ACCA考试《公司法与商法》章节练习(2020-08-12)
发布时间:2020-08-12
备考2020年ACCA考试的小伙伴赶紧来围观,51题库考试学习网为大家准备了ACCA考试《公司法与商法》试题,以供小伙伴们备考练习。
Question:
(a) In
relation to the English legal system, explain the meaning of:
(i)
criminal law;
(ii)
civil law.
(b)
Explain the hierarchy of courts dealing with criminal law.
Answer:
(a) (i)
Criminal law relates to conduct which the State considers with disapproval and
which it seeks to control. Criminal law involves the enforcement of particular
forms of behaviour, and the State, as the representative of society, acts
positively to ensure compliance. Thus, criminal cases are brought by the State
in the name of the Crown and cases are reported in the form of Regina v …
(Regina is simply Latin for ‘queen’ and case references are usually abbreviated
to R v ...). In criminal law the prosecutor prosecutes a defendant (or ‘the
accused’) and is required to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond
reasonable doubt. The Companies Act (CA) 006 sets out many potential criminal
offences, which may be committed by either the company itself, or its officers
or other individuals. An example of this which may be cited is s.993, which
relates to the criminal offence of fraudulent trading and applies to any
person, not just directors or members, who is knowingly a party to the carrying
on of a business with the intent to defraud creditors. The potential penalty on
conviction is imprisonment for a maximum period of 10 years, or a fine or both.
(ii)
Civil law, on the other hand, is a form of private law and involves the
relationships between individual citizens. It is the legal mechanism through
which individuals can assert claims against others and have those rights
adjudicated and enforced. The purpose of civil law is to settle disputes
between individuals and to provide remedies; it is not concerned with
punishment as such. The role of the State in relation to civil law is to
establish the general framework of legal rules and to provide the legal
institutions to operate those rights, but the activation of the civil law is
strictly a matter for the individuals concerned.
Contract,
tort and property law are generally aspects of civil law.
Civil
cases are referred to by the names of the parties involved in the dispute, for
example, Smith v Jones. In civil law, a claimant sues (or ‘brings a claim
against’) a defendant and the degree of proof is on the balance of
probabilities. In relation to the CA 006, the duties owed to companies by
directors set out in ss.171–177 may be cited as examples of civil liability,
and directors in breach are liable to recompense the company for the
consequences of their failure to comply with those duties, as is set out in
s.178.
In
distinguishing between criminal and civil actions, it has to be remembered that
the same event may give rise to both. For example, where the driver of a car
injures someone through their reckless driving, they will be liable to be
prosecuted under the Road Traffic legislation, but at the same time, they will
also be responsible to the injured party in the civil law relating to the tort
of negligence. Similarly, a director may fall foul of both the criminal
regulation of fraudulent trading (s.993 CA 006) as well as breaching their duty
to the company under one of the provisions of ss.171–177 CA 006.
(b) The
essential criminal trial courts are the magistrates’ courts and Crown Courts.
In serious offences, known as indictable offences, the defendant is tried by a
judge and jury in a Crown Court. For less serious offences, known as summary
offences, the defendant is tried by magistrates; and for ‘either way’ offences,
the defendant can be tried by magistrates if they agree but the defendant may
elect for jury trial.
Criminal
appeals from the magistrates go to the Crown Court or to the Queen’s Bench
Division (QBD) Divisional Court ‘by way of case stated’ on a point of law or
that the magistrates went beyond their proper powers.
Further
appeal is to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and then to the Supreme
Court on a significant point of law.
以上是本次51题库考试学习网分享给大家的ACCA考试试题,备考的小伙伴抓紧时间练习一下吧。欲了解更多关于ACCA考试的试题,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(b) Advise on the capital gains implications should Trent Limited’s old building be sold as proposed. Support your
advice with relevant calculations. (4 marks)
This gives a higher post-entry loss of £50,000 (150,000 – 100,000) and so it is advisable for Trent Limited to make
this election.
The £100,000 of pre-entry losses are still available, but can only be set against gains on assets which:
(i) Trent Limited sold prior to being acquired (subject to the normal carry back restrictions), or
(ii) Trent Limited already owned when it was acquired, or
(iii) Trent Limited acquired from outside the group and used in its trade after being bought by Tay Limited.
(a) An assistant of yours has been criticised over a piece of assessed work that he produced for his study course for giving the definition of a non-current asset as ‘a physical asset of substantial cost, owned by the company, which will last longer than one year’.
Required:
Provide an explanation to your assistant of the weaknesses in his definition of non-current assets when
compared to the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) view of assets. (4 marks)
(b) The same assistant has encountered the following matters during the preparation of the draft financial statements of Darby for the year ending 30 September 2009. He has given an explanation of his treatment of them.
