了解一下,ACCA机考都有什么题型?

发布时间:2020-08-15


备考ACCA考试的小伙伴们,考试题型大家都了解吗?下面51题库考试学习网就带领大家一起来看看ACCA机考考试题型,感兴趣的小伙伴赶紧来围观吧。

ACCA AB-FM前九科目均为机考考试,专业阶段的科目也将于20213月全部改为机考考试。以下是ACCA机考考试题型:

AB(原F1)

Accountant in Business

Section A(共76分。46道题, 302分值题,161分值题):单选、多选、判断;

Section B(共24分。6道题,每题4分):给一个背景资料,搭配几道小题。题型包括:下拉菜单、单选、多选、判断。

MA(原F2)

Management Accounting

Section A(共70分。35道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、填空;

Section B(共30分。3道题,每题10分):给一个背景资料,搭配几道小题。题型包括:下拉菜单、单选、多选、判断、填空。

FA(原F3)

Financial Accounting

Section A(共70分。35道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、判断、填空;

Section B(共30分。2道题,每题15分):给一个背景资料,搭配几道小题。题型包括:下拉菜单、单选、多选、判断、填空。

LW(原F4)

Corporate and Business Law

Section A(共70分。25道题-每题2分;20道题-每题1分):单选、多选、判断、填空;

Section B30分。5道题,每题6分):给一个背景资料,搭配几道小题。题型包括:下拉菜单、单选、多选、判断、填空。

PM(原F5)

Performance Management

Section A(共30分。15道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、判断、填空、拖拽匹配题、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section B(共30分。共3个案例题,每个案例题下有5道客观题,共计15道题,每道题2分):给三个case背景资料,每个背景资料搭配五个题目。题型包括:拖拽匹配题、单选、多选、判断、填空、热点题、下拉菜单题。

Section C(共40分。2道题,每道题20分):两道案例分析题主观题,包含做表计算,简答essay等。

TX(原F6 UK)

Taxation UK

Section A(共30分。15道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、判断、填空、拖拽匹配题、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section B(共30分。共3个案例题,每个案例题下有5道客观题,共计15道题,每道题2分):给背景资料,每个背景资料搭配5道单选题。题型包括:拖拽匹配题、单选、多选、判断、填空、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section C(共40分。110分题和215分题):三道案例分析题

TX-CHN(原F6 CHN)

Taxation CHN

Section A(共30分。15道题,每道题2分):选择题

Section B(共70分。410分题和215分题):案例分析题

FR(原F7)

Financial Reporting

Section A(共30分。共15道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、判断、填空、拖拽匹配题、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section B(共30分。共3个案例题,每个案例题下有5道客观题,共计15道题,每道题2分):题型包括:拖拽匹配题、单选、多选、判断、填空、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section C(共40分。共2道题,每道题20分):两道案例分析题

额外10分的种子题,随机分配在Section A五个独立客观题中,或Section B围绕单一情境设置的五个客观题中。

AA(原F8)

Audit and Assurance

Section A(共30分。共3个案例题,每个案例题下有5道客观题,共计15道题,每道题2分)题型:拖拽匹配题、单选、多选、判断、填空、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section B(共70分。共3道题,每道题20分或30分):案例分析题

额外10分的种子题,随机分配在Section A五个独立客观题中,或Section B围绕单一情境设置的五个客观题中。

FM(原F9)

Financial Managemen

Section A(共30分。共15道题,每道题2分):单选、多选、判断、填空、拖拽匹配题、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section B(共30分。共3个案例题,每个案例题下有5道客观题,共计15道题,每道题2分)题型:拖拽匹配题、单选、多选、判断、填空、热点题、下拉菜单题

Section C(共40分。共2道题,每道题20分):两道案例分析题

以上是关于ACCA机考考试题型,相信大家都清楚了。欲了解更多关于ACCA考试的资讯,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Assuming that the income from the sale of the books is not treated as trading income, calculate Bob’s taxable

income and gains for all relevant tax years, using any loss reliefs in the most tax-efficient manner. Your

answer should include an explanation of the loss reliefs available and your reasons for using (or not using)

them. (12 marks)

Assume that the rates and allowances for 2004/05 apply throughout this part of the question.

正确答案:

 


(b) You are an audit manager with specific responsibility for reviewing other information in documents containing

audited financial statements before your firm’s auditor’s report is signed. The financial statements of Hegas, a

privately-owned civil engineering company, show total assets of $120 million, revenue of $261 million, and profit

before tax of $9·2 million for the year ended 31 March 2005. Your review of the Annual Report has revealed

the following:

(i) The statement of changes in equity includes $4·5 million under a separate heading of ‘miscellaneous item’

which is described as ‘other difference not recognized in income’. There is no further reference to this

amount or ‘other difference’ elsewhere in the financial statements. However, the Management Report, which

is required by statute, is not audited. It discloses that ‘changes in shareholders’ equity not recognized in

income includes $4·5 million arising on the revaluation of investment properties’.

