2019ACCA这些免考福利政策你都清楚了吗?
发布时间:2019-07-19
据2019年ACCA官网信息了解到,2019-2020年部分财务相关专业大学在校或毕业学生,在参加ACCA考试注册时,将获得一定科目的免试权。ACCA对于参加专业会计师考试(ACCA)的中国学员的免试政策详情如下:
一、ACCA对中国教育部认可的全日制大学在读生(会计或金融专业)设置的免试政策
1. 会计学或金融学(完成第一学年课程):可以注册为ACCA正式学员,无免试
2. 会计学或金融学(完成第二学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 会计学或金融学(完成第三学年课程):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
4. 其他专业(在校生完成大一后):可以注册但无免试
*大学在读考生准备时间相对充足,可以每次报考三门课程,不建议报考四门,科目可以以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
二、ACCA对中国教育部认可高校毕业生设置的免试政策
1. 会计学(获得学士学位):免试5门课程(F1-F5)
2. 会计学(辅修专业):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
3. 金融专业:免试5门课程(F1-F5)
4. 法律专业:免试1门课程(F4)
5. 商务及管理专业:免试1门课程(F1)
6. MPAcc专业(获得MPAcc学位或完成MPAcc大纲规定的所有课程、只有论文待完成):原则上免试九门课程(F1–F9),其中F6(税务)的免试条件:CICPA全科通过或MPAcc课程中选修了"中国税制"课程。
7. MBA学位(获得MBA学位):免试3门课程(F1-F3)
8. 非相关专业:无免试
高校毕业生(即:在职人士),可以每次报考两门课程,小编建议不要超过三门课程,科目可以F5/F6/F7三门计算类科目为主,通过逐步的学习加强英文能力,然后再学习F4、F8、F9有文字写作要求的科目。
三、注册会计师考生
1. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之前获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试5门课程(F1-F4和F6)
2. 2009年CICPA"6+1"新制度实行之后获得CICPA全科通过的人员:免试9们课程(F1-F9)
3. 如果在学习ACCA基础阶段科目的过程中获得了CICPA全科合格证(须2009年"6+1"制度实行后的新版证书),可以自行决定是否申请追加免试。
*通过注会考试的考生对于财务知识基础相对好,一般F7、F8、F9通过率比其他考生高很多,建议从这些科目入手,加强英语的阅读和写作能力,注会考试大纲与ACCA考试大纲类似,只其是在审计及财务管理类的科目上,基本上知识点是相通的。F7会计科目中国际会计准则会计处理上略有不同。
四、其他
1. CMA(美国注册管理会计师)全科通过并取得证书:免试F1-F5、F8、F9(共免7门)
2. USCPA(美国注册会计师)全科通过:免试F1-F6、F8、F9(共免8门)
五、注意事项
1.在校生只有顺利通过整学年的课程才能够申请免试。
2.针对在校生的部分课程免试政策只适用于会计学专业全日制大学本科的在读学生,而不适用于硕士学位或大专学历的在读学生。
3.已完成MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,还需完成论文的学员也可注册并申请免试。但须提交由学校出具的通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程的成绩单,并附注"该学员已通过所有MPAcc学位大纲规定课程,论文待完成"的说明。
4.特许学位(即海外大学与中国本地大学合作而授予海外大学学位的项目)— 部分完成时不能申请免试。
5.政策适用于在中国教育部认可的高等院校全部完成或部分完成本科课程的学生,而不考虑目前居住地点。
6.欲申请牛津•布鲁克斯大学学士学位的学员需放弃F7-F9的免试。
综合以上就是关于2019ACCA免试政策的全部内容,希望对于正在备考的小伙伴么有帮助,小编将持续更新相关ACCA的相关资讯。
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
2 It was the final day of a two-week-long audit of Van Buren Company, a longstanding client of Fillmore Pierce Auditors.
In the afternoon, Anne Hayes, a recently qualified accountant and member of the audit team, was following an audit
trail on some cash payments when she discovered what she described to the audit partner, Zachary Lincoln, as an
‘irregularity’. A large and material cash payment had been recorded with no recipient named. The corresponding
invoice was handwritten on a scrap of paper and the signature was illegible.
Zachary, the audit partner, was under pressure to finish the audit that afternoon. He advised Anne to seek an
explanation from Frank Monroe, the client’s finance director. Zachary told her that Van Buren was a longstanding client
of Fillmore Pierce and he would be surprised if there was anything unethical or illegal about the payment. He said
that he had personally been involved in the Van Buren audit for the last eight years and that it had always been
without incident. He also said that Frank Monroe was an old friend of his from university days and that he was certain
that he wouldn’t approve anything unethical or illegal. Zachary said that Fillmore Pierce had also done some
consultancy for Van Buren so it was a very important client that he didn’t want Anne to upset with unwelcome and
uncomfortable questioning.
When Anne sought an explanation from Mr Monroe, she was told that nobody could remember what the payment
was for but that she had to recognise that ‘real’ audits were sometimes a bit messy and that not all audit trails would
end as she might like them to. He also reminded her that it was the final day and both he and the audit firm were
under time pressure to conclude business and get the audit signed off.
