快讯:多所院校初试科目加入全国统考,初试统考或成未来趋势?

发布时间:2020-09-11


考研政策每年都有所变化,今年也不例外。从目前官方发布的政策来看,考研将出现一些新的变化。那么有哪些考研政策变化是需要我们注意的呢?下面跟随51题库考试学习网一起来看看吧。

初试统考或成未来趋势?

除了以上313历史学基础和396经济类联考,今年教育学、计算机、心理学等专业的初试科目,改成统考的学校也很多——

①北京工业大学:北京工业大学0401教育学、0812计算机科学与技术、0839网络空间安全、0854电子信息(专业学位)四个专业的专业课自命题考试均改为全国统考。

②天津大学:教育经济与管理专业自命题科目改为《311教育学专业基础综合》。

③东北师范大学:教育学部7个专业的考试科目三变更为《311教育学专业基础综合》;原“120403教育经济与管理”拟调整为“047101教育经济与管理”,考试科目三变更为《311教育学专业基础综合》。

篇幅有限,这里就不一一举例了,大家可以去目标院校的研究生院,密切关注下最新变化。

其实对于这项改革,早有前奏,去年教育部在《2020年硕士研究生招生工作管理规定》中第五章命题部分,就新增一条说明:大力推进按一级学科命题和题库命题,鼓励招生单位选用统考科目试卷。

国家进行此项改革,从整体布局上来说,对大家是有利的,能更大限度地统一考研初试科目,保证初试公平。还有,即便到后期需要调剂,高校在筛选考生时,也可以更大限度地保证公平,考试科目一样的情况下,按初试成绩的高低进行筛选。

所以,初试科目往统考方向改变,很可能会是未来的发展趋势,大家要做好心理准备,尤其是一级学科命题和题库命题,以后公布的院校会越来越多。

但就是有时一些高校的政策调整公告公布时间稍晚了些,参加20考研的同学也知道,去年就有不少学校在8、9月份才通知初试科目有此改动,给调整的时间有些少。

目前已经有50多所学校发布了考研初试科目变动

江西师范大学、山东大学、西北农林科技大学、青岛农业大学、新疆农业大学、河北工业大学、福建师范大学、中国传媒大学、江苏理工学院、西安交通大学、浙江理工大学、深圳大学、河北经贸大学、南京信息工程大学、上海电机学院、暨南大学、北京交通大学、江南大学、首都经济贸易大学、北京工业大学、西南交通大学、中国人民大学、西南大学、东北师范大学、中国地质大学(北京)、浙江大学、重庆理工大学、天津大学、安徽大学、复旦大学、湖南大学、陕西理工大学、山西大学、西北政法大学、东北大学、中央民族大学、吉林大学、杭州电子科技大学、齐鲁工业大学、中国政法大学、西北师范大学、北京国家会计学院

上海国家会计学院、河南财经政法大学、山东大学、广东外语外贸大学、陕西师范大学、北京外国语大学、四川师范大学、南京大学、东莞理工学院

以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家带来的全部内容,希望能给大家一些帮助。另外,小伙伴们如果还有其他关于考研的疑问,也可以留言咨询哦。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2021年研究生入学考试的小伙伴都能取得优异的成绩。


下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

新月体性肾小球肾炎的病理变化有


A.肾小囊壁层上皮细胞增生
B.基底膜呈钉状突起
C.免疫荧光可呈阴性
D.肾小囊内单核细胞渗出
答案:A,C,D
解析:

was a Vote Leave campaigner during the eu referendum campaign in 2016.In fact,I was one of many Vote Leave volunteers who were in the headquarters on a daily basis.I met Boris Johnson Daniel Hannan and other pro-leave leaders.But I have come to the conclusion that there absolutely should be a referendum on the final Brexit deal.Here's why.Twice now the British people have been asked how they feel about our relationship with the European Union,and twice the British people have said:Hey,I'm not really sure.The first time was at the actual referendum in June 2016,in which the voting public was split 51.9%/48.1%.The second time was the 2017 general election,in which the question of our membership wasn't on the table,but the manner of our exit was,and the result was a hung parliament.The recent revelations concerning Cambridge analytica and AggregatelY,and their involvement in the referendum are serious and troubling.Next to the fact that the gove ment hasnt consulted the public at all on the kind of Brexit it wants,evidence of possible cheating and unethical practices fur-ther undermine the referendum's legitimacy.I wasn’t privy to financial goings-on at Vote Leave.But I remember being surprised when I heard about the formatin.on of BeLeave--the campaign group specifical argeting young people-and even more surprised when I heard the rumour that it was funded by Vote Leave,because that organisation already had a programme of activities to engage young people.I was part of it.Suffice to say,I believe there is evidence of ethical misconduct sing the EU referendum This evidence concerns Vote Leave in the main,but not exclusively.In 10 years'time,shouldn’t we be able to look pack and be certain that the decision to leave was the genuine will of the people,that the new relationship between the UK and the EU was broadly approved of,and that both of those things were in the best interests of the UK?I don't think anybody can say that,even two years after the referendum Why did I vote leave in the first place?Because i listened to the arguments,and nobody on the remain side had satisfactory answers to criticisms of our relationship with the EU.Successive British governments assented to consecutive EU treaties that brought European nations towards"an ever closer union with greater alignment on banking,foreign policy,travel and trade The biggest issues that the world will face over the next century are transnational.Large-scale migration,environmental issues,global food and water shortages,AI and the ethics of advanced technology.Having a substantial framework for national cooperation is a headstart to resolving those issues.I believe that it's possible to want to leave the EU and want international cooperation at the same time,but,setting aside their rhetorical flourishes that doesn't seem like the vision that the chief Brexi teers actually want.The UK doesn't need a second in/out referendum-it would defeat the purpose of the first one However,it is vital that the Uk has another,separate referendum on the terms of the final exit arrangement.In that referendum,the public should have the opportunity to accept the deal the government has negotiated,to reject it and ask that it renegotiate,to reject it and leave the EU without a deal,or to remain in the EU he prime minister knows that delivering Brexit,any Brexit,has become an existential issue for the Conservative party in the medium term.So if there is to be another referendum,the government will have to be forced into granting it.This will be an extremely difficult task,and I'm not optimistic about our chances.But over the next year,I'm going to be campaigning with everything I have for that possibility.After all,I'm one of the people who got us into this mess

答案:
解析:
我认为,想要退出欧盟的同时进行国际合作是要有可能的,但抛开这些华丽的辞藻,这似乎不像是脱欧派领导人真正想要的愿景.本句为复合句。该句主干为i believe that.;that引导的为宾语从句,从句的主干为i'possible to but that doesn't seem like the vision。其中该句第三个that引导的为定语从句,修饰先行词vision。本句翻译前半句it's possible to时要注意进行语序的调整,译为“想要退出欧盟的同时进行国际合作是有可能的”。


答案:
解析:


下列选项中,可导致气短的原因有

A.元气亏虚
B.气机阻滞
C.痰饮内停
D.瘀血内阻
答案:A,B,C,D
解析:

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。