速看!ACCA的EPSM 是什么,ACCA道德测试模块又怎么测试呢

发布时间:2020-04-21


ACCA协会为了培养学员高标准的综合职业道德行为,帮助学员在职业生涯和商业领域中取得成功,创新性的提出了道德模块(EPSM)的测试,ACCA道德测试模块是又被称为职业道德与专业技能模块(EPSM)。很多同学对道德模块测试不太了解,今天就跟51题库考试学习网一起来看看吧!

道德测试(EPSM)是测试不是考试,没有次数限制,选择时间也比较自由。在考完FAFM或是13门全部通过后都可以去做题。通过后就代表满足申请OBUMember的其中一个要求了,以后都不用再做。另外由于新模块涵盖内容广泛,培养专业资格以及行业广泛领域里的核心技能,能够为学员创造重要价值。

改版的道德测试模块跟传统的道德测试模块最大的一个不同就是,新版的要收费了!老版是直接做就可以了,但是现在ACCA道德测试模块老版已经完全下线,现在只能通过新版的道德测试模块了!新版ACCA道德测试模块收费60磅,根据汇率的不同500人民币左右上下浮动。

那么,ACCA道德测试模块怎么测试呢?

登录ACCA官网,进入MY ACCA

第一步,选择ETHICS&PROFESSIONALISM会出来两个ethicProfessional Ethics moduleFoundations in Professionalism module

第二步,进入Professional Ethics module,模块包含10个单位,按照数字顺序完成。大约需要1小时至3小时的时间。

另外,针对完成ACCA考试科目前3科的,和未完成ACCA考试科目前3科的还有点区别。未完成前三科,官网可做foundation in professionalism module板块,在myACCA里可以看到。完成前三科的考试之后,官网可做foundation in professionalism moduleprofessional ethics module两板块。

完成ABMAFA+foundation in professionalism module,可获得ACCA商业会计师资格证。完成F阶段9+professional ethics module,可获得ACCA高级商业会计师资格证。

再次强调,ACCA道德模块测试并不会影响你的ACCA任何一门考试科目的正常考试,只是会影响到OBUACCA Member。大概要花3-4小时,做完的部分系统会保存的,不用担心。以后申请OBUMember都需要完成道德模块测试,所以只要你做完了就代表满足申请OBUMember的其中一个要求了。

道德模块的题目和ACCA考试的其他科目一样,都是50分通过。但是没有关系,就算没到50分,也是可以重新进行测试的,直到你通过为止。当然啦,还是建议大家,最好一次性通过考试哦,因为如果第一次没通过重新开始答题的话,是要从头开始答题的哦。

如何确认已经做完提交了?

选择EXAM STATUS&RESULTS,再选择View your status report,可以查看Ethic的进度条。满格就是做完了。完成测试后提交后,大约三天到2周不等,系统会生成证书,到时候可以自行下载打印即可。

好的,以上就是今天51题库考试学习网为大家分享的全部内容,大家清楚了吗?如想了解更多内容,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(d) Additionally Router purchased 60% of the ordinary shares of a radio station, Playtime, a public limited company,

on 31 May 2007. The remaining 40% of the ordinary shares are owned by a competitor company who owns a

substantial number of warrants issued by Playtime which are currently exercisable. If these warrants are

exercised, they will result in Router only owning 35% of the voting shares of Playtime. (4 marks)

Required:

Discuss how the above items should be dealt with in the group financial statements of Router for the year ended

31 May 2007.

正确答案:

(d) IAS27 paragraph 14, ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’, states that warrants that have the potential to give
the holder voting power or reduce another party’s voting power over the financial and operating policies of the issuer should
be considered when existence of control is assessed. The warrants held by the competitor company, if exercised, would grant
that company control over Playtime. One party only can control Playtime and, therefore, the competitor company should
consolidate Playtime. In coming to this decision all the facts and circumstances that affect potential voting rights (except the
intention of management and the financial ability to exercise or convert) should be considered. It seems, however, that there
is a prima facie case for not consolidating Playtime but accounting for it under IAS28 or IAS39.


13 At 1 January 2005 a company had an allowance for receivables of $18,000

At 31 December 2005 the company’s trade receivables were $458,000.

It was decided:

(a) To write off debts totalling $28,000 as irrecoverable;

(b) To adjust the allowance for receivables to the equivalent of 5% of the remaining receivables based on past

experience.

What figure should appear in the company’s income statement for the total of debts written off as irrecoverable

and the movement in the allowance for receivables for the year ended 31 December 2005?

A $49,500

B $31,500

C $32,900

D $50,900

正确答案:B
430,000 x 5% = 21,500 – 18,000 + 28,000

(c) Critically discuss FOUR principal roles of non-executive directors and explain the potential tensions between

these roles that WM’s non-executive directors may experience in advising on the disclosure of the

overestimation of the mallerite reserve. (12 marks)

正确答案:
(c) Non-executive directors
Roles of NEDs
Non-executive directors have four principal roles.
The strategy role recognises that NEDs are full members of the board and thus have the right and responsibility to contribute
to the strategic success of the organisation for the benefit of shareholders. The enterprise must have a clear strategic direction
and NEDs should be able to bring considerable experience from their lives and business experience to bear on ensuring that
chosen strategies are sound. In this role they may challenge any aspect of strategy they see fit and offer advice or input to
help to develop successful strategy.
In the scrutinising or performance role, NEDs are required to hold executive colleagues to account for decisions taken and
company performance. In this respect they are required to represent the shareholders’ interests against the possibility that
agency issues arise to reduce shareholder value.
The risk role involves NEDs ensuring the company has an adequate system of internal controls and systems of risk
management in place. This is often informed by prescribed codes (such as Turnbull in the UK) but some industries, such as
chemicals, have other systems in place, some of which fall under ISO standards. In this role, NEDs should satisfy themselves
on the integrity of financial information and that financial controls and systems of risk management are robust and defensible.
Finally, the ‘people’ role involves NEDs overseeing a range of responsibilities with regard to the management of the executive
members of the board. This typically involves issues on appointments and remuneration, but might also involve contractual
or disciplinary issues and succession planning.
Tutorial note: these four roles are as described in the UK Higgs Report and are also contained in the Combined Code 2003.
Tensions in NED roles in the case
This refers to a potential tension in the loyalties of the NEDs. Although the NED is accountable, through the chairman to the
shareholders and thus must always act in the economic best interests of the shareholders, he or she is also a part of the board
of the company and they may, in some situations, advise discretion. Withholding information might be judged correct because
of strategic considerations or longer-term shareholder interests. In most situations, NEDs will argue for greater transparency,
less concealment and more clarity of how and why a given action will be in the interests of shareholders.
The case of mallerite overestimation places the WM NEDs in a position of some tension. Any instinct to conceal the full extent
of the overestimate of the reserve for the possible protection of the company’s short-term value must be balanced against the
duty to serve longer-term strategic interests and the public interest. Whilst concealment would protect the company’s
reputation and share price in the short term, it would be a duty of the NEDs to point out that WM should observe transparency
as far as possible in its dealing with the shareholders and other capital market participants.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。