ACCA小白看过来,教你如何注册ACCA!

发布时间:2020-04-10


2020ACCA考试一直是备注瞩目,ACCA是含金量很高的证书,因此吸引了一大批想要报考的在校生和已就业人员。已经参加过ACCA的同学对注册信息了如指掌,那ACCA小白该如何报考呢?本次51题库考试学习网为大家提供了详细的ACCA报名条件信息,一起来看一下吧!

报名注册ACCA学员,具备以下条件之一即可:

1、教育部认可的高等院校在校生(本科在校),顺利完成大一的课程考试,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

2、凡具有教育部承认的大专以上学历,即可报名成为ACCA的正式学员;

3、未符合12项报名资格的申请者,年满16周岁的可以先申请参加FIA(Foundations in Accountancy)基础财务资格考试。在完成FAB(基础商业会计)FMA(基础管理会计)FFA(基础财务会计)3门课程后,可以豁免ACCAF1-F3三门课程的考试,直接进入ACCA技能课程的考试。

了解到自己是否能参加ACCA考试之后,满足条件的同学还需要知道相关的注册流程,今天51题库考试学习网带大家熟悉一下注册流程。

一、注册报名。

1、准备注册相关材料。

2、在全球官方网站进行注册。

1)上传注册资料扫描文件;

2)将纸质注册资料递交至ACCA代表处。

3、注册费用。

采用线上传资料方式的必须在线支付。

4、查询注册进度。

1)线上完成全部注册约2周;

2)纸质注册约6周。

5、下面介绍一下学生所需准备的注册材料。

1)中英文在校证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件)

2)中英文成绩单(均需为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)

3)中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)

二、注册时间。

ACCA考试注册报名没有时间要求,但是注册时间早,考试时间就早。注册完成后必须在官方考试报名截止前获得审核,审核通过后才可以参加考试报名。

三、注册费用缴纳。

ACCA的注册费、年费、考试费用支持双币信用卡及银联及支付宝付款。

四、信息变更。

注册后您的通讯地址、EMAIL地址及手机号码如果发生变更,请您登录ACCA英文官方网站和中文官方网站MY ACCA,及时在线更新。特别提醒,为了方便英国总部与您联系,电话一项请您最好提供有效的手机号码,避免不必要的麻烦。

以上就是51题库考试学习网带来的资讯,ACCA小白再也不用担心注册问题了,赶紧操作起来吧!更多相关资讯请关注51题库考试学习网。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

5 All managers need to understand the importance of motivation in the workplace.

Required:

(a) Explain the ‘content theory’ of motivation. (5 marks)

正确答案:
5 The way in which managers treat their employees can significantly influence the satisfaction that the employees derive from their work and thus the overall success of the organisation. Understanding the importance of motivation is therefore an important management skill.
(a) Content theories address the question ‘What are the things that motivate people?’
Content theories are also called need theories (because they concentrate on the needs fulfilled by work) and are based on the notion that all human beings have a set of needs or required outcomes, and according to this theory, these needs can be satisfied through work. The theory focuses on what arouses, maintains and regulates good, directed behaviour and what specific individual forces motivate people. However, content theories assume that everyone responds to motivating factors in the same way and that consequently there is one, best way to motivate everybody.

4 The country of Europia has an extensive historical and industrial heritage. It has many tourist sites (such as castles,

palaces, temples, houses and factories) which attract visitors from home and abroad. Most of these tourist sites have

gift shops where visitors can buy mementos and souvenirs of their visit. These souvenirs often include cups, saucers,

plates and other items which feature a printed image of the particular tourist site.

The Universal Pottery Company (UPC) is the main supplier of these pottery souvenir items to the tourist trade. It

produces the items in its potteries and then applies the appropriate image using specialised image printing machines.

UPC also supplies other organisations that require personalised products. For example, it recently won the right to

produce souvenirs for the Eurasian Games, which are being held in Europia in two years time. UPC currently ships

about 250,000 items of pottery out of its factory every month. Most of these items are shipped in relatively small

packages. All collections from the factory and deliveries to customers are made by a nationwide courier company.

