要考ACCA的小伙伴注意啦!ACCA了解一下!

发布时间:2020-04-07


最近有一些小伙伴在关注ACCA考试,你们对ACCA了解多少呢?我们一起来看看吧!


ACCA在国内称为"国际注册会计师",实际上是英国的注册会计师协会之一,但它是英国具有特许头衔的4家注册会计师协会之一,也是当今知名的国际性会计师组织之一。

ACCA资格被认为是"国际财会界的通行证",许多国家立法许可ACCA会员从事审计、投资顾问和破产执行工作。ACCA也在欧洲会计专家协会、亚太会计师联合会和加勒比特许会计师协会等会计组织中起着非常重要的作用。

ACCA资格是理论知识与实际经验的高度紧密结合。其考试大纲充分表达了雇主和专业人士的意见,反映了现代商务社会对财会人员的要求。同时,ACCA也是一个比较完善的系统知识体系,课程是根据现时商务社会对财会人员的实际要求进行开发、设计的,特别注意培养学员的分析能力和在复杂条件下的决策、判断能力。系统的、高质量的培训给予学员真才实学,学员学成后能适应各种环境,并逐步成为具有全面管理素质的高级财务管理专家。

ACCA考试是按现代企业财务人员需要具备的技能和技术的要求而设计的,共有13门课程,两门选修课,课程分为3个部分:第一部分涉及基本会计原理;第二部分涵盖专业财会人员应具备的核心专业技能;第三部分培养学员以专业知识对信息进行评估,并提出合理的经营建议和忠告。正是因为ACCA的课程全面覆盖了财务、财务管理、审计、税务及经营战略等方方面面的专业知识,因此更能提升学员分析能力并拓宽战略思维。

ACCA的报考条件有哪些呢?

凡具有教育部承认的大专以上学历;

顺利完成大一的课程考试,并且是教育部认可的高等院校在校生;

不符合前两项报名资格,但年满16周岁以上,也可申请报。

好了,相信小伙伴们对ACCA有了更多的了解,如果还想了解更多信息,欢迎来51题库考试学习网留言哦!




下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider, and the evidence you would expect to find in respect of the

carrying value of the cost of investment of Dylan Co in the financial statements of Rosie Co; and

(7 marks)

正确答案:
(b) (i) Cost of investment on acquisition of Dylan Co
Matters to consider
According to the schedule provided by the client, the cost of investment comprises three elements. One matter to
consider is whether the cost of investment is complete.
It appears that no legal or professional fees have been included in the cost of investment (unless included within the
heading ‘cash consideration’). Directly attributable costs should be included per IFRS 3 Business Combinations, and
there is a risk that these costs may be expensed in error, leading to understatement of the investment.
The cash consideration of $2·5 million is the least problematical component. The only matter to consider is whether the
cash has actually been paid. Given that Dylan Co was acquired in the last month of the financial year it is possible that
the amount had not been paid before the year end, in which case the amount should be recognised as a current liability
on the statement of financial position (balance sheet). However, this seems unlikely given that normally control of an
acquired company only passes to the acquirer on cash payment.
IFRS 3 states that the cost of investment should be recognised at fair value, which means that deferred consideration
should be discounted to present value at the date of acquisition. If the consideration payable on 31 January 2009 has
not been discounted, the cost of investment, and the corresponding liability, will be overstated. It is possible that the
impact of discounting the $1·5 million payable one year after acquisition would be immaterial to the financial
statements, in which case it would be acceptable to leave the consideration at face value within the cost of investment.
Contingent consideration should be accrued if it is probable to be paid. Here the amount is payable if revenue growth
targets are achieved over the next four years. The auditor must therefore assess the probability of the targets being
achieved, using forecasts and projections of Maxwell Co’s revenue. Such information is inherently subjective, and could
have been manipulated, if prepared by the vendor of Maxwell Co, in order to secure the deal and maximise
consideration. Here it will be crucial to be sceptical when reviewing the forecasts, and the assumptions underlying the
data. The management of Rosie Co should have reached their own opinion on the probability of paying the contingent
consideration, but they may have relied heavily on information provided at the time of the acquisition.
Audit evidence
– Agreement of the monetary value and payment dates of the consideration per the client schedule to legal
documentation signed by vendor and acquirer.
– Agreement of $2·5 million paid to Rosie Co’s bank statement and cash book prior to year end. If payment occurs
after year end confirm that a current liability is recognised on the individual company and consolidated statement
of financial position (balance sheet).
– Board minutes approving the payment.
– Recomputation of discounting calculations applied to deferred and contingent consideration.
– Agreement that the discount rate used is pre-tax, and reflects current market assessment of the time value of money
(e.g. by comparison to Rosie Co’s weighted average cost of capital).
– Revenue and profit projections for the period until January 2012, checked for arithmetic accuracy.
– A review of assumptions used in the projections, and agreement that the assumptions are comparable with the
auditor’s understanding of Dylan Co’s business.
Tutorial note: As the scenario states that Chien & Co has audited Dylan Co for several years, it is reasonable to rely on
their cumulative knowledge and understanding of the business in auditing the revenue projections.

