听说ACCA考试挺难,是真的吗?
发布时间:2019-07-21
很多同学一听到ACCA考试科目一共有14门在加上全英文的,就觉得考试很难。那么ACCA难考吗?ACCA全球通过率高吗?通过率是多少?报名ACCA需要准备什么材料?这些问题对于一个准备报考ACCA的小伙伴来说一定是在心里徘徊已久的问题了。为此小编特地整理了如下内容。
一、ACCA考试难度
ACCA是全英文考试,教材有非常厚,有几十本,考试科目也非常多,有13门。这些因素凑在一块,无疑不在加深ACCA的难度。不过,ACCA考试的难度是以英国大学学位考试的难度为标准。具体而言,第一(f1-f3)、第二部分(f4-f9)的难度分别相当于学士学位高年级课程的考试难度,第三部分的考试相当于硕士学位最后阶段的考试。
第一部分的每门考试只是测试本门课程所包含的知识,着重于为后两个部分中实务性的课程所要运用的理论和技能打下基础。
第二部分的考试除了本门课程的内容之外,还会考到第一部分的一些知识,着重培养学员的分析能力。
第三部分的考试要求学员综合运用学到的知识、技能和决断力。不仅会考到以前的课程内容,还会考到邻近科目的内容。
二、ACCA全球单科通过率
ACCA全球单科通过率基本在30-40%左右,中国学员通过率为50-60%。
ACCA作为国际注册会计师,逐渐受到了越来越多财务人士的认可。ACCA证书的含金量比较高,但是它的报考门槛却不高,凡具有国家教育局认可的大专以上学历即可报名参加考试。
三、在线注册报名考试的时候,需要准备哪些资料呢?
1.学历/ 学位证明(高校在校生需提交学校出具的在校证明函及第一年所有课程考试合格的成绩单)的原件、复印件和译文;外地申请者不要邮寄原件,请把您的申请材料复印件加盖公司或学校公章,或邮寄公证件既可。
2.身份证的原件、复印件和译文;或提供护照,不需提交翻译件。
3.两张张两寸照片;(黑白彩色均可)
4.注册报名费(银行汇票或信用卡支付),请确认信用卡可以从国外付款,否则会影响您的注册返回时间;如果不能确定建议您用汇票交纳注册费。(信用卡支付请在英文网站上注册时直接输入信用卡详细信息,英国总部收到您的书面注册材料后才会从您的信用卡上划帐)。
综上所述就是关于ACCA问题的解答,希望对于各位小伙伴有用,小编将持续为大家更新ACCA相关内容。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(c) Using sensitivity analysis, estimate by what percentage the life cycle of the Snowballer would need to change
before the recommendation in (a) above is varied. (4 marks)
(c) Explain the benefits of performance-related pay in rewarding directors and critically evaluate the implications
of the package offered to Choo Wang. (8 marks)
(c) Choo Wang’s remuneration package
Benefits of PRP
In general terms, performance-related pay serves to align directors’ and shareholders’ interests in that the performancerelated
element can be made to reflect those things held to be important to shareholders (such as financial targets). This, in
turn, serves to motivate directors, especially if they are directly responsible for a cost or revenue/profit budget or centre. The
possibility of additional income serves to motivate directors towards higher performance and this, in turn, can assist in
recruitment and retention. Finally, performance-related pay can increase the board’s control over strategic planning and
implementation by aligning rewards against strategic objectives.
Critical evaluation of Choo Wang’s package
Choo Wang’s package appears to have a number of advantages and shortcomings. It was strategically correct to include some
element of pay linked specifically to Southland success. This will increase Choo’s motivation to make it successful and indeed,
he has said as much – he appears to be highly motivated and aware that additional income rests upon its success. Against
these advantages, it appears that the performance-related component does not take account of, or discount in any way for,
the risk of the Southland investment. The bonus does not become payable on a sliding scale but only on a single payout basis
when the factory reaches an ‘ambitious’ level of output. Accordingly, Choo has more incentive to be accepting of risk with
decisions on the Southland investment than risk averse. This may be what was planned, but such a bias should be pointed
out. Clearly, the company should accept some risk but recklessness should be discouraged. In conclusion, Choo’s PRP
package could have been better designed, especially if the Southland investment is seen as strategically risky.
