快速查看!ACCA机考常见问题及回答

发布时间:2020-08-14


目前大部分ACCA考试科目都采用了机考的形式,但是每次考试参考的小伙伴都会遇到各种各样的问题,为了帮助大家更好的参加考试,下面51题库考试学习网就和大家一起来看看,ACCA机考常见问题及回答,将要参考的小伙伴赶紧来围观哦,避免考试途中你也遇到类似的问题哦。

1.在机考考试中,考生是否能查看他们的答题进度?

答:你在acca考试最后一道题目的界面上点击“Next”,会显示“Review”界面。可以让你看到每一道题目的答题状态,也可以挑选一些考题重新回答。考试各部分的总结界面将会对考试下一部分的内容进行总结。

2.是否可以在考试中使用剪切,复制和黏贴功能?

你可以在同一个文字处理和电子表格答题区域中或者在草稿纸(Scratch Pad)中使用剪切,复制和黏贴功能。但是请注意你无法从一个答题区剪切,复制或黏贴至另一个答题区,也无法从草稿纸至答题区完成这些操作。

3.如何获取电子草稿纸(Scratch Pad)?

点击顶部工具栏的草稿纸按钮即可获得电子草稿纸。电子草稿纸只有学员选择了才会显示。但该功能不建议使用。考场上会提供纸质草稿纸。请注意无论是纸质还是电子草稿纸上的任何回答都不会进行判分。

4.是否可以在主观题答题区使用键盘快捷键?

可以。

5.能否插入行或列并且调整高度和宽度?

可以,这个问题和文字处理题型有关。该项操作可以通过工具栏表格的菜单完成。因为我比较倾向用 T 字账户编制现金流量表,因此能否在FR的机考中放置 T 字账户?就像在纸质考试中一样,你可以选择任何布局来陈列他们的运算过程。在要求用电子表格来完成现金流量表的题目中,可以用 T 字账户来陈列运算过程。

6.如何知道主观题的总数量和要求(以及每个要求的分值)?

每个部分的总结界面会确认总共有多少道主观题(比如说 2 道或者 3 )以及每道多少分值。在题目的上方会提示有多少个要求和案例/问题相关。

7.在真实的考试中是否会弹出窗口提示你没有查看整个的屏幕等?在考试中我是否被这些屏幕干扰?

是的,真实考试中会出现这样的情况。这种设计旨在帮助你确保在跳转至下一道题目之前,他们阅读了整个试题和答题框,所以窗口弹出目的是提醒你。

8.能否删除主观题中预先设定格式的答案?如果它们不小心删除了,我该怎么办?

你可以删除主观题中预先设定格式的答案,但是可以点击“Reset”按钮将答题区域重新恢复至原始设置,将会显示空白的预先设定格式的答案。他们也可以使用“Undo”功能恢复无意中删除的内容。

以上是关于ACCA机考常见问题及回答的内容,小伙伴都了解了吗?欲了解更多关于ACCA考试的资讯,敬请关注51题库考试学习网!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(ii) Describe the procedures to verify the number of serious accidents in the year ended 30 November 2007.

(4 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Procedures to verify the number of serious accidents during 2007 could include the following:
Tutorial note: procedures should focus on the completeness of the disclosure as it is in the interest of Sci-Tech Co to
understate the number of serious accidents.
– Review the accident log book and count the total number of accidents during the year
– Discuss the definition of ‘serious accident’ with the directors and clarify exactly what criteria need to be met to
satisfy the definition
– For serious accidents identified:
? review HR records to determine the amount of time taken off work
? review payroll records to determine the financial amount of sick pay awarded to the employee
? review correspondence with the employee regarding the accident.
Tutorial note: the above will help to clarify that the accident was indeed serious.
– Review board minutes where the increase in the number of serious accidents has been discussed
– Review correspondence with Sci-Tech Co’s legal advisors to ascertain any legal claims made against the company
due to accidents at work
– Enquire as to whether any health and safety visits have been conducted during the year by regulatory bodies, and
review any documentation or correspondence issued to Sci-Tech Co after such visits.
Tutorial note: it is highly likely that in a regulated industry such as pharmaceutical research, any serious accident
would trigger a health and safety inspection from the appropriate regulatory body.
– Discuss the level of accidents with representatives of Sci-Tech Co’s employees to reach an understanding as to
whether accidents sometimes go unreported in the accident log book.

