你知道云南财经大学2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式吗?

发布时间:2020-02-28


据51题库考试学习网了解,多数地区2020考研成绩查询时间都在220号。个别未发布官方通知的地区和院校近两天也会发布2020考研成绩查询时间和方法,云南省17号也发布了2020考研成绩查询的通知。51题库考试学习网特意为大家带来了云南财经大学2020考研成绩查询时间的通知。

关于 2020 年全国硕士研究生招生考试初试成绩查询及有关事项的通知

各位考生:

2020 年 全 国 硕 士 研 究 生 招 生 考 试 初 试 成 绩 将 于2020 2 20 日公布。现将有关事项通知如下:

一、成绩查询

考 生 可 以 通 过 “ 云 南 省 招 考 频 道 ” (https://www.ynzs.cn )或“云南省招生考试院”官方微信公众号查询初试成绩。

二、成绩复核

 (一)成绩申请复核原则

1.成绩复核申请需有充分理由,成绩复核内容仅限对答卷的漏判、漏统、错统和卷面各项累计分,包括小项累计分、总分及卷面成绩与公布成绩是否相符。不受理查阅答卷原卷,不受理查阅评卷宽严幅度,考生本人不得查阅试卷。

2.成绩复核申请采取“一次性”原则,即在规定的成绩复核期限内,学校仅受理一次复核申请。

 (二)成绩申请复核程序

1.考生于 2 20 日~2 22 16:00 前发送成绩复核电子邮件至邮箱 yncjdxyzb@163.com,逾期不再受理。邮件主题为“成绩复核+考生编号+姓名”,邮件附件是以“成绩复核+考生编号+姓名”命名的压缩包,压缩包内包括《云南省 2020 年全国硕士研究生初试成绩复核申请表》、考生本人身份证和准考证电子图片。

2.复核结果将在我校研究部网站公布,具体时间通过电子邮件通知考生。

三、其他

按照教育部文件规定可以享受照顾政策的考生在国家分数线公布前,须向我校研究生招生办公室提交正式 申 请 , 将 相 关 证 明 材 料 电 子 图 片 发 送 至yncjdxyzb@163.com,逾期未申请者视为自动放弃享受照顾政策。邮件主题为“照顾政策申请+考生编号+姓名”,邮件附件是以“照顾政策申请+考生编号+姓名”命名的压缩包。

1.可享受少数民族照顾政策(在网上报名时须如实填写少数民族身份,且申请定向就业少数民族地区)的考生,提交云南财经大学定向培养硕士研究生合同书和身份证正反面的电子图片。

2.报考“退役大学生士兵”专项硕士研究生招生计划的考生提交本人《入伍批准书》和《退出现役证》的电子图片。

3.参加教育部文件规定可加分项目的考生,如“大学生志愿服务西部计划”“三支一扶计划”“农村义务教育阶段学校教师特设岗位计划”“赴外汉语教师志愿者”“选聘高校毕业生到村任职”等项目(具体项目以教育部相关文件为准)。提交参加项目期满,考核合格的证明材料。

云南财经大学研究生招生办公室

二〇二〇年二月十七日

附件:

1.云南省 2020 年全国硕士研究生初试成绩复核申请表

2.云南财经大学定向培养硕士研究生合同书

以上就51题库考试学习网带来的相关内容,希望能给各位小伙伴带来帮助。


下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

下列关于法律部门划分的表述,正确的是( )。

A.法律部门的划分虽然有客观依据,但最终还是人们主观活动的产物
B.划分法律部门的目的主要是便于统计本国法律数量的多少
C.划分法律部门时应当注意使各法律部门之间法律规范的数量保持相等
D.法律部门划定后应保持其恒定性,不能随着社会法制状况的改变而调整
答案:A
解析:
法律部门的划分原则主要有以下几种:(1)客观原则;(2)目的原则;(3)平衡原则;(4)发展原则;(5)相对稳定原则;(6)主次原则。虽然划分法律部门要坚持客观原则,但是其在根本上就是一种主观活动,所以必然是一种主观活动的产物。划分法律部门要符合目的原则,但是目的并不在于统计国家的法律数量,而是在于便于理解和掌握现行法律。划分法律部门同时也应该坚持平衡原则,但是平衡原则并不意味着各个法律部门的数量应该相等。根据发展原则,划分法律部门时必须考虑到社会的发展状况,而不应该过于死板一成不变