When Anne told Zachary what Frank had said, Zachary agreed not to get the audit signed off without Anne’s support,
but warned her that she should be very certain that the irregularity was worth delaying the signoff for. It was therefore
now Anne’s decision whether to extend the audit or have it signed off by the end of Friday afternoon.
Required:
(a) Explain why ‘auditor independence’ is necessary in auditor-client relationships and describe THREE threats
to auditor independence in the case. (9 marks)
(a) Importance of independence
The auditor must be materially independent of the client for the following reasons:
To increase credibility and to underpin confidence in the process. In an external audit, this will primarily be for the benefit of
the shareholders and in an internal audit, it will often be for the audit committee that is, in turn, the recipient of the internal
audit report.
To ensure the reliability of the audit report. Any evidence of lack of independence (or ‘capture’) has the potential to undermine
all or part of the audit report thus rendering the exercise flawed.
To ensure the effectiveness of the investigation of the process being audited. An audit, by definition, is only effective as a
means of interrogation if the parties are independent of each other.
Three threats to independence
There are three threats to independence described in the case.
The same audit partner (Zachary) was assigned to Van Buren in eight consecutive years. This is an association threat and is
a contravention of some corporate governance codes. Both Sarbanes-Oxley and the Smith Guidance (contained in the UK
Combined Code), for example, specify auditor rotation to avoid association threat.
Fillmore Pierce provides more than one service to the same client. One of the threats to independence identified between
Arthur Andersen and Enron after the Enron collapse was an over-dependence on Enron by Andersen arising from the provision
of several services to the same client. Good practice is not to offer additional services to audit clients to avoid the appearance
of compromised independence. Some corporate governance codes formally prohibit this.
The audit partner (Zachary) is an old friend of the financial director of Van Buren (Frank). This ‘familiarity’ threat should be
declared to Fillmore Pierce at the outset and it may disqualify Zachary from acting as audit partner on the Van Buren account.
(ii) The shares held in Date Inc and the dividend income received from that company. (7 marks)
(ii) Shares held in Date Inc and the related dividend income
Degrouping charge
There will be a degrouping charge in Nikau Ltd in the year ending 31 March 2008 in respect of the shares in Date Inc.
This is because Nikau Ltd has left the Facet Group within six years of the no gain, no loss transfer of the shares whilst
still owning them.
Nikau Ltd is treated as if it has sold the shares in Date Inc for their market value as at the time of the no gain, no loss
transfer. This will give rise to a gain, ignoring indexation allowance, of £201,000 (£338,000 – £137,000).
This gain will give rise to additional corporation tax of £60,300 (£201,000 x 30%).
Controlled foreign company
Date Inc is a controlled foreign company. The profits of such a company are normally attributed to its UK resident
shareholders such that they are subject to UK corporation tax.
However, none of the profits of Date Inc will be attributed to Nikau Ltd because Date Inc distributes more than 90%
(£115,000/£120,000 = 95·8%) of its chargeable profits to its shareholders.
Dividend income
Nikau Ltd is a UK resident company and is therefore subject to corporation tax on its worldwide income.
The dividend income will be grossed up in respect of the withholding tax giving rise to taxable income of £39,792
(£38,200 x 100/96). There is no underlying tax as there are no taxes on income or capital profits in Palladia.
The corporation tax of £11,938 (£39,792 x 30%) will be reduced by unilateral double tax relief equal to the withholding
tax suffered of £1,592 (£39,792 x 4%) resulting in corporation tax due of £10,346 (£11,938 – £1,592).
18 How should interest charged on partners’ drawings appear in partnership financial statements?
A As income in the income statement
B Added to net profit and charged to partners in the division of profit
C Deducted from net profit and charged to partners in the division of profit
D Deducted from net profit in the division of profit and credited to partners
4 A properly conducted appraisal interview is fundamental in ensuring the success of an organisation’s performance
appraisal system.
Required:
(a) Describe three approaches to conducting the appraisal interview. (5 marks)
4 Appraisal systems are central to human resource management and understanding the difficulties of such schemes and the correct
approach to them is necessary if the appraisal process is to be successful and worthwhile.
(a) The manager conducting the interview might base it on one of three approaches.
The Tell and Sell Method. The manager explains to the employee being appraised how the appraisal assessment is to be undertaken and gains acceptance of the evaluation and improvement plan from the employee. Human resource skills are important with this approach in order for the manager to be able to provide constructive criticism and to motivate the employee.
The Tell and Listen Method. The manager invites the employee to respond to the way that the interview is to be conducted.This approach requires counselling skills and encouragement to allow the employee to participate fully in the interview. A particular feature of this approach is the encouragment of feedback from the employee.
The Problem Solving Method. With this method the manager takes a more helpful approach and concentrates on the work problems of the employee, who is encouraged to think through his or her problems and to provide their own intrinsic motivation.
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-05-15
- 2020-05-02
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-05-06
- 2020-04-11
- 2020-04-11
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-02-04
- 2020-05-24
- 2020-04-10
- 2020-05-16
- 2020-03-21
- 2020-04-20
- 2020-02-06
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-02-12
- 2020-03-07
- 2020-05-14
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-05-14
- 2020-01-09
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-03-14
- 2019-07-19
- 2020-03-15
- 2020-02-01
- 2020-05-12
- 2020-01-09