The notes to the financial statements state that the company has implemented IAS 40 ‘Investment Property’

for the first time in the year to 31 March 2005 and also that ‘the adoption of this standard did not have a

significant impact on Hegas’s financial position or its results of operations during 2005’.

(ii) The chairman’s statement asserts ‘Hegas has now achieved a position as one of the world’s largest

generators of hydro-electricity, with a dedicated commitment to accountable ethical professionalism’. Audit

working papers show that 14% of revenue was derived from hydro-electricity (2004: 12%). Publicly

available information shows that there are seven international suppliers of hydro-electricity in Africa alone,

which are all at least three times the size of Hegas in terms of both annual turnover and population supplied.

Required:

Identify and comment on the implications of the above matters for the auditor’s report on the financial

statements of Hegas for the year ended 31 March 2005. (10 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Implications for the auditor’s report
(i) Management Report
■ $4·5 million represents 3·75% of total assets, 1·7% of revenue and 48·9% profit before tax. As this is material
by any criteria (exceeding all of 2% of total assets, 1/2% revenue and 5% PBT), the specific disclosure requirements
of IASs need to be met (IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’).
■ The Management Report discloses the amount and the reason for a material change in equity whereas the financial
statements do not show the reason for the change and suggest that it is immaterial. As the increase in equity
attributable to this adjustment is nearly half as much as that attributable to PBT there is a material inconsistency
between the Management Report and the audited financial statements.
■ Amendment to the Management Report is not required.
Tutorial note: Marks will be awarded for arguing, alternatively, that the Management Report disclosure needs to
be amended to clarify that the revaluation arises from the first time implementation.
■ Amendment to the financial statements is required because the disclosure is:
– incorrect – as, on first adoption of IAS 40, the fair value adjustment should be against the opening balance
of retained earnings; and
– inadequate – because it is being ‘supplemented’ by additional disclosure in a document which is not within
the scope of the audit of financial statements.
■ Whilst it is true that the adoption of IAS 40 did not have a significant impact on results of operations, Hegas’s
financial position has increased by nearly 4% in respect of the revaluation (to fair value) of just one asset category
(investment properties). As this is significant, the statement in the notes should be redrafted.
■ If the financial statements are not amended, the auditor’s report should be qualified ‘except for’ on grounds of
disagreement (non-compliance with IAS 40) as the matter is material but not pervasive. Additional disclosure
should also be given (e.g. that the ‘other difference’ is a fair value adjustment).
■ However, it is likely that when faced with the prospect of a qualified auditor’s report Hegas’s management will
rectify the financial statements so that an unmodified auditor’s report can be issued.
Tutorial note: Marks will be awarded for other relevant points e.g. citing IAS 8 ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors’.
(ii) Chairman’s statement
Tutorial note: Hegas is privately-owned therefore IAS 14 ‘Segment Reporting’ does not apply and the proportion of
revenue attributable to hydro-electricity will not be required to be disclosed in the financial statements. However, credit
will be awarded for discussing the implications for the auditor’s report if it is regarded as a material inconsistency on
the assumption that segment revenue (or similar) is reported in the financial statements.
■ The assertion in the chairman’s statement, which does not fall within the scope of the audit of the financial
statements, claims two things, namely that the company:
(1) is ‘one of the world’s largest generators of hydro-electricity’; and
(2) has ‘a dedicated commitment to accountable ethical professionalism’.
■ To the extent that this information does not relate to matters disclosed in the financial statements it may give rise
to a material misstatement of fact. In particular, the first statement presents a misleading impression of the
company’s size. In misleading a user of the financial statements with this statement, the second statement is not
true (as it is not ethical or professional to mislead the reader and potentially undermine the credibility of the
financial statements).
■ The first statement is a material misstatement of fact because, for example:
– the company is privately-owned, and publicly-owned international/multi-nationals are larger;
– the company’s main activity is civil engineering not electricity generation (only 14% of revenue is derived from
HEP);
– as the company ranks at best eighth against African companies alone it ranks much lower globally.
■ Hegas should be asked to reconsider the wording of the chairman’s statement (i.e. removing these assertions) and
consult, as necessary, the company’s legal advisor.
■ If the statement is not changed there will be no grounds for qualification of the opinion on the audited financial
statements. The audit firm should therefore take legal advice on how the matter should be reported.
■ However, an emphasis of matter paragraph may be used to report on matters other than those affecting the audited
financial statements. For example, to explain the misstatement of fact if management refuses to make the
amendment.
Tutorial note: Marks will also be awarded for relevant comments about the chairman’s statement being perceived by
many readers to be subject to audit and therefore that the unfounded statement might undermine the credibility of the
financial statements. Shareholders tend to rely on the chairman’s statement, even though it is not regulated or audited,
because modern financial statements are so complex.

