河北省考生注意:在ACCA考试中提前交卷后果怎么样?不堪设想……
发布时间:2020-01-09
近期,有不少第一次备考ACCA考试的小伙伴来咨询51题库考试学习网,问:考试能不能提前交卷呢?在这里告诉大家,根据考试的相关规定是不允许的。什么?还有些小伙伴不知道考试时应当注意些什么?没关系,现在了解还来得及,51题库考试学习网这就将相关注意事项告诉大家:
ACCA考试之前注意事项:
1.考生必须准时到场考试,一旦迟到,考试时间不会延长。因此,再次强调考生必须时刻关注考试时间,以防迟到。
2.三小时答题时间及15分钟的读题时间以准考证时间为准。阅读过程中,考生可以浏览试题册,但是不能打开并书写答题册。如果违法相关规定,有可能会取消考试资格
3.需要注意的还有,考试开始一小时后,考生不允许再进入考场。
4.直到考试结束,考生才允许离开考场。
5.如果考生要求短时间离开考场,必须有监考人员陪同。
6.不得私自携带手机等电子工具,考生必须将书包和公文包放置监考人员规定处。
7.对于笔考的科目,考生只能用黑色圆珠笔作答。
8.考生必须确认自己参加的考试的代号与准考证上的考试科目代号一致。
ACCA考试时的注意事项有哪些?
1.在新版的考生答题册上(candidate answer booklet)的第一页仔细填涂以下项目
1)考试的科目和版本(注:如P2,应填INT;F4填写ENG;F6填写UK等)
2)考场代码(包括Hall code)考场名字和座位号
3)以上信息均在你个人的准考证(Exam Attendance Docket)上有显示;
2.在新的一页上开始每答一道新题,要在这页上部填涂题号;
3.所有答题均使用黑色圆珠笔作答,(铅笔,黑色签字笔,荧光笔等不允许);
4.答错可划掉错误的答案,不允许使用涂改液;51题库考试学习网建议考生在不确定答案的时候最好不要填写,卷面也是影响得分的一大因素
5.不能将答案写在答题纸边缘及答题本两页的中间位置,否则将视为无效作答;
学生如需要,可索要第二本答题本,第二本答题本上同样必须填写完整个人信息。
当然,对于笔考,机考的确是有些差别的。这主要体现在:
1、大题部分需要通过计算机进行解答,相较于笔试,计算机打字能力和某些公式的熟练度会间接地影响考试结果;
2、考试时间有所不同。目前,应用技能课程的机考时间均为3个小时,而战略课程的笔试一般为3小时15分钟,SBL为4个小时。因此,考试在考试之前需要提前了解是机考还是笔考,以免出现战略层面上的失误。
以上ACCA考试的注意事项大家要提高警觉哦,遇到了上文提到以外突发事故及时向监考老师提出来,听从监考老师的安排即可,不要因为突发事件而影响了自己的考试心态从而影响到成绩。调整好心态,重新积极考试!~
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Explain how Perfect Shopper might re-structure its downstream supply chain to address the problems
identified in the scenario. (10 marks)
(c) A number of opportunities appear to exist in the downstream supply chain.
As already mentioned above, Perfect Shopper can revisit its contract distribution arrangements. At present, distribution to
neighbourhood shops is in the hands of locally appointed contract distributors. As already suggested, it may be possible to
contract one integrated logistics company to carry out both inbound and outbound logistics, so gaining economies of scale
and opportunities for branding.
One of the problems identified in the independent report was the inflexibility of the ordering and delivering system. The
ordering system appears to be built around a fixed standard delivery made every two weeks, agreed in advance for a three
month period. Variations can be made to this standard order, but only increases – not decreases. Presumably, this
arrangement is required to allow Perfect Shopper to forecast demand over a three month period and to place bulk orders to
reflect these commitments. However, this may cause at least two problems. The first is that participating shops place a
relatively low standard order and rely on variations to fulfil demand. This causes problems for Perfect Shopper. Secondly, any
unpredictable fall in demand during the three month period leads to the shop having storage problems and unsold stock. This
potentially creates problems for the shop owner, who may also begin to question the value of the franchise. Hence Perfect
Shopper might wish to consider a much more flexible system where orders can be made to match demand and deliveries
can be made as required. This would also remove the requirement for a three monthly meeting between the franchisee andthe sales representative from Perfect Shopper. Investments in IT systems will be required to support this, with participating
shops placing orders over the Internet to reflect their requirements. This move towards a more flexible purchasing arrangement
may also make the outsourcing of warehousing and distribution even more appealing.
