2020年ACCA教材可能发生这些变化,速看!它来了!
发布时间:2020-03-01
由于ACCA官方并不编写考试教材(教材是由其他专业教材出版机构出版),因此每年的教材变动情况就是许多学员关心的问题。在新年到来之后,有网友就在网上询问2020年ACCA教材可能发生哪些变化。鉴于此,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来ACCA考试教材的相关信息,以供参考。
通常而言,ACCA教材是每年换一次的,一般7,8月份出。在大纲不换的情况下,每年的教材内容变化不大。2020年的ACCA考试教材内容与去年基本一致。虽然考试教材基本不变,但是ACCA考试教材的配套练习册是半年换一次,2,3月和7,8月,与考试同步。配套练习册每次的变化就是加入上一次考试的试题,并且删除一些以前的试题,总的收录试题数差不多。为了更好地熟悉考试题型,小伙伴们要注意购买当年的ACCA考试配套练习册哦
说完教材,我们再来看看ACCA考试内容变化。ACCA大概四五年换一次大纲,每次大纲转变后有些课可能会被取消,然后有些新的课程会加进去。比如说,2007年底就进行了一次大纲转换,主要的就是2.1取消了,增加了F5-绩效管理以及Core Paper由以前的3.5,3.6,3.7变成了现在的P3,P2,P1,从次序大家就能看出,现在需要先考core paper,后考optional等。也就是ACCA现在实行的考试制度。
值得一提的是,ACCA在2018年就把P1和P3取消了,改为一个新科目SBL,P2改为一个新科目SBR。那么对应的教材练习册都会发生相应的变化。因此,小伙伴们应购买2020年的ACCA考试教材练习册。
以上就是关于ACCA考试教材的相关情况。51题库考试学习网提醒:各版本的ACCA考试教材在编写方式上有一定的不同,因此小伙伴们在购买时要注意选择适合自己的教材版本。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴都能顺利通过。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
15 What journal entry is required to record goods taken from inventory by the owner of a business?
A Debit Drawings
Credit Purchases
B Debit Sales
Credit Drawings
C Debit Drawings
Credit Inventory
D Debit Purchases
Credit Drawings
(iii) How items not dealt with by an IFRS for SMEs should be treated. (5 marks)
(iii) The treatment of items not dealt with by an IFRS for SMEs
IFRSs for SMEs would not necessarily deal with all the recognition and measurement issues facing an entity but the key
issues should revolve around the nature of the recognition, measurement and disclosure of the transactions of SMEs. In
the case where the item is not dealt with by the standards there are three alternatives:
(a) the entity can look to the full IFRS to resolve the issue
(b) management’s judgement can be used with reference to the Framework and consistency with other IFRSs for SMEs
(c) existing practice could be used.
The first approach is more likely to result in greater consistency and comparability. However, this approach may also
increase the burden on SMEs as it can be argued that they are subject to two sets of standards.
An SME may wish to make a disclosure required by a full IFRS which is not required by the SME standard, or a
measurement principle is simplified or exempted in the SME standard, or the IFRS may give a choice between two
measurement options and the SME standard does not allow choice. Thus the issue arises as to whether SMEs should
be able to choose to comply with a full IFRS for some items and SME standards for other items, allowing an SME to
revert to IFRS on a principle by principle basis. The problem which will arise will be a lack of consistency and
comparability of SME financial statements.
(b) What research techniques could Mark use to get an accurate assessment of staff attitudes to the proposed
changes? (8 marks)
(b) As the term internal marketing implies, the methods of ascertaining staff reactions to the proposed growth strategy have close
parallels with the ways you find out about customer reaction to the company or its products. The benefits of taking a
structured research approach are considerable and often firms may prefer that attitude surveys are carried out by outside
consultants in order to improve objectivity and to remove some of the problems with Mark’s power and position. As with
external market research you are looking to see whether staff will ‘buy into’ the proposed strategy and the accurate
measurement of attitudes and consequent behaviour is very important.
