准备ACCA考试哪版教材比较好?
发布时间:2022-05-09
报考ACCA考试的考生都知道,ACCA官方认可的教材总共有三个版本,分别是BPP、Kaplan及Becker。那么第一次备考ACCA考试的考生应该如何选择适合自己的教材呢?接下来就和51题库考试学习网一起去了解下吧!
如果是基础比较薄弱的,或者英语水平较差的学员优先考虑BPP和FTC,如果是相对拥有一些扎实的财务基础,或者考过注会等的学员可以选择FTC。不过,中国国内仅买下了BPP版权,考生可以在国内商店进行购买,而其他两者则需要在国外购买。
以下是每个版本教材的特点:
1、BPP以详细见称,BPP教材是全球ACCA使用最多的版本,通俗易懂,比较适合新老学员自学,ACCA学员以看BPP课本及精简版讲义为主。同时但国内基本上所有的高校ACCA专业也是使用的BPP版教材,因为审计署买下了BPP教材在中国的版权,并且比之FTC版教材价格也有优势,每个点都讲解得很细。
ACCA教材BPP版本主要适合于英语水平一般的,理解能力稍微弱的或者是初学者等。但是ACCA教材BPP版本很多的,有时候讲得也很啰嗦。
2、FTC版是ACCA官方版本教材,在全球使用也比较多。这套教材的优点是简洁,基本上每门课教材都比BPP版薄,但是FTC对LW阶段的ACCA备考并不是那么适用,其难度较之BPP版有所加大,所用单词也要复杂一些。而且最新版有些地方讲解不是很细致,单凭它参加考试有一定难度。
目前这两种都较适合中国ACCA考生,关键在于其编撰风格对大家各自的适应程度如何。不管是FTC还是BPP的ACCA教材都只是负责知识点的讲解的,最终出题目的还是还是官方的。不管选择何种教材,ACCA学员在备考时,都一定要结合大纲,将ACCA教材多看几遍,再多做练习题,这样才不会在考试中失利,顺利的通过ACCA考试。总的来说,同学们可以根据自身需要,选择适合自己的教材最重要。
以上就是51题库考试学习网给大家带来的关于选择ACCA考试教材的相关资讯,希望能够帮到大家!请大家持续关注51题库考试学习网,51题库考试学习网将会为大家带来最新、最热的考试资讯!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(b) Describe the content of a reference. (5 marks)
Part (b)
A simple standard form. to be completed by the referee is acceptable to provide all the required details. A standard form. should
ask about the existing job title, the main duties and responsibilities of the current job, period of employment, present pay or salary
and the attendance record.
2 Tyre, a public limited company, operates in the vehicle retailing sector. The company is currently preparing its financial
statements for the year ended 31 May 2006 and has asked for advice on how to deal with the following items:
(i) Tyre requires customers to pay a deposit of 20% of the purchase price when placing an order for a vehicle. If the
customer cancels the order, the deposit is not refundable and Tyre retains it. If the order cannot be fulfilled by
Tyre, the company repays the full amount of the deposit to the customer. The balance of the purchase price
becomes payable on the delivery of the vehicle when the title to the goods passes. Tyre proposes to recognise
the revenue from the deposits immediately and the balance of the purchase price when the goods are delivered
to the customer. The cost of sales for the vehicle is recognised when the balance of the purchase price is paid.
Additionally, Tyre had sold a fleet of cars to Hub and gave Hub a discount of 30% of the retail price on the
transaction. The discount given is normal for this type of transaction. Tyre has given Hub a buyback option which
entitles Hub to require Tyre to repurchase the vehicles after three years for 40% of the purchase price. The normal
economic life of the vehicles is five years and the buyback option is expected to be exercised. (8 marks)
Required:
Advise the directors of Tyre on how to treat the above items in the financial statements for the year ended
31 May 2006.
(The mark allocation is shown against each of the above items)
2 Advice on sundry accounting issues: year ended 31 May 2006
The following details the nature of the advice relevant to the accounting issues.
Revenue recognition
(i) Sale to customers
IAS18 ‘Revenue’ requires that revenue relating to the sale of goods is recognised when the significant risks and rewards are
transferred to the buyer. Also the company should not retain any continuing managerial involvement associated with
ownership or control of the goods. Additionally the revenue and costs must be capable of reliable measurement and it should
be probable that the economic benefits of the transaction will go to the company.
