2020年ACCA考试不同类型考生的报考建议
发布时间:2020-03-04
众所周知,ACCA考试一共16门科目,其中前12科为必考,后四科为四选二。选择适合自己的科目,可以让考生更容易通过考试。因此,在新年到来之后,就有小伙伴在网上询问考试科目该如何搭配。鉴于此,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来ACCA考试科目选择的相关信息,以供参考。
首先,我们可以从考试内容搭配。根据历年考试情况来看,ACCA F阶段基础知识与P阶段课程内容有很大的联系,也就说ACCA学员在进行F阶段的考试时,就能清晰地看到自己在某一方面的学习优势。因此,ACCA学员只需要根据自己的优势来选择对应的P阶段课程就能够为自己争取到更高的通关概率。那么,具体的科目对应关系是怎样的呢?
首先,如果你对F5科目很感兴趣,那么P5对于你来说就是不错的选择;假如你F9考试成绩很好,那么选择P4对你来说将会更加容易。其他的科目与此类似。因此,找到自己擅长的科目类型是通过考试的关键。
除了科目对应外,我们还可以从P阶段各科目的出题方式以及实际应用途径来进行选择。ACCA考试科目中的P4-高级财务管理,此课程包含的知识点具有较强的实用性,其对应实际工作中的公司新项目投资评估、公司并购估值、公司财务或业务战略重组以及公司外汇及信用风险管理等内容,所以在此科目考试中各类计算占主要部分。因此,51题库考试学习网建议擅长计算的同学可优先报选读P4,在取得ACCA的qualification之后。当然了,有需要的小伙伴也可再选修P7课程,可以进一步提高自身的能力。为自己谋求更好的个人发展。
而P7这门课程偏重于会计师事务所各类审计计划和报告,考试注重写作。因此,51题库考试学习网建议具有相关经验和擅长写作的同学可以考虑先选修这门课程。当然了,小伙伴们在取得ACCA的qualification后,如果需要也可再选修P4课程以进一步提高自身的能力。因此,51题库考试学习网还是建议各位小伙伴去尝试报考哦。
以上就是关于ACCA考试题型的相关情况。51题库考试学习网提醒:由于ACCA考试的F阶段和P阶段的部分科目对应,因此小伙伴们在报考时,尽量不要选择免试,以便更合理的选择P阶段科目。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴都能顺利通过。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(ii) Suggest THREE other performance measures (not applied in (i)) which might be used to assess the
customer perspective of the balanced scorecard of GER. (3 marks)
(ii) Performance measures that may be used to assess the customer perspective of the balanced scorecard of GER include
the following:
Lost or damaged luggage per 1,000 passengers
Train cancellation rate
Denied boarding rate
Number of passenger complaints.
Note: Only three measures were required.
You are the audit supervisor of Maple & Co and are currently planning the audit of an existing client, Sycamore Science Co (Sycamore), whose year end was 30 April 2015. Sycamore is a pharmaceutical company, which manufactures and supplies a wide range of medical supplies. The draft financial statements show revenue of $35·6 million and profit before tax of $5·9 million.
Sycamore’s previous finance director left the company in December 2014 after it was discovered that he had been claiming fraudulent expenses from the company for a significant period of time. A new finance director was appointed in January 2015 who was previously a financial controller of a bank, and she has expressed surprise that Maple & Co had not uncovered the fraud during last year’s audit.
During the year Sycamore has spent $1·8 million on developing several new products. These projects are at different stages of development and the draft financial statements show the full amount of $1·8 million within intangible assets. In order to fund this development, $2·0 million was borrowed from the bank and is due for repayment over a ten-year period. The bank has attached minimum profit targets as part of the loan covenants.
The new finance director has informed the audit partner that since the year end there has been an increased number of sales returns and that in the month of May over $0·5 million of goods sold in April were returned.
Maple & Co attended the year-end inventory count at Sycamore’s warehouse. The auditor present raised concerns that during the count there were movements of goods in and out the warehouse and this process did not seem well controlled.
During the year, a review of plant and equipment in the factory was undertaken and surplus plant was sold, resulting in a profit on disposal of $210,000.
Required:
(a) State Maples & Co’s responsibilities in relation to the prevention and detection of fraud and error. (4 marks)
(b) Describe SIX audit risks, and explain the auditor’s response to each risk, in planning the audit of Sycamore Science Co. (12 marks)
(c) Sycamore’s new finance director has read about review engagements and is interested in the possibility of Maple & Co undertaking these in the future. However, she is unsure how these engagements differ from an external audit and how much assurance would be gained from this type of engagement.
Required:
(i) Explain the purpose of review engagements and how these differ from external audits; and (2 marks)
(ii) Describe the level of assurance provided by external audits and review engagements. (2 marks)
(a) Fraud responsibility
Maple & Co must conduct an audit in accordance with ISA 240 The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements and are responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements taken as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
In order to fulfil this responsibility, Maple & Co is required to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud.
They need to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud, through designing and implementing appropriate responses. In addition, Maple & Co must respond appropriately to fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit.
When obtaining reasonable assurance, Maple & Co is responsible for maintaining professional scepticism throughout the audit, considering the potential for management override of controls and recognising the fact that audit procedures which are effective in detecting error may not be effective in detecting fraud.
To ensure that the whole engagement team is aware of the risks and responsibilities for fraud and error, ISAs require that a discussion is held within the team. For members not present at the meeting, Sycamore’s audit engagement partner should determine which matters are to be communicated to them.
(b) Audit risks and auditors’ responses
(c) (i) Review engagements
Review engagements are often undertaken as an alternative to an audit, and involve a practitioner reviewing financial data, such as six-monthly figures. This would involve the practitioner undertaking procedures to state whether anything has come to their attention which causes the practitioner to believe that the financial data is not in accordance with the financial reporting framework.
A review engagement differs to an external audit in that the procedures undertaken are not nearly as comprehensive as those in an audit, with procedures such as analytical review and enquiry used extensively. In addition, the practitioner does not need to comply with ISAs as these only relate to external audits.
(ii) Levels of assurance
The level of assurance provided by audit and review engagements is as follows:
External audit – A high but not absolute level of assurance is provided, this is known as reasonable assurance. This provides comfort that the financial statements present fairly in all material respects (or are true and fair) and are free of material misstatements.
Review engagements – where an opinion is being provided, the practitioner gathers sufficient evidence to be satisfied that the subject matter is plausible; in this case negative assurance is given whereby the practitioner confirms that nothing has come to their attention which indicates that the subject matter contains material misstatements.
(iii) Lateral or horizontal. (3 marks)
(iii) Lateral or horizontal. Traditional communication assumes a hierarchical structure with only vertical communication,however horizontal communication has become important and necessary in less formal organisations. It takes the form. of coordination with departmental managers or supervisors meeting regularly, problem solving with department members meeting to resolve an issue or information sharing and it also describes interdepartmental sharing of ideas or conflict resolution where there is a need to resolve interdepartmental friction.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-28
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-13
- 2021-04-23
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-03-29
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-12-29
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-03-08
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-03
- 2020-05-05
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-01-09
- 2021-06-27
- 2020-04-10
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-08-13
- 2020-03-05