浙江省考生们!2020年ACCA国际会计师考试科目、考试题题型题量!

发布时间:2020-01-09


2020年一月即将过去一半了,各位参加3月份ACCA考试的ACCAer们得要抓紧时间好好复习了呀~考试科目难度不了解?不知道怎么在有限的时间规划复习的侧重点?这些问题都通通不用担心,接下来51题库考试学习网就为大家讲解关于ACCA考试每个科目的难度,便于各位ACCAer们有重点的复习。

最简单的:知识课程原F1,F2,F3

这三个科目的内容在ACCA所有科目中属于最基础也是新手最容易入门的,难度不算太大,但仍然需要认真复习,且需要掌握的内容不多,都是会计学的基础。也正是因为这样,会计学本专业学生在完成第二年课程后可以免试这三科。这三科考试都为机考考试,且选择题居多,通过率按照往年的数据来看都在70%左右。

技能课程:原F4,F5,F6,F7,F9

这几门相对前三门难度有所提高,但相比较后面的专业阶段的考试科目来说,通过难度不算太大的。F4法律内容较多,需要背诵,但总体不难。F5是F2的进阶版,知识点重叠的部分很多。因此,只要F2学的好,通过F5也不在话下。F6关于税法,考试时以计算题为主,也正是因为计算题量大,对于中国考生来说,难度并不高,但这一部分对计算能力的考核的难度还是有的。F9和P1相似,以文字内容为主,想要通过考试需要动用记忆能力,记忆能力欠佳的考生建议反复多读和背,只要认真背过知识点的,总体难度一般。这几门中相对较难的是F7,从近几年的通过率来看是最低的,内容涉及到财务报表的编制,为P2专业阶段的考试打基础。想要编平报表,需要大量的练习历年真题是必不可少的。

AA(F8)SBL(P1+P3),AAA(F7)

这三门之所以难度较高,原因在于大量的主观论述题。不少考生表示考到这几科才发现ACCA考试与其说是会计考试,不如说更像是英语作文考试。这几门难就难在需要站在一定高度去分析问题,且相比之前的F阶段考试需要更深层次的去了解。在F8阶段,需要了解具体的审计程序,而到了P7,则需要从事务所合伙人的角度来思考问题。考到这一等级,ACCA考试的核心才能体现出来,之前的F阶段的全部考试都是为此打基础。对于思维方式的养成初见成效,之前熟悉的备考应试方法显得捉襟见肘,考生唯有自己学会分析问题的方法,并用自己的语言阐述出来。

SBR(P2)和选修课程(P4-P7)

这几科之所以难,难在全为文字大题,光题目都有好几页。因此这不仅仅是对考生英语词汇量的挑战,不少同学表示光是读懂题目都已经非常有挑战性。但好在P4,P5,P6,P7四科是可以4选2报考的,考生可以根据自己对科目的掌握程度,结合自己的综合能力水平,选择自己最容易通过的科目报考。到这一阶段,考察的能力也是最多的,不仅需要记忆,理解相应的知识点,还需要用自己的语言表达观点。这就是对考生的记忆、理解、表达的这三方面的考核,但即便这样,经常也会有大神表示P5非常简单,其原因还是自己充分理解了考试内容和分析问题的方法。

F级跟P级的差别,就是F级只要花足够时间去学习,及格都不成问题,通过的话也是不在话下的。

但P级就有很多开放式答案,实在难说能掌握到什么程度。考试靠发挥、考心态、还有运气成分,因此建议大家在此阶段就需要更加努力的去复习和学习。

综合分析完所有ACCA考试科目,51题库考试学习网也收集到不少关于ACCAer自己的一些看法,看看他们眼中的考试科目难度是否和你想的一样呢?

