2019ACCA这些免考福利政策你都清楚了吗?
发布时间:2019-07-19
据2019年ACCA官网信息了解到,2019-2020年部分财务相关专业大学在校或毕业学生,在参加ACCA考试注册时,将获得一定科目的免试权。ACCA对于参加专业会计师考试(ACCA)的中国学员的免试政策详情如下:
一、ACCA对中国教育部认可的全日制大学在读生(会计或金融专业)设置的免试政策
1. 会计学或金融学(完成第一学年课程):可以注册为ACCA正式学员,无免试
2. 会计学或金融学(完成第二学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 会计学或金融学(完成第三学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
4. 其他专业(在校生完成大一后):可以注册但无免试
*大学在读考生准备时间相对充足,可以每次报考三门课程,不建议报考四门,科目可以以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
二、ACCA对中国教育部认可高校毕业生设置的免试政策
1. 会计学(获得学士学位):免试5门课程(F1-F5)
2. 会计学(辅修专业):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 金融专业:免试5门课程(F1-F5)
4. 法律专业:免试1门课程(F4)
5. 商务及管理专业:免试1门课程(F1)
6. MPAcc专业(获得MPAcc学位或完成MPAcc大纲规定的所有课程、只有论文待完成):原则上免试九门课程(F1–F9),其中F6(税务)的免试条件:CICPA全科通过或MPAcc课程中选修了"中国税制"课程。
7. MBA学位(获得MBA学位):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
8. 非相关专业:无免试
高校毕业生(即:在职人士),可以每次报考两门课程,小编建议不要超过三门课程,科目可以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
三、注册会计师考生
1. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之前获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试5门课程(F1-F4和F6)
2. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之后获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试9们课程(F1-F9)
3. 如果在学习ACCA基础阶段科目的过程中获得了CICPA全科合格证(须2009年"6+1"制度实行后的新版证书),可以自行决定是否申请追加免试。
*通过注会考试的考生对于财务知识基础相对好,一般F7、F8、F9通过率比其他考生高很多,建议从这些科目入手,加强英语的阅读和写作能力,注会考试大纲与ACCA考试大纲类似,只其是在审计及财务管理类的科目上,基本上知识点是相通的。F7会计科目中国际会计准则会计处理上略有不同。
四、其他
1. CMA(美国注册管理会计师)全科通过并取得证书:免试F1-F5、F8、F9(共免7门)
2. USCPA(美国注册会计师)全科通过:免试F1-F6、F8、F9(共免8门)
五、注意事项
1.在校生只有顺利通过整学年的课程才能够申请免试。
2.针对在校生的部分课程免试政策只适用于会计学专业全日制大学本科的在读学生,而不适用于硕士学位或大专学历的在读学生。
3.已完成MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,还需完成论文的学员也可注册并申请免试。但须提交由学校出具的通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程的成绩单,并附注"该学员已通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,论文待完成"的说明。
4.特许学位(即海外大学与中国本地大学合作而授予海外大学学位的项目)— 部分完成时不能申请免试。
5.政策适用于在中国教育部认可的高等院校全部完成或部分完成本科课程的学生,而不考虑目前居住地点。
6.欲申请牛津•布鲁克斯大学学士学位的学员需放弃F7-F9的免试。
综合以上就是关于2019ACCA免试政策的全部内容,希望对于正在备考的小伙伴么有帮助,小编将持续更新相关ACCA的相关资讯。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
4 (a) The purpose of ISA 510 ‘Initial Engagements – Opening Balances’ is to establish standards and provide guidance
regarding opening balances when the financial statements are audited for the first time or when the financial
statements for the prior period were audited by another auditor.
Required:
Explain the auditor’s reporting responsibilities that are specific to initial engagements. (5 marks)
4 JOHNSTON CO
(a) Reporting responsibilities specific to initial engagements
For initial audit engagements, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that:
■ the opening balances do not contain misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial statements;
■ the prior period’s closing balances have been correctly brought forward to the current period (or, where appropriate, have
been restated); and
■ appropriate accounting policies are consistently applied or changes in accounting policies have been properly accounted
for (and adequately presented and disclosed).
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning opening balances there will be a limitation
on the scope of the audit. The auditor’s report should include:
■ a qualified (‘except for’) opinion;
■ a disclaimer of opinion; or
■ in those jurisdictions where it is permitted, an opinion which is:
– qualified (or disclaimed) regarding the results of operations (i.e. on the income statement); and
– unqualified regarding financial position (i.e. on the balance sheet).
