浙江省考生想知道ACCA的科目F1怎么备考？

发布时间：2020-01-10

步入2020年，离ACCA考试越来越近了，虽然在ACCA考试中F1科目是难度比较低的一个考试科目了，但还是很多ACCAer们不知道如何备考考试科目F1。不用担心，小伙伴们所遇到的问题51题库考试学习网都一一帮助大家找寻到了答案，现在就来告诉你：

F1科目介绍

首先要明确，F1全部都是选择题，包括填空下拉框选择，并且部分内容根据你的常识（遇到表示绝对、极端、否定的词汇，要留个心眼）一般来说你都是可以根据常识做出来的。所以第一步要做的就是稳住阵脚，及时调整好自己的心态，找回考试的状态，不要因为是全英就慌。

作为ACCA考试的第一科，通常来说初次备考ACCA考试的同学都会选择先考F1，因为F1在整个考试的知识体系中起着提纲挈领的作用。就像修高楼大厦，如果地基不打好，即便修成了高楼也会轻而易举被夷为平地。虽然很多人说F1是第一门，也是最简单的，但是这并不代表就可以对此掉以轻心。对于初学者还是有一定困难的，这一门考试的内容包括很多，但仔细梳理一下，主要是这三方面的内容：组织行为学、人力资源管理、会计和审计。

其中，组织行为学包括：组织结构，个体，群体，团队管理，组织文化，管理原理和领导理论，激励理论和沟通原理等。

人力资源管理方面的内容包括：招聘选拔，公平工作机会和多样化员工管理，员工培训和开发，绩效考评和工作健康，安全等。

会计和审计方面的内容主要包括：会计职能，内审外审，内部控制，公司治理和欺诈等。

除此之外，F1还会考察经济学、战略管理、市场学、信息管理和时间管理、职业道德方面的知识。

学习方法

F1这门课以概念定义题为主，知识点较多，必须在理解的基础上才能尽可能的掌握课程要点。要在课下提高英语的阅读速度和词汇量，如果题目读不懂，肯定很难做答。特别是对于刚接触ACCA的国际实验班学生会产生排斥心理，这就需要考生在备考阶段，反复阅读课本，讲义，以及BPP练习册及后面的解析。看书的时候，无论教材还是讲义，都要正确理解、融会贯通，千万不要死记硬背。毕竟大纲里对F1的要求是fundamental level，这代表只需“基本理解”。一句话概括：F1的pass=大量阅读+理解+记忆关键理论或关键词。

考试形式及题型

考试为机考，提交试卷后即出成绩，50分为通过。

Section A  

46道选择题，30道2分题，16道1分题，共76分。

Section B

6道大题，每个题有2个任务题，每题2分，共24分

学霸总结与备考建议

F1课程的内容追求广度而不是精度，同学们主要是以了解整个商业世界中的基础理论与概念为学习目标，不必刨根问底，F1的作用在于让你对整个ACCA体系有一个大概的认识。所以，本门课的通过秘诀在于，尽可能拓展自己的知识面并且对F1课程有逻辑清晰的理解，整理知识框架，重点是对理论概念的理解及其优缺点的掌握，对科学家提出的理论的掌握以及人名的对应，重点概念及相似概念的区分。

Part A (The business organization its stakeholders the external environment)重点是不同组织的特点，Mendelow 矩阵及PESTEL模型中的P,Political 的政治因素和T，technology 科技因素对组织机构的影响。宏观经济中，要重点掌握政府调控经济的4大目标（包括不同类型的企业），财政政策和货币政策。微观经济学中，需理解PED,IED及CED公式及其弹性的影响，需求曲线及供给曲线的点的移动及平移。

Part B（Business organization structure functions and governance)重点是不同的组织结构，其中的专业定义的解释，以及非正式组织的优缺点。不同的组织文化以及文化的三要素也是重点。

Part C (Accounting and reporting system and technology: compliance, control and security)重点是会计信息系统，internal control system,internal audit system,以及舞弊.

PartD（learning and managing individuals and teams)全部很重要，管理学及其理论，定义和区分，激励理论，学习理论以及业绩评估为重中之重。

PartE(Personal,effectiveness,and,communication)其中个人有效性及交流图需要着重理解。

Part F (Professional ethics in accounting and business)知识点考的频率较高，Code of Ethics 的理解很重要。

怎能抛功名，畅游在海外。绞尽脑汁干，名在孙山外。两袖清风去，何苦染尘埃。祝大家考试成功！

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

19 Which of the following statements about intangible assets in company financial statements are correct according

to international accounting standards?

1 Internally generated goodwill should not be capitalised.

2 Purchased goodwill should normally be amortised through the income statement.

3 Development expenditure must be capitalised if certain conditions are met.

A 1 and 3 only

B 1 and 2 only

C 2 and 3 only

D All three statements are correct

正确答案：A

3 Mary Hobbes joined the board of Rosh and Company, a large retailer, as finance director earlier this year. Whilst she

was glad to have finally been given the chance to become finance director after several years as a financial

accountant, she also quickly realised that the new appointment would offer her a lot of challenges. In the first board

meeting, she realised that not only was she the only woman but she was also the youngest by many years.

