看看有你所在的新疆有上榜吗——ACCA中国考点分布城市
发布时间:2020-01-08
还有两个多月的时间就又要迎来新的一季ACCA考试了。备考的ACCAer们准备的怎么样了呢?虽然现在看似时间还算充足,但除去周末和春节假日,给大家复习的时间其实已经不算太多了。因此,51题库考试学习网建议有参加3月份考试的ACCAer们现在开始可以着手准备啦!什么?你竟然不知道考试地点在哪里?不用担心,51题库考试学习网会为大家解决这个问题,快来看看离家近不近呢?由于目前2020年3月份的ACCA考试地点暂未公布,大家可以参考一下往年的考试地址,根据考试时间和地点提前做好相应的安排,避免考试迟到:
北京考点
I998北京广播电视大学
海淀区大钟寺东路5号北京广播电视大学4号教学楼(北三环大钟寺古钟博物馆往北500米)
I837首都经济贸易大学红庙校区
北京朝阳门外红庙金台里2号4号教学楼
I866北京市教育考试指导中心
北京市安定门外外馆东街23号
河北考点
I769保定
河北省保定市恒祥北大街3188号河北金融学院东门教学楼C区1楼071051
上海考点
I987上海东北
上海开放大学(主校区),国顺路288号
I997上海西南
好望角大饭店,肇嘉浜路500号;青松城大酒店,肇嘉浜路777号
I844上海浦东
上海海事大学(东明路校区),东明路1336号
I849松江
上海市松江区文翔路1900号上海对外贸易学院松江校区
长沙考点地址:
I900长沙考点
湖南大众传媒职业技术学院南院,湖南省长沙市新建西路77号湖南大众传媒职业技术学院新教学楼
重庆考点
I893重庆
具体地址目前待定,届时会在您的准考证中直接显示
成都考点
I803成都市人才培训中心(成都市人事考试中心),四川省成都市中南大街56号,
I803四川大学出国留学人员培训部,四川省成都市科华北路(川大西门)
以上就是关于ACCA考试的部分考点地址,希望对你备考ACCA的你有所帮助。最后,51题库考试学习网祝福ACCAer们旗开得胜,相信自己,加油~
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(ii) The percentage change in revenue, total costs and net assets during the year ended 31 May 2008 that
would have been required in order to have achieved a target ROI of 20% by the Beetown centre. Your
answer should consider each of these three variables in isolation. State any assumptions that you make.
(6 marks)
(ii) The ROI of Beetown is currently 13·96%. In order to obtain an ROI of 20%, operating profit would need to increase to
(20% x $3,160,000) = $632,000, based on the current level of net assets. Three alternative ways in which a target
ROI of 20% could be achieved for the Beetown centre are as follows:
(1) Attempts could be made to increase revenue by attracting more clients while keeping invested capital and operating
profit per $ of revenue constant. Revenue would have to increase to $2,361,644, assuming that the current level
of profitability is maintained and fixed costs remain unchanged. The current rate of contribution to revenue is
$2,100,000 – $567,000 = $1,533,000/$2,100,000 = 73%. Operating profit needs to increase by $191,000
in order to achieve an ROI of 20%. Therefore, revenue needs to increase by $191,000/0·73 = $261,644 =
12·46%.
(2) Attempts could be made to decrease the level of operating costs by, for example, increasing the efficiency of
maintenance operations. This would have the effect of increasing operating profit per $ of revenue. This would
require that revenue and invested capital were kept constant. Total operating costs would need to fall by $191,000
in order to obtain an ROI of 20%. This represents a percentage decrease of 191,000/1,659,000 = 11·5%. If fixed
costs were truly fixed, then variable costs would need to fall to a level of $376,000, which represents a decrease
of 33·7%.
(3) Attempts could be made to decrease the net asset base of HFG by, for example, reducing debtor balances and/or
increasing creditor balances, while keeping turnover and operating profit per $ of revenue constant. Net assets
would need to fall to a level of ($441,000/0·2) = $2,205,000, which represents a percentage decrease
amounting to $3,160,000 – $2,205,000 = 955,000/3,160,000 = 30·2%.
4 At an academic conference, a debate took place on the implementation of corporate governance practices in
developing countries. Professor James West from North America argued that one of the key needs for developing
countries was to implement rigorous systems of corporate governance to underpin investor confidence in businesses
in those countries. If they did not, he warned, there would be no lasting economic growth as potential foreign inward
investors would be discouraged from investing.
In reply, Professor Amy Leroi, herself from a developing country, reported that many developing countries are
discussing these issues at governmental level. One issue, she said, was about whether to adopt a rules-based or a
principles-based approach. She pointed to evidence highlighting a reduced number of small and medium sized initial
public offerings in New York compared to significant growth in London. She suggested that this change could be
attributed to the costs of complying with Sarbanes-Oxley in the United States and that over-regulation would be the
last thing that a developing country would need. She concluded that a principles-based approach, such as in the
United Kingdom, was preferable for developing countries.
Professor Leroi drew attention to an important section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to illustrate her point. The key
requirement of that section was to externally report on – and have attested (verified) – internal controls. This was, she
argued, far too ambitious for small and medium companies that tended to dominate the economies of developing
countries.
Professor West countered by saying that whilst Sarbanes-Oxley may have had some problems, it remained the case
that it regulated corporate governance in the ‘largest and most successful economy in the world’. He said that rules
will sometimes be hard to follow but that is no reason to abandon them in favour of what he referred to as ‘softer’
approaches.
(a) There are arguments for both rules and principles-based approaches to corporate governance.
Required:
(i) Describe the essential features of a rules-based approach to corporate governance; (3 marks)
(a) (i) Describe rules-based
In a rules-based jurisdiction, corporate governance provisions are legally binding and enforceable in law.
Non-compliance is punishable by fines or ultimately (in extremis) by delisting and director prosecutions.
There is limited latitude for interpretation of the provisions to match individual circumstances (‘one size fits all’). Some
have described this as a ‘box ticking’ exercise as companies seek to comply despite some provisions applying to their
individual circumstances more than others.
Investor confidence is underpinned by the quality of the legislation rather than the degree of compliance (which will be
total for the most part).
(b) (i) State the condition that would need to be satisfied for the exercise of Paul’s share options in Memphis
plc to be exempt from income tax and the tax implications if this condition is not satisfied.
(2 marks)
(b) (i) Paul has options in an HMRC approved share scheme. Under such schemes, no tax liabilities arise either on the grant
or exercise of the option. The excess of the proceeds over the price paid for the shares (the exercise price) is charged to
capital gains tax on their disposal.
However, in order to secure this treatment, one of the conditions to be satisfied is that the options cannot be exercised
within three years of the date of grant. If Paul were to exercise his options now (i.e. before the third anniversary of the
grant), the exercise would instead be treated as an unapproved exercise. At that date, income tax would be charged on
the difference between the market value of the shares on exercise and the price paid to exercise the option.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-04-24
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-08-13
- 2020-02-23
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-27
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-13
- 2020-09-03
- 2020-02-28
- 2020-02-27
- 2021-01-13
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-01
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-05-06
- 2020-02-27
- 2021-01-13
- 2020-09-03
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-03-28
- 2021-04-22
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-16