甘肃省考生:ACCA考试内容是什么?难度和专业课相比怎样?

发布时间:2020-01-09


第一次听闻ACCA考试的同学可能只知道其证书的含金量是十分高的,但当听到ACCA考试的考试科目多达13科的时候,可能有些同学就会打退堂鼓了。其实,51题库考试学习网想告诉大家的是,ACCA考试并不是高不可攀的,任何一场考试他都是有难度的,但只要自己付出过汗水,努力过,即使没有通过也不会留下遗憾。可能这样说大家还是感觉到很空洞吧,那么51题库考试学习网就结合当下同学们目前正在学习的学校专业课程与ACCA考试的科目进行比较,让你们更加直观地感受ACCA考试的具体内容。

和大学课程相比,ACCA的难度如何?

相比较国内会计师考试,ACCA对于报考要求很低,最明显的一点就是它不要求你需要从事此行业到一定年限才可以报考,即使是没接触过会计学科知识的人,通过ACCA的考试的系统化的学习、记忆和理解,也能建立起系统的会计学科知识。

ACCA考试分为基础阶段和专业阶段。因为ACCA总部是在英国,所以考试的难度是以英国大学学位考试的难度为标准,换到国内的水平就是:基础课程的难度相当于学士学位高年级课程的考试难度,专业阶段课程的考试相当于硕士学位的考试。再说简单点就是,基础阶段是国内大学水平,专业阶段是国内硕士水平。所以更大学的专业课程相比,基础阶段的知识还能勉强用大学所学的知识应付,而到了专业阶段就可能不适用了,因此必须要去学习专业阶段的知识。ACCA的课程使学员全面掌握财务、财务管理、审计、税务及经营战略等方面的专业知识,提升分析能力并拓宽战略思维。

与国内注会拔高式的考试内容不同,ACCA的知识体系是呈阶梯式递进的。难度也是层层递进的,因此即便是非财会专业出身,也不必担心吃不透某个基础概念的状况。如果你是财会专业出身,ACCA学起来不但更为轻松,高级阶段教授的知识内容也能你让你提前领会在校期间学不到的商业奥义。

考完ACCA需要多长时间呢?

听到考试科目多达13科目是不是被吓到了?一次性同时备考13个科目压力还是太大了。所以,ACCA官方给了你7年时间去完成整个考试,不过大家不要怕,基本上大多数学生只需要花2-4年的时间就可以全部考完。当然前提是你每个阶段都是认真学习的情况下。

英语不好学ACCA会不会困难?

简单来说,ACCA里的英文水准可能等同于国家三级水准,只要在大学考试通过了CET-4的同学,一般来说没什么参加ACCA考试不会吃看不懂单词的亏。学ACCA不是学英语,只要表述没有问题,考官不会在意你用的是什么华丽的句式或者无伤大雅的语病。而且语感这东西,在学习的过程中是能逐渐培养出来的,也就是所谓的“套路”。

需要注意的地方是:ACCA里很多是会计专业词汇,我们平时学的英语单词很少用上。而且在ACCA培训班,老师解释的时候都用中文,这样字典也不用查了,况且不少专业词汇的用法在普通字典里是查不到的,比如premium既可以解释为“溢价”,又可以解释为“定金/押金”,普通字典查不到这种解释,大学四六级雅思什么的也没有这种解释。所以说,51题库考试学习网建议大家购买专业的英文字典,可以去ACCA官网了解一下相关字典是通过何种渠道获得的。

ACCA能否通过,要看你付出到什么程度。

ACCA考试虽然有一定的难度,但是绝对是在大家能力范围之内的——只要你努力。如果你想不花精力和时间就通过ACCA的话,通过考试也只是痴人说梦。想要通过ACCA肯定是要做出一定的牺牲的。俗话说,贵在坚持,也就是说,ACCA的难度其实取决于你自己。通过率的高低其实与我们没有太大的关系,通过率再高,你不认真学习,也是通不过的。

如何平衡ACCA考试与大学生活

在大学生活中,如果备考ACCA考试,那么首先要面临的问题就是如何平衡考试与大学生活了。大学专业课的绩点与排名,对自己能否拿到学位证和学历证以及对今后的考研或出国来说,还是有着至关重要影响的,所以51题库考试学习网建议在ACCA的复习备考的基础上要首先完善好大学的相关课程和作业,因为毕竟ACCA考试的年限长达7年,而大学也就4年左右。所以,该做取舍的时候就还是可以做取舍的。建议大家在大学期间每一个考季不用报考满4个科目,根据自己的学习时间来制定相应的计划就可以了。

