ACCAF4考试-公司法与商法(基础阶段)模拟试题(2020-10-08)
发布时间:2020-10-08
各位要参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴们注意啦!今天51题库考试学习网给各位小伙伴分享ACCAF4考试-公司法与商法(基础阶段)模拟试题练习(5),感兴趣的小伙伴赶快来围观哦!
1. Background
Waddell is based in Manchester and faxed an
offer to Xavier in Houston making an offer to sell goods to him. Xavier
immediately faxed back and accept the offer. Even though the fax was received
in Waddell’s office during normal business hours, she did not read it.
Waddell, having no knowledge that Xavier
had sent a fax then received a letter from Yaull offering to buy Waddell’s
goods. The letter stated that if he did not hear anything, Yaull would assume
the goods were his.
Waddell, not agreeing with the tone of
Yaull’s letter, instead offered to sell the goods to Zang. Zang posted a letter
of acceptance which Waddell did not receive. Waddell had never indicated to
Zang that post was an accepted made of communications as past negotiations have
always taken place face-to-face.
Task-1
Is there a contract between Waddell and
Xavier, and for what reason?
A. No,because acceptance has to be
effectively communicated and Waddell did not read the acceptance
B. No,because acceptance by fax is not
recognized in the law of contract
C. Yes,because even though the fax has not
been read, effective communication of acceptance has taken place
D. Yes,because Waddell has made an offer to
Xavier and is obliged to sell to him
参考答案C
2. Background
John, Fran and Stan have purchased an off
–the –shelf company, XYZ Ltd, from their solicitor. Their solicitor has advised
them to change the name to make it more meaningful in relation to their film
production business. The solicitor has also advised them to consider which of
the company’s articles of association require changing?
Task-1
Which of the following CANNOT be changed,
in relation to the company‘s articles of association?
A. The procedure for declaring dividends
B. The requirement for the company’s shares
to be fully paid-up at the time they are issued
C. The name of the company
D. The procedure for changing the company’s
articles
参考答案D
今天的试题分享到此结束,预祝各位小伙伴顺利通过接下来的ACCA考试,如需查看更多ACCA考试试题,记得关注51题库考试学习网!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Comment on four reasons why the Managing Director of Quicklink Ltd might consider the acquisition of the
Celer Transport business to be a ‘good strategic move’ insofar as may be determined from the information
provided. (5 marks)
17 A business income statement for the year ended 31 December 2004 showed a net profit of $83,600. It was later
found that $18,000 paid for the purchase of a motor van had been debited to motor expenses account. It is the
company’s policy to depreciate motor vans at 25 per cent per year, with a full year’s charge in the year of acquisition.
What would the net profit be after adjusting for this error?
A $106,100
B $70,100
C $97,100
D $101,600
83,600 + 18,000 – 4,500 = 97,100
(b) Router has a number of film studios and office buildings. The office buildings are in prestigious areas whereas
the film studios are located in ‘out of town’ locations. The management of Router wish to apply the ‘revaluation
model’ to the office buildings and the ‘cost model’ to the film studios in the year ended 31 May 2007. At present
both types of buildings are valued using the ‘revaluation model’. One of the film studios has been converted to a
theme park. In this case only, the land and buildings on the park are leased on a single lease from a third party.
The lease term was 30 years in 1990. The lease of the land and buildings was classified as a finance lease even
though the financial statements purport to comply with IAS 17 ‘Leases’.
The terms of the lease were changed on 31 May 2007. Router is now going to terminate the lease early in 2015
in exchange for a payment of $10 million on 31 May 2007 and a reduction in the monthly lease payments.
Router intends to move from the site in 2015. The revised lease terms have not resulted in a change of
classification of the lease in the financial statements of Router. (10 marks)
Required:
Discuss how the above items should be dealt with in the group financial statements of Router for the year ended
31 May 2007.
(b) IAS16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ permits assets to be revalued on a class by class basis. The different characteristics
of the buildings allow them to be classified separately. Different measurement models can, therefore, be used for the office
buildings and the film studios. However, IAS8 ‘Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors’ says that
once an entity has decided on its accounting policies, it should apply them consistently from period to period and across all
relevant transactions. An entity can change its accounting policies but only in specific circumstances. These circumstances
are:
(a) where there is a new accounting standard or interpretation or changes to an accounting standard
(b) where the change results in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information about the effects
of transactions, other events or conditions on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, or cash flows
Voluntary changes in accounting policies are quite uncommon but may occur when an accounting policy is no longer
appropriate. Router will have to ensure that the change in accounting policy meets the criteria in IAS8. Additionally,
depreciated historical cost will have to be calculated for the film studios at the commencement of the period and the opening
balance on the revaluation reserve and any other affected component of equity adjusted. The comparative amounts for each
prior period should be presented as if the new accounting policy had always been applied. There are limits on retrospective
application on the grounds of impracticability.
It is surprising that the lease of the land is considered to be a finance lease under IAS17 ‘Leases’. Land is considered to have
an indefinite life and should, therefore normally be classified as an operating lease unless ownership passes to the lessee
during the lease term. The lease of the land should be separated out from the lease and treated individually. The value of the
land so determined would be taken off the balance sheet in terms of the liability and asset and the lease payments treated
as rentals in the income statement. A prior period adjustment should also be made. The buildings would continue to be
treated as property, plant and equipment (PPE) and the carrying amount not adjusted. However, the remaining useful life of
the building should be revised to reflect the shorter lease term. This will result in the carrying amount being depreciated over
the shorter period. This change to the depreciation policy is applied prospectively not retrospectively.
The lease liability must be assessed for derecognition under IAS39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’,
because of the revision of the lease terms, in order to determine whether the new terms are substantially different from the
old. The purpose of this is to determine whether the change in terms is a modification or an extinguishment. The change
seems to constitute a ‘modification’ because there is little change to the terms. The lease liability is, therefore, amended by
deducting the one off payment ($10 million) from the carrying amount (after adjustment for the lease of land) together with
any transaction costs. The lease liability is then remeasured to the present value of the revised future cash flows, discounted
using the original effective interest rate. Any adjustment made in remeasuring the lease liability will be taken to the income
statement.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2019-01-04
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-10-08
- 2019-01-04
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2020-08-15
- 2019-01-04
- 2020-10-08
- 2020-10-08