2019ACCA这些免考福利政策你都清楚了吗?
发布时间:2019-07-19
据2019年ACCA官网信息了解到,2019-2020年部分财务相关专业大学在校或毕业学生,在参加ACCA考试注册时,将获得一定科目的免试权。ACCA对于参加专业会计师考试(ACCA)的中国学员的免试政策详情如下:
一、ACCA对中国教育部认可的全日制大学在读生(会计或金融专业)设置的免试政策
1. 会计学或金融学(完成第一学年课程):可以注册为ACCA正式学员,无免试
2. 会计学或金融学(完成第二学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 会计学或金融学(完成第三学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
4. 其他专业(在校生完成大一后):可以注册但无免试
*大学在读考生准备时间相对充足,可以每次报考三门课程,不建议报考四门,科目可以以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
二、ACCA对中国教育部认可高校毕业生设置的免试政策
1. 会计学(获得学士学位):免试5门课程(F1-F5)
2. 会计学(辅修专业):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 金融专业:免试5门课程(F1-F5)
4. 法律专业:免试1门课程(F4)
5. 商务及管理专业:免试1门课程(F1)
6. MPAcc专业(获得MPAcc学位或完成MPAcc大纲规定的所有课程、只有论文待完成):原则上免试九门课程(F1–F9),其中F6(税务)的免试条件:CICPA全科通过或MPAcc课程中选修了"中国税制"课程。
7. MBA学位(获得MBA学位):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
8. 非相关专业:无免试
高校毕业生(即:在职人士),可以每次报考两门课程,小编建议不要超过三门课程,科目可以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
三、注册会计师考生
1. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之前获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试5门课程(F1-F4和F6)
2. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之后获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试9们课程(F1-F9)
3. 如果在学习ACCA基础阶段科目的过程中获得了CICPA全科合格证(须2009年"6+1"制度实行后的新版证书),可以自行决定是否申请追加免试。
*通过注会考试的考生对于财务知识基础相对好,一般F7、F8、F9通过率比其他考生高很多,建议从这些科目入手,加强英语的阅读和写作能力,注会考试大纲与ACCA考试大纲类似,只其是在审计及财务管理类的科目上,基本上知识点是相通的。F7会计科目中国际会计准则会计处理上略有不同。
四、其他
1. CMA(美国注册管理会计师)全科通过并取得证书:免试F1-F5、F8、F9(共免7门)
2. USCPA(美国注册会计师)全科通过:免试F1-F6、F8、F9(共免8门)
五、注意事项
1.在校生只有顺利通过整学年的课程才能够申请免试。
2.针对在校生的部分课程免试政策只适用于会计学专业全日制大学本科的在读学生,而不适用于硕士学位或大专学历的在读学生。
3.已完成MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,还需完成论文的学员也可注册并申请免试。但须提交由学校出具的通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程的成绩单,并附注"该学员已通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,论文待完成"的说明。
4.特许学位(即海外大学与中国本地大学合作而授予海外大学学位的项目)— 部分完成时不能申请免试。
5.政策适用于在中国教育部认可的高等院校全部完成或部分完成本科课程的学生,而不考虑目前居住地点。
6.欲申请牛津•布鲁克斯大学学士学位的学员需放弃F7-F9的免试。
综合以上就是关于2019ACCA免试政策的全部内容,希望对于正在备考的小伙伴么有帮助,小编将持续更新相关ACCA的相关资讯。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Assuming that Joanne registers for value added tax (VAT) with effect from 1 April 2006:
(i) Calculate her income tax (IT) and capital gains tax (CGT) payable for the year of assessment 2005/06.
You are not required to calculate any national insurance liabilities in this sub-part. (6 marks)
6 Sergio and Gerard each inherited a half interest in a property, ‘Hilltop’, in October 2005. ‘Hilltop’ had a probate value
of £124,000, but in November 2005 it was badly damaged by fire. In January 2006 the insurance company made
a payment of £81,700 each to Sergio and Gerard. In February 2006 Sergio and Gerard each spent £55,500 of the
insurance proceeds on restoring the property. ‘Hilltop’ was worth £269,000 following the restoration work. In July
2006, Sergio and Gerard sold ‘Hilltop’ for £310,000.
Sergio is 69 years old and a widower with three adult children and seven grandchildren. His annual income consists
of a pension of £9,900 and interest of £300 on savings of £7,600 in a bank deposit account. Sergio owns his home
but no other significant assets. He plans to buy a domestic rental property with the proceeds from the sale of ‘Hilltop’,
such that on his death he will have a significant asset which can be sold and divided between the members of his
family.