In the last two years there has been a noticeable increase in the number of complaints about the quality of these

items. The complaints, from gift shop owners, concentrate on two main issues:

(i) The physical condition of goods when they arrive at the gift shop. Initial evidence suggests that ‘a significant

number of products are now arriving broken, chipped or cracked’. These items are unusable and they have to be

returned to UPC. UPC management are convinced that the increased breakages are due to packers not following

the correct packing method.

(ii) Incorrect alignment of the image of the tourist site on the selected item. For example, a recent batch of 100 cups

for Carish Castle included 10 cups where the image of the castle sloped significantly from left to right. These

were returned by the customer and destroyed by UPC.

The image problem was investigated in more depth and it was discovered that approximately 500 items were

delivered every month with misaligned images. Each item costs, on average, $20 to produce.

As a result of these complaints, UPC appointed a small quality inspection team who were asked to inspect one in

every 20 packages for correct packaging and correct image alignment. However, although some problems have been

found, a significant number of defective products have still been delivered to customers. A director of UPC used this

evidence to support his assertion that the ‘quality inspection team is just not working’.

The payment system for packers has also been such an issue. It was established ten years ago as an attempt to boost

productivity. Packers receive a bonus for packing more than a target number of packages per hour. Hence, packers

are more concerned with the speed of packing rather than its quality.

Finally, there is also evidence that to achieve agreed customer deadlines, certain managers have asked the quality

inspection team to overlook defective items so that order deadlines could be met.

The company has decided to review the quality issue again. The director who claimed that the quality inspection team

is not working has suggested using a Six Sigma approach to the company’s quality problems.

Required:

(a) Analyse the current and potential role of quality, quality control and quality assurance at UPC. (15 marks)

正确答案:
(a) Quality
Quality has become an increasingly important issue in organisations. For some companies it is an important differentiator,
allowing the organisation to pursue a high price/high quality strategy. For other organisations, such as UPC, the quality
threshold requirements for their products have increased significantly over the last few years. Customers have increased
expectations of product construction, longevity and reliability. Quality is rarely absolute; and it is usually constrained by such
factors as selling price. This particularly applies in UPC’s market where it is likely that the quality of the product is limited by
the relatively low price consumers are willing to pay for it. Quality concerns how a product meets its designed purpose and
satisfies its original requirements. The target selling price is likely to be one of those requirements.
At UPC quality appears to be defined in terms of the physical condition of the products (no breakages, cracks or chips) and
in the accurate positioning of the printed image on the product. These are the reasons given by the UPC management for
setting up the inspection team. However, this perception of quality would have to be confirmed by the customer. It may be
that other issues, such as the density of the printed image, are also important to the customer but have not yet been fed back
to UPC.
Many definitions of quality include references to the customer. They stress meeting the requirements of the customer or user
of the product. UPC might benefit from re-considering who it perceives to be the customer. Their current perception appears
to be that the customer is the gift shop that sells the product. It is not the ultimate person or consumer who buys the product
from the shop and uses it. For this consumer, other issues may be significant such as:
– The ability to wash the item in a dishwasher.
– The long-term safety of the product, for example: the handle does not break off a cup and spill its content on the drinker.
– The long-term clarity of the image on the item after many washes.
Investigating the issue of quality from the perspective of the consumer may identify other problems that need addressing.
Finally, quality has to be considered in the context of responsibility. UPC currently uses a courier company to deliver its
products to the gift shops. This means that freedom from breakage is only partly under UPC’s control. The delivery condition
of products is partly determined by the care with which the courier company handles the package. Hence delivery quality
depends on courier performance as well as on packaging care. In contrast, the quality of the printed image on the item is
completely within the control of UPC.
Quality control
Quality Control (QC) is primarily concerned with checking and reviewing work that has been done. It is an inspection system
for ensuring that pre-determined quality standards are being met. In theory, the responsibility for the control of quality lies
with the person undertaking the process, whether it is the production of goods, delivery of a service or the passing of
information. QC is the part of quality management focused on fulfilling quality requirements.
In many quality control systems, sample products are removed and inspected. Defects in these sampled products may lead
to the whole batch being inspected and defective items destroyed. This is essentially the role of the inspection team at UPC,
where 1 in 20 packed packages are inspected for accuracy of printing and correctness of packing. Incorrect packing in a
sampled package will lead to the inspection (and potential re-packing) of all packages packed by that employee. Failure in
the accuracy of the printed image is likely to lead to the destruction of the whole batch, and the re-setting of the production
imaging machine to address the positional inaccuracy of the image. It has to be stressed that, in this instance, quality control
is a sampling activity and so it is very likely that defective batches will get through to the customer. To criticise the inspection
unit for failing to find defective batches (‘the quality inspection team is just not working’) fails to recognise the sampling nature
of the role.