Although the deposit is non refundable on cancellation of the order by the customer, there is a valid expectation that the
deposit will be repaid where the company does not fulfil its contractual obligation in supplying the vehicle. The deposit should,
therefore, only be recognised in revenue when the vehicle has been delivered and accepted by the customer. It should be
treated as a liability up to this point. At this point also, the balance of the sale proceeds will be recognised. If the customer
does cancel the order, then the deposit would be recognised in revenue at the date of the cancellation of the order.
The appendix to IAS18, although not part of the standard, agrees that revenue is recognised when goods of this nature are
delivered to the buyer.
Sale of Fleet cars
The company has not transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership as required by IAS18 as the buyback option
is expected to occur. The reason for this conclusion is that the company has retained the risk associated with the residual
value of the vehicles. Therefore, the transaction should not be treated as a sale. The vehicles should be treated as an operating
lease as essentially only 60% of the purchase price will be received by Tyre. Ownership of the assets are not expected to be
transferred to Hub, the lease term is arguably not for the major part of the assets’ life, and the present value of the minimum
lease payments will not be substantially equivalent to the fair value of the asset. Therefore it is an operating lease (IAS17).
No ‘outright sale profit’ will be recognised as the risks and rewards of ownership have been retained and no sale has occurred.
The vehicles will be shown in property, plant and equipment at their carrying amount. The lease income should be recognised
on a straight line basis over the lease term of three years unless some other basis is more representative. The vehicles will
be depreciated in accordance with IAS16, ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’. If there is any indication of impairment then the
company will apply IAS36 ‘Impairment of Assets’. As the discount given is normal for this type of transaction, it will not be
taken into account in estimating the fair value of the assets.
The buyback option will probably meet the definition of a financial liability and will be accounted for under IAS39 ‘Financial
Instruments: recognition and measurement’. The liability should be measured at ‘fair value’ and subsequently at amortisedcost unless designated at the outset as being at fair value through profit or loss.
(b) Describe a framework to assess the risks to the progress of the Giant Dam Project. Your answer should
include a diagram to represent the framework. (6 marks)
(b) Framework for assessing risk
Risk is assessed by considering each identified risk in terms of two variables:
– its hazard (or consequences or impact) and,
– its probability of happening (or being realised or ‘crystallising’).
The most material risks are those identified as having high impact/hazard and the highest probability of happening. Risks
with low hazard and low probability will have low priority whilst between these two extremes are situations where judgement
is required on how to manage the risk.
In practice, it is difficult to measure both variables with any degree of certainty and so if is often sufficient to consider each
in terms of relative crude metrics such as ‘high/medium/low’ or even ‘high/low’. The framework can be represented as a ‘map’
of two intersecting continuums with each variable being plotted along a continuum.
(b) Discuss the limitations of the above estimates. (6 marks)
(b) The estimates are based upon unrealistic assumptions and are subject to a considerable margin of error. Possible limitations
include:
(i) Sales, operating costs, replacement investments, and dividends are unlikely to increase by the same amount.
(ii) Forecasts of future growth rates may not be accurate. Paxis is unlikely to have access to enough internal information
about the activities of Wragger to make accurate projections.
(iii) The expected reduction in operating costs might not be achieved.
(iv) The estimates are based upon present values to infinity of expected free cash flows. A shorter time horizon might be
more realistic.
(v) The cost of capital for the combined company could differ from that estimated, depending how the market evaluates the
risk of the combined entity.
(vi) The analysis is based upon the assumption that the initial offer price is accepted.
(vii) There is no information about the fees and other costs associated with the proposed acquisition. In many cases these
are substantial, and must be included in the analysis.
(viii) The post acquisition integration of organisations often involves unforeseen costs which would reduce the benefit of any
potential synergy.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-15
- 2020-10-09
- 2020-03-13
- 2022-02-03
- 2020-03-27
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-01-03
- 2019-12-31
- 2020-03-13
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-04
- 2020-02-10
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-01-10
- 2022-05-19
- 2020-02-05
- 2020-03-04