If the effect of a misstatement in the opening balances is not properly accounted for and adequately presented and disclosed,
the auditor should express a qualified (‘except for’ disagreement) opinion or an adverse opinion, as appropriate.
If the current period’s accounting policies have not been consistently applied in relation to opening balances and if the change
has not been properly accounted for and adequately presented and disclosed, the auditor should similarly express
disagreement (‘except for’ or adverse opinion as appropriate).
However, if a modification regarding the prior period’s financial statements remains relevant and material to the current
period’s financial statements, the auditor should modify the current auditor’s report accordingly.
4 In addition to the application form. and interview, references provide further confidential information about the
prospective employee.
Required:
(a) Define the purpose of a reference. (3 marks)
4 Overview:
References are used by most employers as a key part of their selection process, but mainly to verify facts about the candidate rather
than as an aid to decision making. The reference check is usually the last stage in the selection process and referees should be
contacted only after permission has been given by the applicant. Good referees are almost certain to know more about the
applicant than the selector and it would be foolish not to seek their advice or treat the reference check as a mere formality.
Part (a)
References provide further confidential information about the prospective employee. This may be of varying value, as the reliability
of all but the most factual information must be in question.
The purpose of a reference is to obtain straightforward factual information confirming the nature of the applicant’s previous job(s),
the period of employment, current pay and the circumstances for wishing to leave the present employment and to seek opinions
about the applicant’s personality and other attributes. However, allowance must be made for prejudice and charity.
(c) (i) Identify and describe FOUR quality control procedures that are applicable to the individual audit
engagement; and (8 marks)
(c) (i) ISQC 1 Quality Control for Firms That Perform. Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information and Other
Assurance and Related Services Engagements provides guidance on the overall quality control systems that should be
implemented by an audit firm. ISA 220 Quality Control for Audits of Historical Financial Information specifies the quality
control procedures that should be applied by the engagement team in individual audit assignments.
Procedures include the following:
Client acceptance procedures
There should be full documentation, and conclusion on, ethical and client acceptance issues in each audit assignment.
The engagement partner should consider whether members of the audit team have complied with ethical requirements,
for example, whether all members of the team are independent of the client. Additionally, the engagement partner should
conclude whether all acceptance procedures have been followed, for example, that the audit firm has considered the
integrity of the principal owners and key management of the client. Other procedures on client acceptance should
include:
– Obtaining professional clearance from previous auditors
– Consideration of any conflict of interest
– Money laundering (client identification) procedures.
Engagement team
Procedures should be followed to ensure that the engagement team collectively has the skills, competence and time to
perform. the audit engagement. The engagement partner should assess that the audit team, for example:
– Has the appropriate level of technical knowledge
– Has experience of audit engagements of a similar nature and complexity
– Has the ability to apply professional judgement
– Understands professional standards, and regulatory and legal requirements.
Direction
The engagement team should be directed by the engagement partner. Procedures such as an engagement planning
meeting should be undertaken to ensure that the team understands:
– Their responsibilities
– The objectives of the work they are to perform
– The nature of the client’s business
– Risk related issues
– How to deal with any problems that may arise; and
– The detailed approach to the performance of the audit.
The planning meeting should be led by the partner and should include all people involved with the audit. There should
be a discussion of the key issues identified at the planning stage.
Supervision
Supervision should be continuous during the engagement. Any problems that arise during the audit should be rectified
as soon as possible. Attention should be focused on ensuring that members of the audit team are carrying out their work
in accordance with the planned approach to the engagement. Significant matters should be brought to the attention of
senior members of the audit team. Documentation should be made of key decisions made during the audit engagement.
Review
The review process is one of the key quality control procedures. All work performed must be reviewed by a more senior
member of the audit team. Reviewers should consider for example whether:
– Work has been performed in accordance with professional standards
– The objectives of the procedures performed have been achieved
– Work supports conclusions drawn and is appropriately documented.
The review process itself must be evidenced.
Consultation
Finally the engagement partner should arrange consultation on difficult or contentious matters. This is a procedure
whereby the matter is discussed with a professional outside the engagement team, and sometimes outside the audit
firm. Consultations must be documented to show:
– The issue on which the consultation was sought; and
– The results of the consultation.