In the context of UPC there are at least three further factors that inhibit effective quality control.
– The quality control of the positioning of the image takes place too late in the process. It should take place before packing,
not after it. Valuable packing time and materials can be wasted by packing items with defective images which are found
when the package is inspected.
– The reward system for packers is based on the throughput of packages rather than the quality of packing. In the past
many manufacturing organisations have valued productivity more than quality and reflected this in their reward system.
This is the case at UPC where faults in packing are not reflected in the reward system of the packers. In fact, the very
opposite appears to be true. Packers are incentivised to pack quickly, not effectively. Beckford suggests that ‘a major
barrier to quality may be built into the reward system of the organisation’.
– There is evidence that the inspection team has participated in the achievement of the required throughput targets by
passing packages that did not meet the required quality. This is clearly giving the wrong message, but the inspection
team is only reflecting the need for the company to meet certain deadlines.
Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance (QA) is the part of quality management focused on providing confidence that quality requirements will be
fulfilled. It may be defined as a set of procedures designed to ensure that quality standards and processes are adhered to and
that the final product meets or exceeds the required technical and performance requirements. Quality assurance covers
activities such as product design, development, production, installation and servicing. It also sets the pre-determined
standards required for effective quality control. If quality control is primarily concerned with detecting defective products, then
quality assurance is primarily about the prevention of quality problems through planned and systematic activities.
There is little evidence of quality assurance at UPC. However, the company may wish to consider:
– Setting quality targets and delegating responsibility for achieving those targets to the people who are meant to achieve
them. In UPC it would be preferable to give responsibility for product quality to the employees who actually make the
products and to reflect this in their reward structure. One of the roles of QA is to enable quality improvement initiatives.
A possible initiative is to investigate the purchasing of imaging machines (or adopting the current ones) with a facility
to automatically assess the accuracy of the image before printing. If the image falls outside certain tolerances then it
may be feasible for the machine to automatically adjust it before printing. If these machines were installed, it would be
the responsibility of QA to ensure that they were calibrated correctly and to verify that every product had undergone the
necessary check.
– QA also offers quality advice and expertise and trains employees in quality matters. They would set standards for
materials used in packing and establish systems for monitoring raw materials sent by suppliers to ensure that these
standards were met. It may also be possible to improve how items are physically laid out in the package to reduce the
chance of damage. The internal layout of the packages may be constructed in such a way that they only allow products
to be packed in a prescribed pattern. QA would be involved in defining that prescribed pattern and training packers to
use it – as well as subsequently monitoring that the prescribed pattern had been followed.
– The increased importance of quality means that many customers now demand some proof that the supplier is capable
of consistently producing quality products. This proof is part of the ‘confidence’ factor of QA and may be demonstrated
by a third party certification, such as ISO 9000. Certification helps show the customer that the supplier has a
commitment to consistently supplying a quality product. QA will be concerned with gaining and maintaining such
certification and this should assist the company in securing and retaining contracts.
At UPC the current inspection team is focused on QC. The responsibility for this should be moved to the production process
itself or to the people who actually undertake that process. The inspection team could then focus on QA, setting standards
for quality, establishing how those standards should be monitored, and then ensuring that such monitoring is being
performed. In making this transition, the company will move to a culture of attempting to prevent faults rather than relyingsolely on detecting them.

3 Assume that today’s date is 10 May 2005.

You have recently been approached by Fred Flop. Fred is the managing director and 100% shareholder of Flop

Limited, a UK trading company with one wholly owned subsidiary. Both companies have a 31 March year-end.

