为什么国际会计师证书会被注销呢?
发布时间:2022-05-20
目前,有不少通过自己的努力考过ACCA考试进入证书申请阶段的同学有了新的疑问:ACCA证书有效年限是多久?怎么样才能一直保持ACCA会员资格呢?有些哪些规定会导致取消ACCA会员资格导致证书被吊销呢?接下来,51题库考试学习网一一解答大家心中的疑惑,避免在领证之路上出现一些不必要的意外。
首先,ACCA证书是不会过期的,拿到了ACCA证书就是终身有效的,但终身有效的前提是:只要成为ACCA会员以后每年维持ACCA年费的正常支付,就可以保持ACCA资格。
需要注意的是:但是在成为ACCA会员之前,ACCA考试的时候成绩是有有效期的。
ACCA有效期新规显示,ACCAF阶段不再设有时间限制,从P阶段通过第一门开始算有七年有效期,如果七年内没有全部通过,成绩将全部作废,意思是就是在七年之后你就需要重新考试你已经考过的科目了。
以下是关于ACCA P阶段有效期的官方原文:
ACCA学员有七年的时间通过专业阶段的考试(即P1、P2和P3,以及P4-P7中的任选两门)。如果学员不能在七年内通过所有专业阶段考试,超过七年的已通过专业阶段科目的成绩将作废,须重新考试。七年时限从学员通过第一门专业阶段考试之日算起。
当然你必须要遵守以下的一些规定,否则你的ACCA会员资格会被取消,导致你无法正常领取证书:
1.最首要的就是,在ACCA学员阶段需要注意的是千万不要在考试的时候出现作弊的情况,一旦发现就会被取消ACCA会员资格
2.违反职业道德将会被直接除名。何为违反职业道德呢?其实就是类似于做假账之类的情况发生,无论是什么情况,出于知情或者不知情的情况下,一旦被发现,自己的ACCA职业生涯就宣告结束~
3.要维持ACCA会员资格只需要按时缴纳年费即可。那么不按时缴纳年费呢?首先你的ACCA会员资格将会暂时被取消,您的ACCA账户也将被冻结。当然这个也是暂时的,你只要及时的申请补缴信息,成功缴费就可以恢复会员的身份了。如果不需要ACCA会员这个头衔可以通过不缴纳年费这个方法来实现。
ACCA会不会和国内会计证书一样需要继续教育来继续维持会员资格呢?
答案是否定的。和国内会计证书不一样,国内会计证首先是有时间年限的,是需要继续教育来维持证书年限的,而ACCA并没有开设继续教育等课程,学员需要维持会员资格只需要按时缴纳年费即可。但是ACCA后续有许多拓展课程,例如obu学士学位,UCL伦敦大学硕士学位等等,都是在ACCA学习过程中可以考的。
那如果不小心没有按时缴费造成了账户被冻结的情况应该怎么办呢?
很简单,写封邮件向官方解释一下情况,并表达想恢复ACCA会员资格的意愿,并通过官方回复的渠道补交年费和一定数额的罚金即可回复ACCA会员资格了。温馨提示一下,由于ACCA官方是在英国,所以办理的时限可能会很长,因此建各位考生还是按时缴纳会费,避免不必要的影响。
以上就是关于ACCA考试证书申请流程和后续注意事宜,希望对大家有所帮助,最后再次恭喜成功通过ACCA全科考试的同学们,成功上岸~
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(b) Assess the likely strategic impact of the new customer delivery system on Supaserve’s activities and its ability
to differentiate itself from its competitors. (10 marks)
(b) Supaserve, through its electronic point of sale system (EPOS), is already likely to have useful information on the overall
patterns of buying behaviour in terms of products bought frequently, peak periods, etc. It is less likely to have detailed
information on individual customer purchase patterns, though it may be monitoring where its customers are living, travel
patterns, etc. The introduction of the new online system has the potential to have a major strategic impact on the company
and its relationship with its customers. Impact can be measured by assessing the significance of the change on the company’s
operations and the likelihood of its occurrence. In Michael Porter’s words, ‘the basic tool for understanding the influence of
information technology on companies is the value chain . . . and how it affects both a company’s cost and the value delivered
to buyers’.
