考情前瞻:2021年考研英语哲学类阅读理解模拟题及答案(八)
发布时间:2020-10-11
目前,2021年考研初试备考时间已不足三个月,不知各位小伙伴复习的如何了?在最后阶段,我们最需要做的是了解考试,而试题练习无疑是非常不错的方法。为了帮助大家备考,51题库考试学习网在下面为大家带来考研初试的一些模拟试题,一起练起来吧。
Part of the scientific faith of the late
nineteenth century was the view that there was one and only one scientific
method.This method,argued
writers like Karl Pearson in his Grammar of Science,was the only sure method for arriving at
knowledge in any sphere.The method was easily described: collect the facts in the area under
study;order them into sequences,such
that law like occurrences could be seen;then,write down the laws so identified.According to this view,disciplines differed only as to subject
matter,since the unity of
science consisted of its method alone.Also,according to this view,the
results of scientific investigation(that is,new knowledge)will always be embodied in the form of a law
connecting the facts in the area under study.
Explanation,according to this view,is
simply accounting for facts on the basis of a deduction from a known law or
laws,or accounting for
some subordinate law on the basis of a deduction from some more general law or
laws.The most influential formulation of this explanation is Carl G Hempel‘s, perhaps most accessibly articulated in his article“Explanation in Science and History”。Sometimes,according to Hempel,such
laws are of a strictly universal form and other times they are of a
probabilistic or statistical form.They are assertions,in this latter case,of the kind that if certain specified
conditions are realized then an occurrence of such and such a kind will come
about with such a probability.
I think that it would be true to say that
in the late nineteenth century it was felt that one feature distinguishing
physics from history as a discipline was that,even if they shared exactly the same method,physics had no need for the latter kind
of probabilistic explanation——at
least in principle——while
in history it was unavoidable.
However,in the twentieth century,whatever else may distinguish physics and history as disciplines it
is not that physics uses only strictly universal laws and deductive
explanations in the nineteenth century sense,while history does not.The physics of the century,from 1 900 onward,has been interested in aggregates of
certain classes of physical individuals(the particles)and in accounts of the
individuals that would enable one to understand the aggregates.As a consequence
partly of this interest in statistical data pertaining to the very small,as well as for a number of other reasons,physicists have tended to formulate the
mechanics of the very small in terms of equations in which probabilistic
notions are fundamental.
1. According to Karl Pearson,only one scientific method——。
[A J prevailed in every field of study
during 1890s
[B]directed the collection and arrangement
of facts
[C]served as a unique element uniting all
disciplines
[D]made the identification of new knowledge
plausible
2. As stated by Hempel,general laws are——。
[A]based on detailed accounts of actual
facts
[B]composed of subordinate laws by
deduction
[C]realized in probabilistic or statistic
form
[D]applied to all cases or under certain
