备考ACCA哪版教材比较好?
发布时间:2021-05-14
备考ACCA考试的考生都知道,ACCA官方认可的教材总共有三个版本,分别是BPP、Kaplan及Becker。那么第一次备考ACCA考试的考生应该如何选择适合自己的教材呢?接下来就和51题库考试学习网一起去了解下吧!
如果是基础比较薄弱的,或者英语水平较差的学员优先考虑BPP和FTC,如果是相对拥有一些扎实的财务基础,或者考过注会等的学员可以选择FTC。不过,中国国内仅买下了BPP版权,考生可以在国内商店进行购买,而其他两者则需要在国外购买。
以下是每个版本教材的特点:
1、BPP以详细见称,BPP教材是全球ACCA使用最多的版本,通俗易懂,比较适合新老学员自学,ACCA学员以看BPP课本及精简版讲义为主。同时但国内基本上所有的高校ACCA专业也是使用的BPP版教材,因为审计署买下了BPP教材在中国的版权,并且比之FTC版教材价格也有优势,每个点都讲解得很细。
ACCA教材BPP版本主要适合于英语水平一般的,理解能力稍微弱的或者是初学者等。但是ACCA教材BPP版本很多的,有时候讲得也很啰嗦。
2、FTC版是ACCA官方版本教材,在全球使用也比较多。这套教材的优点是简洁,基本上每门课教材都比BPP版薄,但是FTC对LW阶段的ACCA备考并不是那么适用,其难度较之BPP版有所加大,所用单词也要复杂一些。而且最新版有些地方讲解不是很细致,单凭它参加考试有一定难度。
目前这两种都较适合中国ACCA考生,关键在于其编撰风格对大家各自的适应程度如何。不管是FTC还是BPP的ACCA教材都只是负责知识点的讲解的,最终出题目的还是还是官方的。不管选择何种教材,ACCA学员在备考时,都一定要结合大纲,将ACCA教材多看几遍,再多做练习题,这样才不会在考试中失利,顺利的通过ACCA考试。总的来说,同学们可以根据自身需要,选择适合自己的教材最重要。
以上就是51题库考试学习网给大家带来的关于选择ACCA考试教材的相关分享,希望能够帮到大家!后续请大家持续关注51题库考试学习网,51题库考试学习网将会为大家带来最新、最热的考试资讯!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Discuss the ethical and social responsibilities of the Beth Group and whether a change in the ethical and
social attitudes of the management could improve business performance. (7 marks)
Note: requirement (c) includes 2 professional marks for development of the discussion of the ethical and social
responsibilities of the Beth Group.
(c) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is concerned with business ethics and the company’s accountability to its stakeholders,
and about the way it meets its wider obligations. CSR emphasises the need for companies to adopt a coherent approach to
a range of stakeholders including investors, employees, suppliers, and customers. Beth has paid little regard to the promotion
of socially and ethically responsible policies. For example, the decision to not pay the SME creditors on the grounds that they
could not afford to sue the company is ethically unacceptable. Additionally, Beth pays little regard to local customs and
cultures in its business dealings.
The stagnation being suffered by Beth could perhaps be reversed if it adopted more environmentally friendly policies. The
corporate image is suffering because of its attitude to the environment. Environmentally friendly policies could be cost effective
if they help to increase market share and reduce the amount of litigation costs it has to suffer. The communication of these
policies would be through the environmental report, and it is critical that stakeholders feel that the company is being
transparent in its disclosures.
Evidence of corporate misbehaviour (Enron, World.com) has stimulated interest in the behaviour of companies. There has
been pressure for companies to show more awareness and concern, not only for the environment but for the rights and
interests of the people they do business with. Governments have made it clear that directors must consider the short-term
and long-term consequences of their actions, and take into account their relationships with employees and the impact of the
business on the community and the environment. The behaviour of Beth will have had an adverse effect on their corporate
image.
CSR requires the directors to address strategic issues about the aims, purposes, and operational methods of the organisation,
and some redefinition of the business model that assumes that profit motive and shareholder interests define the core purpose
of the company. The profits of Beth will suffer if employees are not valued and there is poor customer support.
Arrangements should be put in place to ensure that the business is conducted in a responsible manner. The board should
look at broad social and environmental issues affecting the company and set policy and targets, monitoring performance and
improvements.
4 (a) ISA 701 Modifications to The Independent Auditor’s Report includes ‘suggested wording of modifying phrases
for use when issuing modified reports’.
Required:
Explain and distinguish between each of the following terms:
(i) ‘qualified opinion’;
(ii) ‘disclaimer of opinion’;
(iii) ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’. (6 marks)
4 PETRIE CO
(a) Independent auditor’s report terms
(i) Qualified opinion – A qualified opinion is expressed when the auditor concludes that an unqualified opinion cannot be
expressed but that the effect of any disagreement with management, or limitation on scope is not so material and
pervasive as to require an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
(ii) Disclaimer of opinion – A disclaimer of opinion is expressed when the possible effect of a limitation on scope is so
material and pervasive that the auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and accordingly
is unable to express an opinion on the financial statements.
(iii) Emphasis of matter paragraph – An auditor’s report may be modified by adding an emphasis of matter paragraph to
highlight a matter affecting the financial statements that is included in a note to the financial statements that more
extensively discusses the matter. Such an emphasis of matter paragraph does not affect the auditor’s opinion. An
emphasis of matter paragraph may also be used to report matters other than those affecting the financial statements
(e.g. if there is a misstatement of fact in other information included in documents containing audited financial
statements).
(iii) is clearly distinguishable from (i) and (ii) because (i) and (ii) affect the opinion paragraph, whereas (iii) does not.
(i) and (ii) are distinguishable by the degree of their impact on the financial statements. In (i) the effects of any disagreement
or limitation on scope can be identified with an ‘except for …’ opinion. In (ii) the matter is pervasive, that is, affecting the
financial statements as a whole.
(ii) can only arise in respect of a limitation in scope (i.e. insufficient evidence) that has a pervasive effect. (i) is not pervasive
and may also arise from disagreement (i.e. where there is sufficient evidence).
(ii) Upwards; (3 marks)
(ii) Upwards communication is generally non-directive in nature and often takes two forms: personal problems or suggestions and/or technical feedback as part of the organisation’s control system.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-05-17
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-30
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-28
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-03-22
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-04
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-15
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-21
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-01-29
- 2020-04-03
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-12-30
- 2020-01-10