(b) One of the hotels owned by Norman is a hotel complex which includes a theme park, a casino and a golf course,

as well as a hotel. The theme park, casino, and hotel were sold in the year ended 31 May 2008 to Conquest, a

public limited company, for $200 million but the sale agreement stated that Norman would continue to operate

and manage the three businesses for their remaining useful life of 15 years. The residual interest in the business

reverts back to Norman after the 15 year period. Norman would receive 75% of the net profit of the businesses

as operator fees and Conquest would receive the remaining 25%. Norman has guaranteed to Conquest that the

net minimum profit paid to Conquest would not be less than $15 million. (4 marks)

Norman has recently started issuing vouchers to customers when they stay in its hotels. The vouchers entitle the

customers to a $30 discount on a subsequent room booking within three months of their stay. Historical

experience has shown that only one in five vouchers are redeemed by the customer. At the company’s year end

of 31 May 2008, it is estimated that there are vouchers worth $20 million which are eligible for discount. The

income from room sales for the year is $300 million and Norman is unsure how to report the income from room

sales in the financial statements. (4 marks)

Norman has obtained a significant amount of grant income for the development of hotels in Europe. The grants

have been received from government bodies and relate to the size of the hotel which has been built by the grant

assistance. The intention of the grant income was to create jobs in areas where there was significant

unemployment. The grants received of $70 million will have to be repaid if the cost of building the hotels is less

than $500 million. (4 marks)

Appropriateness and quality of discussion (2 marks)

Required:

Discuss how the above income would be treated in the financial statements of Norman for the year ended

31 May 2008.

正确答案:
(b) Property is sometimes sold with a degree of continuing involvement by the seller so that the risks and rewards of ownership
have not been transferred. The nature and extent of the buyer’s involvement will determine how the transaction is accounted
for. The substance of the transaction is determined by looking at the transaction as a whole and IAS18 ‘Revenue’ requires
this by stating that where two or more transactions are linked, they should be treated as a single transaction in order to
understand the commercial effect (IAS18 paragraph 13). In the case of the sale of the hotel, theme park and casino, Norman
should not recognise a sale as the company continues to enjoy substantially all of the risks and rewards of the businesses,
and still operates and manages them. Additionally the residual interest in the business reverts back to Norman. Also Norman
has guaranteed the income level for the purchaser as the minimum payment to Conquest will be $15 million a year. The
transaction is in substance a financing arrangement and the proceeds should be treated as a loan and the payment of profits
as interest.
The principles of IAS18 and IFRIC13 ‘Customer Loyalty Programmes’ require that revenue in respect of each separate
component of a transaction is measured at its fair value. Where vouchers are issued as part of a sales transaction and are
redeemable against future purchases, revenue should be reported at the amount of the consideration received/receivable less
the voucher’s fair value. In substance, the customer is purchasing both goods or services and a voucher. The fair value of the
voucher is determined by reference to the value to the holder and not the cost to the issuer. Factors to be taken into account
when estimating the fair value, would be the discount the customer obtains, the percentage of vouchers that would be
redeemed, and the time value of money. As only one in five vouchers are redeemed, then effectively the hotel has sold goods
worth ($300 + $4) million, i.e. $304 million for a consideration of $300 million. Thus allocating the discount between the
two elements would mean that (300 ÷ 304 x $300m) i.e. $296·1 million will be allocated to the room sales and the balance
of $3·9 million to the vouchers. The deferred portion of the proceeds is only recognised when the obligations are fulfilled.
The recognition of government grants is covered by IAS20 ‘Accounting for government grants and disclosure of government
assistance’. The accruals concept is used by the standard to match the grant received with the related costs. The relationship
between the grant and the related expenditure is the key to establishing the accounting treatment. Grants should not be
recognised until there is reasonable assurance that the company can comply with the conditions relating to their receipt and
the grant will be received. Provision should be made if it appears that the grant may have to be repaid.
There may be difficulties of matching costs and revenues when the terms of the grant do not specify precisely the expense
towards which the grant contributes. In this case the grant appears to relate to both the building of hotels and the creation of
employment. However, if the grant was related to revenue expenditure, then the terms would have been related to payroll or
a fixed amount per job created. Hence it would appear that the grant is capital based and should be matched against the
depreciation of the hotels by using a deferred income approach or deducting the grant from the carrying value of the asset
(IAS20). Additionally the grant is only to be repaid if the cost of the hotel is less than $500 million which itself would seem
to indicate that the grant is capital based. If the company feels that the cost will not reach $500 million, a provision should
be made for the estimated liability if the grant has been recognised.

(b) Calculate the percentage of maximum capacity at which the zoo will break even during the year ending

30 November 2007. You should assume that 50% of the revenue from sales of ticket type ZC is attributable

to the zoo. (7 marks)

正确答案:

14 Alpha buys goods from Beta. At 30 June 2005 Beta’s account in Alpha’s records showed $5,700 owing to Beta.

Beta submitted a statement to Alpha as at the same date showing a balance due of $5,200.

Which of the following could account fully for the difference?

A Alpha has sent a cheque to Beta for $500 which has not yet been received by Beta.

B The credit side of Beta’s account in Alpha’s records has been undercast by $500.

C An invoice for $250 from Beta has been treated in Alpha’s records as if it had been a credit note.

D Beta has issued a credit note for $500 to Alpha which Alpha has not yet received.

正确答案:D

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。