conditions
3. The author feels sure of the truth that
in 19th century———————
[A]physics and history shared a common
feature
[B]the same method blended history with
ph)rsics
[C]statistical laws were compatible with
physics
[D]probabilistic method was inapplicable to
history
4. In the 20th century, it was true that—————————
[A]universal laws ceased to belong merely
to physics
[B]deductive explanations became dominant
in history
[C]distinction between history and physics
turned obscure
[D]statistical explanations were adopted by
physicists
5. In the study of physical particles_____
[A]statistical information accounts for the
interest in aggregates
[B]probabilistic conceptions result from
their formulation
[C] description of their mechanics is based
on statistical data
[D]physical equations are accountable for
probabilistic ideas
参考答案:
1. c推断题。由题干关键词Karl Pearson定位文章第一段。根据第二句之后的内容,可立即排除A(流行于每一个研究领域);题干中的According to Karl Pearson相当于第四句的According to this View,因此可将答案锁定在此句,推断可知c与其内容一致,是正确答案;B(指导事实论据的搜集和整理)不全面;D中的plausible(似是而非的)是一种不确定的说法,不合文意。
2. D推断题。由题干中关键词Hempel定位第二段第三、四句,其中的such
laws即general laws(普遍规律)。选项D概括了这两句的内容,all cases相当于第三句中的universal from(普遍型),certain conditions即specified
conditions(特定情况)。A(基于对事实的详细说明)、B(由演绎得出的从属定律构成)两项指的是explanation;C不全面,只是指general laws中的一种,即概率型或统计型。
3. A推断题。题干中的The author feels相当于第三段开头的I think,故答案应在此段之中。A说物理学和历史学有共同特点,即指此段所说的也same method(同样的方法),故为答案。B(同样的方法把历史学和物理学混为一谈)不合逻辑;C的comparable with(相符的)和D的was inapplicable
to(不适用于)皆与句意相悖。
4. D推断题。由题干关键词20m century定位文章最后一段。文中指出用19世纪的普遍规律和演绎性解释来区分物理学和历史学是不对的。由此可知选项A(普遍规律不再只属于物理学)、B(演绎性解释在历史学中占主导地位)、c(历史学和物理学之间的区别变得模糊)是对文章的故意曲解;文章末句说,物理学家往往用方程式来阐述微观世界的力学原理,而方程式的基础就是概率概念,故推断可知D正确。
5. C推断题。由题干关键词physical particles定位最后一段第二、三句,其中提到20世纪的物理研究兴趣主要在于某些种类的物质个体的总计及对这些物质个体的解释以便人们了解这种总计,由此可知A(统计信息说明人们对总计的兴趣)因果颠倒;文中说物理学家们倾向于用方程式来阐述微观世界的力学原理,而在这些方程式中,有关概率的概念是最基础的,言外之意,微观世界的描述是以概率的概念为基础的,由此可知B(概率的概念由方程式而生)本末倒置,D(物理方程式可以解释概率理念)因果颠倒,而c(对其力学原理的描述基于统计数据)正确。
以上就是51题库考试学习网为大家带来的全部内容,希望能给大家一些帮助。51题库考试学习网提醒:目前2021年考研大纲已经公布,小伙伴们在复习时要注意以大纲为准哦。另外,小伙伴们如果还有其他关于考研信息的疑问,也可以留言咨询哦。
下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
A.正常肠黏膜可吸收三价铁 B.血清铁一般是亚铁离子 C.维生素C能把食物中铁游离化
D.铁主要在空肠下段吸收 E.在肠黏膜细胞内铁离子与去铁铁蛋白结合
A.科技革命是摆脱社会危机的根本出路
B.科学技术是社会形态更替的根本标志
C.社会实践的需要是科技发展的强大动力
D.科技创新能够推动社会经济跨越式发展
科学技术革命是社会动力体系中的一种重要动力。科学技术革命主要是通过促进人们的 生产方式、生活方式和思维方式的深刻变化来推动社会发展的。现代科学技术革命对人类社会发展的影响更加深远,更加强烈。
科学技术像一把双刃剑,既能通过促进经济发展以造福于人类,同时也可能在一定条件下 对人类的生存发展带来消极后果。
【解题思路】
(l)本题考查人类社会及其发展规律中关于社会历史发展动力的理解。
(2)自从工业革命开始,科学技术在社会发展中的地位和作用越来越重要。本题通过实 例来考查科学技术和科学技术革命在社会发展中的作用。
(3)A、B项的“根本出路”和“根本标志”是不对的,摆脱社会危机的根本出路是生产力的 发展和变革,而社会形态更替的根本标志是经济制度的变革导致的社会制度的变革,都不是科 技革命,C、D是正确选项,C体现了科学技术产生的必然性,一个新生事物之所以能够产生,原因都是社会实践有了这种需要。D体现了科学技术的重要作用,即可以促进社会经济的快速发展。
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-10-26
- 2020-10-10
- 2020-10-11
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-25
- 2020-10-11
- 2020-10-09
- 2020-10-18
- 2020-10-25
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-10
- 2020-09-03
- 2020-10-26
- 2019-01-16
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-14
- 2020-10-12
- 2020-10-26
- 2020-10-17
- 2020-10-09
- 2020-10-18
- 2020-10-09
- 2020-10-15
- 2020-10-23
- 2020-10-18
- 2020-10-12
- 2020-10-26
- 2020-10-26