请问什么情况下海南省考生ACCA国际会计师证书会被注销呢?

发布时间:2020-01-09


目前,有不少通过自己的努力已经考过ACCA考试进入证书申请阶段的同学出现了新的疑问:ACCA证书有有效年限吗?怎么样才能一直保持ACCA会员资格呢?有些什么规定会导致取消ACCA会员资格导致证书被吊销呢?接下来,51题库考试学习网一一解答大家心中的疑惑,避免在领证之路上出现一些不必要的意外。  

首先,ACCA证书是不会过期的,拿到了ACCA证书就是终身有效的,但终身有效的前提是:只要成为ACCA会员以后每年维持ACCA年费的正常支付,就可以保持ACCA资格。

需要注意的是:但是在成为ACCA会员之前,ACCA考试的时候成绩是有有效期的。

ACCA有效期新规显示,ACCAF阶段不再设有时间限制,从P阶段通过第一门开始算有七年有效期,如果七年内没有全部通过,成绩将全部作废,意思是就是在七年之后你就需要重新考试你已经考过的科目了。

以下是关于ACCA P阶段有效期的官方原文:

ACCA学员有七年的时间通过专业阶段的考试(即P1、P2和P3,以及P4-P7中的任选两门)。如果学员不能在七年内通过所有专业阶段考试,超过七年的已通过专业阶段科目的成绩将作废,须重新考试。七年时限从学员通过第一门专业阶段考试之日算起。

当然你必须要遵守以下的一些规定,否则你的ACCA会员资格会被取消,导致你无法正常领取证书:

1.最首要的就是,在ACCA学员阶段需要注意的是千万不要在考试的时候出现作弊的情况,一旦发现就会被取消ACCA会员资格

2.违反职业道德将会被直接除名。何为违反职业道德呢?其实就是类似于做假账之类的情况发生,无论是什么情况,出于知情或者不知情的情况下,一旦被发现,自己的ACCA职业生涯就宣告结束~

3.要维持ACCA会员资格只需要按时缴纳年费即可。那么不按时缴纳年费呢?首先你的ACCA会员资格将会暂时被取消,您的ACCA账户也将被冻结。当然这个也是暂时的,你只要及时的申请补缴信息,成功缴费就可以恢复会员的身份了。如果不需要ACCA会员这个头衔可以通过不缴纳年费这个方法来实现。

ACCA会不会和国内会计证书一样需要继续教育来继续维持会员资格呢?

答案是否定的。和国内会计证书不一样,国内会计证首先是有时间年限的,是需要继续教育来维持证书年限的,而ACCA并没有开设继续教育等课程,学员需要维持会员资格只需要按时缴纳年费即可。但是ACCA后续有许多拓展课程,例如obu学士学位,UCL伦敦大学硕士学位等等,都是在ACCA学习过程中可以考的。

那如果不小心没有按时缴费造成了账户被冻结的情况应该怎么办呢?

很简单,写封邮件向官方解释一下情况,并表达想恢复ACCA会员资格的意愿,并通过官方回复的渠道补交年费和一定数额的罚金即可回复ACCA会员资格了。温馨提示一下,由于ACCA官方是在英国,所以办理的时限可能会很长,因此建各位考生还是按时缴纳会费,避免不必要的影响。

以上就是关于ACCA考试证书申请流程和后续注意事宜的相关内容,希望对大家有所帮助,最后再次恭喜成功通过ACCA全科考试的同学们,成功上岸~


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

Note: requirement (a) includes 4 professional marks.

A central feature of the performance measurement system at TSC is the widespread use of league tables that display

each depot’s performance relative to one another.

Required:

(b) Evaluate the potential benefits and problems associated with the use of ‘league tables’ as a means of

measuring performance. (6 marks)

正确答案:
(b) A central feature of many performance measurement systems is the widespread use of league tables that display each
business unit’s performance relative to one another. In the case of service organisations such as TSC the use of league tables
emphasises the company’s critical success factors of profitability and quality of service by reporting results on a weekly basis
at the depot level. The fact that such league tables are used by management will actively encourage competition, in terms of
performance, among depots. The individual position of a business unit in the league table is keenly observed both by the
manager of that unit and his/her peers.
In theory, performance is transparent. In practice although each depot performs essentially the same function and is subject
to the same modes of measurement, circumstances pertaining to different business units may vary significantly. Some depots
may be situated near to the hub (main distribution centre), some may be located far away and some may be in urban zones
with well developed road networks whilst others may be in remote rural areas. Measuring performance via a league table
makes no allowance whatsoever for these relative differences, hence, inequality is built into the performance measurement
system.
Moreover, depot managers might be held responsible for areas over which they have no formal control. The network nature
of the business suggests that there will be a high degree of interdependence of depots; the depot responsible for collection
will very often not be the depot responsible for delivery. Therefore, it is frequently the case that business may be gained for
which the collecting depot receives the revenue, but for which the delivering depot bears the cost. Obviously this impacts
upon the profit statements of both depots. The formal system might not recognise such difficulties, the corporate view being
that ‘the business needs to be managed’; the depots should therefore see any such anomalies as mild constraints to work
around rather than barriers to break down. In such circumstances delivering depots and collecting depots should discuss such
problems on an informal basis. Such informal discussions are aided by close communications between depots recognising
the interdependencies of the business.

(ii) Division C is considering a decision to lower its selling price to customers external to the group to $95

per kilogram. If implemented, this decision is expected to increase sales to external customers to

70,000 kilograms.

Required:

For BOTH the current selling price of CC of $105 per kilogram and the proposed selling price of $95

per kilogram, prepare a detailed analysis of revenue, costs and net profits of BAG.

Note: in addition, comment on other considerations that should be taken into account before this selling

price change is implemented. (6 marks)

正确答案:

 


(ii) Can we entertain our clients as a gesture of goodwill or is corporate hospitality ruled out? (3 marks)

Required:

For EACH of the three FAQs, explain the threats to objectivity that may arise and the safeguards that should

be available to manage them to an acceptable level.

NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three questions.

正确答案:
(ii) Corporate hospitality
A partner in an audit firm is obviously in a position to influence the conduct and outcome of an audit. Therefore a
partner being on ‘too friendly’ terms with an audit client creates a familiarity threat. Other members of the audit team
may not exert as much influence on the audit.
A self-interest threat may also be perceived (e.g. if corporate hospitality is provided to keep a prestigious client).
There is no absolute prohibition against corporate hospitality provided:
■ the value attached to such hospitality is ‘insignificant’; and
■ the ‘frequency, nature and cost’ of the hospitality is reasonable.
Thus, flying the directors of an audit client for weekends away could be seen as significant. Similarly, entertaining an
audit client on a regular basis could be seen as unacceptable.
Partners and staff of Boleyn will need to be objective in their assessments of the significance or reasonableness of the
hospitality offered. (Would ‘a reasonable and informed third party’ conclude that the hospitality will or is likely to be
seen to impair your objectivity?)
If they have any doubts they should discuss the matter in the first instance with the audit engagement partner, who
should refer the matter to the ethics partner if in doubt.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。