Rosh was established almost 100 years ago. Members of the Rosh family have occupied senior board positions since

the outset and even after the company’s flotation 20 years ago a member of the Rosh family has either been executive

chairman or chief executive. The current longstanding chairman, Timothy Rosh, has already prepared his slightly

younger brother, Geoffrey (also a longstanding member of the board) to succeed him in two years’ time when he plans

to retire. The Rosh family, who still own 40% of the shares, consider it their right to occupy the most senior positions

in the company so have never been very active in external recruitment. They only appointed Mary because they felt

they needed a qualified accountant on the board to deal with changes in international financial reporting standards.

Several former executive members have been recruited as non-executives immediately after they retired from full-time

service. A recent death, however, has reduced the number of non-executive directors to two. These sit alongside an

executive board of seven that, apart from Mary, have all been in post for over ten years.

Mary noted that board meetings very rarely contain any significant discussion of strategy and never involve any debate

or disagreement. When she asked why this was, she was told that the directors had all known each other for so long

that they knew how each other thought. All of the other directors came from similar backgrounds, she was told, and

had worked for the company for so long that they all knew what was ‘best’ for the company in any given situation.

Mary observed that notes on strategy were not presented at board meetings and she asked Timothy Rosh whether the

existing board was fully equipped to formulate strategy in the changing world of retailing. She did not receive a reply.

Required:

(a) Explain ‘agency’ in the context of corporate governance and criticise the governance arrangements of Rosh

and Company. (12 marks)

正确答案：
(a) Defining and explaining agency
Agency is defined in relation to a principal. A principal appoints an agent to act on his or her behalf. In the case of corporate
governance, the principal is a shareholder in a joint stock company and the agents (that have an agency relationship with
principals) are the directors. The directors remain accountable to the principals for the stewardship of their investment in the
company. In the case of Rosh, 60% of the shares are owned by shareholders external to the Rosh family and the board has
agency responsibility to those shareholders.
Criticisms of Rosh’s CG arrangements
The corporate governance arrangements at Rosh and Company are far from ideal. Five points can be made based on the
evidence in the case.
There are several issues associated with the non-executive directors (NEDs) at Rosh. It is doubtful whether two NEDs are
enough to bring sufficient scrutiny to the executive board. Some corporate governance codes require half of the board of larger
companies to be non-executive and Rosh would clearly be in breach of such a requirement. Perhaps of equal concern, there
is significant doubt over the independence of the current NEDs as they were recruited from retired executive members of the
board and presumably have relationships with existing executives going back many years. Some corporate governance codes
(such as the UK Combined Code) specify that NEDs should not have worked for the company within the last five years. Again,
Rosh would be in breach of this provision.
Succession planning for senior positions in the company seems to be based on Rosh family membership rather than any
meritocratic approach to appointments (there doesn’t appear to be a nominations committee). Whilst this may have been
acceptable before the flotation when the Rosh family owned all of the shares, the flotation introduced an important need for
external scrutiny of this arrangement. The lack of NED independence makes this difficult.
There is a poor (very narrow) diversity of backgrounds among board members. Whilst diversity can bring increased conflict,
it is generally assumed that it can also stimulate discussion and debate that is often helpful.
There is a somewhat entrenched executive board and Mary is the first new appointment to the board in many years (and is
the first woman). Whilst experience is very important on a board, the appointment of new members, in addition to seeding
the board with talent for the future, can also bring fresh ideas and helpful scrutiny of existing policies.
There is no discussion of strategy and there is evidence of a lack of preparation of strategic notes to the board. The assumption
seems to be that the ‘best’ option is obvious and so there is no need for discussion and debate. Procedures for preparing
briefing notes on strategy for board meetings appear to be absent. Most corporate governance codes place the discussion and
setting of strategy as a high priority for boards and Rosh would be in breach of such a provision.
There is no evidence of training for Mary to facilitate her introduction into the organisation and its systems. Thorough training
of new members and ongoing professional development of existing members is an important component of good governance.

(b) Compare and contrast Gray, Owen and Adams’s ‘pristine capitalist’ position with the ‘social contractarian’

position. Explain how these positions would affect responses to stakeholder concerns in the new stadium

project. (8 marks)

正确答案：

(c) (i) Explain how Messier Ltd can assist Galileo with the cost of relocating to the UK and/or provide him with

interest-free loan finance for this purpose without increasing his UK income tax liability; (3 marks)

正确答案：
(c) (i) Relocation costs
Direct assistance
Messier Ltd can bear the cost of certain qualifying relocation costs of Galileo up to a maximum of ￡8,000 without
increasing his UK income tax liability. Qualifying costs include the legal, professional and other fees in relation to the
purchase of a house, the costs of travelling to the UK and the cost of transporting his belongings. The costs must be
incurred before the end of the tax year following the year of the relocation, i.e. by 5 April 2010.
Assistance in the form. of a loan
Messier Ltd can provide Galileo with an interest-free loan of up to ￡5,000 without giving rise to any UK income tax.

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签