(b) Determine whether your decision in (a) would change if you were to use each of the Maximin and Minimax

regret decision criteria.

Your answer should be supported by relevant workings. (6 marks)

正确答案:

3 At a recent international meeting of business leaders, Seamus O’Brien said that multi-jurisdictional attempts to

regulate corporate governance were futile because of differences in national culture. He drew particular attention to

the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and International Corporate Governance

Network (ICGN) codes, saying that they were, ‘silly attempts to harmonise practice’. He said that in some countries,

for example, there were ‘family reasons’ for making the chairman and chief executive the same person. In other

countries, he said, the separation of these roles seemed to work. Another delegate, Alliya Yongvanich, said that the

roles of chief executive and chairman should always be separated because of what she called ‘accountability to

shareholders’.

One delegate, Vincent Viola, said that the right approach was to allow each country to set up its own corporate

governance provisions. He said that it was suitable for some countries to produce and abide by their own ‘very

structured’ corporate governance provisions, but in some other parts of the world, the local culture was to allow what

he called, ‘local interpretation of the rules’. He said that some cultures valued highly structured governance systems

while others do not care as much.

Required:

(a) Explain the roles of the chairman in corporate governance. (5 marks)

正确答案:
(a) Roles of the chairman in corporate governance
The chairman is the leader of the board of directors in a private or public company although other organisations are often run
on similar governance lines. In this role, he or she is responsible for ensuring the board’s effectiveness as a unit, in the service
of the shareholders. This means agreeing and, if necessary, setting the board’s agenda and ensuring that board meetings
take place on a regular basis.
The chairman represents the company to investors and other outside stakeholders/constituents. He or she is often the
‘public face’ of the organisation, especially if the organisation must account for itself in a public manner. Linked to this,
the chairman’s roles include communication with shareholders. This occurs in a statutory sense in the annual report
(where, in many jurisdictions, the chairman must write to shareholders each year in the form. of a chairman’s statement)
and at annual and extraordinary general meetings.
Internally, the chairman ensures that directors receive relevant information in advance of board meetings so that all
discussions and decisions are made by directors fully apprised of the situation under discussion. Finally, his or her role
extends to co-ordinating the contributions of non-executive directors (NEDs) and facilitating good relationships between
executive and non-executive directors.

(b) Explain why making sales of Sabals in North America will have no effect on Nikau Ltd’s ability to recover its

input tax. (3 marks)

Notes: – you should assume that the corporation tax rates and allowances for the financial year to 31 March 2007

will continue to apply for the foreseeable future.

– you should ignore indexation allowance.

正确答案:
(b) Recoverability of input tax
Sales by Nikau Ltd of its existing products are subject to UK VAT at 17·5% because it is selling to domestic customers who
will not be registered for VAT. Accordingly, at present, Nikau Ltd can recover all of its input tax.
Sales to customers in North America will be zero rated because the goods are being exported from the EU. Zero rated supplies
are classified as taxable for the purposes of VAT and therefore Nikau Ltd will continue to be able to recover all of its input tax.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。