2020年ACCA考试会计师与企业财经词汇汇编(15)

发布时间:2020-10-10


各位小伙伴注意了,备考已经进入了关键期,现在状态如何啊,今天51题库考试学习网为大家分享2020ACCA考试会计师与企业财经词汇汇编(15),一起来看看吧。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Liquidity Preference Theory

English Terms

Liquidity Preference Theory

【中文翻译】

流动性偏好理论

【详情解释/例子】

假定远期汇率高于未来即期汇率的理论。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Liquidity

English Terms

Liquidity

【中文翻译】

流通性、变现能力

【详情解释/例子】

1. 一种资产或证券在不影响资产价值的情况下被买入或卖出的可能性。交易活动多是流通性高的指标。

2. 一种资产转换成为现金的能力。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Liquidation

English Terms

Liquidation

【中文翻译】

清算、清理

【详情解释/例子】

若一项业务或一家公司终止运作或破产,资产将会被出售,以便向债权人偿还债务。剩余的金额将分配给股东。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Liquid Market

English Terms

Liquid Market

【中文翻译】

高流通性市场

【详情解释/例子】

存在大量叫价及出价的市场,高流通性、价差低及波动性低是高流通性市场的指标。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Liquidity Risk

English Terms

Liquidity Risk

【中文翻译】

流通风险

【详情解释/例子】

指一项投资缺乏市场买卖能力,即不能迅速买入或卖出,以避免或减少损失的风险。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Listed Security

English Terms

Listed Security

【中文翻译】

上市证券

【详情解释/例子】

获认可、受管制交易所接受进行买卖的证券。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Loan to Value Ratio

English Terms

Loan to Value Ratio

【中文翻译】

贷款与价值比率

【详情解释/例子】

放贷风险比率,计算方法为抵押或贷款总额除以物业的估值。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Loan Syndication

English Terms

Loan Syndication

【中文翻译】

贷款银团

【详情解释/例子】

多个贷方共同出资的贷款,各贷方的出资比例可能不同。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Loan Sharking

English Terms

Loan Sharking

【中文翻译】

高利贷

【详情解释/例子】

借方支付的利息高于法定利率。贷方一般不能收取高于每年60%的利息,但实际规定根据国家而定。

ACCA财经词汇汇编:Loan Loss Provision

English Terms

Loan Loss Provision

【中文翻译】

贷款损失准备金

【详情解释/例子】

预留应付坏账的款项(客户违约、需要重新磋商贷款条款等)

以上就是51题库考试学习网带给大家的全部内容,相信小伙伴们都了解清楚。预祝12月份ACCA考试取得满意的成绩,如果想要了解更多关于ACCA考试的资讯,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(ii) evaluates the relative performance of the four depots as indicated by the analysis in the summary table

prepared in (i); (5 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) The summary analysis in (a)(i) shows that using overall points gained, Michaelangelotown has achieved the best
performance with 12 points. Donatellotown and Leonardotown have achieved a reasonable level of performance with
eight points each. Raphaeltown has under performed, however, gaining only four out of the available 12 points.
Michaelangelotown is the only depot to have achieved both an increase in revenue over budget and an increased
profit:revenue percentage.
In the customer care and service delivery statistics, Michaelangelotown has achieved all six of the target standards,
Donatellotown four; Leonardotown three. The Raphaeltown statistic of achieving only one out of six targets indicates the
need for investigation.
With regard to the credit control and administrative efficiency statistics, Leonardotown and Michaelangelotown achieved
all four standards and Donatellotown achieved three of the four standards. Once again, Raphaeltown is the ‘poor
performer’ achieving only two of the four standards.

Additionally the directors wish to know how the provision for deferred taxation would be calculated in the following

situations under IAS12 ‘Income Taxes’:

(i) On 1 November 2003, the company had granted ten million share options worth $40 million subject to a two

year vesting period. Local tax law allows a tax deduction at the exercise date of the intrinsic value of the options.

The intrinsic value of the ten million share options at 31 October 2004 was $16 million and at 31 October 2005

was $46 million. The increase in the share price in the year to 31 October 2005 could not be foreseen at

31 October 2004. The options were exercised at 31 October 2005. The directors are unsure how to account

for deferred taxation on this transaction for the years ended 31 October 2004 and 31 October 2005.

(ii) Panel is leasing plant under a finance lease over a five year period. The asset was recorded at the present value

of the minimum lease payments of $12 million at the inception of the lease which was 1 November 2004. The

asset is depreciated on a straight line basis over the five years and has no residual value. The annual lease

payments are $3 million payable in arrears on 31 October and the effective interest rate is 8% per annum. The

directors have not leased an asset under a finance lease before and are unsure as to its treatment for deferred

taxation. The company can claim a tax deduction for the annual rental payment as the finance lease does not

qualify for tax relief.