(i) Darby spent $200,000 sending its staff on training courses during the year. This has already led to an
improvement in the company’s efficiency and resulted in cost savings. The organiser of the course has stated that the benefits from the training should last for a minimum of four years. The assistant has therefore treated the cost of the training as an intangible asset and charged six months’ amortisation based on the average date during the year on which the training courses were completed. (3 marks)
(ii) During the year the company started research work with a view to the eventual development of a new
processor chip. By 30 September 2009 it had spent $1·6 million on this project. Darby has a past history
of being particularly successful in bringing similar projects to a profitable conclusion. As a consequence the
assistant has treated the expenditure to date on this project as an asset in the statement of financial position.
Darby was also commissioned by a customer to research and, if feasible, produce a computer system to
install in motor vehicles that can automatically stop the vehicle if it is about to be involved in a collision. At
30 September 2009, Darby had spent $2·4 million on this project, but at this date it was uncertain as to
whether the project would be successful. As a consequence the assistant has treated the $2·4 million as an
expense in the income statement. (4 marks)
(iii) Darby signed a contract (for an initial three years) in August 2009 with a company called Media Today to
install a satellite dish and cabling system to a newly built group of residential apartments. Media Today will
provide telephone and television services to the residents of the apartments via the satellite system and pay
Darby $50,000 per annum commencing in December 2009. Work on the installation commenced on
1 September 2009 and the expenditure to 30 September 2009 was $58,000. The installation is expected
to be completed by 31 October 2009. Previous experience with similar contracts indicates that Darby will
make a total profit of $40,000 over the three years on this initial contract. The assistant correctly recorded
the costs to 30 September 2009 of $58,000 as a non-current asset, but then wrote this amount down to
$40,000 (the expected total profit) because he believed the asset to be impaired.
The contract is not a finance lease. Ignore discounting. (4 marks)
Required:
For each of the above items (i) to (iii) comment on the assistant’s treatment of them in the financial
statements for the year ended 30 September 2009 and advise him how they should be treated under
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Note: the mark allocation is shown against each of the three items above.
(a)Therearefourelementstotheassistant’sdefinitionofanon-currentassetandheissubstantiallyincorrectinrespectofallofthem.Thetermnon-currentassetswillnormallyincludeintangibleassetsandcertaininvestments;theuseoftheterm‘physicalasset’wouldbespecifictotangibleassetsonly.Whilstitisusuallythecasethatnon-currentassetsareofrelativelyhighvaluethisisnotadefiningaspect.Awastepaperbinmayexhibitthecharacteristicsofanon-currentasset,butonthegroundsofmaterialityitisunlikelytobetreatedassuch.Furthermorethepastcostofanassetmaybeirrelevant;nomatterhowmuchanassethascost,itistheexpectationoffutureeconomicbenefitsflowingfromaresource(normallyintheform.offuturecashinflows)thatdefinesanassetaccordingtotheIASB’sFrameworkforthepreparationandpresentationoffinancialstatements.Theconceptofownershipisnolongeracriticalaspectofthedefinitionofanasset.Itisprobablythecasethatmostnoncurrentassetsinanentity’sstatementoffinancialpositionareownedbytheentity;however,itistheabilityto‘control’assets(includingpreventingothersfromhavingaccesstothem)thatisnowadefiningfeature.Forexample:thisisanimportantcharacteristicintreatingafinanceleaseasanassetofthelesseeratherthanthelessor.Itisalsotruethatmostnon-currentassetswillbeusedbyanentityformorethanoneyearandapartofthedefinitionofproperty,plantandequipmentinIAS16Property,plantandequipmentreferstoanexpectationofuseinmorethanoneperiod,butthisisnotnecessarilyalwaysthecase.Itmaybethatanon-currentassetisacquiredwhichprovesunsuitablefortheentity’sintendeduseorisdamagedinanaccident.Inthesecircumstancesassetsmaynothavebeenusedforlongerthanayear,butneverthelesstheywerereportedasnon-currentsduringthetimetheywereinuse.Anon-currentassetmaybewithinayearoftheendofitsusefullifebut(unlessasaleagreementhasbeenreachedunderIFRS5Non-currentassetsheldforsaleanddiscontinuedoperations)wouldstillbereportedasanon-currentassetifitwasstillgivingeconomicbenefits.Anotherdefiningaspectofnon-currentassetsistheirintendedusei.e.heldforcontinuinguseintheproduction,supplyofgoodsorservices,forrentaltoothersorforadministrativepurposes.(b)(i)TheexpenditureonthetrainingcoursesmayexhibitthecharacteristicsofanassetinthattheyhaveandwillcontinuetobringfutureeconomicbenefitsbywayofincreasedefficiencyandcostsavingstoDarby.However,theexpenditurecannotberecognisedasanassetonthestatementoffinancialpositionandmustbechargedasanexpenseasthecostisincurred.Themainreasonforthislieswiththeissueof’control’;itisDarby’semployeesthathavethe‘skills’providedbythecourses,buttheemployeescanleavethecompanyandtaketheirskillswiththemor,throughaccidentorinjury,maybedeprivedofthoseskills.AlsothecapitalisationofstafftrainingcostsisspecificallyprohibitedunderInternationalFinancialReportingStandards(specificallyIAS38Intangibleassets).(ii)Thequestionspecificallystatesthatthecostsincurredtodateonthedevelopmentofthenewprocessorchipareresearchcosts.IAS38statesthatresearchcostsmustbeexpensed.Thisismainlybecauseresearchistherelativelyearlystageofanewprojectandanyfuturebenefitsaresofarinthefuturethattheycannotbeconsideredtomeetthedefinitionofanasset(probablefutureeconomicbenefits),despitethegoodrecordofsuccessinthepastwithsimilarprojects.Althoughtheworkontheautomaticvehiclebrakingsystemisstillattheresearchstage,thisisdifferentinnaturefromthepreviousexampleastheworkhasbeencommissionedbyacustomer,Assuch,fromtheperspectiveofDarby,itisworkinprogress(acurrentasset)andshouldnotbewrittenoffasanexpense.Anoteofcautionshouldbeaddedhereinthatthequestionsaysthatthesuccessoftheprojectisuncertainwhichpresumablymeansitmaynotbecompleted.ThisdoesnotmeanthatDarbywillnotreceivepaymentfortheworkithascarriedout,butitshouldbecheckedtothecontracttoensurethattheamountithasspenttodate($2·4million)willberecoverable.Intheeventthatsay,forexample,thecontractstatedthatonly$2millionwouldbeallowedforresearchcosts,thiswouldplacealimitonhowmuchDarbycouldtreatasworkinprogress.Ifthiswerethecasethen,forthisexample,Darbywouldhavetoexpense$400,000andtreatonly$2millionasworkinprogress.(iii)Thequestionsuggeststhecorrecttreatmentforthiskindofcontractistotreatthecostsoftheinstallationasanon-currentassetand(presumably)depreciateitoveritsexpectedlifeof(atleast)threeyearsfromwhenitbecomesavailableforuse.Inthiscasetheassetwillnotcomeintouseuntilthenextfinancialyear/reportingperiodandnodepreciationneedstobeprovidedat30September2009.Thecapitalisedcoststodateof$58,000shouldonlybewrittendownifthereisevidencethattheassethasbecomeimpaired.Impairmentoccurswheretherecoverableamountofanassetislessthanitscarryingamount.Theassistantappearstobelievethattherecoverableamountisthefutureprofit,whereas(inthiscase)itisthefuture(net)cashinflows.Thusanyimpairmenttestat30September2009shouldcomparethecarryingamountof$58,000withtheexpectednetcashflowfromthesystemof$98,000($50,000perannumforthreeyearslessfuturecashoutflowstocompletiontheinstallationof$52,000(seenotebelow)).Asthefuturenetcashflowsareinexcessofthecarryingamount,theassetisnotimpairedanditshouldnotbewrittendownbutshownasanon-currentasset(underconstruction)atcostof$58,000.Note:asthecontractisexpectedtomakeaprofitof$40,000onincomeof$150,000,thetotalcostsmustbe$110,000,withcoststodateat$58,000thisleavescompletioncostsof$52,000.
(d) Comment on THREE factors other than NPV that the directors of ITL should consider when deciding whether
to manufacture the Snowballer. (3 marks)
(d) Factors that should be considered by the directors of ITL include:
(i) The cash flows are estimated. How accurate they are requires detailed consideration.
(ii) The cost of capital used by the finance director might be inappropriate. For example if the Snowballer proposal is less
risky than other projects undertaken by ITL then a lower cost of capital should be used.
(iii) The rate of inflation may vary from the anticipated rate of 4% per annum.
(iv) How strong is the Olympic brand name? The directors are proposing to pay royalties equivalent to 6% of sales revenue
during the six years of the anticipated life of the project. Should they market the Snowballer themselves?
(v) Would competitors enter the market and what would be the likely effect on sales volumes and selling prices?
N.B: Only three factors were required.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2019-03-15
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2019-03-15
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2020-08-12
- 2019-03-15
- 2020-08-12