首先,很多小伙伴说,在经历了前期4科的70+%通过率之后,F5忽然滑落到40%左右。这一点让不少新手ACCA都是十分胆怯的。对考取ACCA证书信心备受打击。

51题库考试学习网询认为,任何考试都有它的一些备考技巧,因此想要顺利通过F5只需要注意3个方面的问题即可。

以知识点为重,注意记忆

先看F5的考试题型:

Section A 15*2(选择题,共30)

Section B 3*5*2(选择题,共30)

Section C 2*20(我们俗称的“大题”,有计算和文字,共40)

可以看出,光是选择题就占60分的比重,所以在F5的备考中,保证选择题不丢分是重中之重。因此建议大家可以多练习真题才可以,将章节的大框架理解到位。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) With specific reference to Hugh Co, discuss the objective of a review engagement and contrast the level of

assurance provided with that provided in an audit of financial statements. (6 marks)

正确答案:
(c) The objective of a review engagement is to enable the auditor to obtain moderate assurance as to whether the financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with an identified financial reporting framework. This is defined in ISRE 2400
Engagements to Review Financial Statements.
In order to obtain this assurance, it is necessary to gather evidence using analytical procedures and enquiries with
management. Detailed substantive procedures will not be performed unless the auditor has reason to believe that the
information may be materially misstated.
The auditor should approach the engagement with a high degree of professional scepticism, looking for circumstances that
may cause the financial statements to be misstated. For example, in Hugh Co, the fact that the preparer of the financial
statements is part-qualified may lead the auditor to believe that there is a high inherent risk that the figures are misstated.
As a result of procedures performed, the auditor’s objective is to provide a clear written expression of negative assurance on
the financial statements. In a review engagement the auditor would state that ‘we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the financial statements….’
This is normally referred to as an opinion of ‘negative assurance’.
Negative assurance means that the auditor has performed limited procedures and has concluded that the financial statements
appear reasonable. The user of the financial statements gains some comfort that the figures have been subject to review, but
only a moderate level of assurance is provided. The user may need to carry out additional procedures of their own if they
want to rely on the financial statements. For example, if Hugh Co were to use the financial statements as a means to raise
further bank finance, the bank would presumably perform, or require Hugh Co to perform, additional procedures to provide
a higher level of assurance as to the validity of the figures contained in the financial statements.
In comparison, in an audit, a high level of assurance is provided. The auditors provide an opinion of positive, but not absolute
assurance. The user is assured that the figures are free from material misstatement and that the auditor has based the opinion
on detailed procedures.

(ii) Explain how the inclusion of rental income in Coral’s UK income tax computation could affect the

income tax due on her dividend income. (2 marks)

You are not required to prepare calculations for part (b) of this question.

Note: you should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 and for the financial year to

31 March 2007 will continue to apply for the foreseeable future.

正确答案:
(ii) The effect of taxable rental income on the tax due on Coral’s dividend income
Remitting rental income to the UK may cause some of Coral’s dividend income currently falling within the basic rate
band to fall within the higher rate band. The effect of this would be to increase the tax on the gross dividend income
from 0% (10% less the 10% tax credit) to 221/2% (321/2% less 10%).
Tutorial note
It would be equally acceptable to state that the effective rate of tax on the dividend income would increase from 0%
to 25%.

16 Which of the following statements about accounting concepts and conventions are correct?

(1) The entity concept requires that a business is treated as being separate from its owners.

(2) The use of historical cost accounting tends to understate assets and profit when prices are rising.

(3) The prudence concept means that the lowest possible values should be applied to income and assets and the

highest possible values to expenses and liabilities.

(4) The money measurement concept means that only assets capable of being reliably measured in monetary terms

can be included in the balance sheet of a business.

A 1 and 2

B 2 and 3

C 3 and 4

D 1 and 4

正确答案:D

3 You are the manager responsible for the audit of Albreda Co, a limited liability company, and its subsidiaries. The

group mainly operates a chain of national restaurants and provides vending and other catering services to corporate

clients. All restaurants offer ‘eat-in’, ‘take-away’ and ‘home delivery’ services. The draft consolidated financial

statements for the year ended 30 September 2005 show revenue of $42·2 million (2004 – $41·8 million), profit

before taxation of $1·8 million (2004 – $2·2 million) and total assets of $30·7 million (2004 – $23·4 million).