另外,合理利用自己周末的时间,这就是大学生复习时间的主要来源。对当天所讲的内容进行全面的复习与刷题会比较困难,所以我个人建议,对于一些难度大的知识点要确保在讲授当天及时复习巩固,其他的知识点如果来不及,可以分散到周一到周五去抽一定的时间复习,并保证一定的刷题量,这样才能加深对相应知识点的印象,提高复习的效率,减轻备考时的工作量。

在文章的最后,51题库考试学习网想与大家分享一句话:“人不能漂泊一辈子,但在声嘶力竭之前就安居乐业也未免可惜。”既然选择了报考ACCA这条道路,那就坚持下去,让生命在汗水与努力中呐喊出最灿烂的色彩,大家加油~。


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(iii) assesses TSC in terms of financial performance, competitiveness, service quality, resource utilisation,

flexibility and innovation and discusses the interrelationships between these terms, incorporating

examples from within TSC; and (10 marks)

正确答案:
(iii) The terms listed may be seen as representative of the dimensions of performance. The dimensions may be analysed into
results and determinants.
The results may be measured by focusing on financial performance and competitiveness. Financial performance may
be measured in terms of revenue and profit as shown in the data in the appendix of the question in respect of TSC. The
points system in part (a) of the answer shows which depots have achieved or exceeded the target set. In addition,
liquidity is another aspect of the measurement of financial performance. The points total in part (a) showed that
Leonardotown and Michaelangelotown depots appear to have the best current record in aspects of credit control.
15
Competitiveness may be measured in terms of sales growth but also in terms of market share, number of new
customers, etc. In the TSC statistics available in (a) we only have data for the current quarter. This shows that three of
the four depots listed have achieved increased revenue compared to target.
The determinants are the factors which may be seen to contribute to the achievement of the results. Quality, resource
utilisation, flexibility and innovation are cited by Fitzgerald and Moon as examples of factors that should contribute to
the achievement of the results in terms of financial performance and competitiveness. In TSC a main quality issue
appears to be customer care and service delivery. The statistics in the points table in part (a) of the answer show that
the Raphaeltown depot appears to have a major problem in this area. It has only achieved one point out of the six
available in this particular segment of the statistics.
Resource utilisation for TSC may be measured by the level of effective use of drivers and vehicles. To some extent, this
is highlighted by the statistics relating to customer care and service delivery. For example, late collection of consignments
from customers may be caused by a shortage of vehicles and/or drivers. Such shortages could be due to staff turnover,
sickness, etc or problems with vehicle maintenance.
Flexibility may be an issue. There may, for example, be a problem with vehicle availability. Possibly an increased focus
on sources for short-term sub-contracting of vehicles/collections/deliveries might help overcome delay problems.
The ‘target v actual points system’ may be seen as an example of innovation by the company. This gives a detailed set
of measures that should provide an incentive for improvement at all depots. The points system may illustrate the extent
of achievement/non-achievement of company strategies for success. For example TSC may have a customer care
commitment policy which identifies factors that should be achieved on a continuing basis. For example, timely collection
of consignments, misdirected consignments re-delivered at no extra charge, prompt responses to customer claims and
compensation for customers.

(b) Discuss the relative costs to the preparer and benefits to the users of financial statements of increased

disclosure of information in financial statements. (14 marks)

