重磅消息:听说全国ACCA考试有免考?你得有这些条件哦
发布时间:2020-01-09
众所周知,ACCA国际会计注册师考试科目多达15个科目,备考和复习起来的难度也毋容置疑是十分巨大的,而目前ACCA官方出台了相关的考试规则和免考政策,免考的科目一个人可以多达9科,具体免考的条件是什么呢?且随51题库考试学习网一起去了解一下,看看你能免考几科呢?
首先,在讲述免试政策之前,你得符合ACCA考试规则才可以参与考试,具体的规则如下:
1、申请参加ACCA考试者,必须首先注册成为ACCA学员。(需要到官网上申请注册)
2、学员必须按考试大纲设置的先后次序报考,即知识课程,技术课程,核心课程和选修课程。在一个课程中可以选择任意顺序报考。51题库考试学习网建议在一个课程中可以通过自身能力来考虑报名顺序,并不一定非要按照官方给出的顺序报名。
3、基础阶段的知识课程考试时间为两小时,基础阶段的技能课程和专业阶段所有课程考试时间为三小时,及格成绩为50分(百分制)。从2016年起,ACCA实行4个考季,即学员可选择在3、6、9、12月考季在当地笔试考点进行考试。学员每年最多报考8门。
4、基础阶段9门考试不设时限;专业阶段考试年限为7年,从通过第一门专业阶段考试之日算起。只要在7年内通过全部考试科目都算考核通过,下一步即可申请证书。
5、考试的报名时间不同,考试资费标准就不同(该优惠政策仅限网上报名)。简单点来说就是较早报名考试,费用会相对较少。报考时间分为提前报名时段,常规报名时段和后期报名时段。
接下来,就是万众瞩目的ACCA专业资格考试免试政策,建议ACCAer们收藏分享哟~
以上专业所对应的免试门数仅供参考,最终免试结果由ACCA英国总部审核确认。如有和ACCA英国总部所发布的免试政策有差异,一切以ACCA英国总部发布的文献为主~
如持有国外学历,或需要了解更详细免试情况,请查询官网或联系上财培训。
注意
1、在校生只有顺利通过整学年的课程才能够申请免试。(即未拿到学位证和学历证之前不能申请免试)
2、针对在校生的部分课程免试政策只适用于会计学专业全日制大学本科的在读学生,而不适用于硕士学位或大专学历的在读学生。
3、已完成MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,还需完成论文的学员也可注册并申请免试。但须提交由学校出具的通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程的成绩单,并附注“该学员已通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,论文待完成”的说明。
4、特许学位(即海外大学与中国本地大学合作而授予海外大学学位的项目)部分完成时不能申请免试。
5、政策适用于在中国教育部认可的高等院校全部完成或部分完成本科课程的学生,而不考虑目前居住地点
大家是否已经了解到了自己能免试几科呢?51题库考试学习网提醒一下大家哦,免试虽然不用考试,但考试科目的报名费用还是得缴的哟~大家还是得及时缴费,以防出现不必要的麻烦~
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
24 Sigma’s bank statement shows an overdrawn balance of $38,600 at 30 June 2005. A check against the company’s cash book revealed the following differences:
1 Bank charges of $200 have not been entered in the cash book.
2 Lodgements recorded on 30 June 2005 but credited by the bank on 2 July $14,700.
3 Cheque payments entered in cash book but not presented for payment at 30 June 2005 $27,800.
4 A cheque payment to a supplier of $4,200 charged to the account in June 2005 recorded in the cash book as a receipt.
Based on this information, what was the cash book balance BEFORE any adjustments?