答案:
解析:

伤寒表证可见到的症状是

A.但热不寒
B.但寒不热
C.发热轻而恶风
D.恶寒重发热轻
答案:D
解析:
恶寒重发热轻是外感寒邪所致表寒证的特征。因为寒为阴邪,易伤阳气,又可阻遏阳气的宣散,故见此症。但寒不热是病人只觉怕冷而无发热的表现,若寒邪直中脏腑,可见但寒不热的里寒之征。

The government has been forced into a humiliating overhaul of employment tribunal fees after the supreme court ruled they were inconsistent with access to justice.The highest UK court came clown in favour of the trade union Unison,which argued that fees of up to$1,200 were preventing workers-especially those on lower incomes-from getting justice.Unison's general secretary,Dave Prentis,said it was a major victory for employees."Unprincipled employers no longer have the upper hand,"he said.The general secretary of the Trades Union Congress,Frances O'Grady,said:"This is a massive win for working people.Too many low-paid workers couldn't afford to uphold their rights at work,even when they have faced harassment or have been sacked unfairly.Tribunal fees have been a bonanza for bad bosses,giving them free rein to mistreat staff.Any fees paid so far should be refunded as soon as possible."Prof Nicole Busby,the acting head of the law school at the University of Strathclyde,said it was"a very good day for access to justice".Business leaders expressed concern about the court ruling.Seamus Nevin,head of employment and Skills Policy at the Institute of Directors,said the judgement"opens the door to a rise in unreasonable or malicious claims".He said:"Since fees were introduced,the government has imposed crude and potentially misleading gender pay reporting requirements,and an immigration skills charge that incentivises recruitment based on place of birth.Both of these could lead to an increase in unjustified claims."Mike Spicer,director of Research at the British Chambers of Commerce,said the ruling would leave"employers concerned about a return to the past,when despite winning the majority of cases,companies would often settle to avoid a costly and lengthy process even when their case was strong".Gillian Guy,the chief executive of Citizens Advice,said:"Employment tribunal fees have been a huge barrier to justice,but they are not the only challenge people face.What your rights are,and how to go about getting compensation without resorting to an employment tribunal remains a very complicated picture,which is why we're calling on the government to create a single fair work authority to make it easier for people to get the rights they're entitled to by clamping down on unlawful business practice."Shoaib Khan.a human rights lawyer,said:"The government has wasted precious public funcls on implementing this unlawful,discriminatory regime,and all fees it has received will have to be refunded,at further public cost.A large amount will also have been spent defending this case all the way to the supreme court.If this cruel scheme was meant to be an additional source of revenue for the government,then ir has proved to be counterproductive in every way."Tim Forer,a partner in the employment law team at the national law firm Blake Morgan,said estimates of how much the government owed ranged from 27m t0 31m.He said the praciicalities of how the government planned to refund people"remain to be seen,and it is nor clear how much it witl cost".

Seamus Nevin worried that

A.employers no longer had an advantage over employees
B.the ruling could bring about an increase in unjustified laims
C.employment tribunal fees prevented many workers on lower incomes from defending their rights in the workplace.
D.out that the apprenticeship levy did not work well and would deter the government from hitting its 2020 apprenticeship target.
E.believed that apprentices were being treated as cheap labour and not getting quality training on the job.
F.indicated that increased levy flexibility was vital for businesses to fund a wider range of training.
G.companies would tend to settle to avoid going to court like they used to do.
答案:B
解析:
根据题干Seamus Nevin定位到第五、六段。第五段段末总述Nevin观点“这一裁决将为无理诉讼增加打开方便之门”,第六段进一步补充指出“(取消收费后,)政府在收费期间实施的两项有漏洞的政策可能导致无正当理由的索赔要求增多”。B.是该观点的概括,the ruling对应第五段末句the judgment,bring about an increase in unjustified claims概括两段末句opens the door to a rise-n unreasonable or malicious claims、lead to an increase.n unjustified claims.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。