of Hong Kong from Britain on July 1, 1997.
A.upB.downC.afterD.over
考题
The ad is mainly intended to .A. encourage the British to travel in ChinaB. attract the British to traditional Chinese foodC. offer service of booking air tickets to touristsD. provide the British with a better understanding of China.
考题
Can you tell me the difference between traditional Chinese medicine and_ w__________ medicine?
考题
In order to (56) foreign exchange administration, maintain strong balance of payments position, China (57) the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Administration on January 29,1996. The State Administration of Foreign Exchange is the agency responsible for foreign exchange administration. The SAFE has a similar branch structure with that of the People's Bank of China, China's central bank. The Bank of China (58) the principal foreign exchange bank. Other banks and financial institutions, (59) affiliates of non-resident banks, (60) designed transactions with the approval of the SAFE.(41)A．developB．improveC．changeD．conduct
考题
For traditional Chinese painters, fame and fortune come late, and it is ( )for artists to hold their first exhibitions when they are over seventy years old.A、hardly commonB、less frequentC、not unheard ofD、just usual
考题
The traditional , primary relationship in a Chinese family is usually that between_____.
A、husband and wifeB、father and childrenC、parents and childrenD、teacher and students
考题
Traditional chinese medical doctors usually ________ illnesses by first looking at the color of the patient’s tongue and face.
A.stutterB.adoptC.diagnoseD.tailor
考题
The principles of Traditional Chinese Medicine best illustrate _________ of Chinese people.
A.the synthetic way of thinkingB.the analytic way of thinkingC. the concrete way of thinkingD.the abstract way of thinking
考题
After the SSP being checked by a duly authorized officials of a port State, whom should be reported to by the ship immediately?A.Port StateB.Flag stateC.The CSOD.The Administration
考题
Yourcompanyhastwooffices.AllserversrunWindowsServer2003ServicePack2(SP2).Therelevantportionofthenetworkisconfiguredasshownintheexhibit.(ClicktheExhibitbutton.)wwwwww...EExxxaammkkkiiinngggsss...cccoomm|English|Chinese(Traditional)|Chinese(Simplified)|-8-ExamKingsInformationCo.,Ltd.Allrightsreserved.YouneedtoensurethatServer1cancommunicatewithWebserversontheInternet.WhichdefaultgatewayshouldyouassigntoServer1?（）A.10.10.10.129B.10.10.11.1C.131.107.1.1D.192.168.1.1
考题
Youhaveastand-aloneserverthatrunsWindowsServer2003ServicePack2(SP2).wwwwww...EExxxaammkkkiiinngggsss...cccoomm|English|Chinese(Traditional)|Chinese(Simplified)|-7-ExamKingsInformationCo.,Ltd.Allrightsreserved.YouruntheRunascommandandreceivethefollowingerrormessage:1058:Theservicecannotbestarted,eitherbecauseitisdisabledorhasnoenableddevicesassociatedwithit.”YouneedtoensurethatyoucanuseRunassuccessfully.Whatshouldyoudo?（）A.EnabletheRemoteRegistryservice.B.EnabletheSecondaryLogonservice.C.JointheservertoanActiveDirectorydomain.D.FromDeviceManager,scanforhardwarechanges.
考题
II．完形填空． (20分)What is the best way to study? This is a very ．important question． Some Chinese students often (11) very hard for long hours． It is a (12) habit, but it is not a better way to study．An efficient（讲率的） student must (13) enough sleep, enough food and enough rest． Ev-ery week you (14) to go out for a walk or visit some friends or some nice places． It's good (15) your study． When you return to your studies, you'll find yourself (16) than before and you'll learn more．Maybe we can ( 17) that learning English is (18) taking Chinese medicine． We don't mean that it ,s bitter(苦的)． We mean that like Chinese medicine, the efficiency of your study (19) slowly but surely． ( 20) slowly but surely every day and effects will come just like Chinese medicine．( )11．A．playB．studyC．sleepD．think
考题
______ means the Government of the State whose flag the ship is entitled to fly.A.AssemblyB.OrganizationC.CompanyD.Administration
考题
The port State control officer or the surveyor authorized by the port State Administration must be aware that ______ may be carried on product carriers．A.category A substancesB.crude oilC.certain“oil like”noxious liquid substancesD.category B，C and D substances
考题
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition ActsA.violated the Constitution.
B.undermined the states’interests.
C.supported the federal statute.
D.stood in favor of the states.
考题
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?A.Federal officers’duty to withhold immigrants’information.
B.States’independence from federal immigration law.
C.States’legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
D.Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
考题
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
What can be learned from the last paragraph?A.Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
B.Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
C.Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
D.The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
考题
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because theyA.deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
B.disturbed the power balance between different states.
C.overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
D.contradicted both the federal and state policies.
考题
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to“establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately“occupied the field”and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as“a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect,the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim
The White House claims that its power of enforcementA.outweighs that held by the states.
B.is dependent on the states’support.
C.is established by federal statutes.
D.rarely goes against state laws.
考题
资料：之后，经济学家Mr.W谈了谈对中国的一些看法，请根据下列资料回答问题。
China is an emerging economic giant with almost endless potential for business opportunities. Guan xi-meaning “connections” or “relationship”-is a Chinese way of doing business and is practically considered an art form there. It involves exchanging “favors” when you need something done. Many Chinese business people see it as a way to solidify relationships, get things done, and cultivate well-being.
To Westerners, however, it often looks more like graft in the form of bribery, nepotism, gift giving, and kickbacks. Transparency international, a German-based corruption watchdog, ranks China along with India, Russia, Turkey, Malaysia, and South Africa as the countries with the most rampant corruption.
However, China is cracking down by enacting stricter anticorruption laws and prosecuting violators. In 2007, China’s former director of the State Food and Drug Administration was executed for taking bribes.
What’s the tone of the passage?（ ）A.positive
B.sarcastic
C.skeptical
D.objective
考题
The Chinese medicine eventually cured her disease.A:fortunately
B:apparently
C:finally
D:naturally
考题
单选题The port State control officer or the surveyor authorized by the port State Administration must be aware that（）may be carried on product carriers.A
category A substancesB
crude oilC
certain“oil like”noxious liquid substancesD
category B,C and D substances
考题
单选题Taipei is a city of many faces, ________ you can experience a typical urban lifestyle and understand the traditional spirit of Chinese culture.A
howB
whenC
whereD
why
考题
问答题练习3 The traditional Chinese hospitality requires food diversity, so that guests will be full before eating up all the dishes. A typical Chinese banquet menu includes cold dishes served at the beginning, followed by hot dishes, such as meat, poultry, vegetables, etc. At most banquets, the whole fish is considered to be essential, unless various Kinds of seafood have been served already. Today, Chinese people would like to combine Western specialties with traditional Chinese dishes. Therefore, it is not rare to see steak being served as well. Salad is gaining popularity, although traditionally the Chinese people generally do not eat any food without cooking. There is usually at least a bowl of soup, served at the beginning or in the end of the dinner party. Desserts and fruit usually mark the end of the feast.
考题
填空题国家中医药管理局（State Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration，STCMA）是卫生部管理的主管（）的行政机构，于（）正式成立。
考题
单选题In deciding to detain a ship or not, the PSCO would better not（）A
make his decision independentlyB
request the owner’s representative to provide proposalsC
cooperate with the flag State Administration’s representativesD
consult the organization responsible for issuing the relevant certificates
热门标签
最新试卷