网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
I think animals should be treated as friends.
A:suspect
B:doubt
C:assure
D:maintain
B:doubt
C:assure
D:maintain
参考答案
参考解析
解析：本题考查的是对动词的认知。这句话的意思是：我认为应该把动物当朋友看待。选项A suspect怀疑（某人犯有过错）；选项B doubt怀疑（不会发生、是假的）；选项C assure向……保证、担保；选项D maintain主张。think和maintain意思最接近，所以选D0
更多 “I think animals should be treated as friends.A:suspect B:doubt C:assure D:maintain” 相关考题
考题
–What do you think I should do?–().
A、I don’t know.B、That’s not my business.C、You must talk with him.D、You’d better talk with him.
考题
－－－ You should have listened carefully.－－－I had hoped to, but I didn’t think what the speaker was saying made any ____
A.valueB.funC.useD.sense
考题
Which do you think would be the best title for this passage?A． Work to give women a fair pay deal.B． Time to change the situation.C． Equal work, equal pay.D． Should women be treated as second-class citizens
考题
There is no light in the room.I think he ( ) in.
A、should not beB、mustn't have beenC、mustn't beD、can’t be
考题
I don't think that I shall fail.But if I(), I would try again.
A、should failB、would failC、failedD、had failed
考题
I think we should let Mary to go camping with her boyfriend. ______ she is a big girl now.A、Above allB、First of allC、For allD、After all
考题
— How do you think I should receive the reporter? — How you feel about him, try to be polite.()
考题
Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET II. ( 10 points)Do animals have rights.'? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground clearing way to start. 46) Actually, it isn't, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 47) Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—4or instance to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations.In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it, how do you reply to somebody who says "I don' t like this contract" ?The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 48 ) It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consider- ation humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?Many deny it. 49) Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.This view which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely "logical". In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is right to reject it. The most elementary form. of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others' interests against one's own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 50)When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind' s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.46.____________________
考题
Which do you think would be the best title for this passage? ( )A． Work to give women a fair pay dealB． Time to change the situationC． Equal work, equal payD． Should women be treated as second-class citizens
考题
Decide on the correct stress pattern of the answer to the question: When shall we go to school?A.I think we should leave at seven o'clock.
B.I think we should leave at seven o'clock.
C.I think we should leave at seven o'clock.
D.I think we should leave at seven o'clock.
考题
I should think it over before I（ ）on such a hazardous project.A.commence
B.start
C.begin
D.embark
考题
He has made another wonderful discovery，__________of great importance to science．A.which I think is
B.which I think it is
C.I think which is
D.ofwhich I think it iS
考题
——Whose advice do you think I should take?
——__________.A.That’s OK
B.You are fight
C.It’s up to you
D.It’s a secret
考题
I think a good star should ___________ love his or her own county.A.at all
B.in all
C.first of all
D.after all
考题
Your article is well written,but I think you should__________it again.A.go off
B.go by
C.go over
D.go against
考题
问答题The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other her humans. But the most elementary form of moral reasoning is to weigh others’ interests against one’s own. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. When that happens, it is not a mistake, it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
考题
单选题—My parents and I will go to London for a trip tomorrow.—Really?A
I don’t think soB
Have a good timeC
That’s very strangeD
You should try it
考题
单选题I think you should end it ______ it is too late, or you will be sorry for it.A
beforeB
afterC
so thatD
because
考题
单选题Some sick people think of themselves as broken machines, which suggested that ______.A
modem doctors should treat their patients as machinesB
the level of the treatment was greatly improvedC
they thought they were useless just like broken machinesD
they were not satisfied with the manner in which doctors treated them
考题
单选题I honestly don't want to paint the room this weekend, but I think we should get it _____ with.A
inB
offC
overD
on
考题
问答题Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. 1) Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have. On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 2) Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it, how do you reply to somebody who says “I don’t like this contract”? The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 3) It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all? Many deny it. 4) Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans. This view which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely “logical.” In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others’ interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 5) When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
考题
单选题—Doctor, it seems _____ you like to work with animals.—Yes, I think animals should _____ as our friends.A
that; regardB
that; be regardedC
what; regardD
what; be regarded
热门标签
最新试卷
