考前两个月,ACCA该怎么学才能达到及格线?
发布时间:2020-03-12
目前距离2020年第二考试季的ACCA考试(6月)所剩时间已经不多,一些小伙伴也开始进入复习阶段。对于一些备考效果不是很理想的小伙伴来说,复习尤为重要,是最后的提分阶段。鉴于此,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来ACCA考试备考方法的相关内容,以供参考。
首先,在复习阶段我们要做好查漏补缺的工作。所谓查漏补缺,就是在ACCA考试中找到学习上的薄弱环节,及时采取有效措施进行补充完善,让我们能够全面化、系统化、有效化的吸收知识。在平常做完模拟试卷后,在试卷分析过程中,通过正确答案和错误答案的对比,要重点找到掌握不牢的知识点。接着,我们就应该去巩固这些知识点,巩固方法除了复习好课本和讲义上的基础知识外,还要做好对知识的精细加工,做到举一反三。在复习阶段,我们可以更好的了解自己的不足,及时补救。
其次是对比自己每次的模拟试题成绩,了解自己是否有进步。在复习阶段,考生不免会练习模拟试题,这时考生可以拿本次模考ACCA考试成绩与上次模考成绩对照,看是否比上次有进步。在对比时,考生不仅从分数上比,更要比到细处,细化到知识点。了解自己对不同知识点的掌握程度。
除了对比自己的成绩外,考生也可以拿自己的成绩跟其他同学分数比。将其他学生分数作为参照,帮助自己找到相对处弱势的地方,及时补救。这样可以让知识点掌握更加牢固。
另外,考生还要学会不断反思。考试不仅仅是考查学生对知识的掌握情况,同时也是在检验学生学习方法的优劣和与应试能力的强弱。一般来说,考生在考试中往往暴露粗心、做题方法不对、不会审题、检查不细等方面的不足,及时改正这些不足之处对后面的学习至关重要。同时,考生也要端正考试的态度,不能只关注分数,重要的是找到适合自己的高效学习法,培养适合自己的思考方式,提高自己的应试能力。要把ACCA报名条件和考试当成检验自己各方面能力的一次机遇。
以上就是关于ACCA考试学习方法的相关内容。51题库考试学习网提醒:复习阶段最重要的是保持良好学习状态,要坚持学。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴都能顺利通过。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Discuss the reasons why the net present value investment appraisal method is preferred to other investment
appraisal methods such as payback, return on capital employed and internal rate of return. (9 marks)
(c) There are many reasons that could be discussed in support of the view that net present value (NPV) is superior to other
investment appraisal methods.
NPV considers cash flows
This is the reason why NPV is preferred to return on capital employed (ROCE), since ROCE compares average annual
accounting profit with initial or average capital invested. Financial management always prefers cash flows to accounting profit,
since profit is seen as being open to manipulation. Furthermore, only cash flows are capable of adding to the wealth of
shareholders in the form. of increased dividends. Both internal rate of return (IRR) and Payback also consider cash flows.
NPV considers the whole of an investment project
In this respect NPV is superior to Payback, which measures the time it takes for an investment project to repay the initial
capital invested. Payback therefore considers cash flows within the payback period and ignores cash flows outside of the
payback period. If Payback is used as an investment appraisal method, projects yielding high returns outside of the payback
period will be wrongly rejected. In practice, however, it is unlikely that Payback will be used alone as an investment appraisal
method.
NPV considers the time value of money
NPV and IRR are both discounted cash flow (DCF) models which consider the time value of money, whereas ROCE and
Payback do not. Although Discounted Payback can be used to appraise investment projects, this method still suffers from the
criticism that it ignores cash flows outside of the payback period. Considering the time value of money is essential, since
otherwise cash flows occurring at different times cannot be distinguished from each other in terms of value from the
perspective of the present time.
NPV is an absolute measure of return
NPV is seen as being superior to investment appraisal methods that offer a relative measure of return, such as IRR and ROCE,
and which therefore fail to reflect the amount of the initial investment or the absolute increase in corporate value. Defenders
of IRR and ROCE respond that these methods offer a measure of return that is understandable by managers and which can
be intuitively compared with economic variables such as interest rates and inflation rates.
