快速查看!2020年广东ACCA考试12月报名时间
发布时间:2020-08-13
2020年广东ACCA考试12月报名时间,想要报考的小伙伴们都知道吗?下面51题库考试学习网就带领大家一起来看看广东ACCA考试报名相关内容,感兴趣的小伙伴赶紧来围观吧。
12月ACCA考试报名截止时间:
提前报名截止:2020年8月10日
常规报名截止:2020年10月26日
后期报名截止:2020年11月02日
参加ACCA考试,需要先注册ACCA学员。
ACCA考试注册流程
注册报名:
1、准备注册所需材料
2、在全球官方网站进行注册
–2.1在线上传注册资料扫描文件
–2.2采用纸质材料将注册资料递交ACCA代表处
3、支付注册费用
注:采用在线上传资料方式的必须在线支付
4、查询注册进度
–4.1线上完成全部注册的约2周
–4.2纸质注册约6周
在校学生所需准备的注册材料:
中英文在校证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件)
中英文成绩单(均需为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
2寸彩色护照用证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
非在校学生所需准备的注册资料(符合学历要求):
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件)
中英文学历证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件MPAcc专业,需提供中英文成绩单*国外学历均需提供成绩单)
2寸彩色护照证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
非在校学生所需准备的注册资料(不符合学历要求-FIA形式):
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章或者学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
2寸彩色护照证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
如何进行ACCA考位预约?
1、进入ACCA官网登录myACCA账号;
2、选择 EXAM
ENTRY 然后进入报名页面;
3、选择下方的机考栏目中的 China,点击Book a session CBE ,进入到后续报名页面;
4、然后在后续页面中选择科目等信息,机考报名的操作流程非常简单清晰,一般不会弄错;
5、点击下方考试科目自动弹出考试地点的选择,填写合适的城市就会自动生成考试报名信息,只要添加到考试计划中缴费确认即可报名成功。
以上是关于广东ACCA考试报名相关内容,小伙伴们都了解了吗?ACCA考试12月报名正在进行中,想要报考的小伙伴抓紧时间前去报名吧。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
Required:
(iii) A firm of consultants has offered to undertake a study on behalf of Envico Ltd which will provide perfect
information regarding seminar attendance during the forthcoming year.
Advise the management of Envico Ltd with regard to the maximum amount that they should pay to
consultants for perfect information regarding seminar attendance and comment briefly on the use of
perfect information in such decisions. (5 marks)
(iii) If attendance = 100 then management would opt for room size A which would produce a contribution of £832,000 x
0·2 = £166,400.
If attendance = 200 then management would opt for room size B which would produce a contribution of £2,163,200
x 0·5 = £1,081,600.
If attendance = 400 then management would opt for room size D which would produce a contribution of £6,656,000
x 0·3 = £1,996,800.
Therefore the expected value of perfect information would be the sum of the expected values of the three possible
outcomes which amounts to £3,244,800. Thus, if the information is correct then management should be willing to pay
up to £3,244,800 – £1,497,600 = £1,747,200 for the information. In practice, it is unlikely that perfect information
is obtainable. The management of Envico Ltd are really buying an information system that will provide them with a signal
which may prove to be correct or incorrect! For example, the consultants may predict that demand will be for 300
seminar places, however there still remains the fact that there is a likelihood of actual demand being for either 100,
200 or 400 seminar places. One should be mindful that imperfect information which may be, say only 75% reliable,
might still be worth obtaining. Other than when the value of imperfect and perfect information are equal to zero, the
value of perfect information will always be greater than the value of imperfect information.
