ACCAF4法律的三种分类五种特征！

发布时间：2019-07-20

ACCA作为财会界的黄金证书，一直是很多小伙伴向往的考取的证书，但是因为其考试科目多，考试难度大的问题难倒了很多小伙伴，为此小编特地整理了关于ACCAF4的考试备考内容，具体内容如下。

一、三种分类方式

判例法(case law)指可作为先例据以决案的法院判决，是法官造法，也就是我们说的司法者造法，这点通常与成文法 (statute law) 相对，成文法是由议会制定法律。判例法和成文法都是英国法系法律的两个重要渊源 (source of law) ,也是重要的法律类型之一(types of law)。此时这种分类是按照法律制定的主体来区分的。

根据判例法制度，某一判决中的法律规则不仅适用于该案，而且往往作为一种先例(precedent)而适用于以后该法院或下级法院所管辖的案件。只要案件的基本事实相同或相似，就必须以判例所定规则处理。这就是所谓“遵循先例” (stare decisis) 原则。

此外，我们又可以通过法律规范的主体是否平等，将法律分为私法 (private law) 和公法(public law)。

私法 (private law) 主要是指调整普通公民，组织之间关系的法律，在社会层面上双方当事人的法律地位平等，私法关键在于调整公民个人的权利义务关系(right and obligation)。

公法(public law)主要是指调整国家与普通公民、组织之间关系的法律，从定义中可以看出双方当事人中必须至少有一方是公权力机关。在我们生活中的tax law，constituition law都是属于公法范畴的。

最后我们还可以依据法律规范的内容不同，将法律分为刑法(criminal law)和民法 (civil law)。民法属于私法的范畴，重点在于双方当事人之间权利与义务的分配，刑法属于公法的范畴，重点在于确定什么样的行为是犯罪行为，和对于犯罪行为给与怎么样的处罚(punishment)，所以可以归纳为三个字罪与罚。考试中时常会考到两者的区别，需要同学们对该块内容加以重视。

二、五大必会特征

1. Burden of proof 举证责任

举证责任的一般原则是谁主张，这举证。在民事案件中由我们的原告(claimant)进行举证，在刑事案件中由国家提起公诉，这里的检察官(prosecution)就是代表国家。

2. Standard of proof 举证的标准

在民法中，举证的标准是看原告和被告谁的证据更占优势，即谁的证词可能性越高(balance of probabilities)，谁胜诉的概率就越高。

在刑事案件中，举证的标准会明显提高，需要排除一切合理的怀疑(beyond reasonable doubt)。这是由于刑事案件的两方在法律地位上是不平等的，且刑事案件的判决结果对于被告人更为严重，所以公诉人想要胜诉，必须承担更高的举证标准，来证明被告有罪。

3. Decision 判决结果

在民事案件中，判决结果是被告是否有责任(liable / not liable)，而在刑事案件中，判决结果往往是被告人是否有罪(guilty / not guilty)

4. Aim 法律目的

民法的目的是provide compensatory remedies，具有补偿性质，而并非惩罚。但在刑事案件中，法院对国家不允许或者不赞成的行为，给与惩罚(punishment)

5. Remedies 救济方式

在民事案件中，被告如果有责任，一般给到原告赔偿金(damages)作为救济方式，但是在刑事案件中，被告人如果有罪，就会受到收监关押(prinson)和罚金(fines)的惩罚。

综合以上就是关于ACCAF4的备考内容，希望对各位小伙伴有用，小编将持续更新相关内容。

下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题，供大家学习参考。

(d) Estimate by how much the bid might be increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth, and discuss whether or not the directors of Paxis should proceed with the bid. (5 marks)

正确答案：

(d) The current bid values the shares of Wragger at ￡19·07 million, compared to the current market value of ￡15·36 million, a premium of ￡3·71 million. The expected synergy is ￡15,570,000. If these data are accurate the bid could be substantially increased without the shareholders of Paxis suffering a fall in their expected wealth. In theory, the bid could be increased by an additional ￡11,860,000, or 148 pence for each existing Wragger share.
There might also be strategic reasons for undertaking the bid, and the acquisition of Wragger might lead to future options that are not valued by the above analysis.
The proposed acquisition is expected to result in substantial synergy, and to create wealth for the shareholders of both companies. The directors are recommended to proceed with the bid.

(b) The Superior Fitness Co (SFC), which is well established in Mayland, operates nine centres. Each of SFC’s

centres is similar in size to those of HFG. SFC also provides dietary plans and fitness programmes to its clients.

The directors of HFG have decided that they wish to benchmark the performance of HFG with that of SFC.

Required:

Discuss the problems that the directors of HFG might experience in their wish to benchmark the performance

of HFG with the performance of SFC, and recommend how such problems might be successfully addressed.

(7 marks)

正确答案：
(b) There are a number of potential problems which the directors of HFG need to recognise. These are as follows:
(i) There needs to exist a sufficient incentive for SFO to share their information with HFG as the success of any
benchmarking programme is dependent upon obtaining accurate information about the comparator organisation. This is
not an easy task to accomplish, as many organisations are reluctant to reveal confidential information to competitors.
The directors of HFG must be able to convince the directors of SFO that entering into a benchmarking arrangement is a
potential ‘win-win situation’.
(ii) The value of the exercise must be sufficient to justify the cost involved. Also, it is inevitable that behavioural issues will
need to be addressed in any benchmarking programme. Management should give priority to the need to communicate
the reasons for undertaking a programme of benchmarking in order to gain the full co-operation of its personnel whilst
reducing the potential level of resistance to change.
(iii) Management need to handle the ethical implications relating to the introduction of benchmarking in a sensitive manner
and should endeavour, insofar as possible, to provide reassurance to employees that their status, remuneration and
working conditions will not suffer as a consequence of the introduction of any benchmarking initiatives.

Is the following statement true or false?

A significant change in the ownership of an existing audit client is a factor which makes it appropriate for the auditor to review the terms of engagement.

A.True

B.False

正确答案：A

Where there is a significant change in ownership of the company, ISA 210 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements recommends that a new audit engagement letter is sent to avoid misunderstandings.

声明：本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传，本网站不拥有所有权，未作人工编辑处理，也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容，欢迎发送邮件至：contact@51tk.com 进行举报，并提供相关证据，工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你，一经查实，本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

站内搜索
热门标签