Clearly the investment in Internet based technology will affect both the cost and revenue sides of the business. In terms of
operations the company will need to decide the way in which to integrate the new method of customer buying with its
traditional methods. Does it create a separate ‘dedicated’ warehouse operation solely involved with the online business or does
it integrate it within its existing operations? The customer will have immediate access to information on whether goods are in
stock or not, and this may have a significant impact on the procurement systems Supaserve has with its suppliers and the
inbound logistics which get the products to where they are needed for dispatch to the customers.
Online shopping will have a major impact on outbound logistics in that a totally new distribution process will have to be
created. The extent to which this new service is provided in-house by setting up a new activity within Supaserve, or
alternatively is outsourced to specialist distributors is a key decision affecting costs and efficiency. Supaserve’s delivery
performance will be both measurable and potentially available to competitors and a real source of competitive advantage or
disadvantage.
The new online system will have an immediate impact on marketing and sales. Can customers pay over the Internet?
Opportunities for direct marketing to individual customers are opened up and customisation becomes a real possibility.
Customers can link into after-sales services and provide insights into customer satisfaction. On the support side of the value
chain the impact on human resources may be profound and technology lies at the heart of the change. Above all there is a
key need to link the new strategy to the operational systems needed to deliver it.
Clearly, the introduction of the online shopping system offers an opportunity for Supaserve to differentiate itself from its
aggressive competitors. The online service, as suggested above, is likely to appeal to a limited but growing segment of its
customers. In strategic terms it is a focus differentiation strategy enabling Supaserve to provide an improved level of service
to its customers. For this customers are willing to pay a small premium. Perhaps the more significant impact on its profit
margins will be derived from improved levels of customer retention and the attraction of customers who formerly shopped
with its competitors. The ability to sustain its competitive advantage will be measured by the impact on its competitors and
their ability to introduce a similar service.
There are a number of useful models for assessing the impact of an IT related change. These could include the five forces
model and the frameworks developed by Michael Earl assessing the strategic impact of IT. Michael Earl argues persuasively
for the correct alignment between business strategy and IT strategy. Indeed he sees a need for a ‘binary approach’ with the
alignment of IT investment activities in existing ways of doing business as having to be accommodated with the IT investments
associated with more radical change to the ways business is conducted.
Note: requirement (a) includes 4 professional marks.
A central feature of the performance measurement system at TSC is the widespread use of league tables that display
each depot’s performance relative to one another.
Required:
(b) Evaluate the potential benefits and problems associated with the use of ‘league tables’ as a means of
measuring performance. (6 marks)
(b) A central feature of many performance measurement systems is the widespread use of league tables that display each
business unit’s performance relative to one another. In the case of service organisations such as TSC the use of league tables
emphasises the company’s critical success factors of profitability and quality of service by reporting results on a weekly basis
at the depot level. The fact that such league tables are used by management will actively encourage competition, in terms of
performance, among depots. The individual position of a business unit in the league table is keenly observed both by the
manager of that unit and his/her peers.
In theory, performance is transparent. In practice although each depot performs essentially the same function and is subject
to the same modes of measurement, circumstances pertaining to different business units may vary significantly. Some depots
may be situated near to the hub (main distribution centre), some may be located far away and some may be in urban zones
with well developed road networks whilst others may be in remote rural areas. Measuring performance via a league table
makes no allowance whatsoever for these relative differences, hence, inequality is built into the performance measurement
system.
