网友您好， 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
单选题
Some paleontologists claim that the discovery of what appear to be feathers in the fossil of an Archosaur could force a revision of current theories on the phylogeny of Archosaurs, alter conceptions of dinosaur skin surfaces, and require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier orion than previously thought.
A
require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought
B
scholars may be required to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought
C
require a crediting by scholars of birds with a far earlier origin than previously thought
D
compared to what was previously thought, require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier origin
E
crediting birds with a far earlier origin than scholars had previously though
参考答案
参考解析
解析：
几个选项相比来看，A项在语法和句法上都比较合适，故本题选A项。
几个选项相比来看，A项在语法和句法上都比较合适，故本题选A项。
更多 “单选题Some paleontologists claim that the discovery of what appear to be feathers in the fossil of an Archosaur could force a revision of current theories on the phylogeny of Archosaurs, alter conceptions of dinosaur skin surfaces, and require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier orion than previously thought.A require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thoughtB scholars may be required to credit birds with a far earlier origin than previously thoughtC require a crediting by scholars of birds with a far earlier origin than previously thoughtD compared to what was previously thought, require scholars to credit birds with a far earlier originE crediting birds with a far earlier origin than scholars had previously though” 相关考题
考题
4 All organisations require trained employees. However, training can take many forms, some of which are internal to the organisation.Required:Explain what is meant by the terms:(a) Computer based training. (3 marks)
考题
The newly described languages were often so strikingly different from the well studied languages of Europe and Southeast Asia that some scholars even accused Boas and Sapir of fabricating their data Native American languages are indeed different, so much so in fact that Navajo could be used by the US military as a code during World War II to send secret messages.
考题
Liabilities are usually classified as either current or noncurrent liabilities. Current liabilities are those obligations whose (61) is reasonably expected to require the use of existing resources properly classified as current (62) , or the creation of other current liabilities. This definition of current liabilities emphasizes a short-term creditor's claim to working capital rather than to the due date for (63) purposes. Accounts payable, dividends payable, salaries payable, and taxes payable are examples of current liabilities. Liabilities which are not current liabilities are (64) as noncurrent or long-term liabilities. Bonds payable and mortgages payable are examples of (65) liabilities.(46)A．calculationB．liquidationC．countingD．account
考题
Examine the following command:ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE;In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group? ()
A. when ASM disk goes offlineB. when one or more ASM files are droppedC. when some disks in a disk group are offlineD. when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing
考题
如何强制执行日志切换()
A.ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT;B.ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT FORCE;C.ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE;D.ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE FORCE;E.ALTER DATABASE LOG SWITCH;
考题
What can we infer about primitive birds from the text?A．They had claws to help them climb.B．They could fly long distances.C．They had four wings like hoatzins.D．They had a head with long feathers on the top.
考题
Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public（including other scientists）receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”33.Paragraph 3 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after itA.has attracted the attention of the general public.
B.has been examined by the scientific community.
C.has received recognition from editors and reviewers.
D.has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.
考题
Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public（including other scientists）receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”35.Which of the following would be the best title of the test?A.Novelty as an Engine of Scientific Development.
B.Collective Scrutiny in Scientific Discovery.
C.Evolution of Credibility in Doing Science.
D.Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science.
考题
Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public（including other scientists）receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”32.It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process requiresA.strict inspection.
B.shared efforts.
C.individual wisdom.
D.persistent innovation.
考题
Text 3 In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public（including other scientists）receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works it through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim–a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”34.Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi would most likely agree thatA.scientific claims will survive challenges.
B.discoveries today inspire future research.
C.efforts to make discoveries are justified.
D.scientific work calls for a critical mind.
考题
In a customer’s network， VLAN Trunking Protocol （VTP） is running with a domain named main1. VLANs 1，2，3，4，5，10，20 are active on the network. Suddenly the whole network goes down. No traffic is being passed on VLANs 2，3，4，5，10，20， however traffic passes on VLAN 1 and indicates all switches are operational. Right before the network problem occurred， a switch named TEST1 was added to the network. What three configuration issues on TEST1 could be causing the network outage？（）A、TEST1 is configured as a VTP server with a different domain name.B、TEST1 is not configured to participate in VTP.C、TEST1 is configured as a VTP server with the domain name main1.D、TEST1 has a lower VTP configuration revision than the current VTP revision.E、TEST1 has a higher VTP configuration revision than the current VTP revision.F、TEST1 is configured with only VLAN1.
考题
A VTP domain has six active VLANs. Without notice， all VLANs except VLAN1 fail. Just prior tothe failure， Switch2 was added to the network. Which three issues on Switch2 could be the cause？（）A、Switch2 is configured for only VLAN1B、Switch2 is a VTP server in a different domainC、Switch2 is a VTP server in the Company domainD、Switch2 is not a VTP domain.E、Switch2 has a lower VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revisionF、Switch2 has a higher VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision
考题
如何强制执行日志切换（）A、ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT;B、ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT FORCE;C、ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE;D、ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE FORCE;E、ALTER DATABASE LOG SWITCH;
考题
If you use ALTER DISKGROUP ... ADD DISK and specify a wildcard for the discovery string， what happens to disks that are already a part of the same or another disk group？（） A、 The command fails unless you specify the FORCE option.B、 The command fails unless you specify the REUSE option.C、 The command must be reissued with a more specific discovery string.D、 The other disks， already part of the disk group，are ignored.
