2020年ACCA准会员证书和会员证书领取时间
发布时间:2020-03-08
由于国内部分考试合格证书需要去现场领取,因此一些学员在通过ACCA考试后不免会问成绩合格证书该如何领取,领取时间又是多久?鉴于此,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来2020年ACCA会员注册的相关信息,以供参考。
通过所有考试之后,学员可获得ACCA准会员资格,证书为PDF版本,不需要领取,通常在学员做完线上测试之后的三五天左右生成。ACCA准会员可申请成为会员,具体申请流程如下:
想要申请会员,需要一定的条件和材料:首先是ACCA准会员资格:当你学完了ACCA的所有课程,且通过了考试,就能获得准会员资格。其次,需要在线完成相应的Professionalism and ethics学习和测试,还必须具备三年及以上的工作经验,才可以进行申请。提交申请后,需要通过审核才能正式成为ACCA会员。
具体申请流程为:登录ACCA网站下载并填写《ACCA会员申请表》,并在满足会员必要条件后向ACCA递交ACCA会员申请表。ACCA总部会对申请人进行资料审核,审核通过后,会为申请人颁发ACCA会员证书,一般这个过程需要两个月的时间。等拿到证书后,小伙伴们就是正式的ACCA会员了。
值得一提的是,成为会员约五年后,可向ACCA总部申请称为资深会员(FCCA),具体要求还请各位考生咨询ACCA官网。
以上就是关于ACCA会员申请的相关情况。51题库考试学习网提醒:申请ACCA会员所需时间较长,小伙伴们要耐心等待哦。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴都能顺利通过。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) The Shirtmaster division and Corporate Clothing division, though being part of the same group, operate largely
independently of one another.
Assess the costs and benefits of the two divisions continuing to operate independently of one another.
(15 marks)
(c) The Shirtmaster Group has decided to structure itself using two divisions who are dealing with very different markets,
customers and buying behaviours. In so doing the intention is to provide more value to the customer through a better
understanding of their needs. The existence of the two divisions also reflects the origins of the two family businesses.
Mintzberg in his work on organisation design and structure sees divisional configurations as being appropriate in relatively
simple and static environments where significant strategic power is delegated from the ‘strategic apex’ to the ‘middle line‘
general managers with responsibility for the performance of the division. Indeed one of the benefits cited for divisionalised
companies is their ability to provide a good training ground in strategic decision making for general managers who can then
progress to senior positions at company headquarters. Tony Masters’s reluctance to delegate real strategic decision making
power to the senior managers in the Shirtmaster division may be preventing those managers developing key managerial skills.
Using the Boston Box model one could classify the Shirtmaster division as a ‘dog’ with low market share in a market exhibiting
change but little growth. The Corporate Clothing division, by contrast, can be regarded as a ‘problem child’ having a small
share but of a growing market. Porter’s ‘better-off test’ needs to be met – are the two divisions better off being in the same
Group? As it stands there seems little synergy between the two divisions – there seems to be little evidence of the two divisions
sharing resources or transferring skills or learning between the two divisions. Their two value chains and systems are both
separate and different though on the face of it there are many activities that are similar. Operating independently may
encourage healthy competition between the two divisions and consequently better performance through better motivated staff.
Specialised competences such as Corporate Clothing division’s on-line response to customer orders and design changes are
more easily developed within a divisionalised structure. Performance can be clearly identified and controlled and resources
channelled to those areas showing potential. However, this may be at the expense of costly duplication of resources and an
inability to get the necessary scale to compete in either of their separate markets. Certainly, the lack of co-operation betweenthe divisions in areas such as information systems may lead to higher costs and poorer performance.
(ii) An evaluation of the environmental and sustainability implications of the Giant Dam Project; (8 marks)
(ii) Environmental and sustainability implications of the Giant Dam Project
In our preparation for the bid to act as principal contractor for the Giant Dam Project, we established that there were
two prominent negative implications of the project but these are, in our view, more than offset by two major
environmental positives.
The environmental arguments against the Giant Dam Project both concern the flooding of the valley behind the dam.
Regrettably, it seems that there will be some loss of important habitats. This, in turn, may mean the removal of balanced
environmental conditions for certain animal and plant species. In addition, the flooding of the valley will result in the
loss of productive farmland. This will mean reduced capacity for the host country to grow food and thus support citizens
such as the members of First Nation. From our point of view, as the board of R&M, however, we would remind
shareholders and other observers that the decisions involving the size and positioning of the Giant Dam were taken by
the client, the government. It is R&M’s job, having won the contract as principal contractor, to now carry out the plans,
regardless of our own views.
Happily, however, there are two very powerful environmental arguments in favour of the Giant Dam Project. It will create
a large source of clean energy for economic development that will be sustainable, as it will create no carbon emissions
nor will it consume any non-renewable resources as it does so (compared to, for example, fossil fuels).
At a time when people are becoming very concerned about greenhouse gases produced from conventional power
generation, the Giant Dam Project will contribute to the East Asian country’s internationally agreed carbon reduction
targets. This, in turn, will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gases in the environment.
It is clear that the construction of the Giant Dam Project is an environmental conundrum with strong arguments on both
sides. The deciding factor may be the opinion that we each have of the desirability of economic growth in the East Asian
country (which the energy from the dam is intended to support). It seems that Stop-the-dam values the preservation of
the original environment more than the economic growth that the energy from the dam would support. The client does
not agree with this assessment and we are happy to be involved with a project that will create such a useful source of
renewable and non-polluting energy.
(ii) State, with reasons, whether Messier Ltd can provide Galileo with accommodation in the UK without
giving rise to a UK income tax liability. (2 marks)
(ii) Tax-free accommodation
It is not possible for Messier Ltd to provide Galileo with tax-free accommodation. The provision of accommodation by an
employer to an employee will give rise to a taxable benefit unless it is:
– necessary for the proper performance of the employee’s duties, e.g. a caretaker; or
– for the better performance of the employee’s duties and customary, e.g. a hotel manager; or
– part of arrangements arising out of threats to the employee’s security, e.g. a government minister.
As a manager of Messier Ltd Galileo is unable to satisfy any of the above conditions.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2021-05-23
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-02-29
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2021-05-23
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-09-04
- 2021-02-25
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-08
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-09-04
- 2020-02-29