(iii) A wholly owned overseas subsidiary, Pins, a limited liability company, sold goods costing $7 million to Panel on

1 September 2005, and these goods had not been sold by Panel before the year end. Panel had paid $9 million

for these goods. The directors do not understand how this transaction should be dealt with in the financial

statements of the subsidiary and the group for taxation purposes. Pins pays tax locally at 30%.

(iv) Nails, a limited liability company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Panel, and is a cash generating unit in its own

right. The value of the property, plant and equipment of Nails at 31 October 2005 was $6 million and purchased

goodwill was $1 million before any impairment loss. The company had no other assets or liabilities. An

impairment loss of $1·8 million had occurred at 31 October 2005. The tax base of the property, plant and

equipment of Nails was $4 million as at 31 October 2005. The directors wish to know how the impairment loss

will affect the deferred tax provision for the year. Impairment losses are not an allowable expense for taxation

purposes.

Assume a tax rate of 30%.

Required:

(b) Discuss, with suitable computations, how the situations (i) to (iv) above will impact on the accounting for

deferred tax under IAS12 ‘Income Taxes’ in the group financial statements of Panel. (16 marks)

(The situations in (i) to (iv) above carry equal marks)

正确答案:

(b) (i) The tax deduction is based on the option’s intrinsic value which is the difference between the market price and exercise
price of the share option. It is likely that a deferred tax asset will arise which represents the difference between the tax
base of the employee’s service received to date and the carrying amount which will effectively normally be zero.
The recognition of the deferred tax asset should be dealt with on the following basis:
(a) if the estimated or actual tax deduction is less than or equal to the cumulative recognised expense then the
associated tax benefits are recognised in the income statement
(b) if the estimated or actual tax deduction exceeds the cumulative recognised compensation expense then the excess
tax benefits are recognised directly in a separate component of equity.
As regards the tax effects of the share options, in the year to 31 October 2004, the tax effect of the remuneration expensewill be in excess of the tax benefit.

The company will have to estimate the amount of the tax benefit as it is based on the share price at 31 October 2005.
The information available at 31 October 2004 indicates a tax benefit based on an intrinsic value of $16 million.
As a result, the tax benefit of $2·4 million will be recognised within the deferred tax provision. At 31 October 2005,
the options have been exercised. Tax receivable will be 30% x $46 million i.e. $13·8 million. The deferred tax asset
of $2·4 million is no longer recognised as the tax benefit has crystallised at the date when the options were exercised.
For a tax benefit to be recognised in the year to 31 October 2004, the provisions of IAS12 should be complied with as
regards the recognition of a deferred tax asset.
(ii) Plant acquired under a finance lease will be recorded as property, plant and equipment and a corresponding liability for
the obligation to pay future rentals. Rents payable are apportioned between the finance charge and a reduction of the
outstanding obligation. A temporary difference will effectively arise between the value of the plant for accounting
purposes and the equivalent of the outstanding obligation as the annual rental payments qualify for tax relief. The tax
base of the asset is the amount deductible for tax in future which is zero. The tax base of the liability is the carrying
amount less any future tax deductible amounts which will give a tax base of zero. Thus the net temporary differencewill be:

(iii) The subsidiary, Pins, has made a profit of $2 million on the transaction with Panel. These goods are held in inventory
at the year end and a consolidation adjustment of an equivalent amount will be made against profit and inventory. Pins
will have provided for the tax on this profit as part of its current tax liability. This tax will need to be eliminated at the
group level and this will be done by recognising a deferred tax asset of $2 million x 30%, i.e. $600,000. Thus any
consolidation adjustments that have the effect of deferring or accelerating tax when viewed from a group perspective will
be accounted for as part of the deferred tax provision. Group profit will be different to the sum of the profits of the
individual group companies. Tax is normally payable on the profits of the individual companies. Thus there is a need
to account for this temporary difference. IAS12 does not specifically address the issue of which tax rate should be used
calculate the deferred tax provision. IAS12 does generally say that regard should be had to the expected recovery or
settlement of the tax. This would be generally consistent with using the rate applicable to the transferee company (Panel)
rather than the transferor (Pins).


8 P and Q are in partnership, sharing profits in the ratio 2:1. On 1 July 2004 they admitted P’s son R as a partner. P

guaranteed that R’s profit share would not be less than $25,000 for the six months to 31 December 2004. The profitsharing

arrangements after R’s admission were P 50%, Q 30%, R 20%. The profit for the year ended 31 December

2004 is $240,000, accruing evenly over the year.

What should P’s final profit share be for the year ended 31 December 2004?

A $140,000

B $139,000

C $114,000

D $139,375

正确答案:B
80,000 + 60,000 – 1,000 = 139,000

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。