Perfect Shopper may also wish to investigate whether they can also provide value added services to customers, which not
only simplify the ordering system but also allow the shop managers to better understand their customers and fulfil their
requirements. The supply chain may legitimately include the customer’s customers, particularly for franchisers. This is already
acknowledged because Perfect Shopper produces tailored marketing material aimed at the end-consumer. Point of Sales (PoS)
devices feeding information back to Perfect Shopper would allow sales information to be analysed and fed back to the
shopkeeper as well as allowing automatic replenishment based on purchasing trends. However, this may be culturally difficult
for independent neighbourhood shopkeepers to accept. Furthermore, it would potentially include information outside the
products offered by Perfect Shopper and the implications of this would have to be considered. However, a whole shop sales
analysis might be a useful service to offer existing and potential franchisees.
Customers are increasingly willing to order products over the Internet. It seems unlikely that individual shopkeepers would be
able to establish and maintain their own Internet-based service. It would be useful for Perfect Shopper to explore the potential
of establishing a central website with customers placing orders from local shops. Again there are issues about scope, because
Perfect Shopper does not offer a whole-shop service. However, Michael de Kare-Silver has identified groceries as a product
area that has good potential for Internet purchase. In his electronic shopping potential test any product scoring over 20 hasgood potential. Groceries scored 27.
(b) Explanations of the various matters. (11 marks)
(b) Related matters
(i) National insurance contributions in 2007/08
The profit for the period ending 31 March 2008 is expected to be £1,200 (£400 x 3).
No class 2 contributions will be due as the profit is less than the small earnings exception limit of £4,465.
No class 4 contributions will be due as the profit is less than the lower profits limit of £5,035.
Tutorial note
Adam will have paid class 1 contributions in respect of his earnings from Rheims Ltd, thus preserving his entitlement
to state benefits and pension, and therefore there is no disadvantage in claiming the small earnings exemption from
class 2 contributions.
(ii) Purchase and renovation of the theatre
The theatre is a capital purchase that does not qualify for capital allowances as it is a building but not an industrial
building. Accordingly, the cost of purchasing the theatre will not give rise to a tax deduction for the purpose of computing
AS’s taxable trading income.
The tax treatment of the renovation costs may be summarised as follows:
– The costs will be disallowed if the renovations are necessary before the theatre can be used for business purposes.
This is because they will be regarded as further capital costs of acquiring appropriate premises.
– Some of the costs may be allowable if the condition of the theatre is such that it can be used in its present state
and the renovations are more in the nature of cosmetic improvements.
(iii) VAT position
The grant of a right to occupy the theatre in exchange for rent is an exempt supply. Accordingly, as all of AS’s activities
will be regarded as one for VAT purposes, AS will become partially exempt once he begins to rent out the theatre.
AS will be able to recover the input tax that is directly attributable to his standard rated supplies, i.e. those in connection
with the supply of children’s parties. He will also be able to recover a proportion of the input tax on his overheads; the
proportion being that of his total supplies that are standard rated.
The remainder of his input tax will only be recoverable if it is no more than £625 per month on average and no more
than 50% of his total input tax.
If AS were to opt to tax the theatre, the right to occupy the theatre in exchange for rent would then be a standard rated
supply. AS could then recover all of his input tax, regardless of the amount attributable to the rent, but would have to
charge VAT on the rent and on any future sale of the building.
The decision as to whether or not to opt to tax the theatre will depend on:
– the amount of input tax at stake; and
– whether or not those who rent the theatre are in a position to recover any VAT charged.
3 Mary Hobbes joined the board of Rosh and Company, a large retailer, as finance director earlier this year. Whilst she
was glad to have finally been given the chance to become finance director after several years as a financial
accountant, she also quickly realised that the new appointment would offer her a lot of challenges. In the first board
meeting, she realised that not only was she the only woman but she was also the youngest by many years.