(c) Illustrate how:

(i) inquiry; and (4 marks)

正确答案:
(c) Due diligence review
(i) Inquiries
Tutorial note: These should be focussed on uncovering facts that may not be revealed by the audited financial
statements (e.g. off balance sheet finance, contingencies, commitments and contracts) especially where knowledge
may be confined to management.
■ Do any members of MCM’s senior/executive management have contractual terms that will result in significant
payouts to them (e.g. on change of ownership of the company or their being made redundant)?
■ What contracts with clients, if any, will lapse or be made void in the event that MCM is purchased from Frontiers?
■ What synergy or inter-company trading, if any, currently exists between MCM and Frontiers? For example, Frontiers
may publish MCM’s training materials.
■ Are there any major clients who are likely to be lost if MCM is purchased by Plaza (e.g. any competitor food
retailers)?
■ What are the principal terms of the operating leases relating to the International business’s premises?
■ What penalties should be expected to be incurred if operating leases and/or contracts with training consultants are
terminated?
■ Has MCM entered into any purchase commitments since 31 December 2004 (e.g. to buy or lease further
premises)?
■ Who are the best trainers that Plaza should seek to retain after the purchase of MCM?
■ What events since the audited financial statements to 31 December 2004 were published have made a significant
impact on MCM’s assets, liabilities, operating capability and/or cash flows? (For example, storm damage to
premises, major clients defaulting on payments, significant interest/foreign-exchange rate fluctuations, etc.)
■ Are there any unresolved tax issues which have not been provided for in full?
■ What effect will the purchase have on loan covenants? For example, term loans may be rendered repayable on a
change of ownership.

3 The Stiletto Partnership consisted of three partners, Clint, Ben and Amy, who shared the profits of the business

equally. On 28 February 2007 the partners sold the business to Razor Ltd, in exchange for shares in Razor Ltd, with

each former partner owning one third of the new company.

The recent, tax adjusted, trading profits of the Stiletto Partnership have been as follows:

Year ended 30 June 2006 92,124

1 July 2006 to 28 February 2007 81,795

Clint, who was 65 on 5 October 2006, retired when the business was sold to Razor Ltd. He is now suggesting that

if the sale of the partnership, and his retirement, had been delayed until 30 April 2007, his total tax liability would

have been reduced. Clint’s only other income is gross pension income of £6,100 per year, which he began receiving

in the tax year 2005/06. Clint did not receive any salary or dividends from Razor Ltd. It is estimated that the

partnership’s tax adjusted trading profits for the period from 1 March 2007 to 30 April 2007 would have been

£20,760. Clint has overlap profits of £14,250 brought forward from when the partnership began trading.

Razor Ltd manufactures industrial cutting tools. On 1 July 2007, Razor Ltd will subscribe for the whole of the ordinary

share capital of Cutlass Inc, a company newly incorporated in the country of Sharpenia. It is intended that Cutlass

Inc will purchase partly finished tools from Razor Ltd and customise them in Sharpenia. It is anticipated that Cutlass

Inc’s annual profits chargeable to corporation tax will be approximately £120,000.

Ben and Amy will be the directors of Cutlass Inc, although Ben will not be involved in the company’s business on a

day-to-day basis. Amy intends to spend one or two weeks each month in the country of Sharpenia looking after the

company’s affairs. The remainder of her time will be spent in the UK. Amy has employment contracts with both Razor

Ltd and Cutlass Inc and her duties for Cutlass Inc will be carried out wholly in Sharpenia. Cutlass Inc will pay for

Amy’s flights to and from Sharpenia and for her husband and baby to visit her there twice a year. Amy is currently

UK resident and ordinarily resident.

The system of income tax and corporation tax in the country of Sharpenia is broadly similar to that in the UK although

the rate of corporation tax is 38% regardless of the level of profits. There is a double tax treaty between the UK and

Sharpenia based on the OECD model treaty. The clause in the treaty dealing with company residency states that a

company resident in both countries under domestic law will be regarded under the treaty as being resident only in the

country where it is effectively managed and controlled. Sharpenia is not a member of the European Union.

Required:

(a) (i) Calculate Clint’s taxable trading profits for the tax years 2006/07 and 2007/08 for both of the

alternative retirement dates (28 February 2007 and 30 April 2007). (3 marks)

正确答案:

 


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。