Fred informs you that he is experiencing problems in dealing with aspects of his company tax returns. The company

accountant has been unable to keep up to date with matters, and Fred also believes that mistakes have been made

in the past. Fred needs assistance and tells you the following:

Year ended 31 March 2003

The corporation tax return for this period was not submitted until 2 November 2004, and corporation tax of £123,500

was paid at the same time. Profits chargeable to corporation tax were stated as £704,300.

A formal notice (CT203) requiring the company to file a self-assessment corporation tax return (dated 1 February

2004) had been received by the company on 4 February 2004.

A detailed examination of the accounts and tax computation has revealed the following.

– Computer equipment totalling £50,000 had been expensed in the accounts. No adjustment has been made in

the tax computation.

– A provision of £10,000 was made for repairs, but there is no evidence of supporting information.

– Legal and professional fees totalling £46,500 were allowed in full without any explanation. Fred has

subsequently produced the following analysis:

Analysis of legal & professional fees

Legal fees on a failed attempt to secure a trading loan 15,000

Debt collection agency fees 12,800

Obtaining planning consent for building extension 15,700

Accountant’s fees for preparing accounts 14,000

Legal fees relating to a trade dispute 19,000

– No enquiry has yet been raised by the Inland Revenue.

– Flop Ltd was a large company in terms of the Companies Act definition for the year in question.

– Flop Ltd had taxable profits of £595,000 in the previous year.

Year ended 31 March 2004

The corporation tax return has not yet been submitted for this year. The accounts are late and nearing completion,

with only one change still to be made. A notice requiring the company to file a self-assessment corporation tax return

(CT203) dated 27 July 2004 was received on 1 August 2004. No corporation tax has yet been paid.

1 – The computation currently shows profits chargeable to corporation tax of £815,000 before accounting

adjustments, and any adjustments for prior years.

– A company owing Flop Ltd £50,000 (excluding VAT) has gone into liquidation, and it is unlikely that any of this

money will be paid. The money has been outstanding since 3 September 2003, and the bad debt will need to

be included in the accounts.

1 Fred also believes there are problems in relation to the company’s VAT administration. The VAT return for the quarter

ended 31 March 2005 was submitted on 5 May 2005, and VAT of £24,000 was paid at the same time. The previous

return to 31 December 2004 was also submitted late. In addition, no account has been made for the VAT on the bad

debt. The VAT return for 30 June 2005 may also be late. Fred estimates the VAT liability for that quarter to be £8,250.

Required:

(a) (i) Calculate the revised corporation tax (CT) payable for the accounting periods ending 31 March 2003

and 2004 respectively. Your answer should include an explanation of the adjustments made as a result

of the information which has now come to light. (7 marks)

(ii) State, giving reasons, the due payment date of the corporation tax (CT) and the filing date of the

corporation tax return for each period, and identify any interest and penalties which may have arisen to

date. (8 marks)

正确答案:

(a) Calculation of corporation tax
Year ended 31 March 2003
Corporation tax payable
There are three adjusting items:.
(i) The computers are capital items, as they have an enduring benefit. These need to be added back in the Schedule D
Case I calculation, and capital allowances claimed instead. The company is not small or medium by Companies Act
definitions and therefore no first year allowances are available. Allowances of £12,500 (50,000 x 25%) can be claimed,
leaving a TWDV of £37,500.
(ii) The provision appears to be general in nature. In addition there is insufficient information to justify the provision and it
should be disallowed until such times as it is released or utilised.
(iii) Costs relating to trading loan relationships are allowable, as are costs relating to the trade (debt collection, trade disputes
and accounting work). Costs relating to capital items (£5,700) are not allowable so will have to be added back.
Total profit chargeable to corporation tax is therefore £704,300 + 50,000 – 12,500 + 10,000 + 5,700 = 757,500. There are two associates, and therefore the 30% tax rate starts at £1,500,000/2 = £750,000. Corporation tax payable is 30% x£757,500 = £227,250.
Payment date
Although the rate of tax is 30% and the company ‘large’, quarterly payments will not apply, as the company was not large in the previous year. The due date for payment of tax is therefore nine months and one day after the end of the tax accounting period (31 March 2003) i.e. 1 January 2004.
Filing date
This is the later of:
– 12 months after the end of the period of account: 31 March 2004
– 3 months after the date of the notice requiring the return 1 May 2004
i.e. 1 May 2004.


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。