Quality of discussion and reasoning. (2 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Increased information disclosure benefits users by reducing the likelihood that they will misallocate their capital. This is
obviously a direct benefit to individual users of corporate reports. The disclosure reduces the risk of misallocation of capital
by enabling users to improve their assessments of a company’s prospects. This creates three important results.
(i) Users use information disclosed to increase their investment returns and by definition support the most profitable
companies which are likely to be those that contribute most to economic growth. Thus, an important benefit of
information disclosure is that it improves the effectiveness of the investment process.
(ii) The second result lies in the effect on the liquidity of the capital markets. A more liquid market assists the effective
allocation of capital by allowing users to reallocate their capital quickly. The degree of information asymmetry between
the buyer and seller and the degree of uncertainty of the buyer and the seller will affect the liquidity of the market as
lower asymmetry and less uncertainty will increase the number of transactions and make the market more liquid.
Disclosure will affect uncertainty and information asymmetry.
(iii) Information disclosure helps users understand the risk of a prospective investment. Without any information, the user
has no way of assessing a company’s prospects. Information disclosure helps investors predict a company’s prospects.
Getting a better understanding of the true risk could lower the price of capital for the company. It is difficult to prove
however that the average cost of capital is lowered by information disclosure, even though it is logically and practically
impossible to assess a company’s risk without relevant information. Lower capital costs promote investment, which can
stimulate productivity and economic growth.
However although increased information can benefit users, there are problems of understandability and information overload.
Information disclosure provides a degree of protection to users. The benefit is fairness to users and is part of corporate
accountability to society as a whole.
The main costs to the preparer of financial statements are as follows:
(i) the cost of developing and disseminating information,
(ii) the cost of possible litigation attributable to information disclosure,
(iii) the cost of competitive disadvantage attributable to disclosure.
The costs of developing and disseminating the information include those of gathering, creating and auditing the information.
Additional costs to the preparers include training costs, changes to systems (for example on moving to IFRS), and the more
complex and the greater the information provided, the more it will cost the company.
Although litigation costs are known to arise from information disclosure, it does not follow that all information disclosure leads
to litigation costs. Cases can arise from insufficient disclosure and misleading disclosure. Only the latter is normally prompted
by the presentation of information disclosure. Fuller disclosure could lead to lower costs of litigation as the stock market would
have more realistic expectations of the company’s prospects and the discrepancy between the valuation implicit in the market
price and the valuation based on a company’s financial statements would be lower. However, litigation costs do not
necessarily increase with the extent of the disclosure. Increased disclosure could reduce litigation costs.
Disclosure could weaken a company’s ability to generate future cash flows by aiding its competitors. The effect of disclosure
on competitiveness involves benefits as well as costs. Competitive disadvantage could be created if disclosure is made relating
to strategies, plans, (for example, planned product development, new market targeting) or information about operations (for
example, production-cost figures). There is a significant difference between the purpose of disclosure to users and
competitors. The purpose of disclosure to users is to help them to estimate the amount, timing, and certainty of future cash
flows. Competitors are not trying to predict a company’s future cash flows, and information of use in that context is not
necessarily of use in obtaining competitive advantage. Overlap between information designed to meet users’ needs and
information designed to further the purposes of a competitor is often coincidental. Every company that could suffer competitive
disadvantage from disclosure could gain competitive advantage from comparable disclosure by competitors. Published figures
are often aggregated with little use to competitors.
Companies bargain with suppliers and with customers, and information disclosure could give those parties an advantage in
negotiations. In such cases, the advantage would be a cost for the disclosing entity. However, the cost would be offset
whenever information disclosure was presented by both parties, each would receive an advantage and a disadvantage.
There are other criteria to consider such as whether the information to be disclosed is about the company. This is both a
benefit and a cost criterion. Users of corporate reports need company-specific data, and it is typically more costly to obtain
and present information about matters external to the company. Additionally, consideration must be given as to whether the
company is the best source for the information. It could be inefficient for a company to obtain or develop data that other, more
expert parties could develop and present or do develop at present.
There are many benefits to information disclosure and users have unmet information needs. It cannot be known with any
certainty what the optimal disclosure level is for companies. Some companies through voluntary disclosure may have
achieved their optimal level. There are no quantitative measures of how levels of disclosure stand with respect to optimal
levels. Standard setters have to make such estimates as best they can, guided by prudence, and by what evidence of benefits
and costs they can obtain.

1 The board of Worldwide Minerals (WM) was meeting for the last monthly meeting before the publication of the yearend

results. There were two points of discussion on the agenda. First was the discussion of the year-end results;

second was the crucial latest minerals reserves report.

WM is a large listed multinational company that deals with natural minerals that are extracted from the ground,

processed and sold to a wide range of industrial and construction companies. In order to maintain a consistent supply

of minerals into its principal markets, an essential part of WM’s business strategy is the seeking out of new sources

and the measurement of known reserves. Investment analysts have often pointed out that WM’s value rests principally

upon the accuracy of its reserve reports as these are the best indicators of future cash flows and earnings. In order to

support this key part of its strategy, WM has a large and well-funded geological survey department which, according

to the company website, contains ‘some of the world’s best geologists and minerals scientists’. In its investor relations

literature, the company claims that:

‘our experts search the earth for mineral reserves and once located, they are carefully measured so that the company

can always report on known reserves. This knowledge underpins market confidence and keeps our customers

supplied with the inventory they need. You can trust our reserve reports – our reputation depends on it!’

At the board meeting, the head of the geological survey department, Ranjana Tyler, reported that there was a problem

with the latest report because one of the major reserve figures had recently been found to be wrong. The mineral in

question, mallerite, was WM’s largest mineral in volume terms and Ranjana explained that the mallerite reserves in

a deep mine in a certain part of the world had been significantly overestimated. She explained that, based on the

interim minerals report, the stock market analysts were expecting WM to announce known mallerite reserves of

4·8 billion tonnes. The actual figure was closer to 2·4 billion tonnes. It was agreed that this difference was sufficient

to affect WM’s market value, despite the otherwise good results for the past year. Vanda Monroe, the finance director,

said that the share price reflects market confidence in future earnings. She said that an announcement of an incorrect

estimation like that for mallerite would cause a reduction in share value. More importantly for WM itself, however, it

could undermine confidence in the geological survey department. All agreed that as this was strategically important

for the company, it was a top priority to deal with this problem.