Rosh was established almost 100 years ago. Members of the Rosh family have occupied senior board positions since
the outset and even after the company’s flotation 20 years ago a member of the Rosh family has either been executive
chairman or chief executive. The current longstanding chairman, Timothy Rosh, has already prepared his slightly
younger brother, Geoffrey (also a longstanding member of the board) to succeed him in two years’ time when he plans
to retire. The Rosh family, who still own 40% of the shares, consider it their right to occupy the most senior positions
in the company so have never been very active in external recruitment. They only appointed Mary because they felt
they needed a qualified accountant on the board to deal with changes in international financial reporting standards.
Several former executive members have been recruited as non-executives immediately after they retired from full-time
service. A recent death, however, has reduced the number of non-executive directors to two. These sit alongside an
executive board of seven that, apart from Mary, have all been in post for over ten years.
Mary noted that board meetings very rarely contain any significant discussion of strategy and never involve any debate
or disagreement. When she asked why this was, she was told that the directors had all known each other for so long
that they knew how each other thought. All of the other directors came from similar backgrounds, she was told, and
had worked for the company for so long that they all knew what was ‘best’ for the company in any given situation.
Mary observed that notes on strategy were not presented at board meetings and she asked Timothy Rosh whether the
existing board was fully equipped to formulate strategy in the changing world of retailing. She did not receive a reply.
Required:
(a) Explain ‘agency’ in the context of corporate governance and criticise the governance arrangements of Rosh
and Company. (12 marks)
(a) Defining and explaining agency
Agency is defined in relation to a principal. A principal appoints an agent to act on his or her behalf. In the case of corporate
governance, the principal is a shareholder in a joint stock company and the agents (that have an agency relationship with
principals) are the directors. The directors remain accountable to the principals for the stewardship of their investment in the
company. In the case of Rosh, 60% of the shares are owned by shareholders external to the Rosh family and the board has
agency responsibility to those shareholders.
Criticisms of Rosh’s CG arrangements
The corporate governance arrangements at Rosh and Company are far from ideal. Five points can be made based on the
evidence in the case.
There are several issues associated with the non-executive directors (NEDs) at Rosh. It is doubtful whether two NEDs are
enough to bring sufficient scrutiny to the executive board. Some corporate governance codes require half of the board of larger
companies to be non-executive and Rosh would clearly be in breach of such a requirement. Perhaps of equal concern, there
is significant doubt over the independence of the current NEDs as they were recruited from retired executive members of the
board and presumably have relationships with existing executives going back many years. Some corporate governance codes
(such as the UK Combined Code) specify that NEDs should not have worked for the company within the last five years. Again,
Rosh would be in breach of this provision.
Succession planning for senior positions in the company seems to be based on Rosh family membership rather than any
meritocratic approach to appointments (there doesn’t appear to be a nominations committee). Whilst this may have been
acceptable before the flotation when the Rosh family owned all of the shares, the flotation introduced an important need for
external scrutiny of this arrangement. The lack of NED independence makes this difficult.
There is a poor (very narrow) diversity of backgrounds among board members. Whilst diversity can bring increased conflict,
it is generally assumed that it can also stimulate discussion and debate that is often helpful.
There is a somewhat entrenched executive board and Mary is the first new appointment to the board in many years (and is
the first woman). Whilst experience is very important on a board, the appointment of new members, in addition to seeding
the board with talent for the future, can also bring fresh ideas and helpful scrutiny of existing policies.
There is no discussion of strategy and there is evidence of a lack of preparation of strategic notes to the board. The assumption
seems to be that the ‘best’ option is obvious and so there is no need for discussion and debate. Procedures for preparing
briefing notes on strategy for board meetings appear to be absent. Most corporate governance codes place the discussion and
setting of strategy as a high priority for boards and Rosh would be in breach of such a provision.
There is no evidence of training for Mary to facilitate her introduction into the organisation and its systems. Thorough training
of new members and ongoing professional development of existing members is an important component of good governance.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-04-12
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-28
- 2020-04-19
- 2020-04-20
- 2020-03-11
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-02
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-01
- 2020-05-13
- 2020-01-29
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-15
- 2020-05-02
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-05-07
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-09-04
- 2020-03-28
- 2020-04-07