Moreover, depot managers might be held responsible for areas over which they have no formal control. The network nature
of the business suggests that there will be a high degree of interdependence of depots; the depot responsible for collection
will very often not be the depot responsible for delivery. Therefore, it is frequently the case that business may be gained for
which the collecting depot receives the revenue, but for which the delivering depot bears the cost. Obviously this impacts
upon the profit statements of both depots. The formal system might not recognise such difficulties, the corporate view being
that ‘the business needs to be managed’; the depots should therefore see any such anomalies as mild constraints to work
around rather than barriers to break down. In such circumstances delivering depots and collecting depots should discuss such
problems on an informal basis. Such informal discussions are aided by close communications between depots recognising
the interdependencies of the business.
The IOA Division is also considering whether to undertake an investment in the West of the country (the West Project).
An initial cash outlay investment of £12 million will be required and a net cash inflow amounting to £5 million is
expected to arise in each of the four years of the life of the project.
The activities involved in the West project will cause the local river to become polluted and discoloured due to the
discharge of waste substances from mining operations.
It is estimated that at the end of year four a cash outlay of £2 million would be required to restore the river to its
original colour. This would also clear 90% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA
Division.
The remaining 10% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA Division could be cleared
up by a further cash outlay of £2 million.
(c) Evaluate the West project and, stating your reasons, comment on whether the board of directors of NCL plc
should spend the further £2 million in order to eliminate the remaining 10% of pollution. (6 marks)
(Ignore Taxation).
(c) The net present value of the West project is dependent upon the level of environmental expenditure that will be incurred by
Division IOA at the conclusion of the project. The potential NPV of the West project can be calculated using a discount rate
of 12% per annum which assumes that the West project has similar characteristics to the North, East and South projects.
Net cash inflows for each of years 1–4 = £5 million
Cumulative discount factor at 12% per annum = 3·037
Therefore the present value of cashflows is £5 million x 3·037 = £15,185 million and the net cash flow after the initial
outlay of £12 million is £3,185,000.
There is now the strategic consideration regarding whether to spend £2 million which will restore the river to its original colour
and also clear 90% of the pollution caused as a result of the mining activities of the IOA Division, or to incur expenditure of
a further £2 million which will completely redress any damage done to the environment by the activities of the IOA Division.
(b) Distinguish between strategic and operational risks, and explain why the secrecy option would be a source
of strategic risk. (10 marks)
(b) Strategic and operational risks
Strategic risks
These arise from the overall strategic positioning of the company in its environment. Some strategic positions give rise to
greater risk exposures than others. Because strategic issues typically affect the whole of an organisation and not just one or
more of its parts, strategic risks can potentially concern very high stakes – they can have very high hazards and high returns.
Because of this, they are managed at board level in an organisation and form. a key part of strategic management.
Operational risks
Operational risks refer to potential losses arising from the normal business operations. Accordingly, they affect the day-to-day
running of operations and business systems in contrast to strategic risks that arise from the organisation’s strategic positioning.
Operational risks are managed at risk management level (not necessarily board level) and can be managed and mitigated by
internal control systems.
The secrecy option would be a strategic risk for the following reasons.
It would radically change the environment that SHC is in by reducing competition. This would radically change SHC’s strategic
fit with its competitive environment. In particular, it would change its ‘five forces’ positioning which would change its risk
profile.
It would involve the largest investment programme in the company’s history with new debt substantially changing the
company’s financial structure and making it more vulnerable to short term liquidity problems and monetary pressure (interest
rates).
It would change the way that stakeholders view SHC, for better or worse. It is a ‘crisis issue’, certain to polarise opinion either
way.
It will change the economics of the industry thereby radically affecting future cost, revenue and profit forecasts.
There may be retaliatory behaviour by SHC’s close competitor on 25% of the market.
[Tutorial note: similar reasons if relevant and well argued will attract marks]
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-12-31
- 2020-04-10
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-02-15
- 2020-05-25
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-11
- 2020-02-12
- 2020-01-01
- 2020-04-11
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-05-07
- 2020-02-05
- 2020-01-14
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-02-01
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-07
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-05-02
- 2019-07-19
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-04-30
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09