(b) Comment (with relevant calculations) on the performance of the business of Quicklink Ltd and Celer
Transport during the year ended 31 May 2005 and, insofar as the information permits, its projected
performance for the year ending 31 May 2006. Your answer should specifically consider:
(i) Revenue generation per vehicle
(ii) Vehicle utilisation and delivery mix
(iii) Service quality. (14 marks)
difference will reduce in the year ending 31 May 2006 due to the projected growth in sales volumes of the Celer Transport
business. The average mail/parcels delivery of mail/parcels per vehicle of the Quicklink Ltd part of the business is budgeted
at 12,764 which is still 30·91% higher than that of the Celer Transport business.
As far as specialist activities are concerned, Quicklink Ltd is budgeted to generate average revenues per vehicle amounting to
£374,850 whilst Celer Transport is budgeted to earn an average of £122,727 from each of the vehicles engaged in delivery
of processed food. It is noticeable that all contracts with major food producers were renewed on 1 June 2005 and it would
appear that there were no increases in the annual value of the contracts with major food producers. This might have been
the result of a strategic decision by the management of the combined entity in order to secure the future of this part of the
business which had been built up previously by the management of Celer Transport.
Each vehicle owned by Quicklink Ltd and Celer Transport is in use for 340 days during each year, which based on a
365 day year would give an in use % of 93%. This appears acceptable given the need for routine maintenance and repairs
due to wear and tear.
During the year ended 31 May 2005 the number of on-time deliveries of mail and parcel and industrial machinery deliveries
were 99·5% and 100% respectively. This compares with ratios of 82% and 97% in respect of mail and parcel and processed
food deliveries made by Celer Transport. In this critical area it is worth noting that Quicklink Ltd achieved their higher on-time
delivery target of 99% in respect of each activity whereas Celer Transport were unable to do so. Moreover, it is worth noting
that Celer Transport missed their target time for delivery of food products on 975 occasions throughout the year 31 May 2005
and this might well cause a high level of customer dissatisfaction and even result in lost business.
It is interesting to note that whilst the businesses operate in the same industry they have a rather different delivery mix in
terms of same day/next day demands by clients. Same day deliveries only comprise 20% of the business of Quicklink Ltd
whereas they comprise 75% of the business of Celer Transport. This may explain why the delivery performance of Celer
Transport with regard to mail and parcel deliveries was not as good as that of Quicklink Ltd.
The fact that 120 items of mail and 25 parcels were lost by the Celer Transport business is most disturbing and could prove
damaging as the safe delivery of such items is the very substance of the business and would almost certainly have resulted
in a loss of customer goodwill. This is an issue which must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
The introduction of the call management system by Quicklink Ltd on 1 June 2004 is now proving its worth with 99% of calls
answered within the target time of 20 seconds. This compares favourably with the Celer Transport business in which only
90% of a much smaller volume of calls were answered within a longer target time of 30 seconds. Future performance in this
area will improve if the call management system is applied to the Celer Transport business. In particular, it is likely that the
number of abandoned calls will be reduced and enhance the ‘image’ of the Celer Transport business.
(c) Assess how the fundamental ethical principles of IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants should
be applied to the provision of a forensic investigation service. (6 marks)
(c) Application of ethical principles to a fraud investigation
IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants applies to all ACCA members involved in professional assignments,
including forensic investigations. There are specific considerations in the application of each of the principles in providing
such a service.
Integrity
The forensic investigator is likely to deal frequently with individuals who lack integrity, are dishonest, and attempt to conceal
the true facts from the investigator. It is imperative that the investigator recognises this, and acts with impeccable integrity
throughout the whole investigation.
Objectivity
As in an audit engagement, the investigator’s objectivity must be beyond question. The report that is the outcome of the
forensic investigation must be perceived as independent, as it forms part of the legal evidence presented at court. The
investigator must adhere to the concept that the overriding objective of court proceedings is to deal with cases fairly and justly.
Any real or perceived threats to objectivity could undermine the credibility of the evidence provided by the investigator.
This issue poses a particular problem where an audit client requests its auditors to conduct a forensic investigation. In this
situation, the audit firm would be exposed to threats to objectivity in terms of advocacy, management involvement and selfreview.