The following issues arising during the final audit have been noted on a schedule of points for your attention:

(a) In September 2005 the management board announced plans to cease offering ‘home delivery’ services from the

end of the month. These sales amounted to $0·6 million for the year to 30 September 2005 (2004 – $0·8

million). A provision of $0·2 million has been made as at 30 September 2005 for the compensation of redundant

employees (mainly drivers). Delivery vehicles have been classified as non-current assets held for sale as at 30

September 2005 and measured at fair value less costs to sell, $0·8 million (carrying amount,

$0·5 million). (8 marks)

Required:

For each of the above issues:

(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and

(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,

in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Albreda Co for the year ended

30 September 2005.

NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.

正确答案:

3 ALBREDA CO

(a) Cessation of ‘home delivery’ service
(i) Matters
■ $0·6 million represents 1·4% of reported revenue (prior year 1·9%) and is therefore material.
Tutorial note: However, it is clearly not of such significance that it should raise any doubts whatsoever regarding
the going concern assumption. (On the contrary, as revenue from this service has declined since last year.)
■ The home delivery service is not a component of Albreda and its cessation does not classify as a discontinued
operation (IFRS 5 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations’).
? It is not a cash-generating unit because home delivery revenues are not independent of other revenues
generated by the restaurant kitchens.
? 1·4% of revenue is not a ‘major line of business’.
? Home delivery does not cover a separate geographical area (but many areas around the numerous
restaurants).
■ The redundancy provision of $0·2 million represents 11·1% of profit before tax (10% before allowing for the
provision) and is therefore material. However, it represents only 0·6% of total assets and is therefore immaterial
to the balance sheet.
■ As the provision is a liability it should have been tested primarily for understatement (completeness).
■ The delivery vehicles should be classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally
through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. For this to be the case the following IFRS 5 criteria
must be met:
? the vehicles must be available for immediate sale in their present condition; and
? their sale must be highly probable.
Tutorial note: Highly probable = management commitment to a plan + initiation of plan to locate buyer(s) +
active marketing + completion expected in a year.
■ However, even if the classification as held for sale is appropriate the measurement basis is incorrect.
■ Non-current assets classified as held for sale should be carried at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less
costs to sell.
■ It is incorrect that the vehicles are being measured at fair value less costs to sell which is $0·3 million in excess
of the carrying amount. This amounts to a revaluation. Wherever the credit entry is (equity or income statement)
it should be reversed. $0·3 million represents just less than 1% of assets (16·7% of profit if the credit is to the
income statement).
■ Comparison of fair value less costs to sell against carrying amount should have been made on an item by item
basis (and not on their totals).
(ii) Audit evidence
■ Copy of board minute documenting management’s decision to cease home deliveries (and any press
releases/internal memoranda to staff).
■ An analysis of revenue (e.g. extracted from management accounts) showing the amount attributed to home delivery
sales.
■ Redundancy terms for drivers as set out in their contracts of employment.
■ A ‘proof in total’ for the reasonableness/completeness of the redundancy provision (e.g. number of drivers × sum
of years employed × payment per year of service).
■ A schedule of depreciated cost of delivery vehicles extracted from the non-current asset register.
■ Checking of fair values on a sample basis to second hand market prices (as published/advertised in used vehicle
guides).
■ After-date net sale proceeds from sale of vehicles and comparison of proceeds against estimated fair values.
■ Physical inspection of condition of unsold vehicles.
■ Separate disclosure of the held for sale assets on the face of the balance sheet or in the notes.
■ Assets classified as held for sale (and other disposals) shown in the reconciliation of carrying amount at the
beginning and end of the period.
■ Additional descriptions in the notes of:
? the non-current assets; and
? the facts and circumstances leading to the sale/disposal (i.e. cessation of home delivery service).


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。