Creating the framework for undertaking the research involves defining the issue to be researched – in this case staff attitudes
towards the growth strategy, designing the research methods, including the use of questionnaires and interviews, determining
the sample of staff to be involved, the use or otherwise of focus groups and ways of ensuring the data collected gives an
accurate picture of staff attitudes. The data generated must be analysed and presented to Mark in an appropriate way. How
the insights into staff attitudes are gained through the research is important, as is the communication of the results to the
staff. Mark should be aware that such research will inevitably create expectations among staff and managing those
expectations will be a test of his leadership powers.
(b) While the refrigeration units were undergoing modernisation Lamont outsourced all its cold storage requirements
to Hogg Warehousing Services. At 31 March 2007 it was not possible to physically inspect Lamont’s inventory
held by Hogg due to health and safety requirements preventing unauthorised access to cold storage areas.
Lamont’s management has provided written representation that inventory held at 31 March 2007 was
$10·1 million (2006 – $6·7 million). This amount has been agreed to a costing of Hogg’s monthly return of
quantities held at 31 March 2007. (7 marks)
Required:
For each of the above issues:
(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and
(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,
in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Lamont Co for the year ended
31 March 2007.
NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
(b) Outsourced cold storage
(i) Matters
■ Inventory at 31 March 2007 represents 21% of total assets (10·1/48·0) and is therefore a very material item in the
balance sheet.
■ The value of inventory has increased by 50% though revenue has increased by only 7·5%. Inventory may be
overvalued if no allowance has been made for slow-moving/perished items in accordance with IAS 2 Inventories.
■ Inventory turnover has fallen to 6·6 times per annum (2006 – 9·3 times). This may indicate a build up of
unsaleable items.
Tutorial note: In the absence of cost of sales information, this is calculated on revenue. It may also be expressed
as the number of days sales in inventory, having increased from 39 to 55 days.
■ Inability to inspect inventory may amount to a limitation in scope if the auditor cannot obtain sufficient audit
evidence regarding quantity and its condition. This would result in an ‘except for’ opinion.
■ Although Hogg’s monthly return provides third party documentary evidence concerning the quantity of inventory it
does not provide sufficient evidence with regard to its valuation. Inventory will need to be written down if, for
example, it was contaminated by the leakage (before being moved to Hogg’s cold storage) or defrosted during
transfer.
■ Lamont’s written representation does not provide sufficient evidence regarding the valuation of inventory as
presumably Lamont’s management did not have access to physically inspect it either. If this is the case this may
call into question the value of any other representations made by management.
■ Whether, since the balance sheet date, inventory has been moved back from Hogg’s cold storage to Lamont’s
refrigeration units. If so, a physical inspection and roll-back of the most significant fish lines should have been
undertaken.
Tutorial note: Credit will be awarded for other relevant accounting issues. For example a candidate may question
whether, for example, cold storage costs have been capitalised into the cost of inventory. Or whether inventory moves
on a FIFO basis in deep storage (rather than LIFO).
(ii) Audit evidence
■ A copy of the health and safety regulation preventing the auditor from gaining access to Hogg’s cold storage to
inspect Lamont’s inventory.
■ Analysis of Hogg’s monthly returns and agreement of significant movements to purchase/sales invoices.
■ Analytical procedures such as month-on-month comparison of gross profit percentage and inventory turnover to
identify any trend that may account for the increase in inventory valuation (e.g. if Lamont has purchased
replacement inventory but spoiled items have not been written off).
■ Physical inspection of any inventory in Lamont’s refrigeration units after the balance sheet date to confirm its
condition.
■ An aged-inventory analysis and recalculation of any allowance for slow-moving items.
■ A review of after-date sales invoices for large quantities of fish to confirm that fair value (less costs to sell) exceed
carrying amount.
■ A review of after-date credit notes for any returns of contaminated/perished or otherwise substandard fish.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-03
- 2020-03-11
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-03-12
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-03-01
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-21
- 2020-03-01
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2021-01-16
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-03-11
- 2020-03-12
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-01
- 2020-01-09