你必须了解的ACCA官网缴费的具体流程
发布时间:2020-05-02
小伙伴们看过来呀!关注51题库考试学习网,有更多考试相关信息等你来查阅!今天51题库考试学习网为大家带来关于ACCA官网缴费的具体流程的最新消息,快跟着51题库考试学习网一起来了解详细内容吧!
一、ACCA年费缴纳流程:
第一步:打开ACCA英国官网
第二步:点击右上角MyACCA进行登录
第三步:输入ACCA注册号与密码,点击Sign in to MyACCA
第四步:点击紫色框里面的,Fees,Payments and Print
第五步:按照下图所示,打钩之后点击Pay
第六步:点击左下角Pay
第七步:点击Alipay支付即可
第八步:交完费用之后,Account Balance会显示为0
注:不同的费用缴纳的费用,和缴费的频率是不同的。大家需要区别对待。
二、证书含金量高
1、ACCA的课程设置涉及财务、审计、税务、管理及经营战略等方面的专业知识,其课程内容丰富,各课程之间联系紧密且其难度阶梯设置合理,使学员能在循序渐进的学习过程中,稳固基础知识的同时,不断提升自己的分析能力和战略思维,向企业高层和管理层的道路上迈进。
2、ACCA的课程体系是根据市场对人才的需求点来设计和开发的,特别注重培养学员的分析能力和在复杂条件下的决策、判断能力,使得学员学成后能适应各种商业环境。对ACCA课程的学习使学员不仅拥有系统的专业理论知识,还能拥有相对成熟的实践操作能力,这也让众多企业对具有ACCA证书资格的求职者更加青睐
三、ACCA就业前景
那考下ACCA之后,能去哪些企业~
1.四大会计师事务所
这个毫无疑问,ACCA这张素有“四大通行证”之称的证书,可谓是通往财会行业权威——四大的绝对加分项。但是,ACCAer可不止四大这一个选择哦~
2.国内会计师事务所
虽然,国际四大一直是财会人心中的圣地,但是近几年来,国内事务所的发展迅猛,收入和排名也随之发生了翻天覆地的变化。今年,身为本土八大的致同挤进前四!拿下ACCA,八大的面试官也会对你青睐有加。
3.投资银行
除了高盛、摩根大通、汇丰这些在国际上赫赫有名的国际银行外,国内的四大银行,也能给ACCA持证人们提供一个很好的施展平台。
4.金融机构
都说,金融、财会不分家,在ACCA的学习大军中,也不乏在金融领域打拼多年的从业者。因为金融工作中涉及到的财务报表、IPO估值等都需要用到财会的内容,所以ACCA可以说是对口证书。
5.500强外企
毫无疑问,ACCA这张起源于英国,适用国际会计准则的高端证书,绝对可以称得上是通往外企的“黄金文凭”。
又到了与大家说再见的时候了,以上就是今天51题库考试学习网为大家分享的全部内容,如有其他疑问请继续关注51题库考试学习网!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
6 Sergio and Gerard each inherited a half interest in a property, ‘Hilltop’, in October 2005. ‘Hilltop’ had a probate value
of £124,000, but in November 2005 it was badly damaged by fire. In January 2006 the insurance company made
a payment of £81,700 each to Sergio and Gerard. In February 2006 Sergio and Gerard each spent £55,500 of the
insurance proceeds on restoring the property. ‘Hilltop’ was worth £269,000 following the restoration work. In July
2006, Sergio and Gerard sold ‘Hilltop’ for £310,000.
Sergio is 69 years old and a widower with three adult children and seven grandchildren. His annual income consists
of a pension of £9,900 and interest of £300 on savings of £7,600 in a bank deposit account. Sergio owns his home
but no other significant assets. He plans to buy a domestic rental property with the proceeds from the sale of ‘Hilltop’,
such that on his death he will have a significant asset which can be sold and divided between the members of his
family.
Gerard is 34 years old. He is employed by Fizz plc on a salary of £66,500 per year together with a performance
related bonus. Gerard estimates that he will receive a bonus in December 2007 of £4,500, in line with previous
years, and that his taxable benefits in the tax year 2007/08 will amount to £7,140. He also expects to receive
dividends from UK companies of £1,935 and bank interest of £648 in the tax year 2007/08. Gerard intends to set
up a personal pension plan in August 2007. He has not made any pension contributions in the past and proposes to
use part of the proceeds from the sale of ‘Hilltop’ to make the maximum possible tax allowable contribution.
Fizz plc has announced that it intends to replace the performance related bonus scheme with a share incentive plan,
also linked to performance, with effect from 6 April 2008. Gerard estimates that Fizz plc will award him free shares
worth £2,100 each year. He will also purchase partnership shares worth £700 each year and, as a result, will be
awarded matching shares (further free shares) worth £1,400.
