缴纳ACCA考试费用只能使用英镑吗?

发布时间:2021-04-04


很多备考ACCA考试的考生都会存在考试费用是否只能使用英镑缴纳的疑问,针对考生关注的关于ACCA考试费用相关信息,51题库考试学习网今天就和大家分享下相关信息。

1.ACCA考试费用都需交英镑吗?

是的,一律按照ACCA考试报名当时的英镑汇率进行结算。注册费、年费、考试费、免试费和申请牛津布鲁克斯大学学位的管理费需用英镑结算,可以通过银行汇票或国际结付的信用卡支付。办理银行汇票可以用外汇或人民币。凭身份证就可以到有外汇业务和票汇业务的银行办理换汇和票汇业务。ACCA总部推荐学员使用双币信用卡在线考试报名。这样将可以及时确认报名成功并且可以享受提前考试报名时段的优惠价格。

2.ACCA考试报名付款问题

有些ACCA考试小伙伴反映,银行卡已划款,但MY ACCA10分钟内尚未入账,或者注册时仍旧提示需要付款。则说明付款用于网络问题接收失败。请重新支付。支付失败的款项会在7个工作日左右原路退回到支付卡。如未及时收到退款,请及时联系ACCA查询。还有一种情况是,付款时出现错误,无法支付。说明可能网络或者浏览器有问题,请尝试其他电脑和浏览器,如果还是无法解决问题。请截屏联系ACCA总部(ACCA 24小时全球客服中心:students@accaglobal.com;电话:0044141-5822000)。

3.ACCA报名考试所需费用要一次交清吗?

不是的哦,ACCA注册报名时只需交注册费(按当年费用标准),以后再逐项交纳免试费、年费、考试费。考生可以随时关注自己MYACCA的账单,并且注册后未及时上缴年费,会收到催缴邮件,补上就可以了。考试费用根据每次的报考科目和报考时间段来进行缴费。

不同考生注册ACCA时间的不同,导致年费缴纳的时间不同。考试费受考试阶段和ACCA报考时间影响,所以准备报考的考生抓紧时间报名。报名以后,也比较有压力和动力,推着你每天做好计划,努力复习,积极应考。

4.欠费被除名后如何恢复ACCA身份?

有些ACCA考试小伙伴长期忘记清缴年费,甚至受到催缴邮件后也不上心,没有进行及时缴费,等到需要报名考试的时候,登陆后才发现都被除名了,已被除名的学员/会员发邮件到ACCA 24小时全球客服中心索要电子版的重新注册表格:students @accaglobal.com;电话:0044141-5822000。学员需要缴纳当年欠费及重新注册费,并重新填写注册表后传真或致电英国总部。会员需要缴纳过往欠费及重新注册费,并填写重新注册表后传真或致电英国总部。具体事宜及表格索要可以联系当地代表处,让当地ACCA工作人员协助解决。各位acca考生还是要记得及时缴费哦。

5.acca考试费用支付方式有哪些?

ACCA注册费、年费、考试费、免试费等各项ACCA考试费用支付有三种方法供选择:

信用卡:带VISA或MASTER标志的双币信用卡,按还款当然的汇率结算折合人民币

支付宝:向ACCA官方支付各项费用时直接按缴费当天汇率,折算支付人民币支付

银联卡:带储蓄功能的借记卡,向ACCA官方支付各项费用时直接按缴费当天汇率,折算支付人民币支付注:ACCA官方推荐使用双币种信用卡支付。

看过51题库考试学习网给大家分享的关于ACCA考试费用的相关信息,是不是再也不用担心ACCA考试费用缴纳不成功了,后续请持续关注51题库考试学习网,51题库考试学习网将会大家带来最新,最热的ACCA考试相关资讯!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Prepare the balance sheet of York at 31 October 2006, using International Financial Reporting Standards,

discussing the nature of the accounting treatments selected, the adjustments made and the values placed

on the items in the balance sheet. (20 marks)

正确答案:

Gow’s net assets
IAS36 ‘Impairment of Assets’, sets out the events that might indicate that an asset is impaired. These circumstances include
external events such as the decline in the market value of an asset and internal events such as a reduction in the cash flows
to be generated from an asset or cash generating unit. The loss of the only customer of a cash generating unit (power station)
would be an indication of the possible impairment of the cash generating unit. Therefore, the power station will have to be
impairment tested.
The recoverable amount will have to be determined and compared to the value given to the asset on the setting up of the
joint venture. The recoverable amount is the higher of the cash generating unit’s fair value less costs to sell, and its value-inuse.
The fair value less costs to sell will be $15 million which is the offer for the purchase of the power station ($16 million)
less the costs to sell ($1 million). The value-in-use is the discounted value of the future cash flows expected to arise from the
cash generating unit. The future dismantling costs should be provided for as it has been agreed with the government that it
will be dismantled. The cost should be included in the future cash flows for the purpose of calculating value-in-use and
provided for in the financial statements and the cost added to the property, plant and equipment ($4 million ($5m/1·064)).
The value-in-use based on a discount rate of 6 per cent is $21 million (working). Therefore, the recoverable amount is
$21 million which is higher than the carrying value of the cash generating unit ($20 million) and, therefore, the value of the
cash generating unit is not impaired when compared to the present carrying value of $20 million (value before impairment
test).
Additionally IAS39, ‘Financial Instruments: recognition and measurement’, says that an entity must assess at each balance
sheet date whether a financial asset is impaired. In this case the receivable of $7 million is likely to be impaired as Race is
going into administration. The present value of the estimated future cash flows will be calculated. Normally cash receipts from
trade receivables will not be discounted but because the amounts are not likely to be received for a year then the anticipated
cash payment is 80% of ($5 million × 1/1·06), i.e. $3·8 million. Thus a provision for the impairment of the trade receivables
of $3·2 million should be made. The intangible asset of $3 million would be valueless as the contract has been terminated.
Glass’s Net Assets
The leased property continues to be accounted for as property, plant and equipment and the carrying amount will not be
adjusted. However, the remaining useful life of the property will be revised to reflect the shorter term. Thus the property will
be depreciated at $2 million per annum over the next two years. The change to the depreciation period is applied prospectively
not retrospectively. The lease liability must be assessed under IAS39 in order to determine whether it constitutes a
de-recognition of a financial liability. As the change is a modification of the lease and not an extinguishment, the lease liability
would not be derecognised. The lease liability will be adjusted for the one off payment of $1 million and re-measured to the
present value of the revised future cash flows. That is $0·6 million/1·07 + $0·6 million/(1·07 × 1·07) i.e. $1·1 million. The
adjustment to the lease liability would normally be recognised in profit or loss but in this case it will affect the net capital
contributed by Glass.
The termination cost of the contract cannot be treated as an intangible asset. It is similar to redundancy costs paid to terminate
a contract of employment. It represents compensation for the loss of future income for the agency. Therefore it must be
removed from the balance sheet of York. The recognition criteria for an intangible asset require that there should be probable
future economic benefits flowing to York and the cost can be measured reliably. The latter criterion is met but the first criterion
is not. The cost of gaining future customers is not linked to this compensation.
IAS18 ‘Revenue’ contains a concept of a ‘multiple element’ arrangement. This is a contract which contains two or more
elements which are in substance separate and are separately identifiable. In other words, the two elements can operate
independently from each other. In this case, the contract with the overseas company has two distinct elements. There is a
contract not to supply gas to any other customer in the country and there is a contract to sell gas at fair value to the overseas
company. The contract has not been fulfilled as yet and therefore the payment of $1·5 million should not be taken to profit
or loss in its entirety at the first opportunity. The non supply of gas to customers in that country occurs over the four year
period of the contract and therefore the payment should be recognised over that period. Therefore the amount should be
shown as deferred income and not as a deduction from intangible assets. The revenue on the sale of gas will be recognised
as normal according to IAS18.
There may be an issue over the value of the net assets being contributed. The net assets contributed by Glass amount to
$21·9 million whereas those contributed by Gow only total $13·8 million after taking into account any adjustments required
by IFRS. The joint venturers have equal shareholding in York but no formal written agreements, thus problems may arise ifGlass feels that the contributions to the joint venture are unequal.


(c) Describe the purposes for which a person specification might be used. (4 marks)

正确答案:
Part (c):
The person specification might be used for a number of purposes:
In recruitment, to provide an illustration of the type of candidate sought prior to the selection stage.
In selection, the most obvious and popular use of this document, is to assess whether an individual’s personality, abilities and
experience match the organisation’s requirements.
For promotion, to evaluate whether an individual has the necessary ability and personality to move within the organisation.
In evaluation of performance to assess whether the person has demonstrated the necessary skills to do the job effectively.
In disciplinary procedures through demonstrating that the person specification required to do a particular job for which some one
was appointed are not evident or being applied. For example, where an employee required to be discrete is discovered to have
disclosed confidential information to third parties.

(c) Explanatory notes, together with relevant supporting calculations, in connection with the loan. (8 marks)

Additional marks will be awarded for the appropriateness of the format and presentation of the schedules, the

effectiveness with which the information is communicated and the extent to which the schedules are structured in

a logical manner. (3 marks)

Notes: – you should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2006/07 and for the financial year

to 31 March 2007 apply throughout the question.

– you should ignore value added tax (VAT).

正确答案:
(c) Tax implications of there being a loan from Flores Ltd to Banda
Flores Ltd should have paid tax to HMRC equal to 25% of the loan, i.e. £5,250. The tax should have been paid on the
company’s normal due date for corporation tax in respect of the accounting period in which the loan was made, i.e. 1 April
following the end of the accounting period.
The tax is due because Flores Ltd is a close company that has made a loan to a participator and that loan is not in the ordinary
course of the company’s business.
HMRC will repay the tax when the loan is either repaid or written off.
Flores Ltd should have included the loan on Banda’s Form. P11D in order to report it to HMRC.
Banda should have paid income tax on an annual benefit equal to 5% of the amount of loan outstanding during each tax
year. Accordingly, for each full year for which the loan was outstanding, Banda should have paid income tax of £231
(£21,000 x 5% x 22%).
Interest and penalties may be charged in respect of the tax underpaid by both Flores Ltd and Banda and in respect of the
incorrect returns made to HMRC
Willingness to act for Banda
We would not wish to be associated with a client who has engaged in deliberate tax evasion as this poses a threat to the
fundamental principles of integrity and professional behaviour. Accordingly, we should refuse to act for Banda unless she is
willing to disclose the details regarding the loan to HMRC and pay the ensuing tax liabilities. Even if full disclosure is made,
we should consider whether the loan was deliberately hidden from HMRC or Banda’s previous tax adviser.
In addition, companies are prohibited from making loans to directors under the Companies Act. We should advise Banda to
seek legal advice on her own position and that of Flores Ltd.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。