NPV links directly to the objective of maximising shareholders’ wealth
The NPV of an investment project represents the change in total market value that will occur if the investment project is
accepted. The increase in wealth of each shareholder can therefore be measured by the increase in the value of their
shareholding as a percentage of the overall issued share capital of the company. Other investment appraisal methods do not
have this direct link with the primary financial management objective of the company.
NPV always offers the correct investment advice
With respect to mutually exclusive projects, NPV always indicates which project should be selected in order to achieve the
maximum increase on corporate value. This is not true of IRR, which offers incorrect advice at discount rates which are less
than the internal rate of return of the incremental cash flows. This problem can be overcome by using the incremental yield
approach.
NPV can accommodate changes in the discount rate
While NPV can easily accommodate changes in the discount rate, IRR simply ignores them, since the calculated internal rate
of return is independent of the cost of capital in all time periods.
NPV has a sensible re-investment assumption
NPV assumes that intermediate cash flows are re-invested at the company’s cost of capital, which is a reasonable assumption
as the company’s cost of capital represents the average opportunity cost of the company’s providers of finance, i.e. it
represents a rate of return which exists in the real world. By contrast, IRR assumes that intermediate cash flows are reinvested
at the internal rate of return, which is not an investment rate available in practice,
NPV can accommodate non-conventional cash flows
Non-conventional cash flows exist when negative cash flows arise during the life of the project. For each change in sign there
is potentially one additional internal rate of return. With non-conventional cash flows, therefore, IRR can suffer from the
technical problem of giving multiple internal rates of return.
Under certain circumstances, profits made on transactions between members of a group need to be eliminated from the consolidated financial statements under IFRS.
Which of the following statements about intra-group profits in consolidated financial statements is/are correct?
(i) The profit made by a parent on the sale of goods to a subsidiary is only realised when the subsidiary sells the goods to a third party
(ii) Eliminating intra-group unrealised profits never affects non-controlling interests
(iii) The profit element of goods supplied by the parent to an associate and held in year-end inventory must be eliminated in full
A.(i) only
B.(i) and (ii)
C.(ii) and (iii)
D.(iii) only
(i) is the only correct elimination required by IFRS.
(ii) The use of the trading loss of Tethys Ltd for the year ending 31 December 2008; (6 marks)
(ii) Tethys Ltd – Use of trading loss
– The two companies will not be in a group relief group as Saturn Ltd will not own 75% of Tethys Ltd.
– For a consortium to exist, 75% of the ordinary share capital of Tethys Ltd must be held by companies which each
hold at least 5%. Accordingly, Tethys Ltd will be a consortium company if the balance of its share capital is owned
by Clangers Ltd but not if it is owned by Edith Clanger.
– If Tethys Ltd qualifies as a consortium company: 65% of its trading losses in the period from 1 August 2008 to
31 December 2008 can be surrendered to Saturn Ltd, i.e. £21,667 (£80,000 x 5/12 x 65%).
– If Tethys Ltd does not qualify as a consortium company: none of its loss can be surrendered to Saturn Ltd.
– The acquisition of 65% of Tethys Ltd is a change in ownership of the company. If there is a major change in the
nature or conduct of the trade of Tethys Ltd within three years of 1 August 2008, the loss arising prior to that date
cannot be carried forward for relief in the future.
Further information required:
– Ownership of the balance of the share capital of Tethys Ltd.
(d) Explain whether or not Dovedale Ltd, Hira Ltd and Atapo Inc can register as a group for the purposes of value
added tax. (3 marks)
(d) Dovedale Ltd and Hira Ltd can register as a group for the purposes of value added tax (VAT) because Dovedale Ltd controls
Hira Ltd and both companies are established in the UK in that their head offices are in the UK.
Dovedale Ltd will also control Atapo Inc. However, Atapo Inc cannot be part of a group registration unless it is established
in the UK or has a fixed establishment in the UK. It will be regarded as established in the UK if it is centrally managed and
controlled in the UK or if its head office is in the UK. A fixed establishment is a place where the company has staff and
equipment and where its business is carried on.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-03-26
- 2020-03-13
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-30
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-28
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-12-28
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-02-05
- 2020-04-05
- 2020-03-08
- 2020-03-13
- 2020-03-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-01
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-01-09
- 2021-08-29
- 2020-03-25
- 2020-03-18
- 2020-03-13
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-12-27
- 2020-03-25