The advocacy threat arises because the audit firm may feel pressured into promoting the interests and point of view
of their client, which would breach the overriding issue of objectivity in court proceedings. Secondly, the investigators could
be perceived to be involved in management decisions regarding the implications of the fraud, especially where the investigator
acts as an expert witness. It is however the self-review threat that would be the most significant threat to objectivity. The selfreview
threat arises because the investigation is likely to involve the estimation of an amount (i.e. the loss), which could be
material to the financial statements.
For the reasons outlined above, The Code states that the firm should evaluate threats and put appropriate safeguards in place,
and if safeguards cannot reduce the threats to an acceptable level, then the firm cannot provide both the audit service and
the forensic investigation.
Professional competence and due care
Forensic investigations will involve very specialist skills, which accountants are unlikely to possess without extensive training.
Such skills would include:
– Detailed knowledge of the relevant legal framework surrounding fraud,
– An understanding of how to gather specialist evidence,
– Skills in the safe custody of evidence, including maintaining a clear ‘chain’ of evidence, and
– Strong personal skills in, for example, interview techniques, presentation of material at court, and tactful dealing with
difficult and stressful situations.
It is therefore essential that forensic work is only ever undertaken by highly skilled individuals, under the direction and
supervision of an experienced fraud investigator. Any doubt over the competence of the investigation team could severely
undermine the credibility of the evidence presented at court.
Confidentiality
Normally accountants should not disclose information without the explicit consent of their client. However, during legal
proceedings arising from a fraud investigation, the court will require the investigator to reveal information discovered during
the investigation. There is an overriding requirement for the investigator to disclose all of the information deemed necessary
by the court.
Outside of the court, the investigator must ensure faultless confidentiality, especially because much of the information they
have access to will be highly sensitive.
Professional behaviour
Fraud investigations can become a matter of public interest, and much media attention is often focused on the work of the
forensic investigator. A highly professional attitude must be displayed at all times, in order to avoid damage to the reputation
of the firm, and of the profession. Any lapse in professional behaviour could also undermine the integrity of the forensic
evidence, and of the credibility of the investigator, especially when acting in the capacity of expert witness.
During legal proceedings, the forensic investigator may be involved in discussions with both sides in the court case, and here
it is essential that a courteous and considerate attitude is presented to all parties.
(b) State the immediate tax implications of the proposed gift of the share portfolio to Avril and identify an
alternative strategy that would achieve Crusoe’s objectives whilst avoiding a possible tax liability in the
future. State any deadline(s) in connection with your proposed strategy. (5 marks)
(b) Gift of the share portfolio to Avril
Inheritance tax
The gift would be a potentially exempt transfer at market value. No inheritance tax would be due at the time of the gift.
Capital gains tax
The gift would be a disposal by Crusoe deemed to be made at market value for the purposes of capital gains tax. No gain
would arise as the deemed proceeds will equal Crusoe’s base cost of probate value.
Stamp duty
There is no stamp duty on a gift of shares for no consideration.
Strategy to avoid a possible tax liability in the future
Crusoe should enter into a deed of variation directing the administrators to transfer the shares to Avril rather than to him. This
will not be regarded as a gift by Crusoe. Instead, provided the deed states that it is intended to be effective for inheritance tax
purposes, it will be as if Noland had left the shares to Avril in a will.
This strategy is more tax efficient than Crusoe gifting the shares to Avril as such a gift would be a potentially exempt transfer
and inheritance tax may be due if Crusoe were to die within seven years.
The deed of variation must be entered into by 1 October 2009, i.e. within two years of the date of Noland’s death.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-09-03
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-09-03
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-27
- 2021-04-25
- 2020-01-09
- 2021-04-04
- 2020-04-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-06-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-15
- 2020-02-22
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-22
- 2020-01-09
- 2021-01-13
- 2020-04-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-01-13
- 2020-01-10