考题
Examine the following command： ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE； In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group？（） A、 when ASM disk goes offlineB、 when one or more ASM files are droppedC、 when some disks in a disk group are offlineD、 when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing
考题
单选题The skulls and pelvic bones of some species of dinosaur share characteristics with the skulls and pelvic bones of all modern birds. Even though not all dinosaurs have these characteristics, there are scientists who claim that all animals that do have these characteristics are dinosaurs. If the statements above and the claim of the scientists are true, which of the following must also be true?A
Birds share more characteristics with dinosaurs than they do with other animals.B
Some ancient dinosaurs were indistinguishable from modern birds.C
All animals whose skulls share the characteristics of those of modern birds also have pelvic bones that are similar to those of modern birds.D
Modern birds are dinosaurs.E
All dinosaurs are birds.
考题
单选题Examine the following command： ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE； In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group？（）A
when ASM disk goes offlineB
when one or more ASM files are droppedC
when some disks in a disk group are offlineD
when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing
考题
单选题Examine the following command: ALTER DISKGROUP data MOUNT FORCE; In which scenario can you use the above command to mount the disk group? （）A
when ASM disk goes offlineB
when one or more ASM files are droppedC
when some disks in a disk group are offlineD
when some disks in a failure group for a disk group are rebalancing
考题
单选题Paleontologists hypothesize that modern birds evolved from the family of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus rex. This hypothesis would be strongly supported if evidence that dinosaurs from this family had a body covering resembling feathers could be found, but so far no such evidence has been found. Which of the following, if true, would most help the paleontologists explain why no evidence of feathered dinosaurs has yet been found?A
Fossilized dinosaurs have shown many birdlike characteristics, such as bone structure and winglike arms.B
If birds are in fact the descendants of dinosaurs, then it can be argued that the dinosaurs never really died out.C
Flying dinosaurs such as the Pteranodon, which is not thought to have been related to modern birds, do not appear to have had feathers.D
Soft tissues such as skin and feathers do not fossilize like bones, and therefore are far less likely to have left permanent evidence in the fossil record.E
The thousands of dinosaur fossils excavated by paleontologists represent only a tiny fraction of the billions of dinosaurs that once lived.
考题
单选题Your company has client computers that run Windows 7 and client computers that run Windows XP Professional. You enable the Network Discovery feature on the Windows 7 computers. You discover that the Windows XP computers do not appear on the network map. You need to ensure that all client computers appear on the network map. What should you do?（）A
Configure the IPv6 protocol on the Windows 7 computers.B
Configure the network shares on the Windows 7 computers to include the user names of all employees.C
Configure the network shares on the Windows XP computers to include the user names of all employees.D
Install the Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) Responder on the Windows XP computers.
考题
单选题If you use ALTER DISKGROUP ... ADD DISK and specify a wildcard for the discovery string， what happens to disks that are already a part of the same or another disk group？（）A
The command fails unless you specify the FORCE option.B
The command fails unless you specify the REUSE option.C
The command must be reissued with a more specific discovery string.D
The other disks， already part of the disk group，are ignored.
考题
单选题What is an ebb current（）.A
A current at minimum flowB
A current coming inC
A current going outD
A current at maximum flow
考题
单选题What must be the same to make multiple switches part of the same Multiple Spanning Tree （MST）？（）A
VLAN instance mapping and revision numberB
VLAN instance mapping and member listC
VLAN instance mapping， revision number， and member listD
VLAN instance mapping， revision number， member list， and timers
考题
单选题Why was Salman Rushdie ambivalent about the idea of scholars studying his papers?A
He was afraid that he would be pursued by Islamic extremists again.B
The scholars might use the papers to write a biography about himC
He felt that his privacy might be easily exposed to the public.D
He could not imagine what kind of consequences would be following.
考题
单选题Companycom is migrating from p670 systems running AIX 5.2 to p5 595 systems running AIX 5.3. They will be changing out only the system units. They will re-use the existing 61D drawers and adapters with the new p5 595 systems. What compatibility issue must be considered?（）A
APV features are not supported for some legacy POWER4 adaptersB
APV will require the most current maintenance level for AIX 5.2C
APV features will require that legacy POWER4 adapters be updated with new microcodeD
The Virtual IO Server must run AIX 5.3 and the LPARs can run either AIX 5.2 or AIX 5.3
考题
单选题The discovery of these tombs is _____ for scholars' studying Chinese history.A
of very importantB
great significantC
of great significanceD
greatly importance
考题
多选题A VTP domain has six active VLANs. Without notice， all VLANs except VLAN1 fail. Just prior tothe failure， Switch2 was added to the network. Which three issues on Switch2 could be the cause？（）ASwitch2 is configured for only VLAN1BSwitch2 is a VTP server in a different domainCSwitch2 is a VTP server in the Company domainDSwitch2 is not a VTP domain.ESwitch2 has a lower VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revisionFSwitch2 has a higher VTP configuration revision number than the current VTP revision
热门标签
最新试卷