(iii) Tyre has entered into two new long lease property agreements for two major retail outlets. Annual rentals are paid
under these agreements. Tyre has had to pay a premium to enter into these agreements because of the outlets’
location. Tyre feels that the premiums paid are justifiable because of the increase in revenue that will occur
because of the outlets’ location. Tyre has analysed the leases and has decided that one is a finance lease and
one is an operating lease but the company is unsure as to how to treat this premium. (5 marks)
Required:
Advise the directors of Tyre on how to treat the above items in the financial statements for the year ended
31 May 2006.
(The mark allocation is shown against each of the above items)
(iii) Retail outlets
The two new long lease agreements have been separately classified as an operating lease and a finance lease. The lease
premium paid for a finance lease should be capitalised and recognised as an asset under the lease. IAS17 ‘Leases’ says that
costs identified as directly attributable to a finance lease are added to the amount recognised as an asset. It will be included
in the present value calculation of the minimum lease payments. The finance lease will be recognised at its fair value or if
lower the present value of the minimum lease payments. The premium will be depreciated as part of the asset’s value over
the shorter of the lease term and the asset’s useful life. Initially, a finance lease liability will be set up which is equal to the
value of the leased asset.
The operating lease premium will be spread over the lease term on a straight line basis unless some other method is more
representative. The premium will be effectively treated as a prepayment of rent and is amortised over the life of the agreement.
(c) You have been making preliminary inquiries regarding matters arising from the previous year’s audit of Di Rollo.
It has been revealed that no action has been taken in response to the management letter prepared by the previous
auditors. Di Rollo’s management has explained that this was because it was ‘poorly prepared’ and ‘unhelpful’.
Required:
Briefly describe various criteria against which the effectiveness of a management letter may be assessed.
(7 marks)
(c) Management letter effectiveness criteria
Tutorial note: Candidates at this level must know that a management letter is a letter of weakness (also called post-audit
letter). NO marks will be awarded for consideration of any other letters (e.g. management representation letters, engagement
letters).
■ Timeliness – a management letter should be issued as soon as possible after completion of the audit procedures giving
rise to comment. This is particularly important when audit work is carried out on more than one audit visit and where
it is a matter of urgency that management make improvements to their procedures (e.g. where there is evidence of
serious weakness).
■ Clarity – wording must be clear so that recipients understand the significance of weaknesses that are being drawn to
their attention. It is particularly important that implications are explained clearly in terms that will prompt management
to respond positively (e.g. drawing attention to the risks of financial loss arising).
■ Illustrative – specific illustrative examples (e.g. of where controls have not been evidenced) should aid management in
understanding the nature of the problem(s).
■ Constructive comments/advice – recommendations for improvements must be practicable (i.e. appropriate and costeffective
in the light of the client’s resources) if the client is to take corrective action.
■ Conciseness – unnecessary volume will distract management from new/additional matters that require their attention.
For example, matters adequately dealt with in the internal auditor’s report should not be repeated.
■ Factual accuracy is essential. Inaccuracies will not only aggravate the client and appear unprofessional but could, in rare
circumstances, result in liability. Similarly, the letter should not criticise (or ‘cast aspersions’) on individual staff members
if it is the system that is inadequate.
■ A suitable structure – for example ‘tiered’, where the report contains matters of varying levels of significance. By directing
different classes of matters to the appropriate level or area of responsibility action by management can be taken more
speedily and constructively.
Tutorial note: An alternative structure might be one that sequences those recommendations that improve
profitability/cash flows before those that deal with information systems.
■ Inclusion of staff responses – both to advise senior management of action proposed/being taken by their staff and to give
credit to recommendations for improvements where it is due (e.g. where client’s staff have proposed recommendations).
■ Inclusion of management’s response – an indication of the actions that management intends to take is more likely to
result in action being taken. Discussing findings with management first should also ensure their factual accuracy.
■ Client’s perspective – implications from the client’s viewpoint (e.g. in terms of cost savings) are more likely to be acted
on than those expressed from an audit perspective (e.g. in terms of lowered audit risk).
■ Professional tone – should not be offensive. Comments that fault management’s knowledge, competence, motives or
integrity are likely to provoke defensive reactions. Comments should be positive/constructive by emphasising
solutions/benefits.
Tutorial notes: Other points that candidates may include:
■ Inclusion of matters of future relevance
■ Cost effectiveness – minutes of discussions with management instead of a formal weakness letter
■ Not raising ‘people problems’ in such a formal communication (a confidential discussion is preferable).
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-05-09
- 2020-04-14
- 2021-05-12
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-04-23
- 2021-05-02
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-07
- 2020-04-19
- 2020-03-14
- 2020-05-01
- 2020-01-10
- 2019-07-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-01
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-03-12
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-08
- 2020-03-20