Ranjana explained how the situation had arisen. The major mallerite mine was in a country new to WM’s operations.

The WM engineer at the mine said it was difficult to deal with some local people because, according to the engineer,

‘they didn’t like to give us bad news’. The engineer explained that when the mine was found to be smaller than

originally thought, he was not told until it was too late to reduce the price paid for the mine. This was embarrassing

and it was agreed that it would affect market confidence in WM if it was made public.

The board discussed the options open to it. The chairman, who was also a qualified accountant, was Tim Blake. He

began by expressing serious concern about the overestimation and then invited the board to express views freely. Gary

Howells, the operations director, said that because disclosing the error to the market would be so damaging, it might

be best to keep it a secret and hope that new reserves can be found in the near future that will make up for the

shortfall. He said that it was unlikely that this concealment would be found out as shareholders trusted WM and they

had many years of good investor relations to draw on. Vanda Monroe, the finance director, reminded the board that

the company was bound to certain standards of truthfulness and transparency by its stock market listing. She pointed

out that they were constrained by codes of governance and ethics by the stock market and that colleagues should be

aware that WM would be in technical breach of these if the incorrect estimation was concealed from investors. Finally,

Martin Chan, the human resources director, said that the error should be disclosed to the investors because he would

not want to be deceived if he were an outside investor in the company. He argued that whatever the governance codes

said and whatever the cost in terms of reputation and market value, WM should admit its error and cope with

whatever consequences arose. The WM board contains three non-executive directors and their views were also

invited.

At the preliminary results presentation some time later, one analyst, Christina Gonzales, who had become aware of

the mallerite problem, asked about internal audit and control systems, and whether they were adequate in such a

reserve-sensitive industry. WM’s chairman, Tim Blake, said that he intended to write a letter to all investors and

analysts in the light of the mallerite problem which he hoped would address some of the issues that Miss Gonzales

had raised.

Required:

(a) Define ‘transparency’ and evaluate its importance as an underlying principle in corporate governance and in

relevant and reliable financial reporting. Your answer should refer to the case as appropriate. (10 marks)

正确答案:
(a) Transparency and its importance at WM
Define transparency
Transparency is one of the underlying principles of corporate governance. As such, it is one of the ‘building blocks’ that
underpin a sound system of governance. In particular, transparency is required in the agency relationship. In terms of
definition, transparency means openness (say, of discussions), clarity, lack of withholding of relevant information unless
necessary and a default position of information provision rather than concealment. This is particularly important in financial
reporting, as this is the primary source of information that investors have for making effective investment decisions.
Evaluation of importance of transparency
There are a number of benefits of transparency. For instance, it is part of gaining trust with investors and state authorities
(e.g. tax people). Transparency provides access for investors and other stakeholders to company information thereby dispelling
suspicion and underpinning market confidence in the company through truthful and fair reporting. It also helps to manage
stakeholder claims and reduces the stresses caused by stakeholders (e.g. trade unions) for whom information provision is
important. Reasons for secrecy/confidentiality include the fact that it may be necessary to keep strategy discussions secret
from competitors. Internal issues may be private to individuals, thus justifying confidentiality. Finally, free (secret or
confidential) discussion often has to take place before an agreed position is announced (cabinet government approach).
Reference to case
At Worldwide Minerals, transparency as a principle is needed to deal with the discussion of concealment. Should a discussion
of possible concealment even be taking place? Truthful, accurate and timely reporting underpins investor confidence in all
capital-funded companies including WM. The issue of the overestimation of the mallerite reserve is clearly a matter of concern
to shareholders and so is an example of where a default assumption of transparency would be appropriate.

(b) Describe five major barriers to good communication. (10 marks)

正确答案:
Part (b):
Barriers to communication include the personal background of the people communicating, including language differences between
staff, management and customers. The use of jargon, especially by professional and technical staff, differences in education levels
can be a substantial barrier throughout the organisation. Communication ‘noise’ is a barrier not always recognised. This is where
the message is confused by extraneous matters not relevant to that particular communication. Different levels of education and
experience can lead to different perception of individuals, leading to conflict within the organisation, between individuals and
between departments. Similarly, another barrier often not recognised is communication overload; too much information being
communicated at one time leading to confusion. Distances involved and the subsequent use of different communication facilities
is a barrier, leading to misunderstandings based on problems noted above. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, distortion of the
information transmitted.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。