A $43,100 overdrawn
B $16,900 overdrawn
C $60,300 overdrawn
D $34,100 overdrawn
(b) What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a balanced scorecard to better assess the overall
performance of Lawson Engineering? (8 marks)
(b) In many ways Lawson Engineering and its performance explains why Kaplan and Norton developed the balanced scorecard
to overcome the reliance on traditional, and they would argue flawed, financial measures of performance such as return on
capital employed (ROCE). Lawson Engineering as a privately owned company does not have the same pressure to maximise
shareholder wealth, which is the overarching long-term goal of publicly quoted companies. The intangible resources discussed
above – both internal and external – reflect the success of the company in meeting the expectations of the other key
stakeholders in the business, namely customers, employees and suppliers. In terms of the other measures of performance
used in the balanced scorecard the customer perspective seems to be very much a positive area of performance. Lawson
Engineering has developed a clear niche strategy based on the excellence of its products. Market share as a measure of
customer satisfaction is not too relevant as the company has chosen to develop its own markets and is not looking for large
volumes and a dominant market share. The growth of the company suggests that it is both retaining its existing customer
base and acquiring new ones. Clearly there need to be measures in place to show where its growth is coming from. Customer
acquisition is usually an expensive but necessary activity and cutomer retention a more positive route to profitability. Today
there is increasing emphasis on customer relationship management (CRM) and measures to show the share of a particular
customer’s business the company has, rather than the overall market share the company has achieved. Michael Porter has
drawn attention to the fact that having the biggest market share is not necessarily associated with being the most profitable
company in that market. Customer acquisition and retention are both useful indicators of customer satisfaction which many
companies have problems in measuring. Finally, knowing which customers are profitable ones is a key requirement.
Surprisingly there is a lot of evidence to suggest that many companies are unsure which of their products and which
customers actually contribute to their profits.
The third measure in the balanced scorecard is an internal one – the effectiveness or otherwise of the firm’s internal processes.
In turn there are three areas where performance should be measured – innovation, operational processes and after sales
service (where appropriate). Innovation itself is a result of effective internal processes and Lawson Engineering through its
patents and awards has tangible evidence of its success. Many firms are measuring the contribution of products introduced
in the last three or four years – 3M, a global manufacturer of consumer and industrial products looks to achieve 30% of its
sales from products that are less than four years old. Equally important in a company such as Lawson Engineering is the time
taken to develop and get new products to their customers. The strategy of being ‘first to market’ can be a very effective
competitive strategy.
Equally important for the customers are the operational processes that produce and deliver the inputs from their suppliers.
The introduction of JIT and the use of technology to shorten and simplify the links between supplier and customer are ways
of shortening lead times and increasing customer satisfaction. Lawson Engineering has looked to innovate its processes as
well as its products and can look to develop measures of key areas of operational performance. Finally it is worth stressing
that financial performance, customer satisfaction and effective internal processes are all dependent on the people who make
things happen in the firm. Employees and the way they learn and grow in their jobs will determine whether or not the firm
succeeds. Again there is evidence to suggest that Lawson Engineering’s employees are being trained and developed and as
a consequence are well motivated.
The balanced scorecard has been criticised on a number of accounts. Firstly, such a comprehensive set of performance
measures will take considerable time and commitment on the part of senior management to develop. There is a need to avoid
over-complexity and assess the costs and benefits of the process. Secondly, there is the question of whether all the key
stakeholders have shared goals and expectations and whether the measures are focused on short-, medium- or long-term
performance. Thirdly, its focus on internal and external processes may not come easily to firms that have organised themselves
on traditional lines. Most organisations have retained departments within which functional specialists are located, e.g.
production, marketing etc. Changing the way performance is measured may need a radical change in culture and meetsignificant resistance.
(ii) evaluates the relative performance of the four depots as indicated by the analysis in the summary table
prepared in (i); (5 marks)
(ii) The summary analysis in (a)(i) shows that using overall points gained, Michaelangelotown has achieved the best
performance with 12 points. Donatellotown and Leonardotown have achieved a reasonable level of performance with
eight points each. Raphaeltown has under performed, however, gaining only four out of the available 12 points.
Michaelangelotown is the only depot to have achieved both an increase in revenue over budget and an increased
profit:revenue percentage.
In the customer care and service delivery statistics, Michaelangelotown has achieved all six of the target standards,
Donatellotown four; Leonardotown three. The Raphaeltown statistic of achieving only one out of six targets indicates the
need for investigation.
With regard to the credit control and administrative efficiency statistics, Leonardotown and Michaelangelotown achieved
all four standards and Donatellotown achieved three of the four standards. Once again, Raphaeltown is the ‘poor
performer’ achieving only two of the four standards.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-03-22
- 2020-03-21
- 2020-05-02
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-13
- 2020-01-14
- 2020-03-15
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-29
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-31
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-12
- 2020-04-19
- 2020-03-26
- 2020-03-21
- 2020-05-05
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-01
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-03-24
- 2020-04-12
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-14