4 You are a senior manager in Becker & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants offering audit and assurance
services mainly to large, privately owned companies. The firm has suffered from increased competition, due to two
new firms of accountants setting up in the same town. Several audit clients have moved to the new firms, leading to
loss of revenue, and an over staffed audit department. Bob McEnroe, one of the partners of Becker & Co, has asked
you to consider how the firm could react to this situation. Several possibilities have been raised for your consideration:
1. Murray Co, a manufacturer of electronic equipment, is one of Becker & Co’s audit clients. You are aware that the
company has recently designed a new product, which market research indicates is likely to be very successful.
The development of the product has been a huge drain on cash resources. The managing director of Murray Co
has written to the audit engagement partner to see if Becker & Co would be interested in making an investment
in the new product. It has been suggested that Becker & Co could provide finance for the completion of the
development and the marketing of the product. The finance would be in the form. of convertible debentures.
Alternatively, a joint venture company in which control is shared between Murray Co and Becker & Co could be
established to manufacture, market and distribute the new product.
2. Becker & Co is considering expanding the provision of non-audit services. Ingrid Sharapova, a senior manager in
Becker & Co, has suggested that the firm could offer a recruitment advisory service to clients, specialising in the
recruitment of finance professionals. Becker & Co would charge a fee for this service based on the salary of the
employee recruited. Ingrid Sharapova worked as a recruitment consultant for a year before deciding to train as
an accountant.
3. Several audit clients are experiencing staff shortages, and it has been suggested that temporary staff assignments
could be offered. It is envisaged that a number of audit managers or seniors could be seconded to clients for
periods not exceeding six months, after which time they would return to Becker & Co.
Required:
Identify and explain the ethical and practice management implications in respect of:
(a) A business arrangement with Murray Co. (7 marks)
4 Becker & Co
(a) Joint business arrangement
The business opportunity in respect of Murray Co could be lucrative if the market research is to be believed.
However, IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants states that a mutual business arrangement is likely to give rise
to self-interest and intimidation threats to independence and objectivity. The audit firm must be and be seen to be independent
of the audit client, which clearly cannot be the case if the audit firm and the client are seen to be working together for a
mutual financial gain.
In the scenario, two options are available. Firstly, Becker & Co could provide the audit client with finance to complete the
development and take the product to market. There is a general prohibition on audit firms providing finance to their audit
clients. This would create a clear financial self-interest threat as the audit firm would be receiving a return on investment from
their client. The Code states that if a firm makes a loan (or guarantees a loan) to a client, the self-interest threat created would
be so significant that no safeguard could reduce the threat to an acceptable level.
The provision of finance using convertible debentures raises a further ethical problem, because if the debentures are ultimately
converted to equity, the audit firm would then hold equity shares in their audit client. This is a severe financial self-interest,
which safeguards are unlikely to be able to reduce to an acceptable level.
The finance should not be advanced to Murray Co while the company remains an audit client of Becker & Co.
The second option is for a joint venture company to be established. This would be perceived as a significant mutual business
interest as Becker & Co and Murray Co would be investing together, sharing control and sharing a return on investment in
the form. of dividends. IFAC’s Code of Ethics states that unless the relationship between the two parties is clearly insignificant,
the financial interest is immaterial, and the audit firm is unable to exercise significant influence, then no safeguards could
reduce the threat to an acceptable level. In this case Becker & Co may not enter into the joint venture arrangement while
Murray Co is still an audit client.
The audit practice may consider that investing in the new electronic product is a commercial strategy that it wishes to pursue,
either through loan finance or using a joint venture arrangement. In this case the firm should resign as auditor with immediate
effect in order to eliminate any ethical problem with the business arrangement. The partners should carefully consider if the
potential return on investment will more than compensate for the lost audit fee from Murray Co.
The partners should also reflect on whether they want to diversify to such an extent – this investment is unlikely to be in an
area where any of the audit partners have much knowledge or expertise. A thorough commercial evaluation and business risk
analysis must be performed on the new product to ensure that it is a sound business decision for the firm to invest.
The audit partners should also consider how much time they would need to spend on this business development, if they
decided to resign as auditors and to go ahead with the investment. Such a new and important project could mean that they
take their focus off the key business i.e. the audit practice. They should consider if it would be better to spend their time trying
to compete effectively with the two new firms of accountants, trying to retain key clients, and to attract new accounting and
audit clients rather than diversify into something completely different.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-04-22
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-05
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-04-09
- 2020-05-20
- 2020-05-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-02
- 2020-03-25
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-03-28
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-04-18
- 2020-05-10
- 2020-01-01
- 2020-02-21
- 2020-05-13
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-03-18
- 2020-05-10
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-03-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-05-04