Required:
(a) Calculate the chargeable gains arising on the receipt of the insurance proceeds in January 2006 and the sale
of ‘Hilltop’ in July 2006. You should assume that any elections necessary to minimise the gain on the receipt
of the insurance proceeds have been submitted. (4 marks)
(b) Seymour offers health-related information services through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Aragon Co. Goodwill of
$1·8 million recognised on the purchase of Aragon in October 2004 is not amortised but included at cost in the
consolidated balance sheet. At 30 September 2006 Seymour’s investment in Aragon is shown at cost,
$4·5 million, in its separate financial statements.
Aragon’s draft financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 show a loss before taxation of
$0·6 million (2005 – $0·5 million loss) and total assets of $4·9 million (2005 – $5·7 million). The notes to
Aragon’s financial statements disclose that they have been prepared on a going concern basis that assumes that
Seymour will continue to provide financial support. (7 marks)
Required:
For each of the above issues:
(i) comment on the matters that you should consider; and
(ii) state the audit evidence that you should expect to find,
in undertaking your review of the audit working papers and financial statements of Seymour Co for the year ended
30 September 2006.
NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.
(b) Goodwill
(i) Matters
■ Cost of goodwill, $1·8 million, represents 3·4% consolidated total assets and is therefore material.
Tutorial note: Any assessments of materiality of goodwill against amounts in Aragon’s financial statements are
meaningless since goodwill only exists in the consolidated financial statements of Seymour.
■ It is correct that the goodwill is not being amortised (IFRS 3 Business Combinations). However, it should be tested
at least annually for impairment, by management.
■ Aragon has incurred losses amounting to $1·1 million since it was acquired (two years ago). The write-off of this
amount against goodwill in the consolidated financial statements would be material (being 61% cost of goodwill,
8·3% PBT and 2·1% total assets).
■ The cost of the investment ($4·5 million) in Seymour’s separate financial statements will also be material and
should be tested for impairment.
■ The fair value of net assets acquired was only $2·7 million ($4·5 million less $1·8 million). Therefore the fair
value less costs to sell of Aragon on other than a going concern basis will be less than the carrying amount of the
investment (i.e. the investment is impaired by at least the amount of goodwill recognised on acquisition).
■ In assessing recoverable amount, value in use (rather than fair value less costs to sell) is only relevant if the going
concern assumption is appropriate for Aragon.
■ Supporting Aragon financially may result in Seymour being exposed to actual and/or contingent liabilities that
should be provided for/disclosed in Seymour’s financial statements in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
(ii) Audit evidence
■ Carrying values of cost of investment and goodwill arising on acquisition to prior year audit working papers and
financial statements.
■ A copy of Aragon’s draft financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 showing loss for year.
■ Management’s impairment test of Seymour’s investment in Aragon and of the goodwill arising on consolidation at
30 September 2006. That is a comparison of the present value of the future cash flows expected to be generated
by Aragon (a cash-generating unit) compared with the cost of the investment (in Seymour’s separate financial
statements).
■ Results of any impairment tests on Aragon’s assets extracted from Aragon’s working paper files.
■ Analytical procedures on future cash flows to confirm their reasonableness (e.g. by comparison with cash flows for
the last two years).
■ Bank report for audit purposes for any guarantees supporting Aragon’s loan facilities.
■ A copy of Seymour’s ‘comfort letter’ confirming continuing financial support of Aragon for the foreseeable future.
(iii) whether you agree or not with the statement of the production director. (3 marks)
(iii) ‘If we implement a reward scheme then it is bound to be beneficial for BGL’.
The statement of the manufacturing director is not necessarily correct. Indeed there is much evidence to support the
proposition that the existence of performance-related reward schemes can encourage dysfunctional behaviour. This often
manifests itself in the form. of ‘budgetary slack’ which is incorporated into budgets in anticipation of subsequent cuts by
higher levels of management or to make subsequent performance look better.
(ii) Describe the evidence you would seek to support the assertion that development costs are technically
feasible. (3 marks)
(ii) Evidence supporting the assertion that development costs are technically feasible would include the following:
– Review the results of scientific tests performed on the products, for example, the results of animal or human testing
of the products.
– Discuss any detrimental results of these tests, e.g. harmful side effects, with the scientists working on the project
to determine what corrective action is being taken.
– Enquire whether any licences necessary for continued development and/or commercial production have been
granted by the appropriate regulatory body.
– Compare expected to actual development costs incurred per product being developed. Where actual costs are in
excess of expected costs investigate whether the extra costs have been incurred in order to make good any problems
identified in the development process.
– Review board minutes for relevant discussion of the product development taking place during the year.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-04-22
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-02
- 2019-07-20
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-05-06
- 2020-03-08
- 2020-04-05
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-01-05
- 2020-05-07
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-05-05
- 2020-02-14
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-09
- 2020-02-01
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-25
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-29
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-07
- 2019-12-28
- 2020-05-02