Gerard is 34 years old. He is employed by Fizz plc on a salary of £66,500 per year together with a performance
related bonus. Gerard estimates that he will receive a bonus in December 2007 of £4,500, in line with previous
years, and that his taxable benefits in the tax year 2007/08 will amount to £7,140. He also expects to receive
dividends from UK companies of £1,935 and bank interest of £648 in the tax year 2007/08. Gerard intends to set
up a personal pension plan in August 2007. He has not made any pension contributions in the past and proposes to
use part of the proceeds from the sale of ‘Hilltop’ to make the maximum possible tax allowable contribution.
Fizz plc has announced that it intends to replace the performance related bonus scheme with a share incentive plan,
also linked to performance, with effect from 6 April 2008. Gerard estimates that Fizz plc will award him free shares
worth £2,100 each year. He will also purchase partnership shares worth £700 each year and, as a result, will be
awarded matching shares (further free shares) worth £1,400.
Required:
(a) Calculate the chargeable gains arising on the receipt of the insurance proceeds in January 2006 and the sale
of ‘Hilltop’ in July 2006. You should assume that any elections necessary to minimise the gain on the receipt
of the insurance proceeds have been submitted. (4 marks)
The IOA Division is also considering whether to undertake an investment in the West of the country (the West Project).
An initial cash outlay investment of £12 million will be required and a net cash inflow amounting to £5 million is
expected to arise in each of the four years of the life of the project.
The activities involved in the West project will cause the local river to become polluted and discoloured due to the
discharge of waste substances from mining operations.
It is estimated that at the end of year four a cash outlay of £2 million would be required to restore the river to its
original colour. This would also clear 90% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA
Division.
The remaining 10% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA Division could be cleared
up by a further cash outlay of £2 million.
(c) Evaluate the West project and, stating your reasons, comment on whether the board of directors of NCL plc
should spend the further £2 million in order to eliminate the remaining 10% of pollution. (6 marks)
(Ignore Taxation).
(c) The net present value of the West project is dependent upon the level of environmental expenditure that will be incurred by
Division IOA at the conclusion of the project. The potential NPV of the West project can be calculated using a discount rate
of 12% per annum which assumes that the West project has similar characteristics to the North, East and South projects.
Net cash inflows for each of years 1–4 = £5 million
Cumulative discount factor at 12% per annum = 3·037
Therefore the present value of cashflows is £5 million x 3·037 = £15,185 million and the net cash flow after the initial
outlay of £12 million is £3,185,000.
There is now the strategic consideration regarding whether to spend £2 million which will restore the river to its original colour
and also clear 90% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA Division, or to incur expenditure of
a further £2 million which will completely redress any damage done to the environment by the activities of the IOA Division.
(ii) Recommend further audit procedures that should be carried out. (4 marks)
(ii) Further audit procedures:
Request from Peter Sheffield a written representation detailing:
– the exact nature of his control over Jarvis Co, i.e. if he is a shareholder then state his percentage shareholding, if
he is a member of senior management then state his exact position within the entity,
– a comment on whether in his opinion the balance is recoverable,
– a specific date by which the amount should be expected to be repaid, and
– a confirmation that there are no further balances outstanding from Jarvis Co, or any further transactions between
Jarvis Co and Pulp Co.
Tutorial note: Reference to the Exposure Draft ISA 550 Related Parties (Revised and Redrafted) requirement for both
general and specific management representations will be awarded credit.
Review the terms of any written confirmation of the amount, such as a signed agreement or invoice, checking whether
any interest is due to Pulp Co. The terms should be reviewed for details of any security offered, and the nature of the
consideration to be provided in settlement.
From discussion with Peter Sheffield, develop an understanding of the business purpose of the transaction, particularly
to understand whether the balance is a trade receivable or an investment.
Review the board minutes for evidence of any discussion of the transaction and the recoverability of the balance
outstanding.
Obtain the most recent audited financial statements of Jarvis Co and:
– ascertain whether Peter Sheffield is disclosed as the ultimate controlling party or disclosed as a member of key
management personnel,
– scrutinise the disclosure notes to find any disclosure of the transaction, where it should be described as a related
party liability, and
– perform. a liquidity analysis to establish whether the amount can be repaid from liquid assets.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-03-22
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-07
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-04
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-12-28
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-20
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-01-14
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-05-11
- 2020-03-21
- 2020-02-01
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-05-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-21
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-07