为你解答!ACCA考试报名成功后如何更改考试地点

发布时间:2020-04-10


因为最近的疫情影响,很多小伙伴说原来的ACCA考试地点可能去不了了,想要更改ACCA考试地点,但是又苦于不知道怎么更改ACCA考试地点,为此十分发愁。今天51题库考试学习网就给大家分享了ACCA如何更改考试地点的相关内容。如果你也不知道怎么操作,那就一起来看看吧!

下面给大家列出来详细的ACCA更改考试地点的步骤操作:

首先要注意一件事情,ACCA考试地点的更改是有限制的!!!在正常的报考截止日期之前都是可以修改考试地点的。如果超过报考截止日期了,就不能更改考试地点了。所以大家不要不着急,一定提前做好准备,不要事到临头,在想打算,很可能竹篮打水一场空。提前做好准备很重要,避免重复更改。

备考ACCA的同学只要进入自己的MyACCA账户就可以更改考试地点了。有的同学这时候会问:除了考试地点可以更改,别的东西可以更改吗?

51题库考试学习网来回答你的问题:可以的,如果你要直接退考也是可以直接进行操作的。而一些其他的更改,像是考场的更改啊,以及考试科目的一些更改或者你决定多考几门,去更改增加考试科目这些操作都是可以的。直接在你的MyACCA账户就可以操作的。

下面来跟大家讲讲具体怎么操作。

第一步:登录到你的“MyACCA账户,进入”Exam Entry”页面中,点击”View/Amend Exam Entry”进入报考更改页面。

第二步:进入页面后,点击”Amend Exam Entry”进行考试报名更改。

第三步:更改报考的页面中,会出现初始报名的页面,如需删减考试科目,请将科目的“√”去除;如需增加科目,请直接在需报考的科目后打勾。

第四步:更改考试报名后,会显示出哪门科目被取消,哪门科目已报考成功,相应的费用也会在此页面中进行调整和更改。点击”Proceed to payment”进入支付页面进行付费。付费指引如同初始报名的指引。

最后需要注意的一些小问题!看文章一定看到最后,注意事项还是很重要的。

如果你已经取消了报名费用,这个费用是不会直接退还给你的。只能留在你目前的账户中进行下次的报名缴费。

还有一点大家要注意:常规报名阶段,注意啊!是常规报名阶段才可以!常规报名阶段结束前可以任选一门或者多门考试进行取消。

今日分享时间到此结束啦,如果大家觉得意犹未尽,还想了解更多关于ACCA考试内容的话,敬请关注51题库考试学习网。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) Discuss the factors that might influence whether the initial bid is likely to be accepted by the shareholders of Wragger plc.

正确答案:

(c) The type of payment might influence the success of the bid. Paxis is proposing a share for share exchange which offers a continuation in ownership of the entity, albeit as part of the successful bidder. However, relative share prices will change during the period of the bid, and the owner of shares in the potential victim company will not know the precise postacquisition value of the bid. An alternative might be cash payments which provides a known, precise sum, and might be favoured for this reason. However, in some countries payment in cash might lead to an immediate capital gains tax liability for the investor.

The effective price offered would of course be a major influence. Paxis would need to offer a premium over the existing share price, but the size of the premium that would be acceptable is unknown. Informal discussions with major shareholders of Wragger might assist in determining this (subject to such discussions being permitted by the regulatory authorities).


2 It was the final day of a two-week-long audit of Van Buren Company, a longstanding client of Fillmore Pierce Auditors.

In the afternoon, Anne Hayes, a recently qualified accountant and member of the audit team, was following an audit

trail on some cash payments when she discovered what she described to the audit partner, Zachary Lincoln, as an

‘irregularity’. A large and material cash payment had been recorded with no recipient named. The corresponding

invoice was handwritten on a scrap of paper and the signature was illegible.

Zachary, the audit partner, was under pressure to finish the audit that afternoon. He advised Anne to seek an

explanation from Frank Monroe, the client’s finance director. Zachary told her that Van Buren was a longstanding client

of Fillmore Pierce and he would be surprised if there was anything unethical or illegal about the payment. He said

that he had personally been involved in the Van Buren audit for the last eight years and that it had always been

without incident. He also said that Frank Monroe was an old friend of his from university days and that he was certain

that he wouldn’t approve anything unethical or illegal. Zachary said that Fillmore Pierce had also done some

consultancy for Van Buren so it was a very important client that he didn’t want Anne to upset with unwelcome and

uncomfortable questioning.

When Anne sought an explanation from Mr Monroe, she was told that nobody could remember what the payment

was for but that she had to recognise that ‘real’ audits were sometimes a bit messy and that not all audit trails would

end as she might like them to. He also reminded her that it was the final day and both he and the audit firm were

under time pressure to conclude business and get the audit signed off.

When Anne told Zachary what Frank had said, Zachary agreed not to get the audit signed off without Anne’s support,

but warned her that she should be very certain that the irregularity was worth delaying the signoff for. It was therefore

now Anne’s decision whether to extend the audit or have it signed off by the end of Friday afternoon.

Required:

(a) Explain why ‘auditor independence’ is necessary in auditor-client relationships and describe THREE threats

to auditor independence in the case. (9 marks)

正确答案:
(a) Importance of independence
The auditor must be materially independent of the client for the following reasons:
To increase credibility and to underpin confidence in the process. In an external audit, this will primarily be for the benefit of
the shareholders and in an internal audit, it will often be for the audit committee that is, in turn, the recipient of the internal
audit report.
To ensure the reliability of the audit report. Any evidence of lack of independence (or ‘capture’) has the potential to undermine
all or part of the audit report thus rendering the exercise flawed.
To ensure the effectiveness of the investigation of the process being audited. An audit, by definition, is only effective as a
means of interrogation if the parties are independent of each other.
Three threats to independence
There are three threats to independence described in the case.
The same audit partner (Zachary) was assigned to Van Buren in eight consecutive years. This is an association threat and is
a contravention of some corporate governance codes. Both Sarbanes-Oxley and the Smith Guidance (contained in the UK
Combined Code), for example, specify auditor rotation to avoid association threat.
Fillmore Pierce provides more than one service to the same client. One of the threats to independence identified between
Arthur Andersen and Enron after the Enron collapse was an over-dependence on Enron by Andersen arising from the provision
of several services to the same client. Good practice is not to offer additional services to audit clients to avoid the appearance
of compromised independence. Some corporate governance codes formally prohibit this.
The audit partner (Zachary) is an old friend of the financial director of Van Buren (Frank). This ‘familiarity’ threat should be
declared to Fillmore Pierce at the outset and it may disqualify Zachary from acting as audit partner on the Van Buren account.

(ii) Suggest THREE other performance measures (not applied in (i)) which might be used to assess the

customer perspective of the balanced scorecard of GER. (3 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Performance measures that may be used to assess the customer perspective of the balanced scorecard of GER include
the following:
Lost or damaged luggage per 1,000 passengers
Train cancellation rate
Denied boarding rate
Number of passenger complaints.
Note: Only three measures were required.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。