CPAVS考研,究竟是谁的难度更高一些呢?
发布时间:2020-09-05
近期,有小伙伴询问考研和考CPA哪个更难。CPA和考研的考试难度都比较高,但是二者的难度究竟谁更高,并没有统一的说法。下面,51题库考试学习网为大家带来这方面的详细介绍,一起来看看吧。
考研真有那么难吗
从考研总的招录情况来看,不太难!
2020年全国考研人数首次突破300万人,达到341万人,相比2019年增加51万。而2020年全国考研录取总人数,依据《关于2019年国民经济和社会发展计划执行情况与2020年国民经济和社会发展计划草案的报告》公布:
普通高等教育本专科招生920万人,研究生招生111.4万人。
从考研报考总人数和录取总人数看,考研似乎不是想象中的那么难!当然这其中有一部分是保研的,还有一部分是考取本校研究生!
从具体学校具体专业看,部分难!具体学校、具体专业,大家分值相当,一些好学校、好专业,吸引很多考生,报录比非常高,甚至达到20:1或以上。一般学校的报录比并没有那么高,总体而言,部分学校的研究生确实非常难考!
CPA考试科目
CPA考试分为专业阶段和综合阶段,专业阶段设置六个科目,全部通过以后才能报考综合阶段,单科成绩有效期是五年,也就是说五年如果还不能通过全部科目,则过期科目需要重考!
从中注协公布的CPA通过率来看,专业阶段通过率基本都超过20%,甚至有科目超过30%。CPA专业阶段六科有五年考试期限,一般考生会分2-3年来通过六科。如果想一年通过六个科目,确实非常难!2019年广西CPA考区,专业阶段总报名人数23393人,其中一次通过六科的只有2人,当然这其中有很多人并没有一次报六科。CPA各科目难度,基本中等偏上,如果每年过2-3科,结合备考时间,压力不是很大!
考研和CPA究竟哪个难
考研是入学考试,而注册会计师是准入型职业资格考试,考试性质、考试科目及考试要求都不同,很难准确衡量考试难度。不同比较方法难度大小不同:
一年考:CPA难度远大于考研
考研是一年考试总录取人数超过一百万,而CPA一次通过专业阶段六科的全国不超过千人。这么比较,CPA难度远大于考研!
CPAVS考研
多年考:CPA难度低于考研
CPA是考证,即便最快也要两年拿到证书,一年专业阶段,一年综合阶段,一般考生把专业阶段用2-3年通过,再用1-2年考综合阶段,逐个科目通过。且拿到证书以后,可以加入中注协,成为执业或非执业会员,每年完成相应的继续教育即可。
考研,在初试时超过国家线,且达到学校要求的必要分数,才能进入复试。在复试环节,还要经过一轮或多轮考核。如果不能被录取,则可能要准备“考研二战”!
以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家带来的全部内容,希望能给大家一些帮助。总的来说,考研和CPA考试难度都不低,各有各的难点哦。最后,51题库考试学习网预祝准备参加2021年考研的小伙伴都能取得优异的成绩。
下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
“Universal history,the history of what man has accomplished in this world,is at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here,”wrote the Victorian Thomas Carlyle.Well,not any more it is not.Suddenly,Britain looks to have fallen out with its favorite historical form.This could be no more than a passing literary craze,but it also points to a broader truth about how we now approach the past:less concerned with learning from forefathers and more interested in feeling their pain.Today,we want empathy,not inspiration.From the earliest days of the Renaissance,the writing of history meant recounting the exemplary lives of great men.In 1337,Petrarch began work on his rambling writing De Viris Illustribus—On Famous Men,highlighting the virtus(or virtue)of classical heroes.Petrarch celebrated their greatness in conquering fortune and rising to the top.This was the biographical tradition which Niccolo Machiavelli turned on its head.InThe Prince,he championed cunning,ruthlessness,and boldness,rather than virtue,mercy and justice,as the skills of successful leaders.Over time,the attributes of greatness shifted.The Romantics commemorated the leading painters and authors of their day,stressing the uniqueness of the artist’s personal experience rather than public glory.By contrast,the Victorian author Samuel Smiles wrote Self-Helpas a catalogue of the worthy lives of engineers,industrialists and explorers.“The valuable examples which they furnish of the power of self-help,of patient purpose,resolute working and steadfast integrity,issuing in the formation of truly noble and manly character,exhibit,”wrote Smiles,“what it is in the power of each to accomplish for himself.”His biographies of James Watt,Richard Arkwright and Josian Wedgwood were held up as beacons to guide the working man through his difficult life.This was all a bit bourgeois for Thomas Carlyle,who focused his biographies on the truly heroic lives of Martin Luther,Oliver Cromwell and Napoleon Bonaparte.These epochal figures represented lives hard to imitate,but to be acknowledged as possessing higher authority than mere mortals.Not everyone was convinced by such bombast.“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles,”wrote Marx and Engels in The Communist Manifesto.For them,history did nothing,it possessed no immense wealth nor waged battles:“It is man,real,living man who does all that.”And history should be the story of the masses and their record of struggle,As such,it needed to appreciate the economic realities,the social contexts and power relations in which each epoch stood.For:“Men make their own history,but they do not make it just as they please;they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves,but under circumstances directly found,given and transmitted from the past.”This was the tradition which revolutionized our appreciation of the past.In place of Thomas Carlyle,Britain nurtured Christopher Hill,EP Thompson and Eric Hobsbawm.History from below stood alongside biographies of great men.Whole new realms of understanding—from gender to race to cultural studies—were opened up as scholars unpicked the multiplicity of lost societies.And it transformed public history too:downstairs became just as fascinating as upstairs.
Marx and Engels_____
A.emphasized the virtue of classical heroes.
B.highlighted the public glory of the leading
C.focused on epochal figures whose lives were
D.opened up new realms of understanding the
E.held that history sh
答案:E
解析:
特征词比对根据题干关键词Marx and Engels定位至第六段。第二句提出他们的观点,第三句是对第二句的解释说明,第四句是他们观点的第二点,第五句和第六句是对其的补充。比对选项后发现,E项“held that history should be the story of the masses and their record of struggle”和第四句是同义替换。可以确定E项是正确答案。
气虚发热当选
A.补中益气汤
B.归脾汤
C.四物汤
D.血府逐瘀汤
以“大五”人格因素模型为基础编制的人格测验是
A.NEO
B.MBTI
C.MMPI
D.CPI
答案:A
解析:
1989年麦克雷和柯斯塔编制了“大五人格因素的测定量表”(NEO-PI-R),
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。