ACCA考试和中级会计师考试相比,会难很多吗?
发布时间:2020-03-08
随着我国对外贸易发展,ACCA也是越发引人注意。近年来,网上增加了一些关于ACCA考试的询问。比如,有网友就在问ACCA考试和中级会计师考试相比,是否会难很多。鉴于此,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来有关2020年ACCA考试难度的相关情况,以供参考。
ACCA相比中级经济师的考试难度是要高一些的,主要体现在繁多的考试科目以及全英文的答题模式,至于具体难多少,这就要小伙伴们自己去体会了。
根据相关数据显示,ACCA全球单科通过率基本在30-40%左右,中国学员通过率为50-60%。仅从通过率来看,国内的ACCA考试难度并不算太高。事实上,从考试内容来看,ACCA考试难度很大程度上是来自于英语和坚持,学员在英语过关的情况下,一般平时认真看书,做题还是很容易通过的。如果是英语水平一般的小伙伴,则需要付出更多的努力。
但是如果从考试内容来看,ACCA考试的难度还是不低的。我们以英国大学学位考试的难度为标准来分析ACCA考试难度,第一、第二部分的难度分别相当于学士学位高年级课程的考试难度,第三部分的考试相当于硕士学位最后阶段的考试。因此,ACCA考试的难点主要在最后阶段。
从内容上来说,第一部分的每门考试只是测试本门课程所包含的知识,主要是为了给后两个部分中实务性的课程所要运用的理论和技能打下基础。因此,第一部分考试虽然难度不算高,但是对于最后阶段的学习很重要。因此,小伙伴们在学习这部分知识时,不应该仅仅抱着应对考试的态度去学习。
而第二部分的考试除了本门课程的内容之外,还会考到第一部分的一些知识,着重培养学生的分析能力。这一部分的考生已经脱离单纯的知识学习,进入能力培养阶段,同时也是在为最后阶段做准备。这一阶段,考生最好多去做一些练习题。
最后一部分的考试要求学生综合运用学到的知识、技能和决断力。不仅会考到以前的课程内容,还会考到邻近科目的内容。这就需要考生能够灵活掌握所有课程的内容。在学习最后阶段时,考生既要复习以前课程的内容,还要多去做练习题,了解出题方式以及角度哦。
以上就是关于ACCA考试难度的相关情况。51题库考试学习网提醒:ACCA考试部分F阶段科目拥有免试条例,而这些科目的内容又与最后阶段的科目内容有关联,因此小伙伴们最好不要选择免试哦。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴都能顺利通过。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Calculate and explain the amount of income tax relief that Gerard will obtain in respect of the pension
contributions he proposes to make in the tax year 2007/08 and contrast this with how his position could be
improved by delaying some of the contributions that he could have made in 2007/08 until 2008/09. You
should include relevant supporting calculations and quantify the additional tax savings arising as a result of
your advice.
You should ignore the proposed changes to the bonus scheme for this part of this question and assume that
Gerard’s income will not change in 2008/09. (12 marks)
2 (a) Discuss the nature of the financial objectives that may be set in a not-for-profit organisation such as a charity
or a hospital. (8 marks)
2 (a) In the case of a not-for-profit (NFP) organisation, the limit on the services that can be provided is the amount of funds that
are available in a given period. A key financial objective for an NFP organisation such as a charity is therefore to raise as
much funds as possible. The fund-raising efforts of a charity may be directed towards the public or to grant-making bodies.
In addition, a charity may have income from investments made from surplus funds from previous periods. In any period,
however, a charity is likely to know from previous experience the amount and timing of the funds available for use. The same
is true for an NFP organisation funded by the government, such as a hospital, since such an organisation will operate under
budget constraints or cash limits. Whether funded by the government or not, NFP organisations will therefore have the
financial objective of keeping spending within budget, and budgets will play an important role in controlling spending and in
specifying the level of services or programmes it is planned to provide.
Since the amount of funding available is limited, NFP organisations will seek to generate the maximum benefit from available
funds. They will obtain resources for use by the organisation as economically as possible: they will employ these resources
efficiently, minimising waste and cutting back on any activities that do not assist in achieving the organisation’s non-financial
objectives; and they will ensure that their operations are directed as effectively as possible towards meeting their objectives.
The goals of economy, efficiency and effectiveness are collectively referred to as value for money (VFM). Economy is
concerned with minimising the input costs for a given level of output. Efficiency is concerned with maximising the outputs
obtained from a given level of input resources, i.e. with the process of transforming economic resources into desires services.
Effectiveness is concerned with the extent to which non-financial organisational goals are achieved.
Measuring the achievement of the financial objective of VFM is difficult because the non-financial goals of NFP organisations
are not quantifiable and so not directly measurable. However, current performance can be compared to historic performance
to ascertain the extent to which positive change has occurred. The availability of the healthcare provided by a hospital, for
example, can be measured by the time that patients have to wait for treatment or for an operation, and waiting times can be
compared year on year to determine the extent to which improvements have been achieved or publicised targets have been
met.
Lacking a profit motive, NFP organisations will have financial objectives that relate to the effective use of resources, such as
achieving a target return on capital employed. In an organisation funded by the government from finance raised through
taxation or public sector borrowing, this financial objective will be centrally imposed.
(c) Define ‘retirement by rotation’ and explain its importance in the context of Rosh and Company.
(5 marks)
(c) Retirement by rotation.
Definition
Retirement by rotation is an arrangement in a director’s contract that specifies his or her contract to be limited to a specific
period (typically three years) after which he or she must retire from the board or offer himself (being eligible) for re-election.
The director must be actively re-elected back onto the board to serve another term. The default is that the director retires
unless re-elected.
Importance of
Retirement by rotation reduces the cost of contract termination for underperforming directors. They can simply not be
re-elected after their term of office expires and they will be required to leave the service of the board as a retiree (depending
on contract terms).
It encourages directors’ performance (they know they are assessed by shareholders and reconsidered every three years) and
focuses their minds upon the importance of meeting objectives in line with shareholders’ aims.
It is an opportunity, over time, to replace the board membership whilst maintaining medium term stability of membership
(one or two at a time).
Applied to Rosh
Retirement by rotation would enable the board of Rosh to be changed over time. There is evidence that some directors may
have stayed longer than is ideal because of links with other board members going back many years.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2019-11-28
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-04-17
- 2019-01-04
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-27
- 2020-05-18
- 2021-01-06
- 2020-01-02
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-20
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-31
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-20
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-04-11
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10