看看有你所在的云南省有上榜吗——ACCA中国考点分布城市

发布时间:2020-01-08


还有两个多月的时间就又要迎来新的一季ACCA考试了。备考的ACCAer们准备的怎么样了呢?虽然现在看似时间还算充足,但除去周末和春节假日,给大家复习的时间其实已经不算太多了。因此,51题库考试学习网建议有参加3月份考试的ACCAer们现在开始可以着手准备啦!什么?你竟然不知道考试地点在哪里?不用担心,51题库考试学习网会为大家解决这个问题,快来看看离家近不近呢?由于目前20203月份的ACCA考试地点暂未公布,大家可以参考一下往年的考试地址,根据考试时间和地点提前做好相应的安排,避免考试迟到:

北京考点

I998北京广播电视大学

 海淀区大钟寺东路5号北京广播电视大学4号教学楼(北三环大钟寺古钟博物馆往北500米)

I837首都经济贸易大学红庙校区

北京朝阳门外红庙金台里24号教学楼

I866北京市教育考试指导中心

北京市安定门外外馆东街23

河北考点

I769保定

河北省保定市恒祥北大街3188号河北金融学院东门教学楼C1071051

上海考点

I987上海东北

上海开放大学(主校区),国顺路288

I997上海西南

好望角大饭店,肇嘉浜路500号;青松城大酒店,肇嘉浜路777

I844上海浦东

上海海事大学(东明路校区),东明路1336

I849松江

上海市松江区文翔路1900号上海对外贸易学院松江校区

长沙考点地址:

I900长沙考点

 湖南大众传媒职业技术学院南院,湖南省长沙市新建西路77号湖南大众传媒职业技术学院新教学楼

重庆考点

I893重庆

具体地址目前待定,届时会在您的准考证中直接显示

成都考点

I803成都市人才培训中心(成都市人事考试中心),四川省成都市中南大街56号,

I803四川大学出国留学人员培训部,四川省成都市科华北路(川大西门)

以上就是关于ACCA考试的部分考点地址,希望对你备考ACCA的你有所帮助。最后,51题库考试学习网祝福ACCAer们旗开得胜,相信自己,加油~


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) Software Supply Co. (4 marks)

正确答案:
(c) Software Supply Co
Here it seems that Smith & Co has referred the provision of bespoke accounting software to an external provider – Software
Supply Co, and that a commission is being paid to Smith & Co for these referrals. It is common for audit firms to recommend
other providers to their audit clients.
This could be perceived as an objectivity and self-interest threat, as the audit firm is benefiting financially through
recommending clients to a particular provider of goods and services. However, if appropriate safeguards are in place, the
referrals and receipt of commissions can continue.
Action to be taken:
– Verification from all personnel involved with the audit of clients to whom Software Supply Co has provided a service that
they have no financial or personal interest in Software Supply Co.
– Smith & Co must ensure that:
For each client where a referral is made, full disclosure has been made to the client regarding the arrangement
Written acknowledgement that Smith & Co is to receive a referral fee should be obtained from the client.
– Procedures must be put into place to monitor the quality of goods and services provided by Software Supply Co to audit
clients.

(b) Explain the capital gains tax (CGT) and inheritance tax (IHT) implications of Graeme gifting his remaining ‘T’

ordinary shares at their current value either:

(i) to his wife, Catherine; or

(ii) to his son, Barry.

Your answer should be supported by relevant calculations and clearly identify the availability and effect of

any reliefs (other than the CGT annual exemption) that might be used to reduce or defer any tax liabilities

arising. (9 marks)

正确答案:

 


(b) The marketing director of CTC has suggested the introduction of a new toy ‘Nellie the Elephant’ for which the

following estimated information is available:

1. Sales volumes and selling prices per unit

Year ending, 31 May 2009 2010 2011

Sales units (000) 80 180 100

Selling price per unit ($) 50 50 50

2. Nellie will generate a contribution to sales ratio of 50% throughout the three year period.

3. Product specific fixed overheads during the year ending 31 May 2009 are estimated to be $1·6 million. It

is anticipated that these fixed overheads would decrease by 10% per annum during each of the years ending

31 May 2010 and 31 May 2011.

4. Capital investment amounting to $3·9 million would be required in June 2008. The investment would have

no residual value at 31 May 2011.

5. Additional working capital of $500,000 would be required in June 2008. A further $200,000 would be

required on 31 May 2009. These amounts would be recovered in full at the end of the three year period.

6. The cost of capital is expected to be 12% per annum.

Assume all cash flows (other than where stated) arise at the end of the year.

Required:

(i) Determine whether the new product is viable purely on financial grounds. (4 marks)

正确答案:

 


(ii) On 1 July 2006 Petrie introduced a 10-year warranty on all sales of its entire range of stainless steel

cookware. Sales of stainless steel cookware for the year ended 31 March 2007 totalled $18·2 million. The

notes to the financial statements disclose the following:

‘Since 1 July 2006, the company’s stainless steel cookware is guaranteed to be free from defects in

materials and workmanship under normal household use within a 10-year guarantee period. No provision

has been recognised as the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.’

(4 marks)

Your auditor’s report on the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2006 was unmodified.

Required:

Identify and comment on the implications of these two matters for your auditor’s report on the financial

statements of Petrie Co for the year ended 31 March 2007.

NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the matters above.

正确答案:
(ii) 10-year guarantee
$18·2 million stainless steel cookware sales amount to 43·1% of revenue and are therefore material. However, the
guarantee was only introduced three months into the year, say in respect of $13·6 million (3/4 × 18·2 million) i.e.
approximately 32% of revenue.
The draft note disclosure could indicate that Petrie’s management believes that Petrie has a legal obligation in respect
of the guarantee, that is not remote and likely to be material (otherwise no disclosure would have been required).
A best estimate of the obligation amounting to 5% profit before tax (or more) is likely to be considered material, i.e.
$90,000 (or more). Therefore, if it is probable that 0·66% of sales made under guarantee will be returned for refund,
this would require a warranty provision that would be material.
Tutorial note: The return of 2/3% of sales over a 10-year period may well be probable.
Clearly there is a present obligation as a result of a past obligating event for sales made during the nine months to
31 March 2007. Although the likelihood of outflow under the guarantee is likely to be insignificant (even remote) it is
probable that some outflow will be needed to settle the class of such obligations.
The note in the financial statements is disclosing this matter as a contingent liability. This term encompasses liabilities
that do not meet the recognition criteria (e.g. of reliable measurement in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets).
However, it is extremely rare that no reliable estimate can be made (IAS 37) – the use of estimates being essential to
the preparation of financial statements. Petrie’s management must make a best estimate of the cost of refunds/repairs
under guarantee taking into account, for example:
■ the proportion of sales during the nine months to 31 March 2007 that have been returned under guarantee at the
balance sheet date (and in the post balance sheet event period);
■ the average age of cookware showing a defect;
■ the expected cost of a replacement item (as a refund of replacement is more likely than a repair, say).
If management do not make a provision for the best estimate of the obligation the audit opinion should be qualified
‘except for’ non-compliance with IAS 37 (no provision made). The disclosure made in the note to the financial
statements, however detailed, is not a substitute for making the provision.
Tutorial note: No marks will be awarded for suggesting that an emphasis of matter of paragraph would be appropriate
(drawing attention to the matter more fully explained in the note).
Management’s claim that the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability does not give rise to a limitation
on scope on the audit. The auditor has sufficient evidence of the non-compliance with IAS 37 and disagrees with it.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。